George Municipality says it's struggling to recover money from developer involved in building collapse
George Municipality
Over 100 emergency and disaster personnel from various municipalities are on site to locate those still unaccounted for after a building collapsed in George on 6 May 2024, trapping construction workers. Picture: George Municipality
CAPE TOWN - The George Municipality said it was struggling to recover money owed to it by the company in charge of the land and the development of the collapsed five-storey building in the town last year.
Tuesday marks a year since 34 people were killed and 28 others injured when the 42-unit block of flats being built caved in.
The main developer of the multi-storey apartment block is Neo Victoria Developments.
It later came to light that it had contracted another company, Liatel Developments, that built a structure which was not designed to support the weight of the building.
George municipal manager, Godfrey Louw, told the Western Cape portfolio committee on infrastructure that the municipality spent more than R9 million during the 11-day rescue and recovery operation.
Louw said it's been a tedious process trying to recoup their money."The committee might not know, but this Neo Victoria company has been liquidated in December last year. So now we are sitting with a shell company, and obviously the municipality needs to recover its costs."
He said they've sought legal advice on the matter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Homeowner vindicated after CoJ's ‘illegal use' property rates declared unlawful
High Court orders the City of Joburg to reverse all charges levied against a Randburg property since July 2019. The City of Johannesburg's (CoJ's) conduct in levying property rates on a Randburg woman's home, based on the tariff applicable to properties put to an illegal use, has been declared unlawful by the High Court in Johannesburg. Sylvia Maria Lampe has operated a home exercise studio for 42 years and was granted permission by the Randburg Town Council on 19 January 1984 to run her studio from the property. Some 25 years later in 2017, the CoJ, which had succeeded the Randburg Town Council's rights and obligations, determined that Lampe did not have its consent to operate her business on the premises. ALSO READ: Charged R1 083.63 on your City of Johannesburg bill this month? Here's why Court orders reversal of charges Judge Stuart Wilson on Thursday ordered the CoJ to reverse all charges levied on Lampe's municipal account since 1 July 2019, which were based on the claim that the property was being put to illegal use. Judge Wilson also interdicted and restrained the CoJ from continuing to levy property rates against Lampe's municipal account on this illegal property use basis. The CoJ must, within 30 days of the date of Judge Wilson's order, also furnish Lampe with a municipal account recalculated on the basis of his orders. The CoJ was further interdicted and restrained from terminating any services to Lampe's property on the basis of non-payment of municipal charges levied in contravention of Judge Wilson's order. The order granted against the CoJ reflects what Lampe applied for in her application. Judge Wilson criticised the CoJ, stating it had conducted itself throughout the litigation 'in an unresponsive and high-handed manner'. 'It failed seriously to oppose the bulk of Ms Lampe's claim. In the end, it pursued a far-fetched justification of one portion of the penalties it has imposed. 'Had the city engaged reasonably and sensibly with Ms Lampe from the outset, this application would never have been necessary,' he said. ALSO READ: Johannesburg homeowners uproar over soaring property rates Attempts to resolve consent issue Lampe sent two letters to the CoJ after it determined that she did not have its consent to operate her business from the property. She explained that her business was being operated in accordance with the licence she obtained from the Randburg Town Council in 1984 and that, accordingly, she did have the necessary consent to operate her business. Therefore, the property was not being put to an illegal use, and the notice should be withdrawn. Judge Wilson said those letters were ignored, and the CoJ in July 2019 increased the property rates levied against the property. Lampe told the court that from that month her municipal account included an additional R9 400 per month in rates and taxes. This was levied on the basis that the property was being put to an illegal use because the CoJ had not consented to its use as a home exercise studio. Lampe could not afford these charges and did not pay them, but she lodged a new application with the CoJ for consent to run her business from the property. ALSO READ: Bad news for business and property owners as municipal rates spike Electricity disconnected, later reversed by court The CoJ responded to Lampe's refusal to pay the additional rates by terminating her electricity supply and suing for the outstanding amounts. However, the electricity disconnection was reversed by order of Judge Bashier Vally on 5 March 2020. Judge Vally also ordered the parties to 'hold a debatement regarding the penalties charged' to Lampe within 30 days of his order. Judge Wilson said that this debatement never took place, with the CoJ taking the view it would simply proceed with its action to collect the rates it claimed were owed. Lampe's new consent use application from the CoJ was granted in October 2020. Judge Wilson said this seems to have triggered the withdrawal of the CoJ's action to collect the outstanding rates. But, Judge Wilson said the CoJ continued to levy enhanced rates and taxes against Lampe's property on the basis that it was being put to an illegal use, despite the CoJ itself having consented to the use of the property in October 2020. ALSO READ: City of Joburg, please get your house in order! Ongoing attempts to disconnect Lampe, in the meantime, had to fend off further attempts to disconnect her water and electricity supplies. Judge Wilson said the CoJ did not seriously oppose the relief sought by Lampe in respect of the illegal use charges levied on or after 20 October 2020, the date on which it gave its consent for the use of the property to run her business. He said the CoJ in its answering affidavit says that it is 'attending to reverse the penalty costs charged on and after 20 October 2020,' but highlighted that the answering affidavit was deposed on 6 September 2021. 'I have nothing before me that indicates that Ms Lampe's account has since actually been corrected to the extent the city concedes it should be. 'However, the city can suffer no prejudice from an order that it implements such a correction. If it has already done so, then so much the better,' he said. Judge Wilson said the only real dispute before him was whether Lampe is entitled to the reversal of the penalty charges levied between 1 July 2019 and 20 October 2020. ALSO READ: Huge rates shock could force Joburg schools to close down A 'far-fetched' proposition He said the CoJ maintained the property was being put to an illegal use during that time because its consent was not obtained until 20 October 2020, and that the penalty charges it levied against the property during that time were perfectly lawful. Judge Wilson disagreed, stressing the CoJ accepts that the consent the Randburg Town Council gave for the use of the property in 1984 binds it as the Randburg Town Council's successor in law. He said the CoJ also accepts that the Randburg Town Council granted Lampe a licence to use the property for the purposes to which she put it, and also that the licence was renewed annually for 10 years before being renewed indefinitely. Judge Wilson said the CoJ stakes its opposition to Lampe's application solely on the contention that she never applied for consent in terms of the Randburg Town Planning Scheme of 1976. The CoJ's point, as far as he understands it, seems to be that Lampe might have had a business licence from the Randburg Town Council but that did not mean the Randburg Town Council had consented to the use of the property in terms of its Town Planning Scheme of 1976. 'I find that proposition far-fetched. 'It beggars belief that the Randburg Town Council would have issued a business licence that authorised the illegal operation of Ms Lampe's business from the property nominated in the licence,' he said. Costs were awarded against the CoJ. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Court orders MamKhize's Royal AM to pay back R27 million to Msunduzi Municipality
The sponsorship agreement between Royal AM and Msunduzi Municipality was deemed unlawful and invalid. Tough times seem to be lasting in the life of controversial businesswoman Shauwn 'MaMkhize' Mkhize as she suffers another blow. The Pietermaritzburg High Court has ordered Mkhize's football club, Royal AM, to pay back R27 million for the sponsorship agreement between them and the Msunduzi Municipality. Royal AM and Msunduzi Municipality entered into a three-year sponsorship agreement in 2023, and the football club has been receiving R9 million each year since the commencement of the agreement. Judge Nontuthuzelo Mlaba said the agreement was unlawful and invalid. ALSO READ: MaMkhize's Masterclass: life lessons, financial woes, and fans shouting 'Pay back the money!' Royal AM to pay back the money The sponsorship agreement was brought to court by the DA in KwaZulu-Natal, as they sought to have the contract reviewed and ultimately set aside. The judgment reads, 'all payments made by the first respondent [Msunduzi Municipality] under the sponsorship contract to the fourth respondent [Royal AM] must immediately be repaid to the first respondent with interest from the date of the judgment [08 August 2025].' Mlaba also ordered the first, second and third respondents [the council and municipality manager] to pay for the costs of the application. Termination of the Royal AM's agreement Msunduzi Municipality's council terminated the agreement in June of this year because Royal AM was no longer participating in the Premier Soccer League (PSL) matches. Royal AM was kicked out of the PSL after Mkhize ran into trouble with the South African Revenue Service (Sars). The club was placed under curatorship by Sars as it tried to recoup the R40 million that Mkhize owed it. Mlaba, in her judgment said it appears as if the municipality sought marketing, promotion and public relations benefits from its association with Royal AM. 'These are services that any other soccer club based in KwaZulu-Natal could have been interested in, given the benefits they would gain from the sponsorship contract. The opportunity was, however, not made available to other KZN soccer clubs.' ALSO READ: 'I have lost my soul' – MaMkhize reflects on the pain of losing her football club She added that while the submission by counsel for the municipal respondents was that Royal AM was the only football club identified, no reasons were given as to why it was chosen for the sponsorship. 'This was not in line with Section 217 of the Constitution, which requires that the sourcing of such services be transparent, competitive and fair.' The DA highlighted that the municipality was already in acute financial distress when the sponsorship agreement took place. According to the agreement, the municipality was also obligated to pay for the annual maintenance costs of the Harry Gwala Stadium. Harry Gwala Stadium was the home ground of Royal AM. A win for the people DA Councillor Ross Strachan said the party welcomes the judgment by Mhlaba, and views it as a win for the people of Msunduzi. 'This is not just a legal win, but it is a win for accountability,' he said. 'We will ensure this money is returned and redirected to service delivery.' Msunduzi municipal spokesperson told Daily Sun the judgment was noted. 'We are presently applying our minds to the ruling and carefully considering all legal options available to us.' NOW READ: Sars strikes: MaMkhize's luxury cars up for auction
IOL News
06-08-2025
- IOL News
After 13 years and R9 billion, Go!Durban still lacks buses
Approximately R9 billion has been spent on the Go!Durban programme, which has incurred significant investment to date, with no buses on the route 13 years later. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers Approximately R9 billion has been spent on the Go!Durban project to streamline public transportation, but there are no buses on the route 13 years later. The money was spent on infrastructure, fleet procurement, and related professional services, according to municipal reports. In a general statement, the eThekwini Transport Authority (ETA) stated that it intends to redefine its Integrated Public Transport Network (IPTN) under the GO!Durban programme, presenting a revised strategy aimed at overcoming key challenges in its implementation. In its efforts to address setbacks, including the prolonged negotiations within the minibus taxi and bus industries that stalled progress in 2021, the ETA's new strategy reflects a proactive realignment with national priorities and frameworks. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Nelisiwe Zama, acting director of ETA, said they will initiate an in-depth engagement process with all relevant stakeholders, including regional briefings and discussions with affected minibus taxi and bus operators specific to phase one routes of the network. On Thursday, eThekwini councillors noted the progress made towards the operation of the C3 corridor to achieve an integrated transportation system and preparations for other corridors, namely the C1 and C9, and the inner city to follow suit for an overall improved transport system within the municipality. Other key points raised for noting were: Transition from the Tactical Adjustment Framework to a refined corridor-based Go! Durban Implementation Strategy that aligns with the National Department of Transport (DoT), Treasury, and operator expectations. The municipality is preparing for the transformation and devolution of the Public Transport Operator Grant (PTOG), with plans to integrate existing subsidised services and legacy operators into the Go! Durban corridors. The refined Go!Durban implementation strategy, with corridor-based rollout, operator negotiations, and quality bus service activation model, will be approved. The commencement of structured negotiations and identification of affected operators for Corridors C3, C1, C9, and Inner City Distribution System, to enable compliant Vehicle Operating Company formation and contracting Councillors also approved the call for continued engagements with the provincial and national DoT and National Treasury regarding: (a) disbursement and milestone compliance. (b) institutional support for contract devolution and PTOG integration. Councillors gave the go-ahead for the establishment of a PTOG Transition Framework and Task Team within ETA to lead planning for the absorption of legacy services and operators into the municipal framework. At a council meeting, eThekwini Councillor Warren Burne described the report as vague and incomplete, with no mention of cash flow projections. He said the good intentions for the project from the municipal administration in 2012 were now nothing but a pipe dream 13 years later. 'Here we are years later, trying desperately to breathe life into the matter,' he said. Councillor Jenni Black said the Go!Durban was an important project for the livelihood of South Africans who would be able to access work opportunities outside of their living area. 'The stakeholders are the residents and ratepayers of eThekwini. We are responsible for how the money is spent,' she said. Zwakele Mncwango, ActionSA councillor, described the process of noting this item in council as approving a blank cheque, while Sandile Gwala, an IFP councillor, was concerned that the infrastructure along the route would soon need rehabilitation. Timeline In April 2012 municipal council approved Go! Durban IPTN. In October 2021, tension around vehicle ownership between the operators and the municipality culminated in a deadlock, with the operators affected along C3. In 2022, the eThekwini council commenced with the public participation process with the operators as well as the public on the revised strategy (Tactical Adjustment). In 2023, the council approved the tactical adjustment; however, the National DoT did not fully endorse the strategy. In May 2025, the strategy was finalised.
