ST panel denies info on Great Nicobar project
This PTI correspondent filed an RTI application on April 3 this year, requesting minutes of all commission meetings held since January 1, 2022; all communications exchanged with the Union Ministry of Tribal Affairs concerning the Great Nicobar Island Development Project and its impact on Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) like the Shompens; and correspondence regarding the National Tiger Conservation Authority's (NTCA) directive to relocate villages from core areas of tiger reserves.
The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) disposed of the RTI application on June 9, more than two months after receiving it, asking the applicant to visit its website (http://ncst.nic.in) for copies of all minutes of meetings.
The commission, however, has not yet uploaded the minutes of meetings held since April 6, 2021, on its website.
In response to queries about the Great Nicobar project and the NTCA directive, the NCST asked the PTI correspondent to "provide the concerned file number dealt with in the NCST for required information".
In its July 2 response to a first appeal, the commission said the information sought by the appellant is exempted from disclosure under constitutional provisions and relevant clauses of the RTI Act.
In his reply, Y.P. Yadav, Deputy Secretary and First Appellate Authority (FAA), cited Article 338A of the Constitution, under which the commission submits reports to the President and is empowered to investigate complaints relating to the rights of Scheduled Tribes.
The RTI reply stated that since the NCST is constitutionally mandated to report to the President and since these reports are tabled in Parliament, there is no obligation to disclose such information to the public under the RTI Act.
The commission also invoked several clauses of Section 8 of the RTI Act, which allow public authorities to withhold information in specific cases.
These include provisions that exempt disclosure if it would breach "parliamentary privilege", "endanger" someone's life or physical safety, "identify" a source of information or "impede" investigation or prosecution.
The order also referred to a Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) clarification based on a 2009 Bombay High Court judgement, which said, "The public information authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not." Tribal rights experts argued that the commission's refusal to share even the minutes of its meetings is at odds with the spirit of transparency and public accountability.
"The NCST is a constitutional body created to safeguard tribal interests. If it begins denying access to basic information about its functioning, the entire purpose of having such a body is undermined," said a tribal rights researcher who did not wish to be named.
The denial comes at a time when the Great Nicobar Island project has drawn sharp criticism from conservationists, scientists and tribal rights advocates, who fear that it could displace Indigenous communities and irreversibly damage ecologically sensitive zones.
The project, titled 'Holistic Development of Great Nicobar', involves the construction of a transshipment port, an international airport, a township and a power plant spanning more than 160 sq km. This includes around 130 sq km of pristine forest inhabited by the Nicobarese, a Scheduled Tribe (ST), and the Shompens, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), whose population is estimated to be between 200 and 300.
Similarly, the NTCA's directive for relocation of villages from tiger reserves has sparked controversy, with concerns over the lack of consultation with the affected tribal communities and the alleged violation of the Forest Rights Act.
In an interview with PTI in June, NCST member Asha Lakra said tribal communities in Great Nicobar are not opposed to development but lack sufficient information about the proposed mega infrastructure project on the island.
Ms. Lakra, who led an NCST team to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands from June 5 to 7 to review the issues faced by the tribal communities, said the commission held a detailed meeting with representatives of all tribal groups, including the Great Andamanese, Jarawa, Nicobarese and Shompens.
However, Barnabas Manju, Chairman of the Little and Great Nicobar Tribal Council, told PTI that the council was not invited to the meeting and came to know about it through the local media.
The council had written to the Union Environment Ministry and the Andaman and Nicobar administration in November 2022, withdrawing a no-objection certificate (NOC) it had issued in August that year for the denotification of 84.1 sq km of tribal reserve and the diversion of 130 sq km of forest for the project. It alleged that crucial information was withheld while seeking the NOC.
In April 2023, the NCST issued a notice to the Andaman and Nicobar administration seeking "facts and an action-taken report" on allegations that the mega project would violate the constitutional mandate and "adversely impact" the lives of local tribals.
At a media interaction last month, Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram said his ministry was examining objections raised by tribal communities regarding the proposed project.
In an interview with PTI in February last year, NCST's former acting vice chairperson Ananta Nayak said media reports criticising the "strategically crucial" mega construction project were an "international conspiracy".
He said national security should be the "primary concern" of any government.
Great Nicobar Island is one of the most strategically important areas. The Andaman and Nicobar Islands provide India a commanding geostrategic presence in the Bay of Bengal and access to South and Southeast Asia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
Mumbai police tell high court communist parties can hold Gaza protest on Aug 20
After being questioned by the Bombay High Court, the Mumbai police on Tuesday said that they would permit the Communist Party of India (CPI) and Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) to hold a peaceful protest at Azad Maidan, the designated protest area, in Mumbai."The protest will be held on August 20, between 3 and 6 pm, for the protestors to express their thoughts on the genocide purportedly occurring in Gaza," noted the Public Prosecutor S.C. Gavand submitted that the parties will have to follow the rules of protest as specified under law while protesting at the designated protest area. Senior Advocate Mihir Desai, appearing for the political parties, submitted that the rules will be abided by, and said, "I hope neither of us comes back on the 21st." Desai had pointed out on Monday that the Pune police had permitted a similar protest, after which the court had directed the Mumbai police to explain why they were not allowing the protest to take parties had approached the court earlier, which had questioned the protest over Gaza and suggested that the parties protest on local issues. The plea was dismissed by the High Court on July 25, after which the political parties issued a press release which some lawyers thought was contemptuous, and had thus approached the court seeking action against them. However, the court refused to take up the the petitioners approached the court again, stating that on June 13, members of these political parties, along with members of other political and civil society organisations, under the banner of the All India Peace and Solidarity Organisation (AIPSO), wanted to protest and had filed an application before the application was rejected by the Azad Maidan police station on June 17, on the grounds that since the protest was with respect to an international issue, there was a possibility that the agenda and activities of the meeting would contradict the international policy of the Indian State. It was also stated that various political, social, and religious organisations had raised objections to the protest, and hence a possibility of adverse law and order issues might CPI and CPM then filed another application on June 25 before the police, which was also rejected on July 15. Following this, another application was filed on July 19. After this, the parties approached the Bombay High Court, which dismissed their CPI and CPM stated that the reasons cited by the police were completely untenable, as the agenda of the protest is in consonance with the official stance of the Indian Government, wherein the Ministry of External Affairs has consistently held the view that a ceasefire must be called to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.- EndsTrending Reel
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
From the Urdu Press: ‘All eyes on Rahul's next move as he rises as Opp face', ‘EC must avoid knee-jerk reaction over SIR'
The Election Commission (EC)'s special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar and the 'vote theft' allegations have continued to generate fireworks between the government and the Opposition within Parliament and outside, with about 300 Opposition MPs taking to the streets to hold a march to the EC office. These developments dominated the coverage of the Urdu dailies through the week, with the voter list row expected to remain on the boil for a long time. Referring to the Opposition MPs' march from Parliament House to the EC headquarters in the heart of the Capital over the Bihar SIR and alleged 'vote theft' in various elections, the Mumbai-based Urdu Times, in its August 12 editorial, says that the protest displayed a remarkable show of the INDIA bloc's unity. 'After being mocked as 'Pappu' of Indian politics for a long time, Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has now come a long way as he led an unprecedented march of Opposition MPs, which was stopped by police,' it says, adding that several Opposition leaders, including Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, were detained before release later. The editorial also states that the INDIA bloc's joint protest has sounded the bugle for the Bihar Assembly polls. 'All eyes would now be on the next move of Gandhi, who has established his credentials as the Leader of the Opposition.' Pointing to Gandhi's accusations against the EC and BJP of perpetrating a 'criminal fraud', the New Delhi edition of Inquilab, in its August 10 editorial, writes that a significant aspect of the Congress leader's move this time is that he did not only level the 'vote chori' charge but also sought to substantiate it with findings of a Congress investigation into voting in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment, part of the Bangalore Central parliamentary seat, in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. After making his revelations through a presentation, Gandhi urged the EC to do course-correction in order to properly discharge its constitutional duty as an autonomous body, the edit says. 'The Congress led by Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi seems to have understood that mere allegations and protests against the alleged misuse of the country's institutions by the ruling dispensation would not create resonance, (and this) could be done through evidence unearthed through meticulous research and investigation,' the editorial says. Rather than looking into the LoP's charges objectively, it adds, the EC, in a 'knee-jerk reaction', just asked Gandhi to submit it through a signed declaration. The daily says Gandhi's claims cannot be brushed aside by the EC as they are not just allegations, like those made earlier by the Congress and other Opposition parties in various polls. 'In the absence of digital electoral rolls, the LoP's team pored over massive EC data manually for six months to come up with these revelations. Gandhi should be credited with this long, painstaking exercise, which evoked his 2022-23 Bharat Jodo Yatra that he undertook on foot from Kanyakumari to Kashmir,' it says. 'Gandhi's expose of electoral irregularities has not only enhanced public awareness but would also boost the Opposition's unity.' Commenting on the continuing logjam in Parliament, which has washed out most of the Monsoon Session so far, the Bengaluru-based Salar, in its August 8 leader, points out that such sustained disruptions have regularly hampered the House in recent years. 'This time, there is a standoff between the government and Opposition over the Bihar SIR, with the latter pressing for a debate on the issue. The government has rejected the Opposition's demand on the ground that it is a sub-judice matter pending in the Supreme Court and that the EC is a constitutional body whose functioning could not be discussed in Parliament,' the editorial states. The Opposition has countered the government's stance, it notes, with Rajya Sabha LoP Mallikarjun Kharge highlighting, in a letter to Deputy Chairman Harivansh, a ruling given by the Chairman in 2023 on the issue. The daily points out that there has been a cloud over the Monsoon Session since its beginning over the Bihar SIR, which has now become more controversial over various rows, including deletion of 65 lakh existing electors from the draft voters' list. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has held that the government would be forced to pass Bills amid Opposition MPs' protests, it notes. 'However, it would be better for democracy if both sides participate in constructive debates in the House, for which the government should take the initiative and reach out to the Opposition. It is primarily the government's responsibility to ensure Parliament's functioning,' the edit states. It says alleged irregularities in electoral rolls have also been reported from West Bengal and other states. 'The EC should not be only watchful but also take measures to address the concerns of political parties and citizens in order to uphold public trust in the poll body as well as democracy.'
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliament passes National Sports Bill after extensive discussion
The National Sports Governance Bill was on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) passed by the Parliament with Rajya Sabha giving its nod a mere 24 hours after Lok Sabha, marking a historic first for India's sports administration that is now set to be regulated by a national board and have its own dispute resolution mechanism. The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, which reinforces NADA's autonomy as required by the World Anti-Doping Agency, was also passed by the Parliament. The two bills now await presidential assent to be notified as acts. Also read | National Sports Governance Bill: Federations split over new law, concerns raised over sports autonomy Soon after Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Mansukh Mandaviya moved the bills for consideration and passage in the Upper House at 3pm, there were vociferous opposition protests over revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The opposition eventually staged a walkout led by Leader of Opposition and Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, who demanded a discussion on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. "In 20 countries, there is sports law. I request the Rajya Sabha to make India the 21st country with a sports law," Mandaviya said in his address which was followed by a discussion that lasted over two hours. During the discussion, BJD MP Subhashish Khuntia raised concerns about the centralisation of sports governance due to the bill. He also felt that the bill did not have clarity on district and block level development of athletes. "The bill should empower, not control," he said. Mr. Mandaviya responded by saying that the government is only seeking to be a facilitator. "In this bill, we are bringing transparency, not control, not interference. Government doesn't want to control. We are being the supporters and providers of a structure," he asserted. Former All India Football Federation President and NCP leader Praful Patel and Indian Olympic Association President P T Usha, who is a nominated member, were among the prominent voices who lauded the bill. "It was a long-standing legislation that was required. We have had a sports code, it's been a loose code and never stood any legal scrutiny. What is happening today is the need of the hour," Mr. Patel said. "We are hoping to win the 2036 bid of Olympics. That itself would be a redefining moment for Indian sports. This bill is absolutely in the right direction. We need this to achieve glory that is beyond cricket. It is imperative that this bill be passed with fullest support," he added. Ms. Usha expressed similar sentiments and said, "This bill will usher in transparency, accountability, and gender parity. It will empower athletes and build confidence among sponsors and federations. It is about justice and fair-play." Mandaviya has described it as "the single biggest reform in sports since independence." The most striking aspect of the bill is the NSB to create a stringent system of accountability. The NSB will have the mandate to de-recognise a national body that fails to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed "gross irregularities in the election procedures." Failure to publish annual audited accounts or "misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds" would also be liable for action by the NSB but it would be required to consult the concerned global body before making its move. Another feature is the proposal for a National Sports Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court and decide disputes ranging from selection to election involving federations and athletes. Once instituted, Tribunal's decisions can only be challenged in the Supreme Court. The bill makes some concessions on the issue of age cap for administrators by allowing those in the bracket of 70 to 75 to contest elections if the concerned international bodies' statutes and bylaws allow for it. It is a departure from the national sports code that capped the age limit at 70. All recognised national sports bodies would also come under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, something that the BCCI has vehemently opposed since it is not dependent on government funding. However, the cricket board has got some leeway on that front with the government amending the bill to ensure that RTI would be applicable only on bodies that rely on government funding or support. Another significant amendment made to the draft is the mandatory term of two tenures in the EC to be eligible for fighting NSF elections. That mandatory tenure has been reduced to one term, clearing the decks for the likes of IOA President P.T. Usha to seek a re-election. The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill-2025 incorporates the changes sought by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which objected to "government interference" in the functioning of the country's Anti-Doping Agency (NADA). The act was originally passed in 2022 but its implementation had to be put on hold due to objections raised by WADA. The world body objected to the institution of a National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports, which was empowered to make recommendations to the government on anti-doping regulations. The Board, which was to comprise a chairperson and two members appointed by the central government, was also authorised to oversee the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) and even issue directions to it. WADA rejected this provision as government interference in an autonomous body. In the amended bill, the Board has been retained but without the powers to oversee NADA or the advisory role it was previously assigned. The amended bill asserts NADA's "operational independence".
