logo
The new baby boomer tax funding your children's holidays

The new baby boomer tax funding your children's holidays

Telegraph3 days ago

First it was houses, now it's holidays.
Today's grandparents, largely the post-war baby boomer generation, are increasingly the source of funding for almost everything in Britain.
The Bank of Mum and Dad has been stumping up deposits for house purchases, particularly in London and the South East, in large numbers for a couple of decades now.
House price growth has far outpaced wage rises since the 2007-08 financial crisis tanked the global economy and froze wages in real terms.
The lucky recipients – myself among them – of these so-called 'gifted deposits' are now having children of their own. Once the sprogs reach school age, and your holidays are restricted to times when half the country is also off, the costs are truly astronomical – and they're getting worse.
Colleagues on the Telegraph Travel desk found a return flight to Corfu from Gatwick with easyJet cost £1,300 per person during last week's half-term break. The same journey this week will set you back just £263 per person.
It's no wonder growing numbers of families are instead choosing to take their kids out of school during term time and paying the fines imposed by the council for truancy. Yes, some families take the Michael, but for others, the choice is between breaking the law and having no holiday at all.
And gone are the days when you could rely on a cheap break in this country, either. Even camping has gone bonkers, with bare pitches (where you bring your own tent) costing £50 a night at some campsites.
So, as infantilising as it is, baby boomers are now having to fork out for their children and grandchildren's holidays, too.
The truth is that this generation, now in their 60s and 70s, are the only ones with any money in Britain any more. The triple jackpot – index-linked final salary pension, full state pension and a mortgage-free property – is enjoyed by millions of people.
Today's workers have wages that have stagnated, once you take into account the effects of inflation, and are labouring under the highest tax burden since the end of the Second World War.
If you earn £60,000 a year, your monthly take-home pay (after tax and pensions) will be around £3,300. Take off a typical mortgage or rent, nursery fees for one child, a London travelcard, utilities and food, and you're left with little more than £200. That's simply not enough to build any kind of wealth to afford regular breaks in school holidays.
At the same time as younger generations are being squeezed, the Government is coming up with more reasons for older people to give away their money more quickly than ever.
For instance, from April 2027, unspent pensions will fall into the scope of inheritance tax at 40pc (assuming the £1m tax-free allowance most couples have has been used up). It is policies like this that have led pensioners to rush to spend their savings before the Treasury can get their grubby hands on it.
During last week's holiday, several of the families holidaying around us were all going on the grandparent pound. There were a few nice cars outside – all owned by the retired grandparents, of course, not by their working children.
Those of us lucky enough to have parents willing and able to help are very grateful, but it shouldn't be like this. Something has gone horribly wrong when grown adults are reliant on their parents for a roof and the odd jolly with their families in their own country.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers
Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Illegal work arrests double in year as police target 'unscrupulous' employers

Arrests for illegal work have doubled in a year as police focus on "unscrupulous" employers who exploit undocumented migrants, the government officers arrested more than 6,400 people in the past year in raids at businesses across the UK, data released by the Home Office shows. It said the figure is 51% higher than the previous year. It did not provide numbers as to how many arrests led to charges, convictions or said immigration enforcement officials had "intensified" their work to "tackle those abusing the UK immigration system and exploiting vulnerable people". Officers had visited more than 9,000 businesses - among them restaurants, nail bars and construction sites - to check paperwork and working businesses had often subjected migrants to "squalid conditions and illegal working hours" as well as below-minimum Home Office said there were a range of industries exploiting migrant one case in Surrey, officers arrested nine people at a caravan park who had been working as delivery one one major operation in March, officers arrested 36 people at a building site in Belfast's Titanic Quarter. Some had breached visa conditions while others didn't have working Enforcement director Eddy Montgomery said there were many cases where people travelling to the UK were "sold a lie by smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in the UK."In reality, they often end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours," he Angela Eagle, the minister for border security and asylum, said the government would "continue to root out unscrupulous employers and disrupt illegal workers who undermine our border security".The government said it had also returned nearly 30,000 people over the past year who did not have the right to be in the has said it is cracking down on illegal migration, setting out its plans in a White Paper to tighten work visas and those overstaying. It scrapped a special visa for care workers introduced during the pandemic, noting that this had been a pathway exploited by was mixed reaction to the plans, with some business sectors decrying the restrictions on work visas, while some Conservative opponents said the reforms didn't go far enough to stop illegal most recent data shows that approximately 44,000 people have entered the UK illegally in the year to March 2025, more than 80% through small boat journeys.

Trans lobby groups 'lied for years' that anyone self identifying as a different gender could access women's' toilets, equality chief says
Trans lobby groups 'lied for years' that anyone self identifying as a different gender could access women's' toilets, equality chief says

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trans lobby groups 'lied for years' that anyone self identifying as a different gender could access women's' toilets, equality chief says

Transgender people were misled about their rights to female only spaces by lobby groups, according to a senior member of an equality watchdog has said. In April a Supreme Court ruling confirmed the terms woman and sex in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. Akua Reindorf, a barrister who is one of eight commissioners at the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), said trans people had been deceived about their rights were. Speaking in a personal capacity during a debate about the recent ruling, she said there must be a 'period of correction' to acknowledge women's right to women-only spaces. The decision made it legal for trans people to be banned from women-only sports teams, and from using bathrooms and changing rooms for the gender they lived as. These terms were later supported by interim non-statutory advice given by the EHRC last April. When an audience member at the debate raised fears about the recent Supreme Court ruling and how it could strip away trans peoples rights, barrister and panellist, Naomi Cunningham said: 'It can't be helped, I'm afraid.' In agreement with her fellow panellist, Ms Reindorf said she believed trans lobbyists were at faults for the misunderstanding. 'Unfortunately, young people and trans people have been lied to over many years about what their rights are,' she said. 'It's like Naomi said – I just can't say it in a more diplomatic way than that. They have been lied to, and there has to be a period of correction, because other people have rights' She claimed it boiled down to the law prior to the Supreme Court ruling being misunderstood due to groups contending trans people who self-identified should be treated as their preferred gender. However, this was only the case for the those who had obtained a gender recognition certificate (GRC). The barrister said the amalgamation of different rights made the Equality Act nonviable from a personal capacity. 'The catalyst for many to catch up, belatedly, with the fact that the law never permitted self-ID in the first place,' she said. As such, the feeling of a loss of right of trans people was due to an overwhelming product of 'misinformation' perpetrated by 'lobby group and activists'. Author JK Rowling backed the barrister's recent comments, saying lobby groups lied 'about what the law said'.' However, the head of gender justice at Amnesty International UK, Chiara Capraro, hit back Ms Reindorf's comments. She said: 'The EHRC has the duty to uphold the rights of everyone, including all with protected characteristics. We are concerned that it is failing to do so and is unhelpfully pitting the rights of women and trans people against each other.' A spokesman for the EHRC told The Guardian: 'Akua Reindorf KC spoke at this event in a personal capacity. This was made clear at the event and in the video recording published online. 'As Britain's equality regulator, the Equality and Human Rights Commission upholds and enforces the Equality Act 2010 to ensure everyone is treated fairly, consistent with the Act. 'Our board come from all walks of life and bring with them a breadth of skills and experience. This helps us take impartial decisions, which are always based on evidence and the law.'

Post Office compensation chief steps down after Sir Alan Bates raised 'serious concerns' about schemes
Post Office compensation chief steps down after Sir Alan Bates raised 'serious concerns' about schemes

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Post Office compensation chief steps down after Sir Alan Bates raised 'serious concerns' about schemes

A Post Office boss who backed compensation for Horizon IT scandal victims has left his position as Sir Alan Bates raised 'serious concerns' about schemes. Leader of the Post Office's Remediation Unit, Simon Recaldin, is believed to have opted for voluntary redundancy and left his post this week. It comes as the first part of a public inquiry report into the controversy, analysing the compensation process as well as the affect on victims, is anticipated to be released in the coming weeks. More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after faulty accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Hundreds are still waiting for payouts despite the previous government announcing that those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000. A Post Office spokesperson said yesterday Mr Recaldin's departure was a part of an 'organisational design exercise' across the firm. Now Joanne Hanley, who was previously a managing director and global head of client servicing, data and operations for Lloyds', is understood to have taken up a large portion of the former Post Office chief, according to The Telegraph. It comes as Post Office hero Sir Alan Bates accused the government of running a 'quasi kangaroo court' payout system for the scandal's victims last month. More recently, Sir Alan said he would prefer to see the compensation schemes thrown out rather the people working on them. 'We have got serious concerns about the transparency and the parity across the schemes,' he told The Telegraph. Last November, Mr Recaldin giving evidence to the inquiry, apologised after it was unearthed staff who were managing compensation claims had also been embroiled in prosecutions relating to the scandal. When queried about ex Post Office investigators he said: 'So my regret – and it is a genuine regret – is that when I came in, in January 2022, that I didn't do that conflicts check, check back on my inherited team, and challenge that.' It comes as the Sir Alan, who famously won his High Court battle with the Post Office in 2019 revealed that he had been handed a 'take it or leave it' compensation offer of less than half his original claim. Mr Bates, 70, said the first offer, made in January last year, was just one sixth of what he was asking for, adding that it rose to a third in the second offer. He has now been given a 'final take it or leave it offer' - which he said amounts to 49.2 per cent of his original claim. He, alongside 500 other sub-postmasters, will now have to lodge their bid for compensation via the Group Litigation order, managed by the Government. Bates, who led the sub-postmasters' campaign for justice, attacked the government for reneging on assurances given when the compensation schemes were set up The Post Office currently manages the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is seperate to the aforementioned. This scheme was organised for victims who have not been compensated but believe they experienced financial loses due to the IT scandal. A Post Office spokesman said: 'As part of the Post Office's commitment to deliver a 'new deal for postmasters', we have undertaken a review of our operating model to ensure we have the right structure in place. 'We have been in consultation with a number of colleagues from across the business, including the Remediation Unit. As a result of this Post Office-wide organisational design exercise, Simon Recaldin has left the business.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store