Philippine president and top U.S. officials vow to ramp up deterrence
Marcos met separately with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the State Department, with both top U.S. officials pointing to China as a top mutual threat.
Marcos was due to meet President Donald Trump on Tuesday, where the Philippine leader will aim to secure a trade deal before an Aug. 1 deadline while fending off demands to dole out more cash for defense.
The U.S. this month raised the threatened "reciprocal" tariffs on Philippine imports to 20% from the 17% announced in April. Meanwhile, the Pentagon has set a 'global standard' for U.S. allies to spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense.
Those moves have stoked concern in Manila about Washington's commitment to their alliance and the larger U.S. focus on the Indo-Pacific region.
But Hegseth sought to ameliorate concerns, emphasizing that the region is the United States' 'priority theater' and that the administration 'is committed to achieving peace through strength.'
'Our storied alliance has never been stronger or more essential than it is today, and together we remain committed to the Mutual Defense Treaty,' Hegseth said. 'This pact extends to armed attacks on our armed forces, aircraft or public vessels, including our Coast Guard anywhere in the Pacific, including the South China Sea.'
Manila and Beijing have faced off in the disputed South China Sea, nudging Marcos closer to Washington. This has also seen the Philippines grant the U.S. expanded access to military bases in the Southeast Asian nation — a move that comes amid China's growing pressure on democratic Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its own.
Although Hegseth did not directly mention China by name, his intended audience was clear.
'We do not seek confrontation, but we are and will be ready and resolute,' he said.
Marcos, calling the allies' mutual defense pact the 'cornerstone' of their relationship, offered praise for the allies' growing defense ties. He also appeared to defend the alliance from criticism by Beijing that the allies have been working hand in glove to contain China.
'It is the proper response considering the challenges, let me put it that way,' Marcos said. 'The challenges that we face in the Philippines specifically are vis a vis the changing political geopolitical forces and the political developments around our part of the world.'
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio meets with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at the State Department in Washington on Monday. |
AFP-JIJI
But Marcos said that the U.S.-Philippine relationship 'must continue to evolve' as circumstances change — a hint that he would continue to promote even more robust defense ties.
Hegseth also touched on this, lauding Manila's focus on collective defense, including its push to build security relationships with like-minded partners such as Japan and Australia, as well as its modernization of its armed forces.
The U.S. defense chief also noted the controversial deployment of 'new cutting-edge missiles' and 'unmanned systems.' This includes continued deployment of the advanced Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS) and Typhon U.S. missile systems to Philippine territory. Both systems could put nearby Chinese forces at risk.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy is set to build a new boat maintenance facility to help repair Philippine military vessels in a province facing the South China Sea. The facility could also host unmanned platforms.
"Together, we must forge a strong shield of real deterrence for peace," said Hegseth, who visited Manila in March.
Meanwhile, Marcos and Rubio also discussed economic issues, including cooperation on the Luzon Economic Corridor and strengthening supply chains. A press release from the State Department did not mention if tariffs had been discussed.
However, in a development that could engender goodwill in Trump's mind and help offset trade concerns, the Philippines has signaled an openness to jointly producing ammunition with the U.S. in the Southeast Asian nation.
Manila's ambassador to Washington, Jose Manuel Romualdez, told Philippine media Sunday that such a move would be a 'combination both of defense and economic cooperation.'
U.S. lawmakers have urged the Pentagon and State Department to study the 'feasibility of establishing a joint ammunition and manufacturing storage facility' at the former U.S. naval base in Subic Bay, citing the 'lack of forward-stage ammunition manufacturing facility in the Indo-Pacific.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Why markets may soon call America's tariff bluff
Three months after President Donald Trump announced plans to impose sweeping new tariffs on most countries, the U.S. economy appears surprisingly resilient. The stock market has rebounded from its initial slump, inflation remains under control and fears of a recession have receded — or at least they had before Trump announced a new 30% tariff on imports from Mexico and the European Union, two of America's biggest trading partners. In the months since Trump's initial announcement, several countries have entered negotiations with the United States, offering concessions they had long resisted. Many observers view this as evidence that Trump's aggressive trade tactics are working and that economists may have overestimated the potential costs. Yet this interpretation overlooks a critical detail: Many of the tariffs that Trump announced over the past few months have not been fully implemented. In fact, the administration has repeatedly backed down from its initial threats — a pattern so consistent that it has earned the acronym TACO: 'Trump always chickens out.' Despite its outspoken distrust of experts — particularly economists, scientists and health professionals — the Trump administration has consistently been attuned to financial markets. Since early April, announcements of new or increased duties have repeatedly triggered stock-market declines. In response, the administration has often softened its stance by issuing exemptions, delaying some tariffs and renegotiating others, leading to quick rebounds in equity prices. Announcements of bilateral deals have been met with investor optimism, while renewed threats of escalation have triggered sell-offs. Until recently, this feedback loop has helped rein in the administration's trade policies. But the latest escalation — including a 50% tariff on copper, higher-than-expected tariffs on goods from Vietnam and stalled negotiations with the EU — has barely moved the markets, with equity prices remaining elevated. The most plausible explanation is that investors no longer believe the administration will follow through on its threats. Instead, they see them as part of a now-familiar cycle: bold proclamations followed by delays or partial implementation. Complacency, however, introduces a new kind of risk. If markets become desensitized to Trump's tariff threats, they may no longer serve as an effective check on potentially harmful policies. Freed from that constraint, Trump could be emboldened to move forward with measures his administration has so far been reluctant to implement. It's a classic 'boy who cried wolf' dynamic. In the early stages, Trump's aggressive rhetoric helped bring negotiating partners to the table without triggering the worst-case economic scenarios, largely because the market backlash acted as a deterrent. But as investors increasingly dismiss his tariff threats, the likelihood that he will follow through on them grows. And if that happens, the long-feared consequences could finally materialize: higher consumer prices, reduced trade, disrupted supply chains and slower long-term growth. This dynamic extends beyond financial markets. Many countries that were once firmly committed to multilateralism are now pursuing bilateral deals with the U.S. in the hope of avoiding punitive tariffs. Some see these developments as vindication of the administration's current approach — evidence that the U.S. can use its economic power to reshape a system seen as unfavorable to American interests. But the shift toward bilateralism is less an endorsement of Trump's approach than a pragmatic response. Confronting the U.S. directly would be costly. Finding themselves on increasingly hostile and unpredictable terrain, many governments are buying time and hedging their bets. Such hedging can move in only one direction: away from the U.S. and toward alternative trading partners, particularly China. For most countries, that is not the preferred outcome. Vietnam, for example, has openly expressed its desire to strengthen ties with the U.S. rather than deepen its reliance on China. But as U.S. trade policy grows more erratic, governments are increasingly being forced to choose between the two powers. The irony is that Trump's efforts to bully foreign governments will ultimately diminish America's global influence. Economic leverage, after all, depends on engagement. The U.S. can pressure trading partners today precisely because it remains deeply integrated into the global economy. Consequently, U.S. policymakers now find themselves in a double bind. In the short term, financial markets have mitigated the impact of Trump's aggressive rhetoric by discouraging implementation of the policies that follow from it. But if investors keep treating his threats as empty noise, they will ignore the wolf when it appears. Moreover, given America's central role in the global trading system, its retreat from multilateralism will drive other countries to seek alternatives and diversify their trade relationships. As they become less dependent on the U.S. market, America's bargaining power will inevitably decline. While the Trump administration's strategy may appear to be working, the absence of immediate costs is not evidence of its long-term viability. Instead, it is a sign that the warnings were heard and — for a time — heeded. If the administration ignores those warnings, economists' dire predictions may come true. Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg, a former World Bank Group chief economist and editor-in-chief of the American Economic Review, is professor of economics at Yale University. © Project Syndicate, 2025
The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
Trump Announces Trade Deal With Philippines, Small Reduction in Tariff Rate
The U.S. leader said that Washington would apply a 19 percent tariff on Philippine imports, while Manila has agreed to remove all of its tariffs on American goods. U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a new 19 percent tariff rate for imports from the Philippines, after a meeting with visiting President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at the White House. Trump made the announcement in a post on his Truth Social media platform after the meeting with Marcos, calling the Philippine leader a 'very good and tough negotiator.' 'It was a beautiful visit, and we concluded our Trade Deal, whereby The Philippines is going OPEN MARKET with the United States, and ZERO Tariffs. The Philippines will pay a 19% Tariff,' Trump wrote. 'In addition, we will work together Militarily.' Marcos arrived in Washington on Sunday for a three-day trip during which he also met with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, as well as with U.S. business leaders investing in the Philippines. Speaking to reporters with Marcos, the U.S. leader announced that the two countries were 'very close to finishing a trade deal – a big trade deal, actually.' Trump's announcement comes after he claimed to have finalized similar deals with Vietnam, which negotiated a rate of 20 percent, and Indonesia, whose tariff is now set at 19 percent. (The White House yesterday released more details on the Indonesia agreement, although elements of the agreement with Vietnam have reportedly yet to be finalized.) According to an undated draft of the Philippines-U.S. Agreement on Reciprocal Trade obtained by The Diplomat, the Philippines has agreed to remove nearly all of its tariffs and non-tariff barriers on U.S. imports, including quotas and import licensing requirements, and to bolster intellectual property protections. 'These commitments,' the draft agreement states, 'are intended to enhance reciprocity between the Parties by reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers in the territory of the Philippines and increasing alignment between the United States and the Philippines on economic and national security matters.' The U.S. had a goods trade deficit of $4.9 billion with the Philippines last year, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. As with the two previous agreements with Indonesia and Vietnam, a higher tariff rate will apply to any goods that are deemed to have been transshipped to the U.S. via the Philippines from any third country (i.e. China). The draft agreement states that the 19 percent rate will not apply in the event that a certain percentage of a good 'originates from certain countries not party to this Agreement.' Neither the exact local content threshold nor the tariff on transshipped goods were finalized in the draft, although Trump announced that the rate for Vietnam has been set at 40 percent. (How transshipped goods are to be identified and verified, and by whom, is yet to be determined in any of these cases.) The draft agreement also contains a number of provisions relating to economics and national security. It states that the Philippines will cooperate with Washington 'to regulate the trade in national security sensitive technologies and goods through existing multilateral export control regimes, align with all unilateral export controls in force by the United States, and ensure that its companies do not backfill or undermine these controls.' The agreement also states that the Philippines 'shall adopt and effectively enforce provisions to combat transshipment and other practices to evade or circumvent duties' and that the U.S. 'shall work with the Philippines to streamline and enhance defense trade.' Most notably, the draft states that the U.S. has the right to terminate the agreement if the Philippines 'enters into a new bilateral free trade agreement or preferential economic agreement' with any 'country of concern.' In light of all of these concessions, and its status as a longstanding and 'ironclad' U.S. security ally, it is surprising that the Philippines was unable to secure a greater reduction in the tariff rate. The 19 percent tariff was marginally lower than the 20 percent threatened by Trump in a letter to Marcos earlier this month, but higher than the 17 percent announced in Trump's 'liberation day' tariff announcement in April. It is also notably worse than the 15 percent rate that Trump announced today with Japan, another U.S. ally. The response on Philippine social media has reportedly been unfavorable to Marcos, with many users calling the Philippine leader 'weak' and stating that the risks of the U.S.-Philippine alliance have not been properly counterbalanced by greater U.S. concessions. In a post on X, Renato Reyes Jr., a member of the left-wing Makabayan political coalition, described the agreement as 'a grossly lopsided 'deal' which is really more of an imposition rather than the outcome of any negotiations' and called on the Marcos administration to 'fully disclose' its terms. The national security analyst Justin Baquisal wrote on X that while it remains to be seen whether these political talking points hurt Marcos' political prospects, 'the lack of better treatment for US allies vs non-aligners (esp compared to the original Liberation Day margins) is not doing anybody favors.' 'Most Reliable Ally' Marcos is the first Southeast Asian leader to visit the White House since the beginning of Trump's second term, a reflection of the warmth of the relationship between the two allies. Speaking to reporters at the start of the meeting in the Oval Office, Marcos described the U.S. as his country's 'strongest, closest, most reliable ally,' while Trump praised the Philippine leader, describing him as coming from a 'great family' with a 'great family legacy.' (Marcos' father, Ferdinand E. Marcos, ruled the Philippines through fear and force for more than two decades, including 14 years under Martial Law.) Aside from the trade issue, security and defense were also on the agenda during the Marcos-Trump meeting. Security cooperation between the two nations has increased markedly in recent years as a result of China's growing maritime power and ambition. During Marcos' three years in office, Beijing has increased the frequency and intensity of its incursions into Philippine-claimed waters, which it claims under its expansive 'nine-dash line' claim, resulting in a string of dangerous encounters between the two nations' coast guards. Under Marcos, the Philippines has opened more of its military facilities to a rotational U.S. presence under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, and increased military exercises and joint patrols. The visit did not witness the signing of any new defense cooperation initiatives, but in their meetings with Marcos, both Hegseth and Rubio reaffirmed that the U.S. will come to the Philippines' defense under the Mutual Defense Treaty if its forces, ships and aircraft come under an armed attack, including in the South China Sea – an assurance that has been consistently made since the first Trump administration. Marcos told Hegseth that the assurance of mutual defense 'continues to be the cornerstone' of the U.S.-Philippines relationship and thanked the U.S. for support 'that we need in the face of the threats that we, our country, is facing.' Speaking alongside Trump, Marcos said that 'we are essentially concerned with the defense of our territory and the exercise of our sovereign rights,' adding, 'Our strongest, closest, most reliable ally has always been the United States.' As the AFP news agency reported, Trump 'devoted much of the appearance to attacks on his Democratic predecessors Biden and Barack Obama.' In a possibly significant aside, Trump address relations with China, saying that he would 'probably' visit the country 'in the not-too-distant future.' While taking credit for 'untilt[ing]' the Philippines away from China (the shift in Manila's policy took place under the Biden administration), he said that the Philippines was independent in its dealings with Beijing. 'Do whatever you need to do,' Trump told Marcos, the Associated Press reported. 'But your dealing with China wouldn't bother me at all.'
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Japan and EU launch trade ‘alliance' amid concerns over U.S. and China
Jolted by the threat of sweeping U.S. tariffs and 'unfair' Chinese trade practices, the European Union and Japan on Wednesday launched a 'competitiveness alliance' to expand bilateral trade ties, promote business cooperation and explore ways to diversify critical mineral supply chains. The move comes as both sides have faced increased economic pressure from Washington. U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Washington had reached a new trade deal with Tokyo that leaves in place some tariffs, but the EU still faces a 30% levy with an Aug. 1 deadline. The alliance, which will also include an expanded economic dialogue in a format similar to what are known as two-plus-two talks involving senior officials, was among a series of agreements reached by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during an EU-Japan summit in Tokyo. The alliance framework envisages greater collaboration and policy coordination on a host of issues ranging from boosting industrial competitiveness and supply-chain resilience to reducing strategic dependency. It also calls on the two sides to step up coordination and jointly lead international discussions, for instance, by steering trade-related talks at the World Trade Organization and the Group of Seven meetings. "On geoeconomics, we are witnessing growing trade tensions and uncertainty, even among long-standing partners," von der Leyen said in a written interview Wednesday with the Nikkei daily. "For strategic partners like Europe and Japan, this means bringing our relationship even closer to meet the realities of our time and shape the future." Through the expanded high-level economic dialogue, which will now include Stephane Sejourne, the European Commission's executive vice president for prosperity and industrial strategy, the two sides will aim to identify strategic goods and sectors, while addressing economic coercion and nonmarket policies and practices, including any resulting overcapacity. One key topic discussed was strengthening 'reliable' supply chains, with an initial focus on critical raw materials such as rare earths and batteries — a type of collaboration that Brussels said 'could extend to other sectors in the future.' Last month, Sejourne announced the selection of 13 strategic projects focused on the supply of critical raw materials in countries outside the EU. These include projects for graphite supply in Ukraine, Norway, Greenland, Madagascar and Kazakhstan, with nickel and cobalt production being addressed in Canada, Brazil and Zambia. Von der Leyen told the Nikkei that the EU will explore investment opportunities with Japan throughout Europe, saying for the first time that there are "strong prospects" for collaborating on mining. This comes after China imposed export restrictions in April on seven rare earth elements and magnets used in the defense, energy and automotive sectors in response to increased U.S. tariffs on Chinese products. While Chinese exports have largely resumed under certain conditions, the restrictions have impacted both EU and Japanese industries, with the two sides now considering public-private partnerships to explore new supply chains and reduce their overreliance on Beijing, which currently dominates global rare earth production. Under their new alliance, Tokyo and Brussels also plan to simplify and streamline rules to reduce administrative burdens for Japanese and European businesses and citizens, all while deepening industrial policy cooperation and facilitating investment and business collaborations. Other objectives of the new framework include promoting and protecting critical and emerging technologies, enhancing research security as well as the physical and cybersecurity of critical infrastructure. The ambitious alliance framework also includes steps to work closer together in the areas of energy, decarbonization, the bioeconomy, space, digital, the defense industry as well as research and innovation. Jose Parejo, head of the JP & Associates intelligence consultancy, said that four critical factors had converged to drive the two sides to seek alternative economic partnerships, with the first two being Trump's tariff threats and Beijing's weaponization of critical materials, both of which exposed dangerous vulnerabilities. The third factor, Parejo said, has been the WTO's institutional paralysis. 'Its dysfunctional appellate body has pushed like-minded partners toward plurilateral arrangements that can establish high standards and effective dispute resolution,' he said. Finally, the EU's new Competitiveness Compass positioned innovation, decarbonization, and dependency reduction as growth pillars where Japan emerges as the bloc's 'natural technological and values-based partner,' he added. The European Union and Japan on Wednesday launched a 'competitiveness alliance' to expand bilateral trade ties, promote business cooperation and explore ways to diversify critical mineral supply chains. | REUTERS EU-Japan relations are based on a strategic partnership agreement and a free-trade deal that has been in force since 2019. EU firms already export nearly €70 billion ($81.8 billion) in goods and €28 billion ($32.7 billion) in services to Japan every year. Together, the partners account for almost a quarter of the world's gross domestic product and 20% of global trade in goods and services counted together. Still, the new alliance could take ties even further in a number of areas, experts said. In critical minerals, for instance, Europe could benefit from Japan's world-leading rare-earth refining expertise while Japan could potentially access European Investment Bank financing and joint procurement platforms that reduce costs and enhance negotiating power against Chinese dominance. Green technology coordination, meanwhile, would create the scale necessary to compete with Chinese manufacturers, while digital sovereignty benefits could include joint 6G, AI and semiconductor laboratories that close the innovation gap with the U.S. and China. Market access is equally significant as Japanese companies look to gain preferential single market entry to 450 million consumers, while European firms benefit from Japan as a gateway to the 12-member Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) that bridges European and Asian economic spheres. That said, the alliance's strategic objectives go beyond bilateral cooperation, as it rebalances dependencies away from China and the U.S. 'This isn't anti-American or anti-Chinese positioning, but sophisticated maintenance of European agency in a multipolar world,' Parejo said. 'The alliance represents cornerstone 'selective multilateralism' where rule-making democracies coordinate resilient, sustainable markets while reducing systemic vulnerabilities.' The EU-Japan summit comes after von der Leyen proposed to EU leaders last month the launch of a Europe-led initiative to establish a more structured trade cooperation with Asian countries, potentially laying the groundwork for an alternative to the gridlocked WTO. "I said that we can think about this as the beginning of redesigning the WTO," she said, while referring to the CPTPP as 'a project we should truly engage in.' Whether Brussels is truly aiming to join the free-trade pact is unclear. Some observers say that the European Commission president could be posturing as a way to gain leverage over the Trump administration. EU envoys will reportedly meet as early as this week to formulate a plan to respond to a possible no-deal scenario on tariffs. A growing number of EU member states reportedly wants the bloc to activate its most powerful trade tool, what is called the anti-coercion instrument (ACI), against the U.S. should the two sides fail to reach an acceptable agreement and Trump follows through on his tariff threats. The ACI would give officials broad powers to take retaliatory action. Those measures could include new taxes on U.S. tech giants or targeted curbs on U.S. investments in the EU.
