
Worst episode ever? Why Space Babies doomed Doctor Who
'Space Babies was at the extreme end of light and fluffy,' says Rob Irwin, co-host of The Doctor Who Podcast. 'To be running around a spaceship with some babies and a 'snot monster' – who was really just misunderstood [he was revealed to be a pet] – put some fans off from the start.'
Many never returned. Ratings for Davies's second tilt at Who have nose-dived ever since – a decline that has accelerated through the latest season, which reaches its finale this weekend. So sharp has been the spiral – down 800,000 on 2024 and two million fewer than the not-especially-loved Jodie Whittaker era – there is speculation that the BBC is to quietly put Who out to pasture, with Gatwa strongly rumoured as leaving while will make him the shortest serving Doctor since Christopher 'one and done' Eccleston in 2005). Are they 'soft cancelling' a show which, some feel, caused itself irreparable damage with the insufferably twee Space Babies?
What's especially baffling is that Davies – who presided over the Doctor's glory years of 2005 to 2010 which gave us all-time great Who moments such as the Weeping Angels in Blink – did it all on purpose. Space Babies arrived early in the BBC's £80m deal with Disney to stream Doctor Who outside the UK and Ireland on Disney+ (and chip in on the budget). Eager to appeal – perhaps 'pander' is a better word – to a vast untapped audience of potential Whovians, Davies decided to go cuddly. He also apparently believed there was something innately hilarious about a spaceship full of talking babies, whose creepy CGI mouth movements allow them to be voiced by adult actors, including Sami Amber and Shola Olaitan-Ajiboye.
'I think the chance to do jokes – jokes like that on a bigger scale – is enormous fun,' Davies said. 'And let's face it, the freedom that I'm given and the trust I'm given by the BBC and by Disney+ is glorious.'
'Glorious' is not a word many fans have used about Space Babies, which arrived five months after Gatwa's official debut in the solid Christmas special, The Church on Ruby Road ('delightful' proclaimed the Telegraph). After the Doctor and new assistant, Ruby Sunday (Millie Gibson), are catapulted through time to a space station, they encounter a robot guardian named NAN-E and a population of infants left behind on the abandoned structure.
The babies can talk – in squeaky and very annoying voices – and tell the Doctor about the Bogeyman. The monster was created by the ship in a misguided attempt to entertain the children and is inevitably made out of actual bogies. Although NAN-E (revealed to be a Golda Rosheuvel's Jocelyn) wants to blast it out of the airlock – the fate suffered by HR Giger's Xenomorph at the end of Alien – the Doctor saves it, and the babies adopt it as a sort of disgusting pet.
It wasn't supposed to be like this when the BBC announced Davies was coming back to Who. His predecessor Chris Chibnall had allowed the series to descend into a purgatory of claggy, meandering plots – dragged out over multiple episodes yet rarely approaching coherence. (Can anyone explain what the 'Lone Cyberman' arc was about? Even the Cyberman seemed confused.)
Davies, by contrast, had a reputation for 'getting Who right'. As mentioned above, the Blink/Weeping Angels episode is considered one of the best in Who history (though it was actually written by Steven Moffat, who would succeed Davies as showrunner). He also gave us the terrifying 'Flood' aliens in 2008's Waters of Mars and teamed up the Daleks and Cybermen to winning effect with Army of Ghosts.
That said, Space Babies wasn't breaking any hard and fast rules. Doctor Who has had some wacky concepts in its day: The farting Slitheens from Davies's 2005 episode, Aliens of London, the Adipose creatures made of human fat from 2008 (another Davies concept – is this a pattern?).
I can't lie, Space Babies is downright restrained and tasteful compared to some of the comedy swings Russell T Davies has made in past. pic.twitter.com/KbGjzxyHpj
— Someone Called Kevin (@scribblesscript) May 14, 2024
But for sheer silliness Space Babies nonetheless took the interstellar biscuit – and a backlash against it has been building among the fanbase ever since, to the point where the episode arguably threatens to overshadow the entirety of the Gatwa era. Even for a character as long-established as the Doctor, first impressions count more than ever today – and Davies's revamped vision of the franchise was hard to take seriously.
'This isn't Dr Who. This is some of the worst TV I've ever seen. Seriously, the writing here is abysmal. I can't imagine how it could get any worse. Worse is not conceivable,' wrote one aghast fan on a Doctor Who forum.
'The poorest I have ever seen due mostly to plot and themes,' agreed another. 'Ncuti Gatwa needs better episodes written if he's going to stand the test of time. Massive budgets and charisma from Ncuti don't compensate for lame stories about space babies.'
That isn't to say Space Babies is universally loathed. Some fans will argue passionately on its behalf. It has even been contended that the story is a moving metaphor for the plight of asylum seekers, caught – much like the babies in their space station – in limbo between their old and new lives.
SPACE BABIES
Writer: Russell T Davies
Director: Julie Anne Robinson #DoctorWho pic.twitter.com/mDgmS3Rytk
— Doctor Who (@bbcdoctorwho) March 31, 2024
'Underneath the snot and out-of-this-world peril of Space Babies, it's a story about searching for a chosen family,' argued Digital Spy's Jamie Windust. 'The babies are repeatedly referenced as being refugees, looking for love and connection at a time when they are in desperate fear of the big bad monster that hears every step they make.'
And amidst all the hate and the occasional admiration, many Whovians take a more neutral view and acknowledge Space Babies has both strengths and weaknesses.
'I don't believe Space Babies to be the worst episode of Doctor Who or even in the bottom 20,' says Doctor Who podcaster Philip Edney. 'The production values are too high and some of the concepts are great. RTD has always started every season with a story that is a bit light and fluffy to hook audience.'
One issue with the episode, he feels, is that it does not play to Gatwa's strengths. Quite the opposite – in expecting the actor to hold his own against a bunch of giggling babies, the script hangs him out to dry slightly. It exposes his limitations as an actor who can do emotion well but struggles to communicate the Time Lord's cerebral qualities, which is what you need when trying to maintain a straight face against a rampaging snot monster.
'I loved him in Sex Education. But the high-level camp energy of [his Sex Education character] Eric or the sad, thoughtful Eric were the only two things Ncuti seemed able to bring to the Doctor. Some other actors are able to lift his performance,' said Edney. 'But put him in a room with babies and you can really see his weakness. And, as it becomes apparent that he is going to cry in every episode, you start to wonder where the Doctor has gone.'
Davies's error, many fans believe, was trying to appeal to a new audience while taking for granted the ardent Whoheads who have stuck by the show through good and bad. He also appeared to have buckled slightly under the pressure of re-imagining Doctor Who as a series that could thrive on streaming. And for what?
Disney is rumoured to have been unhappy with Space Babies – to the point where executives judged it unfixable (in contrast to the Christmas special in which they had inserted a scene in which an inflatable snowman falls on the Doctor). There was no tweaking a story about talking babies and snot monsters – so they just let it out into the world, as Davies intended.
'Doctor Who had gone through three very weak years of story and an actor who struggled with poor scripts and knowing who her Doctor was,' says Edney, referring to Gatwa's predecessor Jodie Whittaker. 'The hope was that this new era was going to fix all the issues and bring back Doctor Who. But what we got was Space Babies. That is what broke people's hearts.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Great British Bake Off to return as trailer reveals hosts and judges lineup
The Great British Bake Off has dropped a trailer for its upcoming season of the hit baking show. A minute-long teaser for the Channel 4 reality programme was released on Wednesday (13 August), which features the voice of comedian Joe Wilkinson who takes the audience on a journey through space and time - and baking ingredients. In the trailer, hosts Noel Fielding and Alison Hammond can be seen as animated characters. "From it grew life, intelligent life, adorned in knitwear and leopard print,' Wilkinson narrates. After various shots of the big bang mixed with baked goods, the camera pans out of Paul Hollywood 's eye. 'Once there was nothing, and then there was Bake Off,' Wilkinson states. Prue Leith is not featured in the trailer, though Channel 4 confirmed she will be taking part.


Scottish Sun
7 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Gary Lineker attends niece Tia's lavish wedding as fallout with brother Wayne eases
The brothers have reunited on two occasions this summer FEUD OVER? Gary Lineker attends niece Tia's lavish wedding as fallout with brother Wayne eases Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) GARY Lineker has been seen attending his niece Tia's lavish wedding as the fallout with his brother Wayne seemingly eases. Back in June, Gary appeared to put his feud with brother Wayne to one side as they partied at a family wedding in Ibiza - and now they have taken yet another step towards putting their rift to bed. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Wayne Lineker walked his daughter Tia down the aisle at her wedding this week Credit: @tali__photography 4 Gary Lineker was seen among the guests at the ceremony Credit: @tali__photography 4 He was seen smiling as his younger brother walked Tia down the aisle Credit: @tali__photography The brothers have united once more, this time at Wayne's daughter Tia's wedding. Tia shared the first glimpse of her lavish Mallorca wedding on Instagram on Wednesday - with her uncle clearly in attendance. She tied the knot with husband Harry Agombar, and her uncle Gary was sitting among the guests despite the 17-year feud between the Lineker brothers. Her father Wayne walked her down the alter and linked onto her arm as he did so. Tia looked stunning in a white dress, complete with a veil and huge bouquet of flowers. Her father walked beside her in a dapper black suit. BROTHERS REUNITE Gary was seen sitting among the guests, signalling a truce between the brothers. This was their second reunion in recent weeks. Back in June the former Match of the Day host's son Harry got married. Harry, 31, tied the knot with partner Bella in a luxurious ceremony on the Spanish island of Ibiza. Gary Lineker reveals Match of the Day blunder he made in last-ever appearance for first time in 26 years Spirits were high as all the family celebrated together beneath the sunshine. GARY AND WAYNE'S FEUD The two brothers are believed to have fallen out while Gary was with his second wife Danielle Bux. They travelled to Ibiza to visit Wayne but the trip broke their close relationship, which saw an end to their weekly phone calls. He told The Sun in 2015: "In my opinion, Danielle cost me my relationship with my brother. "Sadly Gary is no longer a part of my life. "They came to Ibiza in August 2008 and it was really awkward. "I didn't spark with Danielle and our relationship was cold." Wayne was Gary's best man at his first wedding to Michelle Cockayne in 1986. But the club owner did not attend as the ex-BBC host tied to knot with Danielle because his invite did not extend to his girlfriend at the time Ana Tanaka. Opening up on the brother's relationship in a recent interview with The Mail, Wayne said: "It's not so good to be honest, we don't really speak very often. "I'll always be his number one fan."


The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Yvette Cooper solves one headache for justice system but may have caused another
By getting her way and allowing police to consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects charged in high-profile cases, Yvette Cooper has solved one enormous headache for the criminal justice system. But she may have caused another, which could have consequences for race relations. The home secretary has encouraged senior police officers to free themselves of longstanding protocols so they can combat the prolific use of social media by far-right bloggers and organisations that have escalated disinformation around high-profile incidents. Last summer's national riots were fomented from an early stage by misinformation about the Southport killer – he was claimed, in posts recycled tens of thousands of times, to be a Muslim, foreign-born and an asylum seeker. All three statements turned out to be wrong. Until today, there was nothing in the College of Policing's guidance that actually prevented police giving information about the nationality, asylum status or even ethnicity of someone who has been charged. The police are restricted as to what they can say about suspects. But the guidance on media relations – and what would be released to the public – said that if someone was arrested, police should only give the suspect's gender and age. Once a suspect was charged, the guidance said police could give out the suspect's name, date of birth and address. Before 2012, police forces made decisions on what information to give to the media on a purely case-by-case basis, decisions often made depending on the force's relationship with individual journalists and media outlets. But it was Lord Leveson's damning 2012 report into press ethics that prompted police forces to become more cautious because of concerns that releasing the ethnicity of suspects could be used to feed false narratives. Leveson examined testimony from the National Union of Journalists claiming that some national newsrooms openly encouraged racist reporting. One reporter was told by the news editor to 'write a story about Britain being flooded by asylum-seeking bummers', another was told to 'make stories as rightwing as you can' and another was told to go out and find Muslim women to photograph, with the instruction: 'Just fucking do it. Wrap yourself around a group of women in burkas for a photo,' the testimony said. He examined numerous reports including a Daily Star article under the headline 'Asylum seekers eat our donkeys,' which claimed that donkey meat was a speciality in Somalia and eastern Europe and blamed asylum seekers, without any evidence. Leveson concluded that 'when assessed as a whole, the evidence of discriminatory, sensational or unbalanced reporting in relation to ethnic minorities, immigrants and/or asylum seekers, is concerning.' Fast-forward 12 years to Southport, and Merseyside police were left making decisions on whether to release information on the ethnicity and nationality of the killer of three young girls in order to dispel public anger that had spilled on to the streets. Senior officers had to deal with major criminal incidents and took days to dispel social media untruths. Such disinformation was at least partly responsible for last summer's riots. At the time, Merseyside police said they were not giving out more information because of the contempt of court rules. It is hoped that the new guidance will mean police will no longer be left flat-footed when responding to viral social media posts by extremists. Decisions on releasing such information will remain with police forces, with wider legal and ethical considerations also taken into account, the National Police Chiefs' Council said, but verifying a suspect's immigration status is up to the Home Office. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion There is concern among some former police and race campaigners that Cooper's change will undo the restrictions imposed after Leveson and fuel racist sentiments. The former Met chief superintendent Dal Babu has warned of the 'unintended consequences' of the new guidance, which he said could lead to more online speculation in cases where these details are not released. 'The danger is there will be an expectation for police to release information on every single occasion,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. The Home Office insists that it will not be encouraging the release of ethnicity and immigration status in all cases, and there are notable occasions when it has not. But a former race adviser to No 10 told the Guardian: 'Yvette has unwittingly opened a Pandora's box. After every charge, everyone with a union jack on their X bio will demand from the police the ethnicity of the suspect. 'The Home Office is going to to get even more demands for the asylum status of every black or brown suspect. It is going to be chaos, and has handed Nigel Farage another stick to beat Labour with.' There could well be a knock-on effect on mainstream reporting and community relations, campaigners believe. Enny Choudhury, from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: 'Releasing the ethnicity of everyone suspected of serious crimes will do nothing to help victims or secure justice – it will simply fuel mistrust, deepen divisions, and make Black and brown communities more vulnerable to prejudice and harm.'