Kubayi calls for law firms to withdraw their challenge against the Legal Sector Code
Image: Jairus Mmutle / GCIS
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi has urged major law firms to reconsider their legal challenge against the Legal Sector Code aimed at transforming the legal profession.
Responding to oral questions in the National Council of Provinces, Kubayi expressed her disappointment over the ongoing court challenge by Norton Rose Fulbright, AfriForum, and others.
'I raise the issue that if the companies that have taken us to court, such as Norton Rose Fulbright and others, could pull out of court because, to be honest with you, what we have here is an embarrassment 30 years down the line we are still talking about making sure that we can be able to bring those who were previously disadvantaged to the fore to participate,' she said.
Kubayi commented when she was asked whether any government-wide capacity and systems exist to monitor briefing patterns of attorneys or advocates by the state organs on litigations against the State.
In her response, she said her department does not have the government-wide capacity and systems to monitor the briefing and outsourcing of legal work patterns.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'The department monitors the outsourcing and briefing patterns of cases outsourced to private practitioners through the Office of the State Attorneys (OSA) on behalf of the national and provincial spheres of government.'
Kubayi stated that municipalities and state-owned enterprises have their own systems of outsourcing legal work.
'The State Attorney Act, as amended, is silent on whether municipalities and state-owned enterprises are supposed to consume legal services from OSA or not.'
Kubayi explained that former Justice and Constitutional Development minister Ronald Lamola and the Legal Practice Council initiated in 2020 the process for the development of a transformation sector code.
The process was guided by the Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Act, and it culminated in the adoption of the proposed Legal Sector Code in February 2021.
The Legal Sector Code is aimed at transforming the briefing patterns in favour of the previously disadvantaged legal practitioners, and was gazetted on September 20, 2024.
Kubayi said the Legal Sector Code was currently being legally challenged through the courts by the big law firms led by Norton Rose Fulbright.
She further said the Legal Sector Code provided for the establishment of the Legal Sector Code Charter Council (LSCCC) by the Ministry to monitor outsourcing targets for private and public institutions to improve participation of historically disadvantaged practitioners and law firms in the legal sector.
'The briefing patterns for the public and private sectors will be monitored by the LSCCC with the assistance of the Solicitor General's office.'
Kubayi also said it was important to be transparent in the manner they did the briefing patterns but also be accountable because some of the issues touched on corruption where people would want to charge more for services but did not deliver.
'When I met with the law Society of South African and black professionals in the sector, the issue was raised that we have got to be able to hold each other accountable.'
She noted that she got lashed out by ministers complaining that OSA allocated a particular advocate who could not argue their case, and as a result, lost the court case.
'I will do a preparatory meeting or engagement with my colleagues in national government, but another issue is to do a roadshow to provincial executives, sit with them and make them understand why sometimes we have a lot of money that we are spending on litigation when we are not supposed to. That is one of the areas that we need to be working on, and we'll continue to improve on it.'
Kubayi also said one of her tasks was to ensure that black advocates were not only briefed by the state, but were paid on time.
'I still get a lot of people saying, I've done work, 30 days have passed, 60 days have passed, I've not been paid. That's one of the critical areas that is important, because if we do not pay them on time, they will not be able to sustain themselves.'
mayibongwe.maqhina@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Minister Kubayi asserts no executive interference in NPA prosecutions
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi says she has given full support to the National Prosecuting Authority's need for financial and operational independence. Image: Jairus Mmutle / GCIS Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi has reaffirmed the independence of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), asserting that her ministerial oversight does not extend to influence over prosecutorial decisions. 'The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development exercises final responsibility over the NPA. This role is administrative and policy-oriented and does not extend to involvement in or interference with specific prosecutorial decisions,' Kubayi said. She made the statement when she was responding to parliamentary questions posed by EFF MP Rebecca Mohlala. Mohlala posed the parliamentary questions following the recent allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. She wanted to know the measures that were in place to guarantee prosecutorial decisions in politically sensitive cases were free from executive interference and undue political influence. In her reply, Kubayi said the Constitution safeguards the NPA's prosecutorial independence. 'It explicitly states that the NPA must exercise its functions without fear, favour or prejudice, which is reinforced by Section 32 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act, 1998 (Act No. 32 of 1998).' She added that the NPA was accountable to Parliament, including for its decisions regarding the institution of prosecutions. The Constitution also provided safeguards against executive interference as it provided that 'national legislation must ensure that the prosecuting authority exercises its functions without fear, favour or prejudice'. 'The NPA is therefore guided by constitutional and legislative provisions that guarantee its independence,' Kubayi said. The minister stated that she did not possess investigative powers and could not initiate or conduct investigations. However, she confirmed that the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in KwaZulu-Natal has received an enquiry from the SAPS and has dedicated prosecutors to deal with allegations of defeating the administration of justice regarding the disbandment of the Political Killings Task Team. 'The DPP will report to the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP).' Kubayi added that matters referred to the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) were assessed to determine whether or not fell within the IDAC's mandate before a decision was made to investigate. She said there were prescripts that guided the investigations and legal processes that IDAC must follow. 'There are sufficient checks and balances to ensure that there is no interference internal or otherwise. To date there has not been any interference in the matters that IDAC has been dealing with.' Regarding high profile cases, Kubayi said National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shamila Batohi issued directives which require prosecutors in the prosecution of sensitive or contentious nature to inform the DPP concerned in writing about the nature and details of such matters, and the DPP was expected to similarly inform Batohi. The NPA applied the same legal standards and prosecutorial guidelines to all politically sensitive cases. 'Decisions are made based on the sufficiency of evidence, public interest, and the prospects of a successful prosecution. The NPA remains committed to upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability, irrespective of the status or affiliation of those involved,' Kubayi said. Asked about measures to restore the independence, credibility and public trust in the NPA, Kubayi said addressing the NPA's operational and financial independence has been a long-outstanding issue. She also said since Batohi came to office, addressing aspects of the NPA's operational and financial independence has featured as one of the key strategic initiatives, including the NPA to obtain its own Accounting Officer in order to safeguard its financial independence.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Ministers under fire for tardy replies to parliamentary questions
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi as well as her Social Development counterpart Sisisi Tolashe are the latest ministers to find themselves having to explain themselves to MPs why they fail to provide responses to written questions within stipulated timelines. Image: Photographer: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Minister are blaming the long time it takes to compile responses to written parliamentary questions for their delayed responses. This happens as parliamentarians are taking some ministers to task for failing to respond to written questions within the stipulated 10 days and the 10-day additional time. Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi as well as her Social Development counterpart Sisisi Tolashe are the latest to find themselves having to explain themselves to MPs, instead of being reprimanded in the sitting of parliamentary session when found to be on the wrong side of the rules. DA MP Janho Engelbrecht asked Kubayi to provide the reasons for not responding to his questions published on April 25 within the period stipulated by parliamentary rules. In her response, Kubayi said she took her responsibilities and accountability very seriously. 'I am aware of the Rule 145(5) which stipulates that Parliamentary Questions should be responded to within 10 working days. 'I would like to confirm that the reply was submitted to Parliament on 22 May 2025, however, due to the process of sourcing the required information as well ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the response, as a result, the tabling of the said reply was delayed,' she said. ActionSA MP Dereleen James enquired from Tolashe why she provided a reply to her written question only as late as 10 March, which was 12 working days from when the reply should have been provided. James asked whether Tolashe has found that her failure to respond within the stipulated time frame undermined parliamentary accountability and oversight as provided for in the rules of the National Assembly and the provisions of the Constitution. Tolashe said the delay with regards to the James' response was regretted and she apologised. She said the question required very extensive and detailed answers as it dealt with expenditures, to ensure that little or no mistake was committed. 'The nature of the question that the honourable member asked requires that we reconcile different records of all expenditures so that we can give an accurate account. The other issues were that (the) honourable member will realise that most of the officials are still new in the organisation; to recognise the need for asking for an extension while we compile her responses,' she said. This development comes as Parliament published a report of outstanding parliamentary questions for both and written reply on August 1. The report is prepared for submission to Leader of Government Business, Deputy President Paul Mashatile, to take up the non-compliance with affected ministers. It shows that a total of 3,282 written questions were asked as at May 30. At least 323 written questions were not responded to as at August 1.
The South African
4 days ago
- The South African
Thabo Bester to Mkhwanazi: Who is daring DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach?
Two years after being praised for her no-nonsense approach to Thabo Bester's prison escape, Glynnis Breytenbach is now facing criticism over her comments about KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The DA's Spokesperson on Justice and Constitutional Development questioned why the top cop did not bring his grievances before parliament. Last month, Mkhwanazi made headlines after accusing the Minister of Police, Senzo Mchunu, of being involved in a politically-motivated criminal syndicate. The bombshell revelations were made in a media conference. Speaking on the DA's official podcast this week, Glynnis Breytenbach questioned Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's actions last month. She said, 'He comes to the portfolio committee on police once a month. Why didn't he tell them about it? That was the appropriate space to raise it.' Glynnis also questioned Mkhwanazi's attire. She continued: 'To come to a press conference with people in full combat gear with automatic weapons and wearing masks, that looks like a coup loading.' Glynnis is one of 18 MPs who form part of the ad hoc committee established to investigate police corruption claims made by the KZN police commissioner. She added, 'We do look forward to it. It is going to be a very interesting ad hoc committee, and we really hope that we get clarity for South Africans.' On the X platform, Glynnis Breytenbach's comments about Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi were widely refuted. Many retweeted screenshots of clips from the KZN police commissioner's comments in parliament back in March. Others dismissed her claims about Mkhwanazi's approach. Glynnis Breytenbach is a feisty figure in the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services meetings held in parliament. The DA MP and Spokesperson on Justice is well-known for grilling ministers and stakeholders on their lack of accountability. Here is what we know about the smoking, swearing former prosecutor… She's a former NPA prosecutor who accused Richard Mdluli of corruption After almost three decades at the NPA, Glynnis Breytenbach was suspended in 2012 after she went after the head of Police Crime Intelligence. After being re-instated, Glynnis joined the DA in 2014. She's a published author Glynnis Breytenbach penned the memoir Rule Of Law about her experiences as a public prosecutor. The book also examines her views on 'the evolution and importance of an independent judiciary in South Africa.' It explains 'why the rule of law is critical to the foundation and the future of the country.' She survived two assassination attempts In her memoir, Glynnis writes about surviving two hits. That didnt scare her, though. In fact, she even attempted to run over her attacker. An excerpt in her memoir reads: ''What a f**king cheek, I'll drive right over you,' she [Glynnis] thought, and aimed her car at the front bike. 'I floored my car, and I hit him. The other two stopped to help him, and I left the scene'. She's a rebel who doesn't care about public opinion As a teenager, Glynnis Breytenbach claims she drove a motorbike and 'spent practically my entire high school in detention.' She said in her biography: 'I don't give a flying f**k if you like me or you don't like me. I'm not going to change.' Her favourite hobbies are 'swearing and smoking' In her memoir, she said of her vulgar vocab, particularly her favourite word – 'f**k,': 'It's expressive and can be used as an adjective, adverb, noun or verb. Its uses are endless. But I never ever use it in court or in Parliament.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
