The Guardian view on gambling: a public reckoning with the dark side of this highly profitable industry is overdue
In the five years since Michael Dugher, a former Labour MP and shadow culture secretary, became chief executive of the Betting and Gaming Council, the £11.5bn-a-year industry has seen off a Tory white paper that threatened to curb its advertising, and resisted pressure for the higher taxation that many expected last year. Now, with Rachel Reeves reviewing gambling taxes in advance of the autumn budget, and amid growing calls for ministers to be more active in addressing gambling harms, including addiction, the organisation and its supporters are making fresh efforts to influence MPs in their favour.
This week, Gordon Brown threw his weight behind demands for higher taxes to be levied on an 'undertaxed' sector, and for the money to be used to meet the roughly £3bn cost of ditching rules that restrict some benefits to a family's first two children. This is the case also made by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) thinktank, and both it and the former prime minister are right to stress the urgency of child poverty-reducing measures. The linkage between highly profitable gambling businesses, some of which are based offshore, and grim levels of deprivation, is powerful in part because high street gambling premises, including adult gaming centres packed with slot machines, are concentrated in poor areas.
But calls for change are not confined to the political left. The cross-party, pro-market Social Market Foundation also thinks the industry should make a bigger contribution. Like the IPPR, it pinpoints the remote gaming duty levied on online casinos, with an identical recommendation that this should jump from 21% to 50%. Currently, this tax accounts for £1.2bn of the £3.6bn in gambling duties overall (including the national lottery), and the thinktanks are right that targeting this form of gambling would be far more beneficial than the harmonisation of rates that has also been discussed.
Just as alcohol, spirits and beer are taxed differently, sports betting and gambling should continue to be recognised as distinct activities. Simplifying the tax system, which is a motive for harmonisation, cannot be regarded as the most important thing, when gambling affects so many lives in troubling ways.
Taxes aside, the campaign being led by Labour's Andy Burnham in Manchester, and Dawn Butler in London, for councils to have more say over the opening of new gambling premises, is overdue but no less welcome for that. Ministers should change the law so that local politicians have more power over planning in this highly sensitive area.
Used as they are to betting shops on high streets, and football shirts emblazoned with gambling sponsors' logos, many voters are probably unaware that regulation in the UK is strikingly lax, compared with other countries. That is all the more reason for politicians to turn down lobbyists' invitations, and focus instead on the need for a public reckoning with this highly profitable industry's harms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
22 minutes ago
- Wales Online
First small boat migrants detained for return to France under new deal
First small boat migrants detained for return to France under new deal The Government has warned people considering travelling to the UK this way to think again, as they risk being returned and losing the money they pay traffickers The first small boat arrivals have been detained, the Home Office has confirmed (Image: PA) The initial small boat arrivals have been detained for deportation to France under a "groundbreaking" new returns agreement. Detentions started for migrants who reached Kent on Wednesday with those being held anticipated to be sent back within a fortnight. This follows the implementation of a new 'one in one out' agreement with France designed to address perilous crossings. The Government has cautioned individuals contemplating this route to the UK to reconsider, as they face the prospect of being returned whilst forfeiting money paid to traffickers. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper described the initial wave of detentions as an "important step forward". This development follows Keir Starmer's praise of a significant UK-France deal to address Channel small boat crossings. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . Ms Cooper stated: "Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France. "That sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.", reports the Mirror. "No one should be making this illegal and dangerous journey that undermines our border security and lines the pockets of the criminal gangs." The Government maintains that the returns agreement - the first with mainland Europe since Brexit - represents a breakthrough in its efforts to tackle smuggling gangs. The fresh initiative will operate until June of next year initially, with sources indicating that as many as 50 individuals weekly could be sent back - approximately 2,600 annually. In return, those with valid claims to reside in the UK will be permitted to travel from France. Ms Cooper added: "Criminal gangs have spent seven years embedding themselves along our border and it will take time to unravel them, but these detentions are an important step towards undermining their business model and unravelling the false promises they make. "These are the early days for this pilot scheme, and it will develop over time. But we are on track to do what no other government has done since this crisis first started - sending small boat arrivals back to France and strengthening our borders through the Plan for Change." The Home Office declared in a statement: "Border Force, Immigration Enforcement and Home Office officials will continue to work round the clock over the coming weeks to identify and detain individuals under the treaty, and undertake the necessary processes to prepare them for their return to France." According to the arrangement, which was established during a UK-France summit in July, individuals permitted entry to the UK will undergo prior screening to determine whether they might present a security risk. However, these measures have been criticised by human rights organisations, which are urging the Government to create more safe and legal pathways. Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty International UK's refugee and migrant rights director, remarked: "A returns deal with France that makes access to safety in the UK - even for those with close family or connections here - dependent on someone else risking their life to cross the Channel only cements the role of smugglers in how people fleeing war and persecution must seek asylum in the UK. "Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy." Louise Calvey, executive director at Asylum Matters, condemned the move as "yet another attack on the human right to seek sanctuary". She commented: "It's a grubby trade in human lives that will do nothing more than remove people from this country back into the hands of people smugglers. "It will send them back to French shores where they'll face escalating police violence: boats being slashed with families onboard, children being teargassed, violence which we know makes Channel crossings even more dangerous." The Home Office also disclosed on Monday a £100 million enhancement to border security, which includes funding for up to 300 additional National Crime Agency Officers. This investment will also support a trial of the 'one-in, one-out' returns agreement with France. Article continues below
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour homelessness minister resigns
Labour MP Rushanara Ali has tonight resigned as homelessness minister after she allegedly threw out her own tenants and then raised the rent on her London home. She told PM Sir Keir Starmer in her resignation letter that 'it is clear continuing in her role will be a distraction from the ambitious work of the government'. It comes after she had come under mountain pressure to quit following an investigation by the i Paper which claimed she had ejected tenants from one of her homes before putting it back on the market for an extra £700 a month. Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake had called for her resignation earlier today, accusing her of 'staggering hypocrisy'. 'It has been the honour of my life to have played my part in first securing and then serving as part of this Labour Government. You have my continued commitment, loyalty and support,' Ms Ali said. 'Further to recent reporting, I wanted to make it clear that at all times I have followed all relevant legal requirements. I believe I took my responsibilities and duties seriously, and the facts demonstrate this. 'However, it is clear that continuing in my role will be a distraction from the ambitious work of the Government. I have therefore decided to resign from my ministerial position.' Sir Keir thanked Ms Ali in a letter 'for all you have done to deliver this Government's ambitious agenda'. The premier went on to praise her 'diligent work... including your efforts to put in measures to repeal the Vagrancy Act, will have a significant impact'. 'You have also begun the process of delivering landmark reforms including tackling harassment and intimidation in public life and encouraging more people to engage and participate in our democracy. This will leave a lasting legacy,' Sir Keir said. 'I know you will continue to support the Government from the backbenches and represent the best interests of your constituents in Bethnal Green and Stepney.' It comes after a renter claimed Ms Ali had told tenants their lease would not be renewed and gave them four months' notice to get out of the £3,300-a-month property. But just four months after the group's departure, the four-bedroom townhouse, less than a mile from London 's Olympic Park, was reportedly back on the market - only this time for £4,000 per month. A source close to Ms Ali insisted the tenants were offered the chance to stay on a rolling contract prior to the house being put up for sale, after they were told the tenancy would not be renewed. They added the property was relisted only after Ms Ali did not find a buyer, the i Paper reports. But Laura Jackson, a self-employed restaurant owner and one of renters in the property, had a different view. Ms Jackson, 33, claimed she had received an email in November telling her the lease would not be renewed - and that she and the other occupiers had four months to leave. Only weeks later she saw the property back up for rent - with the rent raised by £700 a month. The i said the new tenants confirmed they had moved in 'four or five months ago' and were paying the higher figure. Ms Jackson said: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion.' It comes as Labour's renters' Rights Bill, set to become law next year, prohibits landlords from relisting a property with higher rent until at least six months after tenants have moved out - where they have ended a tenancy in order to sell a property. Ms Ali has also previously spoken out against 'private renters being exploited' and insisted her Government will 'empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases'. The property had been managed on behalf of the Bethnal Green and Stepney MP by two lettings agencies - Jack Barclay Estates and Avenue Lettings. At the time the tenants' contract ended, the firms also attempted to charge the tenants nearly £2,000 for the house to be repainted and £395 for professional cleaning. Landlords are prohibited from charging tenants for professional cleaning or to repaint a home under the Tenant Fees Act 2019, unless there has been serious damage. Minor scratches or scuffs to paint work all come under the umbrella of 'reasonable wear and tear', according to the Act. Ms Jackson described the experience as 'really stressful' and claimed the property was 'not clean when [they] moved in'. But mysteriously, the charges were said to have been dropped when Ms Jackson told the agencies she was aware their landlord was a Labour MP. She said: 'If we hadn't known the charges were unlawful, we would have had to pay them. It's exploitative.'
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reform's Olympic champion mayor goes to war with his staff
An Olympic boxer elected as one of Reform UK's first mayors has become embroiled in a war with his own officials, The Telegraph can disclose. Luke Campbell, who won gold for Team GB at the 2012 Olympics, asked five senior staff at the Hull and East Yorkshire combined authority (HEYCA) to resign last week, amid claims and counter-claims about their performance and his management style. The 37-year-old mayor said staff had been 'blocking' his agenda since he was elected in the region's inaugural mayoral contest in May, while they were working from home and trying to 'get paid a fortune and do as little as possible'. However, Mr Campbell has also faced accusations that he tried to book first-class train tickets on expenses, organised an office move without following official rules and created a 'toxic working environment' for staff. Since the party's historic victory in 12 council areas and two mayoralties in May, Reform's new leaders have found themselves bumping up against so-called woke bureaucracy and red tape. Mr Campbell, who was born in Hull, has become a poster boy for the party's work in local government under the newly created HEYCA. He has said he was sick of Conservative 'lies' and wanted to improve the area where he grew up. But in the past three months, he has said his work has been frustrated by staff seconded to the combined authority from across the UK. Insiders said his 'one-man band' approach had made him unpopular in the office and staff miserable in their jobs. Tensions reached a boiling point on Wednesday when he asked five senior staff to resign after a series of conflicts about following local government protocol. The Telegraph understands that at least three of them had already handed in their notice after clashing with the mayor, and have now been placed on gardening leave. Mr Campbell has now said he will hire young, local people to work for the combined authority, who are 'energetic' and will pursue his policy agenda. His supporters say his swashbuckling approach demonstrates how Reform would work in Whitehall, using Elon Musk-style cost-cutting and a suspicion of red tape. That approach has created tension in the councils where Reform is now in charge. It is claimed that after months of dispute between Mr Campbell and the HEYCA staff, he has created a 'toxic working environment' and the office is 'not a happy place'. A source close to the mayor denied that he had created an unpleasant working environment in Hull, blaming the departing staff for the animosity since May. 'As soon as they don't get their own way, they say it's a toxic working environment,' the source claimed. Going against local government protocol It is understood issues began shortly after Mr Campbell took office when he tried to claim first-class train tickets on expenses, against normal local government protocol. 'There was a mismatch of what he had been used to, and what is allowed,' said one person familiar with the situation. The disagreement prompted a formal review by an independent remuneration panel, which recommended that Mr Campbell should only be allowed to claim for standard class travel unless more expensive trains had been explicitly approved by the finance director. Records of the review show it concluded: 'Value for money is paramount and must be considered when making any claims. 'Any claims which may be considered not value for money, such as first-class travel, must be approved in advance.' Reform denied that Mr Campbell had tried to claim first-class travel. However, it is not disputed that he then took 'huge issue' when staff told him he would not be allowed to hire Jack Anderton, a 23-year-old Reform digital strategist, and Robin Hunter-Clarke, a former Ukip official, as political advisers in his office. Local government rules say those roles are 'politically restricted', barring campaigners or employees of political parties from working as council officials. But a Reform source said the two men were 'the people who advised him for the whole campaign' and should have been allowed to work on HEYCA staff. The Telegraph understands the issue has become a major sticking point between Mr Campbell and the officials in recent months, and that he has suggested creating new roles that would allow him to hire the two men legally. The lack of political staff in his office created a headache for the mayor when he was presented with the White Rose Agreement – a joint statement he had been asked to sign with three Labour mayors in Yorkshire. Mr Campbell originally backed the idea, pledging to work with his Labour counterparts, but withdrew shortly before it was intended to be signed last week after objecting to a reference to net zero. A party source said that opposing net zero was 'pretty much a prerequisite' for a Reform mayor, and that his support for the agreement collapsed at the last moment because the text had not been agreed in advance. War on working from home Like other Reform mayors, Mr Campbell has waged war on staff working from home, which was permitted in interim contracts signed by his officials before he won the mayoralty earlier this year. He demanded all employees return to the office five days a week, leading to at least two resignations from officials who lived on the other side of the country and stayed in an East Yorkshire hotel for three days a week to attend meetings in the office. 'He has been frustrated with the pace of the public sector, and with policy officials from the council,' said one insider, adding that after arriving in local government from the outside, Mr Campbell had 'a lot of catching up to do'. According to those familiar with the situation, the tipping point came in the last month when Mr Campbell decided to find a new office building to replace the temporary arrangement used by HEYCA since it was established. He decided that the team should move into 2 Humber Quays, a modern office block on the banks of the Humber with panoramic views of the river and city, and told officials that he had negotiated a 'discount' with the owner. But staff hit back, telling him that he had not completed the relevant paperwork for his idea, and suggested that the team should move into a cheaper former council building. 'Someone said to him, 'You can't do that, you need to do a feasibility study and report, and find out why other offices aren't suitable',' said one source. 'He does get frustrated,' they said. 'He's come from a completely different world.' Sources close to Mr Campbell said he was furious that his plan had been blocked, and that he intended to go ahead with the move now that some officials had left the organisation. 'If the man who has been elected with a huge mandate wants to do something, he should be allowed to do it,' the source said. Mr Campbell told The Telegraph it was the staff, not the bureaucracy of local government, that was to blame for the issues at HEYCA over the last three months. 'It didn't feel like they were doing the job I wanted them to do, and I didn't feel like they were doing a good enough job,' he said. 'They don't know the region and didn't put any effort in, thus blocking my agenda. The rest of the team I've got a fantastic relationship with. 'It's only these civil servants that are coming in from all over the country that think they can run the show, get paid a fortune and do as little as possible that I have an issue with.'
