US House poised to send stablecoin bill to Trump after 'crypto week' drama
House lawmakers in Washington were due to convene on Thursday afternoon to consider passing the stablecoin bill and another that would develop a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies more broadly.
The stablecoin measure, which has already been agreed to in the Senate, is expected to pass and move on to be signed by President Donald Trump as soon as Friday.
That would be a major victory for the digital assets industry, marking the first major crypto law enacted in the United States and paving the way for greater integration of crypto into traditional financial markets.
Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds.
They have gained much momentum in recent years, offering faster and cheaper transaction costs than moving money through a bank. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say they could be used to send payments instantly.
The week's negotiations to consider the legislation - dubbed "crypto week" by Republican lawmakers - ran into unexpected hurdles after some conservative hold-outs voted against considering the measures. Trump huddled with skeptics at the White House on Tuesday to try to save the initiative.
Even after Trump announced an agreement, it still took about nine hours for the bills to clear key procedural hurdles late on Wednesday as private talks continued.
In negotiations that went late into Wednesday evening, lawmakers decided to include language to prohibit the United States from issuing a central bank digital currency in an unrelated defense spending bill as a compromise to conservatives who strongly supported the ban.
The anti-central bank currency bill had become a sticking point for conservative Republicans.
While central banks in some nations have explored issuing their own digital currencies, the topic has been met with quick resistance in the United States from conservative Republicans, who argue it could allow the government to monitor Americans' spending.
The Fed has studied the issue, but Chairman Jerome Powell has said that the central bank would never pursue one absent explicit approval from Congress.
House lawmakers have said they are aiming to vote on all three crypto measures later in the day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
19 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Will Indonesia regret its trade deal with Trump?
JAKARTA: Be careful what you wish for, lest it come true. That ancient proverb comes to mind when considering the eagerness of America's trade partners around the world to negotiate deals with United States President Donald Trump's administration. Four countries already have, with Indonesia the latest to do so – and possibly the first to regret it. The United States has announced a complex, tiered tariff regime, including a 25 per cent tariff on labour-intensive goods such as textiles and footwear, a 40 per cent tariff on goods suspected of being 'trans-shipped' or having content of Chinese origin, and a 50 per cent tariff on so-called 'strategic sectors', including aluminum, copper, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. An additional 10 per cent levy applies to exports from BRICS countries (including Indonesia). Countries might also face anti-dumping duties, which are often steep, politically driven and inconsistently applied. While these measures hurt US importers and consumers the most, they also significantly heighten uncertainty for exporters. By guaranteeing that Indonesia will not face tariffs exceeding 19 per cent on its exports to the US through 2029, its new agreement with the US seems to mitigate this uncertainty, providing a level of protection against Trump's tariff escalations. Indonesia can now rest assured that it will not face the kinds of extreme tariffs to which China has been subjected. A DEAL THAT REDUCES LOSSES WITHOUT DELIVERING GAINS Indonesia's government argues that such a deal was essential, because even though the US accounts for only 9.9 per cent of Indonesia's total exports, the trade relationship is disproportionately important. Indonesian exports to the US – including apparel, footwear, furniture, rubber products and integrated circuits – are labour-intensive, they note, and thus support a substantial number of jobs. But these sectors may remain vulnerable to higher tariffs. As it stands, it is not clear whether the 19 per cent cap applies to all Indonesian exports, or if some products – particularly those containing Chinese inputs – could still be subject to steeper duties. In any case, 19 per cent tariffs are very burdensome, and Indonesia has also agreed to impose no tariffs on US goods. At best, the deal reduces losses; it does not deliver gains. Moreover, to secure this dubious victory, Indonesia reportedly agreed to purchase 50 Boeing aircraft and commit to importing US$15 billion worth of US energy products (nearly 40 per cent of Indonesia's total energy imports) and US$4.5 billion worth of American agricultural products. But many important questions remain unanswered. How will these purchases be financed, and on what terms? What are the specifications, unit costs and delivery timelines? Who will oversee procurement, and how will transparency be ensured? Most important, if these exchanges are merely political gestures, they could turn out to be economically damaging. The use of jets from Boeing, which has faced a string of quality and safety scandals in recent years, could create considerable risks for Indonesia's airlines. And imports of US agricultural goods risk undercutting local farmers and breaching commitments to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as other trade agreements. IMPACT ON INDONESIA'S TRADE RELATIONS The deal might affect Indonesia's trade relationships in other ways. Indonesia has concluded comprehensive trade agreements with several major partners, including Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea. It is close to finalising one with the European Union, and it recently launched negotiations with the United Arab Emirates. If US firms are granted preferential treatment and zero-tariff market access, these partners might question Indonesia's commitment to fair competition – or demand comparable terms. Beyond trade, the agreement risks eroding Indonesia's carefully maintained strategic neutrality. Indonesia has long sought to balance its relationships with the US and China, but this deal could be seen as a lurch toward the US, exposing the country to escalating pressure to choose a side. As Indonesia becomes increasingly politically entangled with one giant – with far-reaching economic and strategic consequences – it is at risk of becoming economically dependent on the other. Over the past decade, Indonesia's trade with China has more than doubled, reflecting deepening economic ties. While Indonesia exports mostly commodities and processed metals to China – especially nickel, iron and steel, mineral fuels and vegetable oils – it imports high-value machinery, electrical equipment, vehicles and plastics from the country. In the face of challenging trade relations with the world's two mightiest powers, Indonesia's government deserves credit for seeking trade assurances. But the deal that it secured with the US lacks clarity, transparency, mutuality, and strategic vision. As a result, it may turn out to be largely symbolic, bringing only a slight reduction in short-term costs. In the long term, it might prove economically and even geopolitically damaging. AVOIDING DEPENDENCE ON A SINGLE PARTNER Three urgent steps can help prevent this outcome. First, Indonesia's government must demand full clarity from the US on the 19 per cent tariff cap: Are all its exports shielded from Trump's sector-specific classifications, or is the real cost of the deal hidden in the fine print? Second, the authorities should publish the full details of their procurement commitments, particularly the purchase of Boeing aircraft and US agricultural and energy products, so that these commitments' financial implications and strategic value can be assessed. Finally, Indonesia must reaffirm a long-term trade strategy anchored in diversification, rules-based agreements, and regional leadership. Above all, it needs a strategy that avoids excessive dependence on any single partner and preserves its autonomy in an increasingly polarised global economy. Only then can Indonesia ensure that a handshake in Washington does not become a handcuff at home.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Texas Instruments third-quarter profit forecast disappoints; shares fall
Texas Instruments forecast third-quarter profit just shy of Wall Street estimates on Tuesday, as the analog chipmaker invests heavily in boosting capacity, while navigating a global trade war, sending its shares down 8 per cent in extended trading. TI's latest outlook adds to concerns over the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policy on semiconductor companies. The company expects quarterly earnings between $1.36 per share and $1.60 per share, the midpoint of which was below the estimates of $1.49 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. TI has made big investments to expand its capacity for cost-effective 300-millimeter wafer manufacturing technology. It also plans to spend more than $60 billion to expand its U.S. manufacturing footprint, as it ramps up domestic production amid pressure from the Trump administration to localize the semiconductor supply chain. TI's capital expenditures in the June quarter stood at $1.31 billion, up more than 22 per cent from the year-ago period. The company is the first among major U.S. chipmakers to report earnings for the June quarter, making its results closely watched. It is also hailed as a demand indicator for various industries, given the widespread use of its chips. It expects revenue in the range of $4.45 billion to $4.80 billion for the third quarter, compared with analysts' average estimate of $4.59 billion. It reported sales of $4.45 billion for the second quarter, beating estimates of $4.36 billion.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
PNC taps Coinbase to create crypto trading offering for bank customers
PNC Bank is working with cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase to offer crypto trading to the bank's customers, the companies said on Tuesday, in a sign that crypto is moving toward becoming increasingly interconnected to mainstream finance. PNC will use Coinbase's institutional "crypto-as-a-service" platform to develop an offering that will allow PNC clients to buy, hold and sell cryptocurrencies. The Pittsburgh-based financial institution will also offer certain banking services to Coinbase. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The PNC-Coinbase partnership is a stark shift for the banking sector, which crypto companies at one point had accused of being hostile to their industry. Lawmakers earlier this year held a hearing to scrutinize U.S. banks and their regulators in response to claims they deny services to particular industries. Republicans and Democrats agreed that banks may be improperly denying services to some clients, but disagreed on the root cause. The banking industry has fiercely resisted accusations it denies services based on ideological reasons. It has instead argued that onerous, outdated and opaque rules make it difficult for banks to sometimes provide services, or explain why they cannot. CONTEXT The partnership announcement comes as U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration have embraced cryptocurrencies and enacted industry-friendly policies. Trump signed a law on Friday to create a regulatory regime for dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies known as stablecoins, a major milestone for the digital asset sector, which has long lobbied for such a framework. Several banks including Bank of America and Citibank have said that they are exploring issuing their own stablecoins.
