The law is deeply flawed when a retailer who asks a customer for ID can be sued for defamation
So far, this deeply flawed Bill has sailed through the Dáil and Seanad, unperturbed by anything other than a few TDs and senators mourning the ending of jury trials for defamation.
The fact that the vast majority of defamation litigation takes place in the Circuit Court without juries has so far escaped notice in the Oireachtas.
So has the fact that Ireland has a higher number of defamation cases than England and Wales combined. In 2023, courts in England and Wales handled 250 defamation cases; Ireland had 360. That means Ireland has a defamation litigation rate 19 times higher than England and Wales on a per-capita basis. This is because our laws encourage litigation, not resolution.
READ MORE
Retailers, in particular, are being hit hard. Did you know that asking a customer at an off-licence for ID can be framed as a defamatory statement? Or asking for a till receipt? Or quietly refusing to accept a €50 that failed a counterfeit check? All have resulted in legal actions.
This is 'retail defamation': situations where businesses are sued (or threatened with being sued) for doing nothing more than protecting their stock or enforcing their legal obligations. The allegations are often minor, exaggerated, manufactured or plainly unfounded.
The cost of fighting them in court is so high that many businesses choose to settle, even when they have done nothing wrong. On legal advice, many retailers now operate a 'no challenge' policy toward suspected shoplifters because it is far cheaper to let them steal than it is to defend a defamation action.
[
Proposed defamation law reforms fall short of addressing free-speech concerns, say campaigners
]
One major Irish grocery operator budgets losses through theft amounting to between €70,000 and €90,000 annually for each of its convenience stores and between €120,000 and €140,000 for its supermarkets.
There is another example where a licensed premises successfully defended a defamation claim in the Circuit Court, only to face a threat of a High Court appeal unless they agreed to cover the plaintiff's legal costs. The business ultimately had to pay €3,000 in the settlement and absorb €12,375 in legal fees, with a subsequent rise in their insurance premium. This case underscores how the system incentivises legal threats against SMEs, regardless of merit.
The original General Scheme for amendment in 2023 promised to introduce a defence of 'transient retail defamation', a common-sense measure to protect retailers, pharmacists, hospitality workers and others dealing with the public.
That protection has been quietly dropped in this Bill. Instead, the Government now points to an expanded 'qualified privilege' defence, which already exists under the 2009 Act. It is already successfully used by retailers to defend these claims, but these are immediately appealed to the High Court. Retailers are still being threatened. Insurance costs are still climbing. And the legal threats keep coming.
Worse still, the Bill does not include a harm test to prevent frivolous cases. This is not reform. It is retreat.
Some people have framed this Bill as an assault on the right to a good name, but it is an attempt to rebalance competing constitutional rights. Unfortunately, the attempt falls far short of what is expected by the
European Court of Human Rights
. Both Article 40 of the Constitution and Article 10 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
(ECHR) protect freedom of expression. That right is more honoured in the breach than the observance in Ireland.
Why the Irish media has been so quiescent on this issue is a mystery. The International Press Institute published a report in 2023 called
Ireland: how the wealthy and powerful abuse legal system to silence reporting
. It detailed 19 cases of Slapp (strategic litigation against public participation) lawsuits referred to it by various parties. It could not identify plaintiffs of course; to do so would be viewed as defamatory in Ireland. To suggest that a defamation plaintiff is engaged in a Slapp suit in Ireland is ... defamatory.
The
Irish Small and Medium Enterprise
association
(
ISME), retail representative group RGDATA and the Index on Censorship have made direct appeals to senators to amend the Bill. Thirty bodies and civil society organisations, including the
National Union of Journalists
,
RTÉ
and the
Irish Council for Civil Liberties
have also called for amendment of this Bill. It is objectively not fit for purpose as legislation intended to address the legal and constitutional shortcomings in the Defamation Act.
ISME has made it very clear to TDs and senators that this Bill falls drastically short of what is required to stop abusive defamation litigation. We have tried to compromise and have sent senators proposals for just two amendments: one on the definition of defamation and the other on the capping of damages. Even these will not close the gaps which the EU Anti-Slapp Directive requires Ireland to address no later than May 2026.
This Bill will not vindicate freedom of expression.
EU
justice commissioner
Michael McGrath
last week described freedom of expression as 'sacrosanct'. If this flawed amendment is enacted, we will be forced to take the matter to the
European Commission's
Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers on Article 10 grounds under the ECHR.
However, we hope that the prime motivator for the Seanad this week is not the threat of referral of the State to the European Commission. Rather, we would like to think our legislators' greater motivation would come from their desire to ensure citizens' rights granted by the 1937 Constitution.
Over to you, Seanad Éireann.
Neil McDonnell is chief executive of ISME, the Irish Small and Medium Enterprise association
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EU-US trade deal: Ireland ‘no doubt' in challenging position over tariffs, says Minister
There is 'no doubt' that Ireland is in a challenging position in relation to tariffs but the recently announced agreement does bring 'some clarity', the Minister for Enterprise has said. Peter Burke said the deal reached on Sunday, which will lock in tariffs of 15 per cent on most EU imports to the US , had avoided a 'direct trade war'. Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland on Monday, Mr Burke said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs, which would have been 'significant', while the Government is awaiting more details to emerge. The final terms of the deal were worked out during a meeting between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday. READ MORE The accord effectively sees the EU accepting import taxes of 15 per cent on most of its huge volume of trade with the US. The two sides agreed that no tariffs would be charged on imports of aircraft, certain chemicals and some agri-food goods, though the finer details of what agricultural products will benefit from these exemptions are still to be worked out. [ EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it Opens in new window ] Mr Burke said there would be a number of 'carveouts' for particular sectors such as aviation, agri-foods and spirits. He said the Government was concerned about the 'stacking mechanism', which refers to the cumulative effect of multiple tariffs applied to the same imported product. 'All of those areas have been called out for separate carveouts, so we have to see what that will look like and what will that amount to on paper, and that's where the devil is going to be in the detail,' he said. 'But the critical thing is that at all costs we have to avoid escalation because it would be devastating in terms of the impact because the scale of the market is so huge.' The Fine Gael TD said the Government had been 'very clear that tariffs are bad'. 'They constrain supply, they drive prices up. They're not good for the US economy, or indeed for the Irish economy,' he said. 'Ireland's position is very clear – we always favour an open, rules-based fair trade at every hand's turn. When you have the talk of tariffs and a deal like this, it is going to be challenging, and I think we have to be very honest about that.' [ EU-US trade deal represents 'substantial burden' for Irish businesses Opens in new window ] The deal includes EU commitments to purchase set amounts of US oil, nuclear power and liquefied natural gas annually. In terms of Ireland buying US oil or gas, Mr Burke said he was not aware of it at this point in time but could not 'give a definitive answer'. Mr Burke added that a deal between China and the US had yet to happen, which would affect Irish exports and they would also have to see what separate carveouts will emerge. 'Until we get flesh on the bones in all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what the budgetary parameters will end up with.' He also said he and the Government remained committed to cutting the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent and that it was in the programme for government, which had been agreed by all parties.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Paul Coulson to get €108m payment from Ardagh creditors to cede control of group
Irish financier Paul Coulson has agreed to cede entire control of Ardagh Group , the glass bottles and drink cans giant he built up over the past 25 years, to a group of its bondholders in exchange for a share of a $300 million (€257 million) pay-off. The company at the top of Ardagh Group corporate tree has an estimated $12.5 billion of debt, which became unsustainable after its earnings were hit since the Covid-19 pandemic by inflation, soaring interest rates, and soft consumer demand on both sides of the Atlantic. Ardagh Group's customers range from Coca-Cola and Heineken to Swiss group Nestlé. Mr Coulson (73) effectively has a 36 per cent stake in the business, with the rest largely in the hands of management and a group of small investors that date back to Ardagh's previous existence on the Dublin stock market. On that basis, he will end up with a €108 million payment to walk away from the business. READ MORE The major debt restructuring will see senior unsecured bondholders and holders of high-risk payment-in-kind notes swap $4.2 billion of debt for equity in Ardagh Group. The senior unsecured creditors will end up with 92.5 per cent of the equity in the group, and holders of the PIK Notes will hold 7.5 per cent. [ Meet Paul 'the Cooler' Coulson: One of the godfathers of leveraged finance Opens in new window ] 'Ardagh Group is pleased to have achieved this significant milestone in agreeing a comprehensive recapitalisation transaction with its key financial stakeholders,' said group chairman Herman Troskie. 'The transaction will preserve the group's ownership of its glass and metal packaging businesses and puts in place a sustainable capital structure, with significantly lower leverage and an enhanced maturity profile. Together with the injection of new capital, Ardagh will be well-placed to deliver our business plan in partnership with our future shareholders.' Mr Coulson entered the glass bottle business in 1998 by buying an initial stake and taking over as chairman of the Irish Glass Bottle Company, which traces its roots back to 1932. After renaming the company Ardagh, he orchestrated a series of overseas acquisitions, fuelled by high-cost debt raised on the international junk-bond market, that would create one of the world's largest packaging groups with annual sales of more than $9 billion. The original bottle-making factory in Ringsend in Dublin was closed in the process, in 2002. Mr Coulson controls Ardagh through an 18.8 per cent direct stake in its ultimate parent company and a 52.4 per cent interest in a vehicle called Yeoman Capital, which owns 33.9 per cent of the group. He effectively owns 36.6 per cent of the equity. The $300 million Mr Coulson and the other investors will share is a fraction of Ardagh Group's market valuation. In 2021, it peaked at almost $6.7 billion. That valued the businessman's holding at about $2.4 billion. Ardagh Group was delisted later that year, after it decided to float its drink cans unit, Ardagh Metal Packaging (AMP). Mr Coulson stepped down as chairman of the group in late 2023, but remained a director and its major shareholder. Still, long-term investors in the group made handsome returns over the years as Ardagh Group distributed hundreds of millions of euros, often funded by the issuance of debt. While earnings have improved significantly in recent quarters in AMP as customers increasingly favour aluminium cans over glass and plastic packaging, the bottle-making business has remained under pressure. AMP's chief executive, Oliver Graham, signalled in April that the business had 'turned a corner', helped by a rebound in demand for energy drinks, sparkling water and health segments. AMP reported on Thursday that its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) rose 18 per cent in the second quarter to $210 million. The company upgraded its full-year earnings forecast for a second time and now sees Ebitda rising to $705 million-$725 million from $672 million for 2024. It had started out the year predicting that earnings would fall between $675 million and $695 million. Ardagh Group typically reports results on the same day as AMP. However, it held off on publishing its figures as the debt restructuring talks reached a pivotal stage.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Echelon in joint venture deal with Spain's Iberdrola
Ireland-based data centre operator Echelon and Europe's largest utility Iberdrola are creating a joint venture to develop and operate data centres in Spain. Iberdrola sees booming demand for data centres as one of the main drivers of future growth both for its grids and renewable energy businesses. With developments like artificial intelligence and cloud computing expected to increase demand for data centre capacity, companies like Iberdrola can benefit both from selling them energy and connecting them to the grid. Echelon will hold an 80% stake in the joint venture, handling permitting, design, marketing and day-to-day management of data centres. The Spanish firm will have the remaining 20% stake, providing energy and land connected to the grid. The joint venture already has a project in the pipeline - Madrid South - a 160,000 square meters complex with a data processing capacity of 144 megawatts. It has already secured a 230 MW electricity connection. Expected to be operational by 2030, its 1 terawatt hour demand will be covered by a planned solar plant and additional green energy supplied by Iberdrola. Iberdrola already supplies 11 TWh of energy to data centres in countries such as Spain, Britain, the US and Germany. Last year, it created a data centre unit, CPD4Green, and had been seeking a partner. "The alliance signed with Echelon will allow us to value our portfolio of sites with access to electricity connection and our ability to offer these infrastructures secure, clean and competitive energy 24 hours a day, 365 days a year," said David Mesonero Molina, corporate development director of Iberdrola. With the deal, Echelon Data Centres - whose major shareholder is private investment firm Starwood Capital Group - achieves its strategic goal to enter the Spanish market, Chief Investment Officer David Smith said. "Entering the Spanish data centre market has been a strategic goal for Echelon for several years. Spain has material benefits as a market for our customers; a supportive regulatory and policy environment, high quality talent from both a construction and operational perspective and access to some of Europe's lowest price renewable energy, in scale," he said. "Our partner, Iberdrola, is a world leader in building and operating generation assets and we are delighted to have this opportunity to partner together to deliver critical infrastructure for our customers," he added.
