Harry Potter actors snapped on set as they start filming for new HBO series
Hold on to your cloaks; the HBO series of Harry Potter is one step closer to being on our screens as the cast have been snapped on the set of the TV adaption of the hugely popular book and movie series.
The cast for the upcoming show, set in the Wizarding World, have began filming on set to adapt JK Rowling's hugely popular novels to the small screen. Much of the cast has been revealed, as Dominic McLaughlin will star as the Boy Who Lived while joining him are Alastair Stout as the loyal sidekick Ron Weasley and Arabella Stanton, set to portray the brilliantly brainy Hermione Granger.
And now the cast have been photographed on the set, getting ready before the cameras start rolling. The show's star, Dominic, 11, was seen wearing a blue hooded jumper and a pair of round glasses – an accessory that has become synonymous with Harry Potter – as he filmed alongside the actors taking on the role as The Dursleys.
Meanwhile, spoiled Dudley Dursley actor Amos Kitson was snapped wearing a shell suit jacket with cropped, wide sleeves which he matched with a pair of grey shell suit trousers with a blue stripe down the side. The actor posed for a photo taken on an iPad by a crew member, as Amos was seen giving the camera a grumpy expression as he appeared to get into character.
Elsewhere on set, Uncle Vernon actor Daniel Rigby was seen having Vernon's signature moustache tended to by a makeup artist as he sported a pair of 1980s style bifocal glasses for the character.
Meanwhile, actress Bel Powley was seen in costume as she takes on the role of Aunt Petunia in the new TV adaption.
The actors were filming scenes at London Zoo for the series, in the very first on-set pictures of the highly anticipated, upcoming programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Cancel culture strikes again for Love Island contestants - but does it really work?
Being 'cancelled' has become a public ritual - but is it truly fair to punish people for their past mistakes? We explore cancel culture, public accountability and what it means to be 'forgotten' in digital form Being ' cancelled ' has almost become the norm for those in the public eye. From musicians and influencers to even politicians, very few manage to escape unscathed once old tweets and controversial comments resurface - leading to job losses or a decline in fans, no matter how long ago they were made or how much they claim to have grown since. In the past few weeks, Love Island contestants have found themselves in the firing line over derogatory and racist comments. First it was Yulissa Escobar, kicked off the US version of the show just two days after a video of her using the N‑word resurfaced online. Then fellow contestant came Cierra Ortega was removed from the show after an old picture surfaced showing her using a slur. Back in the UK, old tweets by contestant Helena Ford recently came to light, including one from over 10 years ago, which read: 'All I can hear are these f**king foreign dickheads.' Viewers have called for ITV to remove her, yet she remains in the villa. But it's not just about reality TV contestants. For many, cancel culture has become both a tool of accountability and a source of conflict - one that millions actively participate in online, even as they question whether it's gone too far. Is cancel culturejustifiable? Many believe cancel culture is a recent phenomenon, with some even dismissing it as a symptom of an overly 'sensitive' generation. But the idea of ostracizing someone for bad behaviour has been around for decades, going back as far as the 1990s. The phrase 'cancel culture,' however, gained mainstream traction in the mid‑2010s, particularly with the rise of the #MeToo movement in 2017, which brought a surge in public accountability for sexual harassment and assault. In a 2024 study published in Acta Psychological, researchers Cheselle Jan L. Roldan, Ardvic Kester S. Ong and Dhonn Q. Tomas explored how Gen Z engage with cancel culture. 'Cancel culture places a spotlight on issues, such as sexism, racism, and abuse, that may push or encourage people to become informed on the gravity and nuances of the issue itself,' they observed. But they also warned that 'cancel culture easily becomes a slippery slope towards cyberbullying, especially for teens, as the act may narrow down the path to empathy and forgiveness towards the errant individual or organisation.' Does cancel culture work? While cancel culture aims to hold people accountable for harm, it doesn't always achieve its intended outcome - particularly when individuals have wealth, powerful fan bases, or iconic brands behind them. Take J.K. Rowling, who faced backlash for her views on transgender people. Yet the Harry Potter franchise continues to generate significant revenue. Rowling is even working on the new TV adaption of the popular series. And sometimes, fans choose to separate the art from the artist entirely refusing to give up what someone's work means to them, regardless of their personal views. The internet does forget As much as we're told 'the internet never forgets,' that isn't entirely true. Under UK GDPR law, individuals actually have a right to be forgotten, also known as the right to erasure, this provision allows people to request the removal of their personal data under certain circumstances. Cancel culture will likely always spark debate. Every situation is different - but can we truly hold someone accountable for a mistake they made as a child? And how do we tell the difference between a mistake and someone's true character?
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
What is the point of Emma Watson?
I've been musing recently how people in the public eye can go 'downhill' in two main ways. One can make big, brash, 'bad' decisions, ignore well-meaning advice and render oneself an outlaw well into old age, unacceptable in polite company and rejected by one's more pusillanimous peers. There's a kind of tattered glory in this, knowing that you didn't toe the line (you were too busy snorting them) because you had talent to burn. Even if you do eventually find yourself on the ropes, you'll always have the satisfaction of knowing that you inspired a whole bunch of youngsters and were remembered by a whole bunch of oldsters – something which line-toers are highly unlikely to do. Or you can get lucky big time, on a bit of fluke fortune, and spend the rest of your career toeing the exact line that the bold minority have turned their back on. But eventually someone will say 'X hasn't done much recently!' – and all those years of bowing to convention will count as nothing as other people in your profession, but without your head-start, overtake you. And then you might think: 'Sod it – I'm going to take a risk because I'm worth it!' And then you get pulled over on a speeding charge. Of all the showbiz has-beens this has happened to, the report this week that the ray of sunshine Emma Watson was in hot water filled me with glee. The Harry Potter actress – who played Hermione Granger in the films – was banned from driving for six months, after she was caught speeding. Watson – who already had nine points on her licence – was collared for driving her Audi at 38mph in a 30mph zone in Oxford last year. The 35-year-old, now – still! – a student, was made to pay a total of £1,044 at High Wycombe Magistrates' Court on Wednesday. Her lawyer told the court: 'She is in a position to pay the fine.' The last line may be the understatement of the century. Watson is thought to have a net worth of around £65 million, most of which one imagines was garnered from the decade between 2001 and 2011, when she was busy pretending to be a witch. In the years since, Watson has been busy – not least earning her status as a high-ranking Transmaid who, alongside the child 'stars' who played her wizard pals Harry and Ron Weasley, attempted to throw JK Rowling under the bus (folly, as she's made of titanium). One wonders if Watson missed a trick in court this week by not deploying her views on gender – that 'trans people are who they say they are' – to shape her defence. Did it cross her mind to put in a plea that she identifies as someone who doesn't drive badly? Still, I suppose that her dirty driving licence tells its own tale, like the time her Audi was towed away last year in Stratford-upon-Avon after she blocked a car park and ignored a 'no parking' sign to visit a pub. Watson is just the latest example of 'the Wokescreen' – a dichotomy which occurs when famous people who identify as Good do Naughty Things but, one feels, expect to be let off as they've proved how wonderful they are by mouthing the liberal establishment truisms about everything from trans to Trump. Thus Watson can serve as a UN Women Goodwill Ambassador while taking a pop at Rowling – the woman who ultimately she should be thanking for bringing her fame and fortune. Rowling must have enjoyed responding to Bungle (Emma Watson), Zippy (Daniel Radcliffe) and George (Rupert Grint) last year after the publication of the Cass review, which called into question the trans orthodoxy and medical intervention on matters of gender. One social media wag replied to Rowling after the report was published to say: 'Just waiting for Dan and Emma to give you a very public apology… safe in the knowledge that you will forgive them…' 'Not safe, I'm afraid,' replied Rowling. How typical that Watson was the public face of the embarrassingly-named 'HeForShe' movement, which seeks to promote gender equality but, to me, appears to centre men at the core of feminism. Haven't we had enough of that? Watson is also the environmental 'activist' who launched a fashion line with Alberta Ferretti, whose dresses cost thousands of pounds; the teetotaller who launched a gin line where bottles go for £40; and the feminist 'role model' who poses in revealing outfits on magazine front covers. It's handy that Watson had all these irons in the fire, as since she finished the Potter films, her acting has hardly set the world on fire. She featured in Beauty and the Beast, The Bling Ring and The Perks of Being a Wallflower; her last role was in the 2019 remake of Little Women. To be fair, she felt the need to return to her studies. Perhaps she figured out that a woman like her with a sky-high IQ owed it to the world to share her wisdom and her words, which were certainly of more worth than those state-schooled idiots who got lucky writing about boy wizards. Like many a thespian these days, Watson is from a wealthy background; a scion of the private prep Dragon School in Oxford (fees £28,000 a year) which coincidentally 'blessed' us with all the male leads in BBC One's 2016 smash The Night Manager – Hugh Laurie, Tom Hiddleston and Tom Hollander. Now much older, if not necessarily wiser (nine points on that licence, remember!), Watson is back in Oxford studying for a master's degree in creative writing. This year, she announced that she'd be sticking around for a PhD. Joy! I'd love to see some of Watson's writing – and I say that in a caring way – because she has always struck me as one of those clunkers who, for their own good and our own sanity, should be dissuaded from speaking unless reading from a script. I can't imagine what she'd sound like reading from a script of her own; it really does sound like the thespian equivalent of some kind of End Of Days portent. On the other hand, I doubt that Watson could ever return to acting. The striking thing about the Harry Potter movies is how uniformly bad the acting of the lead children was in contrast to how good the adult actors were. This is odd as child actors usually steal every scene. Yet I've seen totem poles less wooden than Watson and Radcliffe. There are some little girls who really do go through life hamming it up like terrible actors; it's clear from the books that Hermione Grainger was one of them. In the first couple of films, it's genuinely impossible to tell whether Watson is giving a pitch-perfect performance as a girl who acts like she can't act, or whether she just can't act; it was only her failure to grow out of it that gave the game away. You can see that some child stars, from Judy Garland to Lindsay Lohan, were natural stand-outs from the start. But look at the young Radcliffe and Watson and tell me with a straight face that they had STAR QUALITY stamped on them; I've seen pairs of twice-used teabags with more charisma. Is it perhaps partly the knowledge of how purely lucky they were which causes these repeated jibes at the woman who made their lovely lives possible? The next decade won't be an easy one for Watson; the new HBO adaptation of the Harry Potter books is currently in production, featuring 11-year-old Arabella Stanton as Hermione. Though I can't comment on her acting skills, photographs show a child who appears to have what it's hard not to call 'star quality', in contrast with the rather dull look Watson had even when young. It's a fact of life that many established actresses (and actors) are not the best at their alleged craft, but they usually have some redeeming feature, such as being very good-looking or notoriously witty on chat shows; Watson has none. You probably won't have heard of Geraldine Dvorak, but she was Garbo's stand-in, once described as having 'whatever it is Garbo has except that one thing Garbo has.' That's what I think of when I see Watson; she'd have made a really good stand-in. Instead, promoted far above her abilities thanks to a kind woman who gave her the benefit of the doubt, I think it's fair to say that we will remember Emma Watson as someone who was a very bad driver – and a very bad judge of her own abilities, whether behind the wheel of a car, or a career.
Scottish Sun
13 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Harry Potter star Emma Watson's ‘stalker' kicked out of Britain after cops dropped the probe
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HARRY Potter star Emma Watson's suspected stalker has been kicked out of Britain — as police dropped their probe. Chad Michael Busto was arrested last year for demanding to see her. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Emma Watson's suspected stalker has been kicked out of Britain Credit: Getty 3 Chad Michael Busto was arrested last year for demanding to see Harry Potter star Emma The American, 45, said he had been asking around Oxford University, where she is studying creative writing, to 'connect' with the actress. He was released under investigation but Thames Valley Police have now confirmed they have dropped the probe 'with no further action taken.' Sources also said Busto was no longer in the UK. After his arrest in June 2024, Busto was taken to Colnbrook Immigration Centre, near Heathrow. He told us at the time: 'I visited the English department. I went to the main admissions centre trying to gain information.' In 2023, Busto was arrested for barging into a New York fashion show dressing room and yelling he wanted to marry Emma. He was previously arrested for allegedly stalking actress Drew Barrymore. A Home Office spokesman said yesterday: 'While it remains our policy not to comment on individual cases, this Government has taken swift and decisive action to remove failed asylum seekers, foreign national offenders and other immigration offenders who have no legal right to remain in Britain.' Emma, 35, was this week handed a driving ban for speeding. The star was banned from driving for six months after being caught speeding in her £30k Audi. Emma Watson is BANNED from driving after speeding in £30k Audi
