Ukraine war briefing: Putin stays home and fires a general instead of peace talks
The development came as the Russian president snubbed peace talks that he suggested in Turkey with Ukraine. Putin instead sent a lower-level delegation to Istanbul, and Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy – who had promised to attend if Putin did – reciprocated with a Ukrainian negotiating contingent. Putin had insisted on the Istanbul meeting instead of agreeing to the longstanding offer by Ukraine and its allies of a 30-day unconditional ceasefire.
Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, said Putin and Russia would face new sanctions as a consequence. 'The fact that President Zelenskyy travelled to Istanbul despite this is an enormous gesture,' Merz posted. 'Putin didn't show up – and that put him in the wrong. A new sanctions package is ready. We will adopt it in Brussels on Tuesday.'
UK prime minister Keir Starmer accused Putin of stymying progress on peace. 'There was only one country that started this conflict – that was Russia. That was Putin,' he said, speaking in Albania. 'There's only one country now standing in the way of peace – that is Russia. That is Putin.' There's only one country now standing in the way of peace – that is Russia. That is Putin.'
France's foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, echoed that sentiment: 'In front of Ukrainians, there is an empty chair, one that should have been occupied by Vladimir Putin,' he said. Putin 'is dragging his feet and in all evidence does not want to enter into these peace discussions.'
Due to Putin's no-show , it appeared that any talks taking place would only begin in earnest on Friday, under Turkey's supervision. Zelenskyy on Thursday arrived in Turkey's capital, Ankara, for separate meetings, having said he would meet Putin in Istanbul if the Russian president arrived.
Late on Thursday, Turkey's foreign minister, Hakan Fidan, met the Russian delegation. 'The meeting has ended. Tomorrow there will be more talks in different formats,' said a Turkish foreign ministry source, indicating that 'trilateral talks between Russia, Ukraine and Turkey are on the agenda'.
The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said on Thursday: 'I want to be frank. I don't think we have high expectations of what will happen tomorrow.' The top US diplomat described the current state of the talks to end the war as a 'logjam' that only Donald Trump could break.
Trump, the US president, offered a tangled version of events: 'Obviously he wasn't going to go,' Trump said of Putin. 'He was going to go, but he thought I was going to go. He wasn't going if I wasn't there.' He told reporters on Air Force One: 'I don't believe anything's going to happen, whether you like it or not, until he and I get together.'
Estonia accused Russia on Thursday of posing a 'serious threat' to Nato after a Russian fighter jet violated its airspace. Estonia said it detected the incursion on Tuesday while it was inspecting a tanker from the 'shadow fleet' of ships that Russia is using to skirt sanctions. The Estonian foreign minister, Margus Tsahkna, told a Nato meeting in Turkey that Estonia was inspecting 'the unflagged and uninsured Argent/Jaguar [tanker], which is sanctioned by the United Kingdom', when the Russian plane violated Estonia's airspace. Nato fighter jets scrambled to 'inspect and check the Russian fighter'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want
Boats sailed WHEN will the Government finally get the message on illegal immigration? Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's announcement of 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle people-smuggling gangs is welcome, of course. 1 Anything that disrupts this evil trade is a good thing, in the same way that a crackdown is needed on profiteers who employ the migrants on the cheap — no questions asked — when they get here. But if this £100million investment is the Government's grand plan to 'break the business model' of the crooks then it is doomed to failure. When the risk-versus-reward equation is so much in their favour, the smugglers and the illegal migrants will always find a way. The incentives are too great: millions of pounds for the smugglers, for little effort; hand-outs, accommodation and black market jobs for the migrants, with virtually no chance of being deported. The only way to break the business model is to come up with a deterrent which makes the migrants worry that their money — and the dangers they will face — won't get them what they want. Or where they want. A deterrent like the Rwanda scheme, which was already beginning to work but which Labour couldn't wait to ditch. The soaring number of Channel small boats is the inevitable consequence. Jobs shame THE number of young people facing unemployment is one of the most heart-breaking results of the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax hikes. A million Neets — youngsters Not in Education, Employment or Training — is a disaster for the economy as well as a tragedy for them. Migrant boats are carrying 'bad people' REJECTED by other NATIONS says Trump At a time in their lives when they are desperately trying to find their place in the world, a job — or the skills to get one — gives them purpose and a sense of who they are, just as surely as being dumped on benefits crushes that. The Skills Tax Relief proposed by more than 100 business chiefs would be a vital boost to apprenticeships and vocational training, offering young Brits a route into the workplace. If Rachel Reeves isn't swayed by the thought of saving so many from the scrapheap, then she should be swayed by the £10billion of welfare savings it could bring over the next five years. It's not the water temperature that puts them off but the sewage dumped in it. What a blow for our coastal communities and seaside resorts.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Are Ukrainian's turning on Zelensky?: Multiple casualties reported after civilians 'attack draft officer with bats and metal pipes' in Mykolaiv Oblast
Multiple casualties have been reported after Ukrainian officials alleged that a group of bat and pipe-wielding civilians attacked a draft officer. Officials said the incident took place at 2pm local time in the small village of Buzke in Mykolaiv Oblast. They said that the civilians, who have not yet been identified, were 'armed with bats and metal pipes' and 'damaged a vehicle and inflicted bodily injuries on a soldier.' In response to the attack, the soldier is said to have 'a shot with a non-lethal ammunition device.' The attack left an unspecified number of Ukrainian soldiers and police, as well as civilians injured. Cops are now investigating the incident, and warned dissidents that insulting the 'honour and dignity' of soldiers, as well as threatening violence against them, was punishable by up to five years in prison. It added that bringing harm to soldiers could result in up to 12 years imprisonment. From the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Zelensky faced an uphill battle with his countrymen, who resisted the enforced conscription into the country's military. Just two days ago protesters in the Ukrainian city of Vinnytsia broke into a stadium where roughly 100 men were being held by military enlistment officers. Cops arrested several demonstrators. It comes as a Ukrainian drone attack sparked a fire at an oil depot in Sochi, the Russian resort that hosted the 2014 Winter Olympic which is 250 miles from the Ukrainian border, authorities said Sunday. Ukraine has regularly hit Russian oil and gas infrastructure in response to attacks on its own territory since Russia began its offensive in February 2022. 'Sochi suffered a drone attack by the Kyiv regime last night,' the governor of Russia's Krasnodar region, Veniamin Kondratiev, said on Telegram. He said drone wreckage hit an 'oil tank, which caused a fire' during the night-time attack. Sochi's mayor, Andrei Proshunin, said there were no victims and that the fire was put out several hours later. Images, broadcast by Russian media but whose authenticity AFP could not verify, showed flames and a thick plumes of black smoke rising from the site. Air traffic was briefly suspended at Sochi airport, Russia's air transport regulator Rosaviatsia said. Ukraine authorities have not commented on the fire. Air strikes on Sochi are relatively rare compared to some other Russian cities. However, Ukrainian drone attacks killed two people there late last month, according to local authorities.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Starmer must find REAL ways to solve migrant crisis – not pathetic sticking plaster ‘solutions' voters will see through
THE Home Secretary's plans to fast-track the asylum appeals process are, on the face of it, a welcome development. Because asylum seekers awaiting the results of appeal are entitled to state support, including both a weekly allowance and accommodation in the infamous hotels, it means any delay in processing claims is a direct cost on the taxpayer. 4 Yet there are good reasons to doubt that it will provide anything more than a short-term palliative to a chronic, structural problem with the asylum regime – and perhaps not even that. One of the biggest challenges facing the Home Office has long been deporting people whose claims are rejected. Even if their country of origin is deemed 'predominantly safe', as Yvette Cooper put it, some governments make it very difficult to return their citizens. In other cases, deportation is made extremely difficult because asylum seekers often destroy their passports. Rejected asylum seekers have to be housed and supported by the state, just like those awaiting appeal. This creates a very obvious incentive for politicians to turn any fast-track scheme into a rubber-stamping exercise, 'clearing the backlog' by waving people into the country. It wouldn't be the first time politicians and campaigners have resorted to interpreting a problem over-literally in order to pretend to have solved it. Just a few months ago, the Labour Government proposed to fix the problem of putting asylum seekers up in hotels . . . by having the Home Office buy up private rented housing instead. Then there are those who suggest 'safe and legal routes' as a solution to Channel crossings — a proposal that hinges on the idea that the problem is people coming here in boats rather than their coming at all. If that were the case, we could simply stop searching the lorries at the Channel Tunnel! Moment bus full of asylum seekers are 'snuck into' 4-star London hotel under cover of darkness despite UK-wide protests I don't want to sound like a partisan Tory here. The previous government's efforts to tackle the crisis were in much the same spirit. Whatever the merits of the Rwanda scheme, it was never going to accommodate more than a small fraction of the volume of illegal arrivals (although it nonetheless did seem to have some impact on the number of people trying to cross). Left or Right, when it comes to illegal immigration the motto seems to be: 'look busy'. Ministers keep tinkering around the edges of the problem, but nobody seems willing to confront the deep, structural pull factors which make Britain such an attractive target for migrants. Some of these, such as our language being so widely spoken, cannot be helped. But others, especially our non-contributory welfare system and the ease with which people can work in the black economy, could be tackled. That, however, would require fundamental and far-reaching reform, not least of the welfare state. We could also legislate to make deportations easier. The Home Secretary has pledged to tighten the rules around 'exceptional circumstances', which is a good start. TIED IN KNOTS But the Government could go a lot further, in particular on restricting appeals under Article 8 of the ECHR — the ' right to family life ' — which underpins many of the most egregious decisions made by asylum tribunals. For all the debate around whether or not the UK should quit the European Convention on Human Rights, we don't actually need to. Under the British constitution, the ECHR only applies if given effect by domestic law, and Parliament can legislate as it pleases. Labour should know this well: it was none other than Tony Blair who defied Strasbourg to refuse prisoners the vote. Sir Keir Starmer is unlikely to be enthusiastic about such measures. Lord Hermer, his friend and hand-picked Attorney General, has written to ministers rejecting the very idea that Parliament could legislate in any way that breached international law. But the Prime Minister should learn from the fate of his predecessor. 4 Like Starmer, Rishi Sunak promised the nation he would stop the crossings. He and his team were also — again like Starmer — unwilling to change or challenge any of Britain's existing legal or treaty commitments. The result was that they tied themselves in knots trying to make the Rwanda scheme compliant with the ECHR, only to fail — and paid a historically heavy price at the ballot box the following year. Labour MPs are already worried the same fate may befall them. They are right to worry: while the Government's majority is huge, this is actually the most marginal parliament since 1945 in terms of seat majorities. It would not take a big shift in public opinion to unseat dozens, or even hundreds, of Labour MPs at the next election. So which is more important to Sir Keir: the future of his government or the good opinion of the Attorney General? For so long as Hermer remains in post, the odds of this Government finding a lasting solution to the crisis are very small indeed. MY Conservative Home colleague Tali Fraser opened our editorial meeting yesterday with the claim that 'too many HENRYs are leaving the UK'. Now I quite agree that you can never have enough of us, but this wasn't merely an effort to please the boss. 4 'HENRY' apparently stands for 'high net worth, not rich yet' (I wish) and according to new research by the Adam Smith Institute and Onward, this country is developing a serious problem persuading young, well-educated Brits that they have a future here. No fewer than 28 per cent of 18- to 30-year-olds are either actively planning a move overseas or seriously considering emigrating, according to the report The Prosperity Package. That's very bad news. At present, only about a third of British adults are net contributors to the Exchequer. If the next generation of high earners are driven off by stagnant wages and a sky-high cost of living, that will only deepen our dependence on immigration. It also raises important questions about our focus on 'net immigration'. Yes, subtracting emigration gives a better picture of the raw numbers being added to our population – but it has perhaps made us too complacent about who is leaving.
