
Income taxes rattle Canada: Rich Californians pay an average of 10%, while Canadians pay 70% more
As affordability remains a key concern across Canada, even during the federal election, both Liberals and Conservatives campaigned to reduce income taxes to provide relief for Canadians, which finally will be implemented in the country, as an income tax cut is planned for July 1 this year, as per a report.
How Much Are Canadians Paying in Taxes?
A new report reveals how much of a burden are income taxes on the typical Canadian. According to The Hub report, the 'typical Canadian' is used to describe a person who is a median income earner and is currently taxed at an average of just over 17% (federal plus provincial). The latest tax cut will reduce the tax by around half a percentage point, which will bring it to just below 17%, reported The Hub.
ALSO READ:
Circle Internet Group IPO: Top things investors need to know
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Canada's Income Tax Varies by Province
However, how much a working middle-class Canadian pays in income taxes varies based on where the person lives and how much the 'typical Canadian" makes in each province, according to the report.
The Hub report analysed that, in Nova Scotia, where income taxes are highest, a person earning the provincial median income pays one-fifth of their income in tax, while people living in British Columbia and Ontario pay the least tax, which is at 15%, as per the report. Meanwhile, median earners in most of Canada's provinces, like Quebec, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, pay taxes somewhere in the middle at 18%, reported The Hub.
Live Events
How Does Canada's Tax Compare to the US?
However, when the income tax is compared with Canada's neighbour, the median income earners in all the USA's states have a significantly lower tax burden than Canadians do, according to the report. For instance, in California, which is often considered the US' high-tax state, the median income earner's combined tax bill is 10%, which is the United States average, as per The Hub. While, the tax falls to just 7% to 8% for the nine states with no state-level income tax, which includes Texas, Florida, and Washington, according to the report.
The Hub report explained by giving the example that, "if Canada's combined average income tax rate were the same as in the US, the typical Canadian would save almost $4,000 a year. But even seemingly small tax cuts can have an impact, like the change coming on July 1st—it reduces the lowest federal tax bracket by one percentage point, and will save the typical Canadian around $400 a year," as per the report.
While, income taxes are only a small portion of the impact that it has on the Canadian take-home pay and how that compares to the average American, as per The Hub. There are other taxes like "Sales taxes, property taxes, and payroll taxes that also chip away at income," according to the report.
What Do Canadians Get for Their Higher Taxes?
However, the differences in the taxes between Canada and the United States cannot be said to favour one country or the other, as per The Hub.
The report highlighted that the higher taxes Canadians pay are used by the government to provide far more generous family and unemployment benefits than in the United States, and are also used for subsidized post-secondary education and government-funded universal health care, reported The Hub. While, in the United States, "those costs don't show up on the tax bill, but Americans still pay them at the end of the day," as per the report.
FAQs
How much tax does the typical Canadian pay?
Right now, about 17% of their income goes to federal and provincial taxes. After the cut, it will drop slightly.
Why are Canadian taxes so much higher than the US?
They help pay for things like health care, education subsidies, and other family benefits.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Canadian PM reveals why he invited PM Modi to G7 meet
Hours after inviting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to this month's G7 meet in Alberta, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney Friday pointed to India's status as the fifth-largest economy as a reason for the invite. Canada's action is seen as a step toward improving ties between the two countries, which had seen a sharp dip under the previous prime minister Justin Trudeau. 'As chair of the G7, it is important to invite the most important countries to attend to talk about important issues such as energy, artificial intelligence, critical minerals, and India is really at the very centre of global supply chains,' Carney said during a news conference on Parliament Hill, as reported by The Globe and Mail. Carney also said that the most populous country in the world, with the fifth largest economy, should be present at the year's G7. The two countries had downgraded diplomatic ties after Justin Trudeau, the then Canadian PM, set off a political storm in 2023 when he alleged 'potential' involvement of Indian government agents in the killing of a Canada-based Khalistan separatist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar. India rejected the charges as 'absurd' and 'motivated'. On Friday, Carney declined to say whether he believed India had any involvement in Nijjar's death. 'There is a legal process that is literally under way and quite advanced in Canada, and it's never appropriate to make comments with respect to those legal processes,' Carney told. Carney, however, added that Canada and India had agreed to 'continued law enforcement dialogue,' though he did not confirm whether this includes cooperation in the Nijjar investigation. PM Modi had on Friday confirmed his attendance at the G7 in a post on X, saying he congratulated Carney on his election victory and that 'India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests.' 'Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister Mark J Carney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit,' PM Modi said in a post on X. Usually, G7 host countries invite some countries as guest countries or outreach partners. Canada had so far invited Ukraine and Australia. India has been invited to every G7 Summit since 2019. Barring 2020 when the G7 huddle was cancelled by the US, the host country, Modi has attended every Summit since August 2019.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi now in the line of fire - here's what happened and why it matters
It has been a tumultuous week for American politics, memory, and conscience. Another battle rages within the justice system. Pam Bondi , President Trump's Attorney General, has come under fire for what critics call serious ethical misconduct. The incident highlights broader tensions in Washington regarding justice, power, and political accountability. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Air conditioners without external unit. (click to see prices) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now What exactly is Pam Bondi being accused of? In a 70-person ethics complaint submitted to the Florida Bar , US Attorney General Pam Bondi is charged with " serious professional misconduct ." Law professors, lawyers, and former chief justices of the Florida Supreme Court who lean liberal or moderate are among the signatories. They charged Bondi with misbehavior that "threatens the rule of law and the administration of justice,' as per a report by the Miami Herald. Live Events According to the Herald, the group's complaint claims that Bondi has violated her ethical obligations in her current position. Critics claim she is pressuring DOJ lawyers to act unethically. The complaint also claims that Bondi "sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy,'" as reported by the Herald. Why was the complaint dismissed so quickly? The petition was swiftly dismissed by the Florida Bar on jurisdictional grounds, but in Washington, one of the young punks who now work for the federal government, particularly at the Department of Justice (DOJ), sneered at it. In a statement given to the Miami Herald, Chad Mizelle, chief of staff for the Justice Department, stated that the Florida Bar has twice turned down performative attempts by these out-of-state attorneys to use the bar complaint procedure against AG Bondi. The signatories' lack of intelligence and independent thought will be the only outcome of this third futile attempt. ALSO READ: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just entered the Trump–Musk fight, and the Internet can't get enough Pam Bondi, a native of Florida, was the first female attorney general of the Sunshine State. According to the Florida Bar, "Pamela Jo Bondi" is a member "in Good Standing,' as per a report by The Hill. During her confirmation hearing a few months ago, Bondi was questioned by Democrats about her capacity to oppose Trump, who had repeatedly declared that he would come for his enemies and that he had the "absolute right" to do as he pleased with her department. FAQs Why is Pam Bondi facing criticism right now? She is accused by dozens of legal experts of pressuring DOJ lawyers to violate ethical standards, particularly in a contentious Feb. 5 memo encouraging aggressive tactics. Has the Florida Bar taken action against Bondi? No, it dismissed the complaint due to a lack of jurisdiction, though the criticism sparked a national debate.


Fibre2Fashion
38 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
US' G-III Apparel holds FY26 sales forecast, posts higher Q1 earnings
American clothing company G-III Apparel Group has reaffirmed its net sales outlook for fiscal 2026 (FY26) at approximately $3.14 billion, slightly below the $3.18 billion recorded in fiscal 2025. However, it has withdrawn its net income, non-GAAP income, and adjusted EBITDA guidance issued in March due to uncertainty surrounding tariffs and broader macroeconomic conditions. As of June 5, 2025, current tariff rates are expected to add around $135 million in unmitigated costs, largely in the second half of the year. The company aims to offset these impacts through diversified sourcing, selective pricing adjustments, and cost-saving measures, it said in its financial statement. G-III Apparel Group has reaffirmed its FY26 net sales outlook at $3.14 billion but withdrawn earnings guidance due to tariff-related uncertainty, which may add $135 million in costs. Q1 FY26 sales dipped 4 per cent, but net income rose to $7.8 million. Q2 sales are projected to decline year-on-year. The company cut debt by 96 per cent and repurchased $19.7 million in shares. For the second quarter (Q2) ending July 31, 2025, net sales are projected at $570 million, down from $644.8 million year-on-year, impacted by supply chain disruptions and timing shifts in key programmes. Gross margin is expected to remain stable. Net income is forecast between $1 million and $6 million, or $0.02–$0.12 per diluted share, sharply down from $24.2 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, in Q2 FY25. For the first quarter (Q1) ended April 30, 2025, G-III Apparel Group has reported a 4 per cent year-on-year decline in net sales to $583.6 million, down from $609.7 million in the same period last year. Despite the revenue drop, net income rose to $7.8 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, compared to $5.8 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, in Q1 FY25. On a non-GAAP basis, net income per diluted share came in at $0.19, excluding $1.0 million in one-time severance expenses related to a closed warehouse. This adjustment accounted for a $0.02 per share impact. There were no non-GAAP adjustments in the prior year's first quarter. As of the end of the quarter, inventories declined 5 per cent to $456.5 million, while total debt was slashed by 96 per cent to $18.7 million from $426.4 million. The sharp reduction followed the company's voluntary redemption in August 2024 of its $400 million senior secured notes, financed through cash reserves and borrowings from its revolving credit facility, the statement added. Additionally, the company repurchased 807,437 shares for $19.7 million during the quarter, underscoring its continued commitment to shareholder returns. Morris Goldfarb, G-III's chairman and chief executive officer , said, 'G-III delivered solid first quarter results, marked by earnings that exceeded the high end of guidance. Our performance was fuelled by double-digit growth of our key owned brands, DKNY, Karl Lagerfeld and Donna Karan, which largely offset the exit of the Calvin Klein jeans and sportswear businesses. These results underscore the strong demand and desirability of our brand portfolio and are a testament to our team's outstanding execution.' Goldfarb concluded, 'We are reaffirming our net sales guidance for fiscal 2026 and working diligently to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Our experienced management team has a proven track record of successfully navigating periods of uncertainty, and we view the ongoing disruptions as an opportunity to strengthen our competitive position and capture incremental market share. As we advance our strategic priorities, we have never been more confident in the global resonance of our brands and the significant growth potential ahead to drive long-term profitability and shareholder value.' Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)