Lewd secret Santa gift left abattoir worker in tears
Barry Cochrane was reduced to tears and felt he had no option but to resign after his colleague was given a mug that revealed a crude message about 'teabagging' when filled with hot liquid.
Mr Cochrane had not been at the meeting when the presents were exchanged, but took offence when he felt jokes were made at his expense when 'sexual content' was being discussed.
After being added to a work group chat, he scrolled up to find a colleague had said she was 'thankful' he had not seen the mug.
Mr Cochrane said he felt 'humiliated' and tried to sue his employer for unfair dismissal and sexual harassment.
A judge dismissed his claims in their entirety, finding Mr Cochrane's reaction to be 'disproportionate' and ' confected with litigation in mind '.
The tribunal, held in Aberdeen, was told Mr Cochrane started working for Neerock, a Morrisons-owned meat-processing company, as a health and safety specialist on Dec 11 2023.
Mr Cochrane was initially invited to the meeting where gifts were exchanged on Dec 12, but his invitation had been withdrawn because of a delay in his start date.
'Singled out'
David Orton, a senior health and safety manager at Morrisons, received the gift and 'suspected that there may be something on the mug which might not be appropriate to show in a work meeting'.
Mr Orton unwrapped the gift at home to find a blank mug which, when filled with hot fluid, revealed a picture of a pair of testicles wrapped in a bow-tie with the phrase 'I love teabagging' underneath.
He took a picture of the mug and sent it to a team group chat, adding: 'I think I need to have a word with Santa.'
Various employees reacted to the messages with laughing emojis, before Sally Smith, head of health and safety for Morrisons, wrote: 'Just checked and thankfully Barry isn't on here yet is he!'
Mr Orton commented 'not yet!' and minutes later Ms Smith added Mr Cochrane to the group chat but was unaware he would be able to read earlier messages.
On Dec 20, Mr Cochrane saw the messages and cried at work, before packing up his belongings and leaving the office.
He told Mr Orton among other issues he was leaving 'because he had been singled out on the group chat'.
'No option but to resign'
When Mr Cochrane returned home, he sent an email titled 'resignation due to being named in sexual content', in which he said he had felt 'humiliated'.
He added: 'The job is tough enough and there is lots to do but I would have got to that in time, but after seeing this sexual content and naming me (and only me) I have no option but to resign.'
Mr Orton later said he regretted sending the picture, adding that it was 'meant in the spirit of a laugh'.
Ms Smith said that she made the comment because she thought 'oh what will Barry think of us' having not been in the meeting or understanding the context of the message.
Employment Judge Murdo Macleod said the pair's explanation for their comments was 'entirely credible'.
He added: 'We consider that [Mr Cochrane's] reaction was disproportionate, given that he was not involved in the exchange and that it was plainly not directed at him at that time it was posted.
'His outrage at his name being mentioned on the thread is confected, with this litigation in mind.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS cancelled thousands of appointments during resident doctor strikes
Thousands of patients had their NHS appointments cancelled during the five-day resident doctors' s trike last month. However early data also shows the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients during the latest doctors' strike compared with last year's industrial action, the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) said. The number of resident doctors who walked during the recent strike was also down by 1,243 - 7.5 per cent, the DHSC said. During the five-day strike in June and July 2024, 61,989 inpatient and outpatient appointments were rescheduled, and 23,001 staff were absent from work due to strikes at the peak of the action. However, the DHSC has claimed that during the most recent dispute, the NHS saw less disruption this time around. NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey noted that care was still disrupted for thousands of people. He said: 'While this is really good news for the vast majority of patients whose treatment went ahead, we should still acknowledge that there were thousands whose care was disrupted. 'NHS staff will continue to work hard to ensure patients can get their rescheduled care as soon as possible, but for those patients – and for all our staff who had to work extra shifts or with different responsibilities – a repeat of this action will be unacceptable. 'So, I would urge the Resident Doctors Committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the Government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives.' The full data on cancellations is yet to be released; however, NHS England and the DHSC have released an 'early' analysis. The impact on A&E waiting times is not clear. Health and Social Care Secretary, Wes Streeting, said: 'Due to the dedication of NHS staff and a different operational approach from previous strikes, we have managed to significantly reduce disruption to patients, with early indications showing that 10,000 extra patients are receiving care compared to previous strike action. 'Despite the huge effort made to keep as much planned care as possible going, let's be clear – these damaging strikes still come at a cost to patients, other staff and the NHS.' He added: 'I want to end this unnecessary dispute and I will be urging the BMA to work with the government in good faith in our shared endeavour to improve the working lives of resident doctors, rather than pursuing more reckless strike action.' The DHSC claims the drop in cancellations was due to a change in the NHS's approach, which aimed to maintain planned care rather than cancel it as happened during previous rounds. The government has claimed it maintained 93 per cent of planned appointments, procedures and operations. The claims come as the DHSC faces winter disruption from nurses and other healthcare workers after their unions warned members had rejected the 3.6 per cent pay award given to them for 2025-26. Across the strikes in 2023 and 2024, which also included nurses and ambulance workers, around 1.5 million planned appointments were cancelled across England. Resident doctors, represented by the British Medical Association, staged strike action over a pay dispute in which the union is calling for a 29 per cent pay rise. It says this is to address a 22 per cent decrease in real terms pay since 2008. Following the strikes, the BMA opened a new dispute with the government over specialist training posts, claiming tens of thousands of resident doctors face not having specialist jobs at the end of the summer. The government has repeatedly said it will not move to increase pay. According to the DHSC and NHS England, some trusts managed to maintain more than 90 per cent of planned care, including West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust which maintained 98 per cent and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which maintained 95 per cent. A BMA spokesperson said:'We recognise that for any patient to receive care – urgent or planned – during the period of strike action is of course beneficial for them and we recognise the efforts senior doctors, along with other healthcare workers, will have made to provide that care.' The BMA added: 'Even with NHS England's determination to carry on as if the strikes were not happening, we know that operations will have been postponed, and clinics rescheduled. But all of that could have been avoided if the Health Secretary had been serious in his intent to find a negotiated settlement with us. The strike could have been averted, as could any future ones, if Mr Streeting had come, and will come, to the table with a credible offer that resident doctors in England can accept.'
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hundreds of sick children from Gaza to be evacuated to UK for critical NHS treatment
Hundreds of seriously ill children from Gaza will be evacuated to the UK for treatment by the NHS, as part of a new plan due to be announced within weeks, according to a report. Up to 300 young people will enter the UK for free medical care, a scheme which will run in parallel with another similar operation run by the Project Pure Hope group, a senior Whitehall source told The Times. Since the war began in October 2023, only three children from Gaza have been issued medical visas for the UK, under the Project Pure Hope scheme - which is funded entirely by private donations. The news comes amid a crisis of starvation in the ravaged Gaza strip, where partial and complete Israeli blockades on aid have been behind more than 160 malnutrition-related deaths including 92 children, health authorities in Gaza say. Ted Chaiban, Unicef's deputy executive director for humanitarian action and supply operations, said on Friday that more than 320,000 young children are at risk of acute malnutrition, after a recent trip to Israel, Gaza and the occupied West Bank. The malnutrition indicator in Gaza has 'exceeded the famine threshold', Mr Chaiban said in a statement. Last month, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer promised to evacuate badly injured children. He wrote in The Mirror: 'I know the British people are sickened by what is happening. The images of starvation and desperation in Gaza are utterly horrifying. 'We are urgently accelerating efforts to evacuate children from Gaza who need critical medical assistance — bringing more Palestinian children to the UK for specialist medical treatment.' More than 100 MPs have signed a letter calling for the government to fast-track the scheme, The Times reports. Labour backbench MP Stella Creasy said: 'The commitment we all share to help these children remains absolute and urgent — with every day, more are harmed or die, making the need to overcome any barriers to increasing the support we give them imperative. 'We stand ready to support whatever it takes to make this happen and ask for your urgent response.' Israel denies there is widespread starvation and says that where there is significant hunger in the strip it is a result of the theft of aid by Palestinian militant group Hamas, and of failure by the UN to successfully deliver aid. But Unrwa, which was once the largest provider of humanitarian assistance for Palestinians in Gaza, says it has been entirely sidelined. Secretary-general Philippe Lazzarini said on Friday that the group has 6,000 trucks loaded with aid stuck waiting outside Gaza Israel to give it the green light to enter. Earlier on Saturday, witnesses and medics said Israeli forces killed 10 people after opening fire near two aid distribution sites run by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as crowds of hungry Palestinians again sought food. The violence came a day after US officials visited a GHF site and the US ambassador called the troubled system "an incredible feat'. The GHF denies accusations by UN officials that the killings are partly a result of its aid distribution practices, and says no Palestinians have been killed on its sites. Another 19 people were shot dead as they crowded near the Zikim crossing from Israel in the hope of obtaining aid, said Fares Awad, head of the Gaza health ministry's ambulance and emergency service. Hamas said on Saturday it will carry on fighting until an independent Palestinian state is established in a fresh rebuke to a key Israeli demand to end the war in Gaza. The militants said Hamas would not stop 'armed resistance' until an 'independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital" is recognised. Israel considers the disarmament of Hamas a key condition for any deal to end the conflict, but Hamas has repeatedly said it is not willing to lay down its weapons.
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Asbestos: More than 280 dumping incidents in NI since 2019
Asbestos has been illegally dumped 281 times in Northern Ireland since 2019, BBC News NI can was used in building materials until it was discovered that inhalation of fibres could cause cancers, but it is only considered dangerous when it is is illegal to put asbestos in household waste and is supposed to be removed by specialist contractors to be disposed of at a licensed hazardous waste Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) said the latest figures showed waste crime still posed "a serious threat to our environment and to public health". A spokesperson added: "Asbestos is particularly dangerous when disturbed, making its professional removal a highly specialised, complex and delicate operation crucial for public safety."In July the issue of asbestos material made headlines after it emerged a bonfire site in Belfast contained NIEA subsequently removed about 20kg of the material from the site between the Donegall Road and the Westlink in the south of the in the area questioned why the asbestos had not been removed from the site before issues around the bonfire Minister Andrew Muir defended the NIEA's handling of removing the material, accusing political opponents of "finger pointing".On Friday, Muir confirmed that the presence of asbestos at the site in Belfast was under criminal investigation. Widespread problem There have been more than 3,000 illegal dumping incidents recorded across Northern Ireland between 2019 and 2024 with material including everything from scrap metal to new figures obtained by BBC News NI showed that, after mixed waste and general construction waste, asbestos was the most common illegally-dumped material in Northern law in Northern Ireland states that a licensed removal contractor must be used to dispose of asbestos, but it can often be an expensive process. Failure to dispose of asbestos legally can result in prosecution and it is also the legal responsibility of the landowner to secure their land to prevent any illegal waste and Newtownabbey Council Area had the highest number of illegal asbestos dumping incidents, with 44 recorded since 2019. In 2022 MPs called for a 40-year deadline for all asbestos to be removed from public and commercial Lewis, a director at G&L consultancy in Northern Ireland, a company in Northern Ireland that provides asbestos management and removal services, said a lot of time and effort went into making asbestos removal safe."[We use] full enclosure air locks, negative pressure units, to keep the fibres within the area you're working in and drawing them out safely," he said."All asbestos waste needs to be packaged, labelled, taken from site and taken to the appropriate hazard waste disposal site."Reacting to the asbestos dumping figures he said: "Those numbers are high and I understand why people are concerned."When it comes to illegal dumping, you could have situations where asbestos is being transported and not contained properly, broken up on transit and dumped on the side of the road." A spokesperson for the Health and Safety Executive Northern Ireland said the removal of asbestos was considered "a specialist activity which requires planning, surveying and assessing".Long-term, high-level exposure is needed to cause asbestosis and long-term, low-level inhalation exposure may cause lung disorders, such as asbestos-related cancer - of mesothelioma can take decades to develop, and it is almost always fatal. 'Shocking' The charity Mesothelioma UK said the latest figures on the illegal dumping of asbestos were "extremely concerning"."We urge the UK government to establish a national task force to review and address every aspect of our shameful asbestos legacy," chief executive Liz Darlison said."The UK has the highest incidence of mesothelioma in the world, it is preventable and safe management and disposal of asbestos is at the root of the problem."Between 2014 and 2023, there were 699 asbestos-related deaths in Northern Hagan's father died in 2022 soon after being diagnosed with mesothelioma. Tony Rodgers had worked as a social worker all his life and his family said they had difficulty pinpointing any obvious exposure to asbestos."It really came as shock for our whole family when we found out that the type of cancer dad had was almost always caused by exposure to asbestos," Ms Hagan said. She said the amount of asbestos being illegally-dumped was disgraceful."As someone who has lost one of the people I loved most in the world because of an asbestos-related illness, those statistics just make me cross, it's shocking," she said."It's scary to think that there are places where this dangerous material is just being dumped and members of the public aren't aware aware of it, that anybody could just stumble across." BBC News NI previously reported that millions of pounds had been spent on removing asbestos from healthcare buildings and schools in Northern government has also paid out more than £40m in compensation for asbestos-related illnesses in Northern Ireland since March this year the BBC launched a podcast called Assume Nothing: Killer investigated the history and use of asbestos in the UK.
