3 Gold Mining Stocks Poised to Outshine Q1 Earnings Estimates
The Zacks Mining – Gold industry is housed within the broader Zacks Basic Materials sector. The Q1 earnings picture for this sector looks glum. Basic Materials is among the Zacks sectors that are expected to see the biggest decline in earnings in the first quarter. Overall earnings for the space are projected to fall 17.8% on 0.7% lower revenues, per the latest Earnings Preview. Gold mining companies' first-quarter results are expected to reflect the benefits of higher gold prices and efforts to boost operating efficiency and reduce costs. We have handpicked a few gold miners, Kinross Gold Corporation KGC, Sandstorm Gold Ltd. SAND and IAMGOLD Corporation IAG, which are set to beat earnings estimates this earnings season.
Gold prices are shooting up this year as worries over the global trade war have boosted the safe-haven demand for bullion. Prices of the yellow metal have zoomed roughly 27% year to date, largely attributable to aggressive trade policies, including sweeping new import tariffs announced by President Donald Trump, which have intensified global trade tensions and heightened investor anxiety. Also, central banks worldwide have been accumulating gold reserves, led by risks arising from Trump's policies. Gold prices catapulted to a record high of $3,500 per ounce on April 22 as the U.S. dollar tumbled amid President Trump's criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and call for an immediate reduction in interest rates. Gold prices climbed nearly 19% in the first quarter. Higher prices are expected to have supported the performance of gold miners in the first quarter. On the flip side, higher mining costs, triggered by inflationary pressure on all aspects of input costs, particularly labor, fuel and electricity, are likely to have been a drag. Nevertheless, miners remain committed to whittling down operational costs and capital spending, improving operating efficiency within existing mines, paying down debt, eliminating non-core assets and concentrating on their highest ore-grade assets. Some of these companies have also taken steps to bring down their all-in sustaining costs — the most important cost metric of miners. These actions are expected to support their margins in Q1.
Given the large number of players operating in the gold mining space, picking the right stocks is apparently not an easy task. But our proprietary methodology makes it fairly simple. One can trim the list with the combination of a favorable Zacks Rank — Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) — and a positive Zacks Earnings ESP. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they report with our Earnings ESP Filter.Earnings ESP — the percentage difference between the Most Accurate Estimate and the Zacks Consensus Estimate — is our proprietary methodology for determining stocks that have high chances of delivering earnings surprises in their next announcements. Our research shows that for stocks with this combination, the chance of a positive earnings surprise is as much as 70%.
Below we list three gold mining stocks that have the right combination of elements to pull off positive surprises this earnings season:Kinross Gold has an Earnings ESP of +11.07% and a Zacks Rank #2. It is slated to report on May 6. Kinross surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate in three of the trailing four quarters and missed once. It delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of around 23.7%, on average. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for first-quarter earnings stands at 22 cents. KGC is expected to have gained from higher average realized gold prices. Tasiast and Paracatu mines are expected to have continued their strong production performance, driving overall production, partly masked by higher production costs. (Find the latest EPS estimates and surprises on Zacks Earnings Calendar.)
Kinross Gold Corporation price-eps-surprise | Kinross Gold Corporation Quote
Sandstorm Gold has an Earnings ESP of +6.67% and carries a Zacks Rank #2. The company is scheduled to report on May 6. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.Sandstorm Gold missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate in three of the trailing four quarters while beat once. It delivered a trailing four-quarter negative earnings surprise of around 65.8%, on average. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for SAND's first-quarter earnings is pegged at 5 cents. SAND is expected to have benefited from strong sales and operating margins in the first quarter. Higher selling prices of gold are also likely to have aided Sandstorm Gold's results in the quarter. These are expected to have been partly offset by a higher cost of sales.
Sandstorm Gold Ltd price-eps-surprise | Sandstorm Gold Ltd Quote
IAMGOLD has an Earnings ESP of +9.69% and a Zacks Rank #3. It is slated to report on May 6. IAMGOLD beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in three of the trailing four quarters and missed once. It delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of around 147.6%, on average. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for first-quarter earnings stands at 10 cents. The company is expected to have benefited from strong production volumes and prices in the first quarter. The ramp-up at Cote Gold and continued strong performance at Essakane and Westwood are likely to have aided production. This is likely to have been partly offset by higher costs.
Iamgold Corporation price-eps-surprise | Iamgold Corporation Quote
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Iamgold Corporation (IAG) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Sandstorm Gold Ltd (SAND) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
TPresident Donald Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people . The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ditched by Trump's EEOC, job applicant advances bias lawsuit against Sheetz
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. A Black job applicant who alleged that gas station chain Sheetz disproportionately screened out Black, Native American, Alaskan Native and multiracial applicants moved to continue his case June 5 after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission abandoned it. EEOC filed a class-action lawsuit in April 2024 alleging that Sheetz maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for past criminal convictions and rejected those with such records. This practice violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, EEOC said in a press release, because it had a disparate impact on applicants of certain racial backgrounds. However, the agency moved to have the case dismissed last week because it determined that the disparate-impact claims would conflict with President Donald Trump's April 23 executive order directing agencies to cease enforcement of such claims. EEOC asked the court to defer dismissal of its claims by 60 days to allow the commission to notify class members so that they could obtain private representation. The legality of Trump's executive order on disparate-impact claims proved contentious, with one of EEOC's own administrative judges calling the order 'highly illegal.' But the June 5 filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is one of the first examples in which the order has been put into practice. Trump said the end of disparate-impact liability enforcement was necessary because it inhibited businesses from hiring applicants on the basis of merit and skill. He also said that disparate-impact liability is unconstitutional and 'threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.' The push to end disparate-impact liability is one of the goals stated by the conservative Heritage Foundation in its 'Project 2025' presidential transition document. The organization wrote that the concept should be thrown out because under disparate-impact theory, 'discriminatory motive or intent is irrelevant; the outcome is what matters. But all workplaces have disparities.' That logic has been met with resistance by former Democratic officials of the U.S. Department of Labor and EEOC, who said in May that disparate-impact liability is explicitly outlawed under Title VII and has been upheld by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The former officials cautioned employers that they should avoid following Trump's executive order so they do not violate federal laws. 'Disparate impact liability is a necessary element of advancing equal opportunity for all, consistent with America's national commitment to equal justice,' the officials wrote. In a press release, plaintiff-side firm Outten & Golden, which is partly representing the job applicant in the Sheetz case, said EEOC had spent nearly a decade investigating the claims at issue and had found a basis to allege evidence of systemic discrimination. 'Our client has a right to be judged on his qualifications, and not to be denied a livelihood by policies that exclude people with stale convictions that are unrelated to the job,' said Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center and a co-representative for the plaintiff, said in the press release. 'When the government steps back, we step in. We will not allow political interference to wipe out hard-won legal protections.' A similar dynamic played out following EEOC's abandonment of several lawsuits it filed on behalf of transgender workers alleging discrimination following an executive order from Trump. Advocacy groups have since filed to intervene on behalf of plaintiffs in those cases. Recommended Reading Shell Oil did not discriminate in hiring decision, 5th Cir. says
Boston Globe
36 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Musk says Tesla's robotaxi service to ‘tentatively' launch in Austin on June 22
Last month, Musk told CNBC that the taxis will be remotely monitored at first and 'geofenced' to certain areas of the city deemed the safest to navigate. He said he expected to initially run 10 or so taxis, increase that number rapidly and start offering the service in Los Angeles, San Antonio, San Francisco and other cities. Advertisement Musk has been promising fully autonomous, self-driving vehicles 'next year' for a decade, but the pressure is on now as Tesla actually begins to operate a self-driving taxi service. Sales of Tesla's electric vehicles have sagged due to increased competition, the retooling of its most popular car, the Model Y, and the fallout from Musk's turn to politics. The Austin rollout also comes after Musk had a public blowup with President Donald Trump over the administration's tax bill. Some analysts have expressed concern that Trump could retaliate by encouraging federal safety regulators to to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis.
