Call for affordable housing grows stronger across parties
Opposition and ruling parties on Monday raised concerns as state govt failed to provide affordable housing to the Goan population. Chief minister Pramod Sawant said that govt is in the process of finalising land in the Pernem taluka for affordable housing.
Sawant said that as per the survey conducted in 2011, few people were eligible for PM Awas Yojana, and govt will conduct a new survey under which more people will be eligible for the scheme. Under PM Awas Yojana, four crore affordable houses were provided to the citizens of India.
Navelim MLA Ulhas Tuenkar said that the housing board is providing plots and flats to Goans at market prices, and that is the reason non-Goans are buying those plots and flats.
Tuenkar demanded that govt scrap the auction policy and allot plots and flats on a first-come, first-served basis.
Housing minister Ramkrishna 'Sudin' Dhawalikar said that as per the policy, govt auctions housing plots and flats on two occasions, and if there are no buyers, govt can check whether they can be allotted in other ways.
Tuenkar mentioned that previously the Goa Housing Board used to provide loans to the allottees as they were not in a position to buy the plots of land by getting loans from the bank, and the same should be introduced again.
Opposition leader Yuri Alemao said that the chief minister, in his budget speech, announced a comprehensive housing policy to provide affordable housing for Goans, but to date, it has not materialised.
Mayem MLA Premendra Shet said there is a need to amend the existing laws so that only Goans are eligible for affordable housing, as it has been observed that non-Goans are benefiting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
41 minutes ago
- Hans India
Modi eclipses Indira Gandhi's record with unbroken PM stint
New Delhi: Narendra Modi on Friday overtook Indira Gandhi to become the second longest serving prime minister of India in consecutive terms. Modi, officials noted, completed 4,078 days in office on Friday. Gandhi was in the office in an unbroken stint for 4,077 days, from January 24, 1966, to March 24, 1977. The record for the unbroken stint is held by Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister. Both Modi and Nehru led their respective parties to victory in three consecutive Lok Sabha elections. Nehru, who remained at the helm from August 15, 1947, till his death on May 27, 1964, had an uninterrupted tenure of 6,130 days. As an elected head of a government, in state and at the Centre, Modi already enjoys the longest stint. He became Gujarat chief minister in 2001 and remained in office before taking over as prime minister in 2014. Modi, the first prime minister born after Independence, is also the longest serving non-Congress PM. The officials noted that the Gujarat-born leader is the only non-Congress leader to complete two full terms as the head of the central government. 'Modi is the only leader in India, among all PMs and CMs, to win six consecutive elections as the leader of a party - Gujarat assembly polls in 2002, 2007 and 2012, and the national elections in 2014, 2019, and 2024,' an official said.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
I've proved my academic management skill in past 5.5 years: LU VC Prof Alok Kumar Rai
Days after he was appointed as the director of Institute of Management–Calcutta (IIM–C), Lucknow University VC Prof Alok Kumar Rai said that he was selected purely on merit, and not due to some political connection. Reacting to concerns shown by some faculty members of IIM–C on his appointment, Rai cited his accomplishments as LU VC and clarified that the post of director calls for supervising the academic management and not teaching. "I will have to supervise academic management, which I have proved I am good at during 5.5 years of my tenure as LU VC," he told TOI's Mohita Tewari in a free-wheeling interview. Excerpts... You are set to head a top B-school amid criticism from a section of academic fraternity, which call your appointment a political one. They also talk about your non-IIM background, and your lack of experience in handling the IIM system. It's not at all a political appointment but a procedural one. All laid down procedures have been adhered to. Also, as such there is no 'criticism' but some disagreements or differences in opinion, which are always welcomed. I haven't applied for a professorial position there; IIM-C is an academic administration. You will have to evaluate me based on my competence of being able to perform as an academic administrator of the institute. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Much Does It Cost to Rent a Private Jet - The Prices May Surprise You! Private Jet I Search Ads Learn More Undo The criteria should be: 'Will I be able to deliver the same way as I have done at LU. One should assess me on the basis of what I can; I have a list of accomplishments as an academic administrator. During your term as VC, there were allegations that despite LU being a NAAC A++ University, it struggled with poor infrastructure, and your achievements were more about marketing. LU has very limited resources. Till date, our priority is to pay salaries to our teaching and non-teaching staff; pay off electricity bills and clear Nagar Nigam dues. Despite facing a severe financial crunch, there has been a lot of infrastructure augmentation. Our second campus revamp gives a feel of a new campus while at our old campus we have also improved our infrastructure with whatever money we had and from whatever sources we could arrange. No system is foolproof. Whenever we track progress, we track it from base value -- where we were and where we have reached. We couldn't work for Lal Baradari and the Canning college building which houses several arts faculty departments. We had plans to revamp it with help of Rs 100 crore sanctioned under Pradhan Mantri Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (PM USHA), but the grant is yet to be received. University Grants Commission (UGC) grants LU a category 1 status, which is given to only those that demonstrate high academic standards and are recognized for their quality and performance. Still, there are allegations that professors are not taking classes, and teaching is dependent on research scholars When I joined LU as VC, there was a system of guest faculty/subject experts who were taking classes in most of the departments due to lack of teachers. They would take one class of one hour someday and skip it on other days. They had no responsibility. This system was changed, and we recruited self-financed teachers after a rigorous recruitment drive. Assistant professors recruited since 2021 are known for taking regular classes. In academic institutions, one can't stand with a stick to make professors teach… What have been the major accomplishments in the past 5.5 years of your tenure? I believe as a VC I have strengthened the academic ecosystem and have done research rejuvenation. Now teachers publish research work they take pride in, communicate to social media, talk about the impact factor to the media. When I joined, most of the teachers were not aware of the H index, a metric used to assess the scientific productivity and impact of an individual researcher or a group of researchers of the university. Today, the H index of LU has increased by almost 50%, which proves that there is a research culture inculcation. Today, when most universities are thinking of implementing National Education Policy, our UG four-year NEP students have graduated, and we are pursuing one year PG under NEP. Today, we have assistant professors who have brought projects worth crores in just one year, teachers with fellowship and awards, which reflects quality recruitment. Also, we have built a highly responsive system, even a complaint on X by a student is attended to and resolved in no time. How do you see your new responsibility in comparison with your present term as state vice chancellor. When are you joining IIM-C? I am supposed to join IIM-C before Aug 15. I am really excited to take up this new responsibility. In comparison to LU, IIM-C will be a place where I don't expect to face trivial issues. The kind of challenges there would be of different nature, like placement records.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Look at your own country: Bombay High Court raps CPI(M) over Gaza protest petition
The Bombay High Court on Friday (July 25, 2025) dismissed a petition filed by the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the CPI challenging the Mumbai Police's decision to deny permission for a protest at Azad Maidan against the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The court observed that the Indian political organisations should prioritise domestic issues over international conflicts. A Division Bench comprising Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad pulled up the petitioners for focusing on matters outside the country and said, 'Our country has enough issues to deal with. We do not want anything like this. I am sorry to say that you are short-sighted. You are looking at Gaza and Palestine while neglecting what's happening here. Why don't you do something for your own country? Look at your own country. Be patriots. People say they are patriots, but this is not patriotism. Show patriotism for the citizens of our own country first,' the Bench remarked sharply during the hearing. Senior advocate Mihir Desai representing CPI(M), informed the Bench that on June 13, 2025, his clients submitted an application seeking permission from the Azad Maidan police station to hold a peaceful protest and gathering in Azad Maidan to show solidarity with the people of Gaza, who are currently in the midst of a genocide, by calling for a ceasefire. On June 17, denying permission to the All India Peace and Solidarity Foundation (AIPSF) that police informed them that the permission to protest was being denied in exercise of their powers under Section 168 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 68 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Mr. Desai informed the Bench that the political parties have time and again taken up several causes that has concerned India and have been conducting health and education camps. The Court noted that the CPI(M), being a registered as Indian political party, should ideally be engaging with local civic concerns. 'You are a registered party in India. Your party could have taken up issues like garbage dumping, pollution, drainage, or flooding. Why are you not protesting on these issues? We are only giving examples. Instead, you want to protest over something happening thousands of miles away and showing concern for Palestine and Gaza,' the Bench observed. The petitioners stated that the Indian government's stance and support of Palestine as a State, has been an integral part of the nation's foreign policy. In 1974, India became the first Non-Arab State to recognize Palestine Liberation Organisation as the sole and legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. In 1988, India was also one of the first countries to recognize Palestine as a State. In April 2024, India voted in favour of the Human Rights Council Resolution on the Right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. Moreover, India is a State signatory to the Genocide Convention, 1948, and the protest which was held to condemn violence and genocide in Gaza, can in no way termed to be the foreign policy of the India State. Mr. Desai further argued that citizens have a fundamental right to protest at designated places and that disagreements with the government's foreign policy cannot be grounds to stifle dissent. He also contended that mere apprehensions of law-and-order issues, without concrete evidence, should not override constitutional freedoms. He also clarified that the protest has nothing to do with Operation Sindoor or India's border relations with neighbouring countries. CPI(M) issues statement Rejecting the petition, the court observed, 'You don't know the dust it could kick up. Whether to take a side for Palestine or Israel is their (Govt of India) work, why do you want to create such a situation that the country has to take sides on this? Why do you want to do this? It's obvious, going by the party you represent, that you don't understand what this could do to the foreign affairs of the country.' The CPI(M) has strongly condemned the Bombay High Court's remarks while dismissing its petition challenging the denial of permission to protest against the Gaza conflict. Calling the Court's comments unconstitutional and politically biased, the CPI(M) criticised the bench for questioning its patriotism and aligning with the Central government's foreign policy stance. 'It is regrettable to say that the Bench appears to be completely unaware of the constitutional provisions that empower political parties or the history of our country and the support and brotherly feelings of the Indian people towards the Palestinian people for their right to a homeland. The statement made by the High Court bench regarding the CPI(M) smacks of the bench aligning itself with the position of the Central Government,' the party said in a statement. The party invoked India's historical support for Palestine and urged citizens to reject what it termed a troubling judicial trend undermining democratic rights. 'We appeal to the freedom and democracy-loving people of the country to stand shoulder to shoulder with us in unequivocally rejecting this objectionable view,' the statement read.
