
Musk associates sought to use critical Treasury payment system to shut down USAID spending, emails show
Four days after Donald Trump's inauguration, Elon Musk's top lieutenants at the Treasury Department asked its acting secretary, a career civil servant, to immediately shut off all USAID payments using the department's own ultra-sensitive payment processing system.
The ask was so out of line with how Treasury normally operates, it prompted a skeptical reply from David Lebryk, then serving as acting Treasury secretary, who said he did not believe 'we have the legal authority to stop an authorized payment certified by an agency,' according to a source familiar with the exchange.
Lebryk suggested a 'legally less risky approach' would be for the State Department, which oversees USAID, to rescind the payments itself and examine whether they complied with President Donald Trump's Inauguration Day executive order freezing foreign development aid.
Tom Krause, a former tech executive and now the top DOGE staffer at Treasury, responded that Lebryk could have legal risk himself should he choose not to comply.
This back and forth over email, described to CNN by a source familiar with it, reveals the first known indication that Trump's Department of Government Efficiency emissaries sought to use Treasury's tools to block some payments, fulfilling the president's political agenda.
The ensuing controversy set off a chain reaction around Washington this week, sparking a tense political debate and emergency court proceedings over DOGE's access to the system and the administration's potential interest in using it to turn off payments as it chooses.
The email exchange marked a direct collision between political appointees loyal to Musk and career civil servants at the Treasury Department.
Last Friday, Lebryk announced his sudden departure from government service, ending his more than 35-year career at Treasury.
Democratic senators on Capitol Hill have demanded answers, while unions and protesters voiced fears about Musk's potential incursion into Americans' private data.
The controversy has also drawn attention to a previously obscure office inside Treasury called the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which processes more than a billion payments totaling more than a $5 trillion a year.
The Treasury payment system reliably distributes Americans' tax returns, Social Security benefits, disability payments and federal employees' salaries.
That action and access demanded by Krause is also dramatically different than the access the Treasury Department has since said he was eventually granted.
The Treasury Department, in a letter to lawmakers, said the access to the payment system granted to Krause and a deputy was restricted to 'read-only' with the payments systems. Trump's newly confirmed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivered the same message in a private meeting with House Republicans on Monday.
But that level of access is dramatically different than what Krause and his DOGE associates had pressed Lebryk to grant in the email exchange — and came amid conflicting reports about whether the scope was more expansive than it was being conveyed.
'The hole here is what happened between the initial ask and Bessent's sign-off,' said one source with knowledge of the events that led up to the email exchange. 'Either the DOGE aspirations for what they wanted dramatically changed or the limitations they insist were placed on them aren't the whole story.'
None of the people at Treasury on the emails responded to inquiries from CNN this week.
There have been questions about how far Trump and Musk believe they can go in cutting back spending across the federal government, with Musk in recent days commenting gleefully about shutting down payments.
The emails also highlight how forceful the group from DOGE has been in sketching out a way to use the Treasury Department to control grant funding Trump and Musk oppose, especially from USAID toward developing foreign nations.
Any decision to turn off some payments via Treasury's systems, especially to align with Trump's political wishes, would be an unprecedented fiscal decision and pose a direct threat to Congress' power of the purse by giving the president more control over which payments to make, or not.
That wasn't the Trump delegates' approach, however.
In a lengthy email late January 24, Daniel Katz, the chief of staff to Bessent, Trump's then-Treasury secretary nominee, first wrote that the department should shut off outgoing USAID payments so the State Department could then assess if aid to foreign health care systems complied with Trump's directives, according to the source familiar with the messages.
Katz wrote that 'potentially problematic payments' out of line with the president's orders should be paused en masse by the department.
Still, Katz was clear the new administration believed Treasury could make its own decisions.
A division of USAID that delivered money to health care systems in developing nations had already put in place a process to shut off some payments, Katz wrote, and the administration 'would like to replicate' that at Treasury.
'What we would like to do is, to the extent permitted by law, temporarily pause the automatic processing of payment files,' from a USAID division called Health Systems Strengthening, Katz wrote.
Katz also wrote that Krause, Musk's deputy at Treasury, should be given access to the payments system so he and his team could take action.
Some of the administration's plan, Katz added, included immediately pausing all payment files still in the queue and letting Krause and others look at individual payments certified by USAID for the health care systems. The State Department could then look closer at the payments through USAID, Katz added.
The Health Systems Strengthening program at USAID has primarily funneled money into countries in Africa and Southeast Asia, as well as Indonesia, the Philippines, Guatemala and Haiti. The funds were aimed at building the countries' health systems so they could improve care to prevent infants and mothers from dying in childbirth, control the spread of HIV and AIDS and other infectious diseases, among other projects.
In one project touted on the now-archived USAID website, the division funded an emergency room in Jordan.
Its distributions are now in a 90-day pause because of Trump's executive order.
After Katz's initial message two weeks ago, Lebryk was explicit that the Treasury Department shouldn't do what DOGE proposed.
'There are also practical and personal liability issues that may come into play,' Lebryk wrote, copying a lawyer from the Treasury Department's general counsel's office.
But Krause, the special hire from DOGE sent to Treasury, was undeterred. 'I would also recommend you consider an equal alternative liability,' he wrote to Lebryk.
'I believe we can all feel more comfortable that we hold payment at least to review the underlying payment requests from USAID now so that we can be given time to consult State,' Krause wrote, ending a middle-of-night email on Saturday, according to the source.
Frustrated with Katz and Krause's messages, Lebryk left the department the following week, shortly after the confirmation of now-Secretary Bessent.
Initially, Bessent didn't give Krause and DOGE any limitation on its access to the system, which Lebryk opposed, according to a source familiar with the exchange.
Yet before the weekend was over, the Treasury Department told senators in Capitol Hill that the access Krause and others had to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service systems was 'read-only.'
A lawyer from the Justice Department representing Treasury reaffirmed that in court this week, telling a federal judge on Wednesday the civil litigators believed the DOGE affiliates at Treasury — Krause and one underling, Marko Elez, a Musk employee in his mid-20s — didn't have the ability to make changes to the Treasury payments system.
The lawyers were still nailing down information about the access DOGE had to the system, however, the attorney, Brad Humphreys of DOJ's civil division, told the judge in Washington, DC, on Wednesday.
By Wednesday night, the Trump administration had agreed only the two DOGE affiliates at Treasury, Krause and Elez, could have access to the payment system, outside of its traditional access within the department.
The court also could order that Krause's and Elez's access is 'read only,' the Justice Department agreed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
38 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Din Tai Fung's co-CEOs talk legacy, TikTok virality, and the art of making Americans fall in love with dumplings
For Aaron and Albert Yang, hot soup dumplings are their legacy. The two brothers are the grandsons of the founder of Din Tai Fung, the world's most recognizable dumpling chain. Now, they're the co-CEOs of the chain's North American business and the third generation to helm the family business. Din Tai Fung — or DTF, as its followers have affectionately nicknamed it — has humble origins as a small oil shop in Taiwan. The brothers' grandfather, Yang Bing-Yi, moved from mainland China to Taiwan in the 1940s and worked in a local oil company. Yang later transitioned to selling xiao long bao, or steamed pork soup dumplings. Din Tai Fung is known for those dumplings to this day — as well as for its precision. Each xiao long bao weighs exactly 21 grams and is pleated exactly 18 times before it's closed. The chain has become a global dumpling superpower, with more than 173 outlets in 13 countries, including Singapore, the UK, and Australia. There are 21 Din Tai Fung outlets in the US and Canada, including new stores in Manhattan and California's Disneyland. And for the Yangs, the dumpling business is serious business: Every Din Tai Fung outlet in North America churns out over 10,000 xiao long baos every day, the chain told BI. A duty to carry on the family business Growing up, the brothers helped out after school in their parents' first US Din Tai Fung in Los Angeles. Aaron described the outlet as "very mom-and-pop." "Our parents are immigrants to this country, and English wasn't their first language," said Aaron, 33. "I have a lot of memories of them struggling with things that come with running a business in a foreign country." Aaron said they both went to Cornell University to pursue hospitality degrees so they could take the business pressure off their parents. "It definitely felt like a duty growing up," he added. They would also go to Taiwan every summer to visit their grandfather. "When he first started the restaurant in 1972, he lived above the restaurant with his family, so he would basically go downstairs for work," Aaron said. "Even as he got older, he lived literally across the street from the restaurant so he could see the restaurant, the first original location, from his window. He always wanted to keep an eye on it, even when he was retired and his kids had taken over," he added. Like their grandfather, both men think that being a good leader requires working on the front lines. "We had a meeting about how we can improve our dish washing station, and if I didn't go to Vancouver and stand there in the dish washing station, I'd have no idea," Albert, 32, said. Albert also does product tastings every Wednesday. "There's some exciting stuff, like new menu items. But some stuff isn't exciting. Like realizing, 'We need backup string beans' or 'backup, backup string beans,'" he said. Americans love chicken, and that's a problem for Din Tai Fung These days, DTF offers casual dining. Some of its restaurants are simple in decor; others are more elaborately furnished, with red chandeliers and dark wooden accents. In its Manhattan store, a steamer of 10 xiao long baos costs $18.50. Other popular dishes, like the string beans with garlic and the cucumber salad, cost $17 and $9, respectively. When I asked what their biggest challenge is in terms of consumer tastes in the US, their answer was immediate. "The No. 1 protein in the US is chicken. I think a lot of our American diners might be surprised if they find out that Taiwan doesn't even sell chicken fried rice," Albert said with a laugh. Taiwanese customers, he said, have a pork-heavy palate. "There are a lot more dietary restrictions in the US, which make the dining culture a little bit different compared to the original stores in Taiwan," Albert said. "In the years that I've been here, we did chicken wontons, and now the chicken xiao long baos too. "We added a beef item, and also vegan wontons," he added. The TikTok effect While Din Tai Fung doesn't have an official TikTok, videos of customers dining on its crunchy cucumber salad and biting into its oozing chocolate dumplings have regularly gone viral on the platform. Other popular customer videos highlight chefs rolling out dumpling dough in open-plan kitchens and diners digging into wooden dumpling trays. The cucumber salad, served in a neatly stacked pyramid of cucumber slices drenched in sauce, has even spawned a legion of TikTok videos devoted to copying the recipe. "We've been lucky with TikTok, we don't have our own TikTok account," Albert said. "I think our level of execution provided us some opportunity to get lucky on TikTok, and we really blew up on it. But it was all organic," he said. The CEOs said Americans, particularly younger customers, love Din Tai Fung's chocolate xiao long baos. While the brothers, who are based in California, have tailored the menu to suit Western palates, they say there's a limit. "We'll get the occasional comment of, 'Why don't you guys do like a cheeseburger soup dumpling or something?'" Aaron said. "I'm sure we would sell a lot of, I don't know, cheeseburger, dumplings, or Chinese chicken salad, or orange chicken items that Americans are used to seeing and eating," Albert added. But he said Americans, particularly those in major metropolitan cities, were craving authentic experiences, and so sticking to original recipes was important for them. "We just pride ourselves on trying to carry on this tradition and just staying true to our roots," Albert said.


Axios
40 minutes ago
- Axios
Support for regulating psychoactive hemp gains momentum in NC
Bipartisan support for restricting hemp in North Carolina is gaining steam, with GOP lawmakers unveiling yet another proposal Tuesday that would regulate intoxicating weed-like products in the state. Why it matters: The new legislation, backed by the state's most powerful Republican, is one of several bills proposed in recent months that would crack down on psychoactive hemp products in North Carolina. Though marijuana remains illegal in any form, the state is among the most lenient in the country in its regulation of hemp-derived consumables, but a bipartisan movement to change that has been building. What they're saying: "Stores selling these hemp products are popping up in towns across North Carolina, and children are getting ahold of these products," Senate Leader Phil Berger said in a press release about the bill Monday night. "Without these regulations, the availability of these dangerous products is only going to get worse." Driving the news: On Tuesday morning, Republican lawmakers in North Carolina's state Senate rolled out the most restrictive yet viable proposal yet to regulate hemp while moving to ban products made with any hemp-derived cannabinoids other than delta-9, the psychoactive component of marijuana. The bill would also set age and dosage limits and licensing and testing standards for sellers and manufacturers. Yes, but: It would not legalize marijuana, however — a proposal that has been floated in previous sessions but has yet to surface this year. Flashback: "It's really ironic that in some ways, the most liberal, pro-marijuana adult-use state in the country is North Carolina," Democratic Gov. Josh Stein told WRAL in an exclusive interview earlier this month, in which he also announced he was launching a task force to explore regulations on THC products and marijuana legalization "It's not Colorado, it's not Massachusetts, it's not these states that legalized it and then created a regulatory structure to sell it. It's North Carolina, where we have no rules whatsoever." State of play: As of now, the state has no limits — or age restrictions — on any cannabinoids with psychoactive effects much like those of THC, including delta-9. The new bill unveiled Tuesday, however, would outright ban "synthetic" high-inducing hemp products that can be found on shelves just a few blocks from the state legislature, including delta-8, THC-A, delta-7 and delta-10. The bill also appears to ban CBD, another hemp-derived cannabinoid. The cannabis plant has more than 100 cannabinoids. Some of them produce a weed-like high, while others, like CBD, are not. The other side: House Rules Chairman Rep. John Bell, who is the president of CBD and hemp manufacturer Asterra Labs, is "disappointed in the bill," he told Axios in a text message Tuesday. "This bill will destroy the hemp industry and move it out of state. Not one stakeholder was involved." He had not expressed the same opposition to another bill proposed earlier this session that would regulate his industry, though he told Axios at the time that the legislation wouldn't necessarily be a slam dunk for his company because it would implement new licensing fees and require changes to how it packages its products, for example. Democrats and Republicans alike expressed support for the new legislation, however, when it was unveiled in a committee hearing Tuesday morning. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson also attended the committee meeting. "This is long overdue," Jackson, a Democrat, told lawmakers. "One of the major themes in terms of feedback that I've gotten from law enforcement and from families over the last six months has been about this issue — and usually happens when a family learns that it is truly the Wild West, at least with respect to what children are allowed to buy in these places."

an hour ago
Under a hot summer sun, South Carolina's governor says energy law will keep air conditioners humming
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Under the hot South Carolina summer sun, Republican Gov. Henry McMaster held a ceremonial bill signing for a law he and other supporters said will make sure the rapidly growing state has the energy to run air conditioners and anything else well into the future. McMaster signed the bill into law more than a month ago. But Wednesday's ceremony was a chance to bring utility executives and other workers together with lawmakers to celebrate the promise from supporters that the law will clear the way to meet the power needs of the 1.5 million people the state has added this century — and its fast industrial growth. 'It is hot and promising to get hotter, so we'll be very quick here. This is of course to celebrate a great step for South Carolina,' McMaster said at the ceremony, which lasted less than 15 minutes before most everyone went back into the air-conditioned mansion. The law has immediate impacts. It clears the way for private Dominion Energy and state-owned Santee Cooper to work together on a 2,000-megawatt natural gas plant on the site of a former coal-fired power plant in Colleton County as long as regulators give their OK. Utilities now can appeal decisions from those regulators at the Public Service Commission directly to the South Carolina Supreme Court, meaning projects or rate cases won't be in limbo for years as they wind through the courts. Power companies can now ask for smaller rate increases every year instead of hitting customers with what was sometimes a double-digit increase to cover inflation and rising costs after four or five years. Also in this session, lawmakers cleared the way for cloud computer companies, utilities or others to offer to take over the long-abandoned project to build two new nuclear reactors at the V.C. Summer site near Jenkinsville. Ratepayers paid billions of dollars on the project, which was abandoned in 2017, well before it generated a watt of power. The feasibility of restarting construction or whether a private entity or a utility could get the licenses and permissions that have lapsed has not been determined. The bill didn't get unanimous support. Some Democrats worried consumer protections and energy efficiency efforts were removed. Some Republicans and Democrats worried the state didn't set limits on data centers and that would allow the computer farms to suck up massive amounts of the new energy and raise costs to homeowners and others while providing few local benefits. But Wednesday was a day to celebrate for someone like Dominion Energy South Carolina President Keller Kissam sweating in his suit and tie instead of the short-sleeved polo he would prefer to wear. 'With the heat we experience in South Carolina and you've got to be able to produce 24/7,' Kissam said. 'Our customers expect when they flip a switch or bump the thermostat there's going to be enough electricity.'