logo
Jagdeep Dhankhar's tenure as West Bengal Governor was a constitutional flashpoint

Jagdeep Dhankhar's tenure as West Bengal Governor was a constitutional flashpoint

Indian Express5 days ago
The office of the Governor in India's constitutional architecture occupies a unique and often delicate space. The tenure of Jagdeep Dhankhar, who resigned as Vice President of India last night, as Governor of West Bengal is a classic example of how that delicate space can cause conflict between two offices.
As the nominal head of a state, the Governor is expected to function as a vital link to the Union, a custodian of the Constitution, and a guide to the elected government. This role has an inherent tension: How to perform these duties, particularly on constitutional oversight, without being perceived as encroaching upon the democratic mandate of the state legislature and executive. Dhankhar's role as Governor of WB brought this tension into sharp public focus.
A defining feature was his prolific use of public platforms, most notably Twitter, to communicate his views and question the state government's actions. This marked a departure from constitutional tradition and practice, that gubernatorial advice and concerns are best offered in private consultation with the Chief Minister. By taking his critiques of administrative and policy matters directly to the public sphere, Jagdeep Dhankhar created a dynamic of constant, open friction with the Mamata Banerjee government, fundamentally altering the nature of their constitutional engagement.
On the issue of law and order, Dhankhar was a persistent critic, frequently summoning senior police officials and issuing statements that questioned the state's administrative capacity. Following the 2021 Assembly elections, his visits to areas affected by post-poll violence were presented as a response to a constitutional crisis. However, these actions were met with accusations from the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) that the Raj Bhavan was acting in a partisan manner, with his pronouncements often aligning closely with the narrative of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the opposition in the state.
This friction extended deep into the legislative domain. The Governor's power to grant or withhold assent to bills passed by the legislature is a constitutional check, but it is meant to be exercised with utmost restraint. During his tenure, several bills, including the crucial Howrah Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Bill, remained pending at the Raj Bhavan for extended periods.The state government argued that such delays amounted to an obstruction of the legislative will of the people.
To appreciate the distinctiveness of this approach, it is instructive to contrast it with the gubernatorial style of Gopal Krishna Gandhi, who served in West Bengal from 2004 to 2009. Gandhi, a seasoned diplomat and scholar, presided during an equally, if not more, volatile period. His interventions, however, were rooted in what could be described as constitutional quietude and moral suasion. He engaged in firm, but discreet, dialogue with the then Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya. He sought to be a mediator, a calming influence who could facilitate talks between the government and the Opposition, then led by Mamata Banerjee. The contrast is one of method: One chose public scrutiny as the primary tool of accountability, the other chose private counsel and moral authority.
While one contextualises Jagdeep Dhankhar's tenure, it cannot be divorced from the prevailing national political climate, characterised by intense competition between the BJP-led central government and powerful regional parties such as the TMC. His actions in West Bengal were seen by many observers as part of a pattern in Opposition-ruled states where the Raj Bhavan became a key site of political contestation. This aligns with the long-standing debate over the role of the Governor, with bodies like the Sarkaria Commission having cautioned decades ago against appointing active politicians to the post to prevent the office from being used for partisan ends.
The governorship of Dhankhar in West Bengal was a tenure that consistently tested the established conventions of India's federal democracy. By adopting a posture of public and persistent opposition to the elected state government, his term forced a debate on the very nature of the Governor's role. It highlighted a fundamental divergence in approach from predecessors like Gopal Krishna Gandhi, who operated on the principle of dignified detachment and mediation.
The legacy of Jagdeep Dhankhar's term in West Bengal is, therefore, one that brought critical questions to the fore, one that continues to play out in other states: Where does a Governor's duty to uphold the Constitution end and political interference begin? And what are the long-term institutional consequences when the Raj Bhavan is perceived not as a neutral umpire, but as a player in the political arena?
The author is a political anthropologist and teaches in Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Government College, Kolkata
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kashmir is paradise on earth, sufsim promoted secularism: CJI Gavai
Kashmir is paradise on earth, sufsim promoted secularism: CJI Gavai

New Indian Express

time17 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Kashmir is paradise on earth, sufsim promoted secularism: CJI Gavai

SRINAGAR: Praising Kashmir, the Chief Justice of India Justice B R Gavai on Sunday described Kashmir as 'Paradise on Earth' and said Sufism has truly promoted secularism in the country. While addressing the North Zone Regional Conference of National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) in Srinagar, the CJI started his address by famous Persian couplet, 'Agar firdaus bar roo-e zameen ast, Hameen ast-o hameen ast-o hameen ast' (If there is a paradise on Earth, it is here, it is here and it is only here).' 'I am happy that I am again getting the opportunity to meet you in Kashmir, which is known as paradise. Whenever I have visited Kashmir, I have got love from everybody,' he said. 'I feel like I have come to my hometown. I am thankful for all the love and affection showered on me. I have been to all parts of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh,' the CJI said. 'Kashmir's Valleys, mountains, rivers, streams and if we see these, it can be safely said that Kashmir is a true paradise.' The CJI spoke of Kashmir's 3,000-year-old civilisational heritage and rich culture. He credited Sufism for upholding the values of secularism written in our country's constitution. 'The Sufism has truly promoted secularism,' he asserted. Referring to secularism in J&K, the CJI said in Dargahs, every section of society including Hindus, Muslims or Sikhs go. 'Similarly, people of every religion go to Mandirs and Gurudwaras' CJO Gavai lauded efforts of NALSA and J&K Legal Services Authority for convening the interaction. He also reflected on the legal and administrative foundation laid in the region as early as 1846, calling it one of the oldest and most structured legal systems in India. 'From 1928 till before independence of the country, a high court had been established here and Maharajas here also respected the orders passed by the high court,' he said. 'In the country's Constitution, we have promised ourselves justice — political, social and economic. We are bound to see that justice is implemented in its true spirit. The legal fraternity needs to have a commitment to the true values of the Constitution,' he said. The CJI said that while Babasaheb B R Ambedkar brought about political justice by adopting the principle 'one person, one vote and one value', the author of the Constitution spoke about social compartmentalisation and the difficulty of moving from one compartment to another. 'Our society has been divided into different compartments. The entry from one compartment to another is nearly impossible. On the economic front, our wealth is concentrated in a few hands while the vast majority of the people find it difficult to have two meals a day. We will have to eliminate this inequality and bring about social and economic equality in the true sense. We have all to remain committed to this whether it is executive, legislature or judicial. We are bound to see to it that social and economic justice is implemented in true spirit in this country,' he said. Indirectly referring to the situation in Kashmir during the last 35 years, the CJI said there have been aberrations that need to be undone. 'There have been aberrations, but we have to work to remove these. This dialogue between judges and lawyers will give a new perspective. I am sure this programme will help in rebuilding the traditional and undivided Kashmir where all communities — Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs — used to live together,' he said. Asserting that lawyers and judges are like two wheels of the golden chariot of justice, CJI said, 'If you span one wheel, the efficacy of the entire chariot comes to a standstill. For this, lawyers and judges should work together to give justice to the people who live in the last village of this country. Unless people have the knowledge of their rights, the rights are of no use'. In a key policy suggestion, the CJI urged the Chief Justice of the J&K High Court to consider establishing a separate bench for the Union Territory of Ladakh, acknowledging the consistent demand raised by the Ladakh Bar. ===Ends===

Badal condemns denial of entry to Sikh girl to Rajasthan exam centre for wearing kirpan, kara
Badal condemns denial of entry to Sikh girl to Rajasthan exam centre for wearing kirpan, kara

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Badal condemns denial of entry to Sikh girl to Rajasthan exam centre for wearing kirpan, kara

Sukhbir Badal, Shiromani Akali Dal president, has condemned an incident in Jaipur where a Sikh girl was barred from a judicial services exam for wearing Sikh religious symbols. Badal cited a violation of constitutional rights and urged Prime Minister Modi to intervene, highlighting increasing disrespect towards Sikh identity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Chandigarh: Shiromani Akali Dal SAD ) president Sukhbir Badal on Sunday claimed a baptised Sikh girl from Punjab's Tarn Taran district was stopped from entering a centre for Rajasthan Judicial Services examination in Jaipur as she was wearing 'kara' and 'kirpan', both sacred articles of Sikh faith."This was a gross violation of her constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 25 and it denied her fundamental right to practise her religion. Article 25 of the Constitution specifically mentions 'kirpan' among other symbols of Sikh religion, which are exempt from any bar, even in flights," Badal said in a SAD chief expressed grave concern over "growing" incidents of disrespect and discrimination against the sacred symbols of Sikh religion, and urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to intervene in the matter to put an end to this "painful chain of events" in the a letter, Badal drew Modi's attention to the latest incident in which Gurpreet Kaur from Tarn Taran was stopped from entering the examination centre in Jaipur."It is shocking that rules, if any, are framed by lower authorities flouting the sacred Constitution of India. The government of India should issue -- or, if necessary -- re-issue clear cut guidelines to all states and Union territories about the exemption to the inseparable articles of faith," Badal said in his letter to the prime Akali Dal chief said this was not a one-off incident but part of the ever-increasing number of examples of religious intolerance towards the uniqueness of Sikh a similar incident last year, two Sikh girls were stopped from appearing for the Rajasthan Judicial Services (RJS) exam in Jodhpur."Sikhs and their identity are inseparable and this was duly acknowledged and constitutionally mandated for compliance for all purposes in the country."But some officials at lower rungs deem themselves above the Constitution. This must stop as this vitiates communal harmony in the country," Badal also urged the Rajasthan High Court to provide the Sikh girl a special opportunity to appear for the RJS exam, ensuring that her right to uphold her faith is in the day, the SAD chief asked Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma to take strict action in the matter to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in his state.

JK statehood must be restored for Constitutional respect, says Farooq Abdullah
JK statehood must be restored for Constitutional respect, says Farooq Abdullah

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

JK statehood must be restored for Constitutional respect, says Farooq Abdullah

'If the Constitution of India is to be respected, states are never converted into UTs. A UT is converted into a state. The tragedy is that they converted a state into a UT. And what did they achieve?' he told PTI here recently. 'It's not a question of being hopeful,' Abdullah said in reply to a query about the growing demand for the restoration of statehood in the Union Territory. Srinagar, Jul 27 (PTI) Veteran politician and president of National Conference, Farooq Abdullah, has said if the Constitution of the country has to be respected, statehood for Jammu and Kashmir should be restored and that the recent Pahalgam terror attack could have been prevented had the local government been in charge of the security. Abdullah recalled that 'promises' were made when Article 370 was abrogated six years ago on August 5, 2019, that 'terrorism would disappear'. 'Has militancy disappeared? Or has it increased?' he said, adding, 'The Centre should answer this in the parliament'. Abdullah said that the people were 'expecting' that statehood for Jammu and Kashmir would be announced soon. 'Already, all the opposition parties are fighting for us also in the Parliament…You have seen recently, (Congress President Mallikarjun) Kharge and Rahul Gandhi's letter to the Prime Minister (Narendra Modi) asking that the statehood must be restored.' Abdullah recalled that the central government has made promises 'to us in Parliament and also committed themselves in the Supreme Court'. The veteran politician, who has been the chief minister of the erstwhile state three times and also a Union Minister, questioned the Centre's motive behind 'downgrading' the state. 'And what did they achieve? When they did this, they said that the militancy would die because 370 is responsible for militancy. For the last six years, they have been ruling for all 5 years before the election came. 'And even today, they are in control of the security and all the rest. Has militancy disappeared? Or has it increased?' he asked. Reflecting on the current situation, Abdullah lamented the lack of control the elected government has over security and administrative matters and went on to say that the recent Pahalgam terror attack could have been prevented had a local government been in charge of the security. Referring to admission by the Lieutenant Governor admitting security failure for Pahalgam, Abdullah said, 'I am glad the Lt Governor has accepted his failure. He should have had the courage to resign.' Abdullah pointed out the glaring silence from Jammu and Kashmir in the Rajya Sabha as four seats remain vacant, terming it a 'tragedy'. 'Why was Jammu and Kashmir denied election to the Rajya Sabha?' he said. 'Not only that, two seats are vacant in the Assembly. What is the Election Commission doing?' The National Conference chief dismissed talk of internal discord in the party. 'This party is a democratic party. It is not like the BJP, which has become an autocratic party. Here people have the right to speak what they want,' he said while answering a question about the difference of opinion between the party and Srinagar MP Aga Ruhullah Mehdi. On Pakistan's role, Abdullah's stance was firm. 'Pakistan is not going to give up. Therefore, what is the way forward? War is never a solution to any problem,' he said. He advocated for a peaceful solution that would be 'honourable for India, honourable for Pakistan, and honourable for the people of Jammu and Kashmir'. To a question about separatist leader Bilal Lone announcing joining the mainstream, he said, 'I am very glad, very happy that they have realised that J-K is a part of India', and expressed the hope that the leader could now contribute to the welfare of the people after 'years spent in the wilderness'. PTI SKL RT RT This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store