logo
New rules for commuting as people say it puts them off going to office

New rules for commuting as people say it puts them off going to office

Wales Onlinea day ago
New rules for commuting as people say it puts them off going to office
Commuters have listed the worst behaviour now routinely seen on the way to work
Commuters who sneeze and cough without covering their faces have been named as among the bad habits that fellow passengers hate most. Talking loudly on the phone, playing loud music and putting feet on seats were other bad habits that most annoy fellow passengers, according to the survey.Research by tombola asked what annoys people when travelling to and from work and whether this plays a part in them wanting to be in the office. Chewing loudly and not respecting someone's personal space by sitting next to them when there are other seats are other examples of poor etiquette that gets up workers' noses.The number one gripe is people speaking loudly on the phone, with almost half (42%) of working Brits regarding this as the most infuriating thing that can happen on a commute. The second big no-no, at 39%, is when people play music out loud, a trend also known among younger generations as 'bare beating'.The third cardinal commuting sin for more than a third (34%) of people is when folk sneeze or cough without covering their face. Other poor etiquette includes people having their feet on the seats (29%), chewing loudly (24%) and anti-social behaviour (22%)

What people hate about commuting (tombola)

With the average commute to work taking 27 minutes, there's plenty of time to experience this frustrating behaviour. More than half (51%) of all British commuters will experience a pet peeve at least once a week. A further quarter (24%) claiming they must endure them on multiple occasions a week.Around a third (31%) of commuting Brits would react by merely sitting there in silence, but simmering silently with anger. However, one in ten (10%), who aren't as relaxed, say they would confront the person demanding an explanation for their poor behaviour.Putting the shoe on the other foot, a shocking one in five (20%) questioned admitted to committing one of these pet peeves themselves while on their way to work. British working habits are constantly evolving to adapt to the changing demands of work-life pressures.The survey revealed that only 7% of working Brits have never commuted to work, meaning the majority will be exposed to these grumbles at some point in their career. But since Covid, most working Brits have adopted a 'hybrid' policy, with a quarter (25%) saying they commute less than once a week.For those who do commute, half (50%) say they take the train, with the average train journey taking 63 minutes. More than a third of commuters (36%) say they take other forms of rail such as the tube or tram to get to work, while one in ten (10%) spend at least £50 a week commuting by car.Those working in agriculture are the biggest offenders of commuting pet peeves, with three in five (59%) saying they have committed a pet peeve, much greater than the national average of one in five (20%). On the other hand, retail workers are the most unlikely to commit a commuting pet peeve, with around one in nine (11%) claiming they have.According to the study, marketing professionals experience these the least, with two-thirds claiming they commute less than once a week, less than any other industry. Laura Akano, Etiquette Expert at Polished Manners, said: "When travelling to work it's important to remember that public transport is a shared space - not an extension of your own home."Good etiquette goes a long way to ensure a smoother, more pleasant journey for everyone. Some of the golden rules of etiquette when using public transport are to avoid sitting on priority seats, always have your ticket ready and keep your bags and feet off the seats.
Article continues below
What people hate about commuting (tombola)
"Don't bring or eat food with strong smells, as the smell will linger and make the environment uncomfortable for other passengers, and if eating food try to do it as respectfully as possible. If someone is being inconsiderate on your commute, make sure to use discretion."It's okay to politely ask someone to move their bag if it's on a seat but for more serious issues it's safer to alert staff members. If possible, move to another carriage or wait for the next transport to arrive."Poor commuting etiquette can have a bigger impact than people realise - it can leave passengers feeling stressed, irritable or emotionally drained. For some, if the experience is so unpleasant, they will begin to avoid public transport altogether to protect their general wellbeing, fostering a 'work from home' culture."Samantha Wilcox, Organic Manager at tombola, said: "Our research focuses on the everyday frustrations of commuting, shining a light on some of the nation's biggest pet peeves. Your morning sets the tone for the entire day and the commute to work can significantly influence how the rest of the day unfolds."By highlighting what British workers find frustrating, we're hoping to make it a more pleasant journey for everyone, with a healthy dose of humour thrown in. Because, let's face it, commuting could do with a bit more politeness here and there."UK'S TOP 10 BIGGEST COMMUTING PET PEEVES1. Speaking loudly on the phone - 42%2. Playing music out loud - 39%3. Sneezing/coughing without covering your face - 34%4. Feet on seats - 29%5. Eating/chewing loudly - 24%6. Anti-social behaviour - 22%7. Sitting next to someone even when there are other seats available (lack of personal space) - 20%8. Leaving rubbish behind - 18%9. Not waiting in turn - 17%10. Eating pungent food - 14%TOP FIVE 'OFFENDING INDUSTRIES' OF COMMUTER PET PEEVES1. Agriculture - 59%2. Tech - 34%3. Art - 33%4. Construction - 31%5. Food - 27%
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mum issues urgent warning as toddler left screaming in agony at seaside hotspot thanks to beachgoers' dangerous mistake
Mum issues urgent warning as toddler left screaming in agony at seaside hotspot thanks to beachgoers' dangerous mistake

Scottish Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Mum issues urgent warning as toddler left screaming in agony at seaside hotspot thanks to beachgoers' dangerous mistake

It comes as Brits are expected to flock to beaches with temperatures heating this weekend BEACH ALERT Mum issues urgent warning as toddler left screaming in agony at seaside hotspot thanks to beachgoers' dangerous mistake Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MOTHER has issued an urgent warning after her toddler was left screaming in agony at a popular seaside hotspot due to a dangerous mistake made by beachgoers. The two-year-old boy was taken to hospital as a result of the "thoughtless" beach-goers activities. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Two-year-old Harry Lambert was on a family beach trip with his mum, 36, dad, 37, and brother Tommy, 6 Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media 7 The family enjoyed the first five days of their holiday of playing on the beach in Christchurch Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media 7 Until Harry was left screaming with burns on his feet Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media Harry Lambert received burns to both his both feet - after running over an abandoned fire pit on the beach. Amy Lambert, 36, and her husband Richard Lambert, 37, had driven to Dorset on August 4 for a week's holiday with their two sons Harry and Tommy, 6. The family enjoyed the first five days of their holiday playing on Avon beach in Mudeford, Christchurch. But when the family-of-four visited the beach on August 9th, the mum-of-two said Harry ran over a 'hot' patch of sand while playing and began to scream. Company director Richard rushed Harry into the sea to try and cool his scorched feet down in the water, initially baffled by what had upset him. As Harry continued to cry, Amy rushed her son back up to the lodge where they were staying and ran his feet under the sink for 20 minutes. But when this offered no relief, the company director drove him to Royal Bournemouth Hospital in Bournemouth, Dorset, where she was told he had suffered surface burns on his feet. Wince-inducing photos show the two-year-old's scorched feet had erupted with 'fluid-filled' blisters on each toe, before they were carefully bandaged up. After flagging the incident to a lifeguard after it happened, it was later discovered to be a fire pit concealed by sand that was still burning. Now healing, Amy is sharing her son's story to urge people to put out fire pits and disposable BBQs on the beach properly - to ensure it doesn't happen to anyone else. UK Basks in Glorious Sunshine: Thousands Flock to Beaches as Heatwave Hits Amy, from Fordingbridge, Hampshire, said: "We went down on the beach in the morning. "My son Harry was running along on the beach, playing with his digger and he ran across this patch on the beach and instantly started screaming. "My husband put two and two together and instantly put him in the sea. "His feet were bright red and from the moment it happened he screamed for a whole hour. "I felt hopeless as there was nothing we could do [to stop the pain]. "[While I looked after Harry], my husband had gone back to the beach with my other son to tell the lifeguard. "The lifeguard then got a large bucket of water from the sea and poured it over it [the hot patch of sand]. "A huge cloud of smoke came off it as it was boiling. "As they poured more water on it, they discovered a fire pit underneath that had been dug into the sand. "It looked like normal sand and there was nothing to say there was a fire pit there at all. 7 Harry had his feet bandaged up after being taken to Royal Bournemouth Hospital in Dorset Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media 7 He suffered surface burns on his feet and left with a blister on every toe Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media 7 The toddler screamed for an hour because he was in that much pain Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media "It was heartbreaking to see him in pain as there was nothing I could do and I couldn't explain it to him either as he's so small. "He just kept screaming, 'I don't like it, I don't like it'. "The hospital said that him being in pain was a good thing as he hadn't suffered any nerve damage and it was just surface burns. "He had blisters on every one of his toes and the soles of his feet were bright red." At the hospital, Harry had both his feet bandaged up and returned the next day for a check up. Thankfully, Amy says his injuries are now healing well and he will not need surgery on his feet. Amy said: "He still had the blisters on his toes but they were happy with his progress. "He has three blisters that are quite large and round and filled with fluid but the others are quite flat. "Harry is very lucky. He is only small and if he had fallen over or hit his face, it could have been worse. "He's a little water baby and loves to be down near the sea. "We do intend to get him back down there as soon as we can so he's not worried. It's not something we'd ever think would happen to him." Since the incident, Amy has now shared Harry's story on social media to warn people about the importance of disposing of their beach BBQs and fire pits properly. Amy said: "For me, I've always known not to cover a BBQ but maybe people don't know this. "If you're down on the beach in the evening having a good time, you're probably not thinking about the people the next day. "They probably think that if they cover it, it will be cold the next day. Actually it's making it worse as sand is a conductor and generates more heat. "It was just as hot as if there was still a fire there. You just need to cool it down and get rid of it properly." Anthony Rogers, head of seafront at BCP Council, said: "It is disappointing that the inconsideration of others has ruined what should have been a lovely trip to the beach for the Lambert family. "Disposable BBQs are only allowed on our beaches from 6pm to 10.30pm and we consistently ask everyone who uses one to dispose of them properly - that means extinguishing them carefully and leaving it next to our bins ready for collection. "BBQs should never be buried or put into bins whilst hot and this is an unfortunate reminder of precisely why. "We wish Harry a speedy recovery and hope he can return and enjoy the beach again soon."

Students will want universities to ‘understand context' over grades
Students will want universities to ‘understand context' over grades

Powys County Times

time9 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Students will want universities to ‘understand context' over grades

School and college leavers will want universities to 'respect and understand' that they faced a 'significant' programme to deflate their GCSE grades following Covid-19, the Ucas chief has said. Jo Saxton, chief executive of the university admissions service, suggested that fewer students who are receiving their post-16 qualification results this summer met the entry requirements for A-level courses two years ago when grading was returned to pre-pandemic levels in England. Dr Saxton, who was chief regulator of England's exams regulator Ofqual from 2021 until 2023, has suggested that there could be 'higher' attainment across this year's A-level cohort as a result. Her comments come as students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive their A-level and Level 3 BTec results on Thursday, with many finding out if they have secured a university place. Last year, more than a quarter (27.8%) of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at the University of Buckingham, has suggested that a higher percentage of UK A-level entries awarded top grades – compared with before the pandemic – could become the 'new normal' this summer. During a webinar hosted by the Higher Education Policy Institute think tank, Dr Saxton said: 'This cohort are the first to sit their Level 3 qualifications where they had the pre-pandemic standard reinstated on their GCSEs. 'I think that's just such an important backdrop for this whole cycle, just remembering this is that cohort, that there was a significant national programme to deflate their grades.' Dr Saxton, who was in charge at Ofqual when A-level and GCSE exams were reinstated in England following the pandemic, said she 'lost a lot of sleep' over the action to tackle grade inflation. But she suggested that teenagers told her that they wanted their exams back and they wanted their results to 'carry value'. Dr Saxton said: 'I think they will really be looking to those universities to respect and understand the context in which they've come through.' She said the return to pre-pandemic grading in 2023 meant 'fewer students than in recent years actually met the entry criteria that most schools and colleges would set for progression into A-level subjects'. Provisional exam entries data for England shows that A-level entries decreased by 0.4% from 825,355 last summer to 821,875 this summer, despite a 3.8% increase in the size of the 18-year-old population. Speaking just a few days before students receive their exam results, Dr Saxton added: 'It probably means that there's fractionally higher prior attainment across the cohort. This is me speculating as a former chief regulator.' Dr Saxton said clearing is no longer perceived as a 'bargain basement' for those who are not successful on A-level results day. Clearing is available to students who do not meet the conditions of their offer on A-level results day, as well as those who did not receive any offers. But prospective students who have changed their mind about what or where they wish to study, and also those who have applied outside the normal application window, can also use clearing. On Tuesday, the Ucas chief said: 'Clearing maybe was perceived as a bargain basement – it was for the people who had been unsuccessful. 'But that is definitely not how current applicants perceive it. 'For current applicants it's the mechanism by which they change their mind.' Nearly 22,700 courses with vacancies for undergraduate students living in England were available on the Ucas clearing site as of Wednesday last week – eight days before results day, a PA news agency analysis showed. A sample of 129 of the UK's largest higher education providers showed 17 of the 24 elite Russell Group universities had more than 3,600 courses with vacancies for English residents on clearing. Dr Saxton added: 'It is about students trusting their instincts and going back to their curated playlists, the favourites that they researched, that they've probably visited. 'They're not blindfolded throwing a dart at a dartboard.' Earlier this week, the Education Secretary said 'far too many young' white working-class British students do not get the exam results that they need to allow them to continue on to university. Bridget Phillipson told PA that the Post-16 White Paper and the Schools White Paper, which are both due in the autumn, will focus on turning around these 'thorny and generational challenges'. Dr Saxton said she would like the Government to look at regional disparities in access to and participation in higher education – such as the 'London advantage'. She said: 'More people in all parts of the country should get to benefit from higher education.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store