Billionaire puts £250m mansion up for sale after declaring ‘UK's gone to hell'
John Fredriksen, a Norwegian marine tycoon, is reportedly selling his 300-year old Georgian manor in Mayfair just weeks after criticising Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, for abolishing the non-dom regime.
The property, known as the Old Rectory, is one of Britain's most expensive houses with two acres of gardens and 10 bedrooms across 30,000 sq ft.
It is set to be put on the market with a £250m price tag – with viewings already taking place, The Times reported.
Mr Fredriksen, who was the UK's ninth richest man with a £13.7bn fortune before he announced his departure, bought the property in 2001 for around £40m.
The 81-year-old businessman, who is originally from Oslo, Norway, last month said that Ms Reeves's tax raid had encouraged him to leave the UK and move to the United Arab Emirates.
'The entire Western world is on its way down,' he said, while the UK is 'starting to remind me more and more of Norway. Britain has gone to hell, like Norway'.
The sale comes amid predictions that the UK is poised to lose more millionaires this year than any other country, which may fuel more high end property sales.
Last year Ms Reeves raised taxes on the global elite, abolishing the non-dom status and tightening inheritance tax rules. Non-dom rules had allowed foreigners to only pay tax on their UK income – largely shielding their global income from any taxation.
According to Henley & Partners, the UK will lose 16,500 millionaires this year because of the changes, up from 10,800 last year.
Among those who have left or are leaving include Richard Gnodde, who is one of London's best-known bankers who became Goldman's vice chairman in January, as well as the steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal and property tycoon brothers Ian and Richard Livingstone.
Mr Fredriksen made his fortune building up a fleet of oil tankers and other ships around the world.
Since leaving the UK, he has shrunk his presence including closing the London headquarters of his shipping group Seatankers Management, which was based in Sloane Square.
He has also blasted the US under Donald Trump, saying the president's trade war was 'completely hopeless' and said Norway was 'dull'.
'I gave up on them a long time ago,' he said. 'I gave up in 1978, when I moved. It has only gotten worse. Norway is completely uninteresting,' he said, adding that 'Norway is good for those who work for the state.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Thousands more Britons will be dragged into paying tax on their hard-earned savings
Millions of Britons will be forced to pay tax on their savings this year as soaring numbers of workers are pulled into higher bands for the first time. Rachel Reeves 's decision to keep tax thresholds frozen means many workers receiving wage rises to help combat the cost-of-living crisis will be dragged into paying more tax. In a double blow for many, higher interest rates will also mean around 3.4million people are expected to receive a bill for interest made on their savings in the current tax year, up from 3.1million five years ago. Critics have urged the Chancellor to address the effects of the tax-threshold freeze – known as 'fiscal drag' – as bills go up without income increasing in real terms. She is also facing mounting pressure to maintain the tax-free amount that savers are allowed to put into cash Isas. The Chancellor is understood to have considered lowering the limit to encourage more people to invest in stocks and shares. Harriet Guevara, chief savings officer at Nottingham Building Society (NBS), which studied the latest HMRC figures, said the data showed a 'hidden tax burden for ordinary savers'. She added: 'At a time when families are trying to build financial resilience amid frozen thresholds and rising living costs, the Government should be doing more to reward and protect savers.' Government rules allow people to earn some interest on their savings without paying tax. A person earning less than £17,570 a year can receive up to £6,000 in savings interest tax-free. Basic-rate taxpayers earning between £17,571 and £50,270 have a savings allowance of £1,000. For higher-rate taxpayers, earning up to £125,140, this falls to £500, while additional rate taxpayers over this level receive no tax-free allowance. The allowances have been frozen for nine years, meaning many more people have been dragged into paying tax on savings interest as their incomes have risen in line with inflation. The system is also considered incredibly complicated, which has resulted in many storing their money in Isas, which have a tax-free allowance of £20,000. Ms Reeves reportedly considered cutting the tax-free allowance on cash Isas to encourage more people to invest in shares and boost the economy. But an announcement on the limit was delayed last month following a backlash from building societies and savers. The NBS assessment came as HMRC data compiled by the online investment platform AJ Bell showed that one in every 25 basic-rate taxpayer will receive a bill for interest on their savings this year compared to less than one in 100 four years ago. While rising interest rates have boosted returns for savers, AJ Bell warns that this has now turned into a 'bounty for the taxman' as HMRC is expected to pocket more than £6billion from savers this year.
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How to work out if YOU can claim £950 from the car finance scandal - and what to do if you can't find the paperwork
It's the scandal dubbed 'PPI on Wheels', but last week five judges at the Supreme Court dealt a blow to millions of drivers hoping for a payout on their car finance deals. There will be no compensation for customers who were simply unaware commission was being paid when they took out car finance, with the judges declaring this was not enough to count as mis-selling.
Times
42 minutes ago
- Times
One in ten businesses see staff quit over office working demands
Almost one in ten businesses has had staff quit after they were told to stop working from home, research has shown. The research by the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) found that 9 per cent had lost staff because of a failure to offer remote working. The survey of 583 businesses between April and May also found that 48 per cent expect staff back in the office full-time over the next year. Employers are increasingly turning against working from home in a bid to boost workers' productivity, the BCC said. Some 41 per cent of employers thought remote working made employees less productive. Jane Gratton, the BCC's director of public policy, said the budget had 'ramped up employment costs' and led to businesses looking at how to increase productivity. She said: 'In some cases firms are saying we need to bring people back to the office to reach the levels we want to achieve.' Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, has pushed through reforms to workers' rights, which include the right to request flexible working. Under the changes, bosses have to accept flexible working requests except where 'it is not reasonably feasible' and must provide a justification. Ministers have insisted that there are 'real economic benefits' to more flexible working and that the legal right will help productivity and the 'resilience' of staff. • Legal right to work from home will boost productivity, says Labour But experts said Labour's increase in employers' national insurance contributions at the budget in October had prompted more demands from businesses for in-person working. According to the BCC, manufacturers and customer-facing companies have consistently preferred staff in their premises rather than at homes and are particularly likely to think remote working is bad for their business. Gratton said: 'We're seeing a clear shift towards more firms requiring full onsite working, but it's by no means a uniform picture.' She said some companies had found that fully remote jobs were bad for the business and the employee, with less chance to share ideas and less oversight of how employees are coping under pressure. She also said that companies worried about employee development without young workers shadowing on-site senior colleagues. But not all companies favour a return to strict working rules, with many saying they remained open to flexible arrangements that were not fully remote, such as altered working hours or job shares. Gratton said: 'The pandemic reset how and where people worked, and employment models adjusted. It's taken time for businesses to assess the impact of those working patterns.' A government spokesman said: 'Flexible working can help people achieve a better work life balance, which can lead to healthier and more productive employees, and that's why we've committed to this through our Employment Rights Bill. 'Flexible working extends beyond just home and hybrid working arrangements. It is down to businesses and the employee to determine working arrangements that suit their respective needs.' In 2023 a similar survey found that less than 30 per cent of businesses expected their workforce to be in the office full-time over the next five years.
