Fury over LSE launch for new book that ‘whitewashes' Hamas
Understanding Hamas and Why That Matters, which claims the proscribed terror organisation is subjected to vilification, will be launched at the London School of Economics (LSE) next month.
Campaigners have accused LSE of disregarding the group's violent history, including the Oct 7 massacre, and have urged it to cancel the event.
The Campaign Against Antisemitism claimed that the book is 'an outrageous attempt to whitewash Hamas' barbaric acts of horror', and the LSE event itself is further evidence of how British universities 'have become epicentres of Jew-hatred'.
Anti-Semitic abuse on campuses in the UK has reached record levels following the Hamas attacks against Israel on Oct 7, according to a report by the Community Security Trust (CST).
In December, the CST found that widespread pro-Palestine activism led to many Jewish students feeling university life had become increasingly 'hostile' towards Jews.
Students at LSE slept in the university's atrium for more than a month in support of Palestine and only left after losing a legal challenge.
A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: 'This book's synopsis describes Hamas as 'a widely misunderstood movement' and says that 'the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has been subjected to intense vilification'. Perhaps that is because it capped decades of lethal suicide bombings with the massacre of 1,200 and the abduction of some 250 people.
'Is such conduct not worthy of 'vilification'?
'This appears to be an outrageous attempt to whitewash Hamas's barbaric acts of horror.
'For all their virtuous anti-racism rhetoric, our universities have become epicentres of Jew-hatred and this event is yet another example of how bad the problem is. We will be writing to LSE, which must cancel this propaganda event immediately.'
The university's Middle East Centre, which is hosting the event on March 10, said the book explores Hamas's 'shift from social and religious activism to national political engagement'.
The talk will feature the book's author and academics researching the Middle East.
The centre's director Michael Mason, who will chair the book launch, said the event is 'covered by LSE's commitment to academic freedom and free speech'.
In a statement to The Jewish Chronicle, he said: 'The Middle East Centre does not (as with LSE as an institution) take a formal position on political or international issues.
'We endeavour to provide a platform to facilitate discourse on contemporary matters by encouraging critical debate, within the law, where the views of all parties are treated with respect.'
He added 'Nothing from the hosting of this event can reasonably be construed as the Middle East Centre or LSE condoning Hamas and its actions on October 7.'
The Telegraph contacted LSE for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Wisconsin Woman Who Flew to Britain to Try to Kill a Man Gets 30-Year Sentence
A failed hit woman from Wisconsin convicted of attempting to assassinate a man in Birmingham, England, has been sentenced to 30 years in prison for her part in the plot. Aimee Betro, 45, attempted to shoot the man outside his family home while disguised in an Islamic veil, but failed when her gun jammed. She was convicted of conspiracy to murder, possessing a firearm and importing ammunition this month after a three-week trial. Judge Simon Drew said Ms. Betro was 'recruited to conduct what was intended to be an execution' by her British boyfriend, Mohammed Nazir, who she had met through an online dating website. Mr. Nazir, 31, and his father, Mohammed Aslam, 56, mounted the plot as revenge against a rival family, as part of a bitter dispute that started in 2018. They were jailed for their part in the conspiracy last November. Prosecutors said that Ms. Betro, her face covered by a niqab, lay in wait for their target, Sikander Ali, outside his family home on Sept. 7, 2019. When Mr. Ali arrived in his car and started to get out, Ms. Betro walked toward him, raised a black handgun and pulled the trigger just inches away from his face. The gun jammed and Mr. Ali was able to get back into his vehicle and quickly reversed to escape, prosecutors said. Ms. Betro got into her car and left the scene, but hours later, she returned in a taxi and opened fire on Mr. Ali's home, with three bullets flying through its windows. No one was harmed. Afterward, she sent Mr. Ali's father taunting messages. 'Where are you hiding,' she wrote, with another message threatening: 'Stop playing hide 'n' seek you're lucky it jammed.' Ms. Betro, who is from the city of West Allis, about six miles outside Milwaukee, fled immediately after the attempted shooting. She remained on the run for almost five years before being traced to Armenia last summer, and extradited to face trial in Britain.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Most Americans in favor of Palestinian state, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - A 58% majority of Americans believe that every country in the United Nations should recognize Palestine as a nation, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll, as Israel and Hamas considered a possible truce in the nearly two-year-long Gaza war. Some 33% of respondents did not agree that U.N. members should recognize a Palestinian state and 9% did not answer. The six-day poll, which closed on Monday, found a pronounced partisan divide on the issue, with 78% of Democrats supporting the idea, far more than the 41% of President Donald Trump's Republicans who agreed. A narrow 53% majority of Republicans did not agree that all U.N. member nations should recognize a Palestinian state. Israel has long counted on the U.S., its most powerful ally, for billions of dollars a year in military aid and international diplomatic support. An erosion of U.S. public support would be a worrisome sign for Israel as it faces not only Hamas militants in Gaza but unresolved conflict with Iran, its regional arch-foe. A widely condemned Israeli settlement plan that would cut across occupied West Bank land which the Palestinians seek for a state received final approval on Wednesday, according to an Israeli government statement. More: Israel says it has taken first steps of military operation in Gaza City The poll was taken within weeks of three countries, close U.S. allies Canada, Britain and France, announcing they intend to recognize a Palestinian state. This ratcheted up pressure on Israel as starvation spreads in Gaza. The survey was taken amid hopes that Israel and Hamas would agree on a ceasefire to provide a break in the fighting, free some hostages and ease shipments of humanitarian assistance into the Gaza Strip. Britain, Canada, Australia and several of their European allies said last week that the humanitarian crisis in the war-torn Palestinian enclave has reached "unimaginable levels," as aid groups warned that Gazans are on the verge of famine. The United Nations human rights office said on Tuesday Israel was not letting enough supplies into the Gaza Strip to avert widespread starvation. Israel has denied responsibility for hunger in Gaza, accusing Hamas of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies. More: As Netanyahu expands Gaza war, some reservists grow more disillusioned SUPPORT FOR FIGHTING STARVATION Some 65% of the Reuters/Ipsos poll respondents said the U.S. should take action in Gaza to help people facing starvation, with 28% disagreeing. The number disagreeing included 41% of Republicans. Trump and many of his fellow Republicans take an "America First" approach to international relations, backing steep cuts to the country's international food and medical assistance programs in the belief that U.S. funds should assist Americans, not those outside its borders. More: One meal a day. $20 for an egg. Choosing which kid gets fed. Starvation stalks Gaza The war in Gaza began when Hamas-led fighters stormed into Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Israel's offensive has since killed more than 62,000 Palestinians, plunged Gaza into humanitarian crisis and displaced most of its population, according to Gaza health authorities. The Reuters/Ipsos poll also showed that 59% of Americans believe Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive. Thirty-three percent of respondents disagreed. In a similar Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in February 2024, 53% of respondents agreed that Israel's response had been excessive, and 42% disagreed. Officials at the Israeli embassy in Washington and mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the poll. The latest Reuters/Ipsos survey, conducted online, gathered responses from 4,446 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points. (Reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Jason Lange; editing by Scott Malone, Cynthia Osterman and Mark Heinrich)
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Inside the Dems' fight to be "the new Iowa" and hold the first 2028 primary
Democratic Party officials are quietly battling over which state will be the first to vote in the 2028 presidential primary — a fight that's set to break into the open next week, when the officials meet in Minneapolis. Nevada, New Hampshire, and Michigan are currently the frontrunners to be "the new Iowa," and lead off the 2028 Democratic primary season, according to several people familiar with the Rules and Bylaws committee that will determine the order. Why it matters: The candidate who wins the first state primary gets a boost that can help propel them to the nomination — and potential candidates already are looking into which order of contests could benefit them the most. State of play: For decades, Iowa's caucuses and New Hampshire's primary kicked off the presidential primary season. But the order of contests has become a free-for-all since Iowa botched its caucuses in 2020, and then-President Biden changed the calendar in 2024 to favor his re-election bid by moving up the primary in Biden-friendly South Carolina. Potential candidates and their teams have been contacting members of the party's Rules and Bylaws panel to develop relationships before the 2028 calendar is set. These are the current pitches — and arguments against — the states that appear to be the top contenders to kick off the primary voting, according to several people familiar with them. Pro-Nevada: It has a strong union presence, is racially diverse, and has a large working-class Latino population at a time when Democrats are losing ground with such voters. It's also a swing state, and a presidential primary would bring in money and organizing power that could help Democrats there in the November 2028 election. Anti-Nevada: Voters there typically aren't as engaged as those in places like Iowa, it takes longer to get around a state that's more than 10 times the size of New Hampshire by square mileage, and it's far away from the political classes in Washington and New York. Pro-New Hampshire: It's traditionally been an early primary, and it's a small state with engaged voters who'll give any candidate a shot instead of favoring the one with the most money. Anti-New Hampshire: It's more than 60% white, and the Democratic Party is significantly more diverse than that. There isn't a strong union presence at a time when Democrats are trying to win back working-class voters. Pro-Michigan: It's racially and regionally diverse with a mix of rural and urban residents, and is an important Midwestern swing state with a strong union presence. To some Democrats, it's the choice most representative of all of America. Anti-Michigan: It's too big with too many people (pop. 10 million-plus), which could favor the candidate with the most advertising money rather than one who meets a lot of voters and has a robust organization on the ground. Some Democratic operatives worry that a spotlight on the state's large Arab and Jewish populations could further stoke divisions in the party over the war in Gaza, while other Democrats want that to be part of the debate. Zoom in: The new chair of the DNC, Ken Martin, overhauled and expanded the committee in ways that will affect the final vote. The committee now includes many current and former state party chairs who are seen as close allies of Martin. That could give him significant influence over the final decision. The committee also has expanded from 33 to 49 members. Many of the new members have never served on the Rules and Bylaws panel, which could complicate the process. What they're saying: Rep. Debbie Dingell of Michigan, who joined the committee and is advocating for her state, told Axios she wants to "put the light on important issues early in the primaries, and not in November when we are losing." Michigan's party chair Curtis Hertel added that "placing Michigan early in the process is healthy for our democracy and for the country." "The DNC is committed to running a fair, rigorous, and transparent process for the 2028 presidential nominating calendar," DNC Deputy Communications Director Abhi Rahman said. "All states will have an opportunity to participate." Longtime DNC member Michael Kapp, who is new to the committee, said Martin "is not putting his thumb on the scale," like former chairs did. "It's a very different process than before, and in the right direction." Reality check: It's early in the process, and other states will make bids to host the first primary as conversations heat up later this year. Iowa, which mishandled the vote counting during its 2020 caucuses, will try to make a comeback. But there are no Iowans on the Rules and Bylaws panel that will meet next week. South Carolina, which went first in 2024, also is likely to try to stay first. About one-quarter of South Carolina's residents are Black — a population that leans heavily toward Democrats.
