Iran executes two members of opposition group for attacking infrastructure
Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani-Eslamloo, identified as "operational elements" of the MEK, were sentenced to death in September 2024 - a verdict upheld by the Supreme Court, which denied their request for a retrial, Mizan said.
"The terrorists, in coordination with MEK leaders, had ...
built launchers and hand-held mortars in line with the group's goals, fired projectiles heedlessly at citizens, homes, service and administrative facilities, educational and charity centres," the report said.
The defendants were indicted with "moharebeh", - an Islamic term meaning waging war against God - destroying public property and "membership in a terrorist organisation with the aim of disrupting national security."
Amnesty International said that Ehsani-Eslamloo and Hassani were arrested in 2022 and maintained their innocence during a trial which the rights group called "grossly unfair and marred by allegations of torture and forced confessions.'
"According to informed sources, agents interrogated them without lawyers present and subjected them to torture and other ill-treatment, including beatings and prolonged solitary confinement, to extract self-incriminating statements," it said in January.
According to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, the number of people executed in Iran rose to at least 901 in 2024, the highest number since 2015.
The MEK, known in English as People's Mujahideen Organisation of Iran, was a powerful leftist-Islamist group that staged bombing campaigns against the shah's government and U.S. targets in the 1970s but ultimately fell out with the other factions of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Since then, the MEK has opposed the Islamic Republic and its leadership in exile has been Paris-based. The group was listed as a terrorist organisation by the U.S. and the European Union until 2012.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
13 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Woman wearing Palestine Action t-shirt arrested in Belfast
A woman wearing a Palestine Action t-shirt has been arrested at an anti-racism protest in Belfast city centre. It comes after the British Government in July made expressing support for or being a member of Palestine Action a criminal offence under terrorism legislation. Advertisement In London, around 365 people were arrested for supporting the banned group after protesters gathered in Parliament Square on Saturday. People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll (Claudia Savage/PA) In Belfast, videos shared online show a woman wearing a Palestine Action t-shirt being told by police officers she was being arrested on suspicion of 'possessing an article, namely a sign or t-shirt, that indicates support for Palestine Action'. Belfast MLA Gerry Carroll condemned police action against pro-Palestine activists. He called on Executive ministers to 'speak up for the right to protest' and dismiss any charges people may face. Advertisement 'The whole world can see the mass starvation and daily executions carried out by Israel, yet the people being harassed in Belfast are those who stand up for Palestine,' Mr Carroll said. 'On the same day we saw far-right protesters with offensive and provocative signage, including pro-Israel items, the police took it upon themselves to arrest activists for having the temerity to wear items of clothing in solidarity action. 'The British Government implemented a regressive clampdown with their vote to proscribe Palestine Action, without a single vote being cast in the local Assembly.' Sinn Féin MLA for West Belfast Pat Sheehan said the British Government and PSNI's actions were 'disgraceful'. Advertisement 'While Keir Starmer continues to enable the ongoing Israeli genocide and starvation of Gazans, he is also moving to silence ordinary, decent people for speaking out,' he said. 'Just yesterday, (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu announced his intention to seize Gaza City. 'Yet still, Starmer provides cover for this rogue regime, instead targeting activists for highlighting what should be a universal moral outrage. 'Like all previous censorship attempts by the British Government, which is totally out of step with the wider public, this too will fail. Advertisement 'Highlighting the ongoing devastation in Gaza is not a crime. The real crime is Israel's policy of ethnic cleansing and genocide, aided and abetted by the US and Britain.' The PSNI has been contacted for comment.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
If Albanese is serious about actions not slogans, there is a way Australia can make a difference for Palestinians
Recognition of a state of Palestine must be more than a performative response to domestic political pressure. It's long been framed as the reward at the end of a negotiated two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians. However, given the absence of a viable Palestinian government and overt resistance from the Israeli government, any such solution has been little more than a default talking point used by western politicians for some time. According to Pew Research, only 21% of Israeli adults think Israel and a Palestinian state can coexist peacefully – a historic low. But what's the alternative? Western governments are forcing it now, because of global outrage at the appalling humanitarian situation including starvation in Gaza, with recognition of a Palestinian state being used as a carrot for the Palestinians and a stick for the Israelis to begin such a process. What would recognition mean? In Australia, Anthony Albanese is right to point to the need for 'action not slogans' amid the push from the public and some on his own backbench, particularly the former minister Ed Husic, in the face of horrific images from Gaza. Recognition of Palestine statehood may be a way of responding to public sentiment without imposing substantive sanctions on Israel in response to its breaches of international humanitarian law. It may well be a means to an end but it would need to be coupled with other extensive measures to create any pathway to peace, and even then it's contingent on so many unlikely commitments from both Hamas and Israel that it may be doomed. The pressure on Australia comes as its allies France, the UK and Canada have all indicated willingness to formally recognise a state of Palestine as soon as next month. This is not simple, in any respect. Hamas has set the tone, demanding 'unconditional international recognition' of an independent Palestinian state. Under a French/Saudi proposal, backed by the EU and other Arab nations, a temporary international mission would step in to stabilise the situation. The various conditions and actions outlined by those nations flagging Palestinian recognition borrow some elements of the Arab peace initiative, which has been tossed back and forth since the early 2000s due to various sticking points including the return of Palestinian refugees. While Benjamin Netanyahu has signalled some willingness to negotiate with Arab nations, he has previously rejected that plan. Canada has also demanded elections in the Palestinian territories next year that exclude Hamas. The last parliamentary election in the territories was in 2006, with the Palestinian Authority since then controlling parts of the West Bank under Mahmoud Abbas, and Hamas controlling Gaza. Even if all the other conditions were miraculously met on both sides, holding a viable democratic election within 12 months would be a mammoth practical challenge as well as a diplomatic one. This is just one of many serious roadblocks to progress and is a space where Australia could have impact if Albanese is serious about action over slogans. He says Australia is a small player in this. But offering development assistance and expertise in conjunction with other nations could help. Statehood, for example, would offer the opportunity for a full Australian embassy in Palestine, a potential vehicle for hand-in-hand work to help build a new leadership framework. With or without statehood, while removing Hamas from Gaza is one critical step, democracy building to avoid a dangerous void in governance is another. During an Australian parliamentary visit to Israel and the West Bank in August 2023 – just before the Hamas attacks – I joined a meeting with a particularly dynamic aspiring political candidate in Ramallah. She said new leaders and fresh political thinkers were often shut out of the closed-shop Palestinian Authority. As it stands the authority has neither the mandate nor the logistical resources to lead the immense political change and rebuild required. Equally problematic is getting the Netanyahu government to agree to any of the conditions, when its hardline rightwing members have threatened to walk even over a ceasefire, let alone a permanent pathway to peace. For once, Albanese's characteristic pragmatic caution seems right, recognising both the opportunity to apply pressure while also acknowledging the limits to Australia's influence on what has so far been an intractable conflict. Zoe Daniel is a three-time ABC foreign correspondent and former independent member for Goldstein
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour is forcing the brightest out of Britain
How many people do you know leaving the UK? My list gets longer every week. Meanwhile, the Labour Government is standing still, watching an exodus of talent and enterprise jump to greener pastures where ability and entrepreneurship are applauded, not attacked. I read with despair last month that John Fredriksen, the Norwegian shipping billionaire and Britain's ninth-richest man, is moving to Dubai. On departure he declared 'Britain has gone to hell ' – echoing what I know many of Britain's brightest are thinking. But this isn't just about the wealthy. Walk through the City today and you'll hear people in their twenties and thirties with first-class degrees from Russell Group universities, several years into prosperous jobs and already contributing greatly to our economy, discussing job offers in Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong. These aren't millennials seeking sun and tax breaks; they're Britain's future leaders leaving before their careers have truly taken off. I see this clearly through my son and his friends. Over the summer, I listened to his contemporaries – the sort of ambitious, well-educated graduates Britain desperately needs to retain – comparing salary packages from international firms, all based outside the UK. The ripple effects run deeper than any Treasury spreadsheet can capture. When Fredriksen announced his departure, the headlines focused on losing Britain's ninth-richest man. What they missed was the ecosystem around such figures. The professional services they used, from family offices to accountants and lawyers – all gone. More damaging still is the signal this sends globally. Fredriksen isn't just another wealthy expatriate seeking lower taxes. He's an extraordinary businessman who built an empire from nothing: a global leader whose investment decisions move markets. When someone of his calibre declares that 'Britain has gone to hell' and relocates to Dubai, it resonates far beyond the financial pages. It tells every international investor, every ambitious entrepreneur, every bit of mobile talent considering where to base their next venture, that Britain is no longer the place to do serious business. This is the true cost of Labour's war on wealth creation – not just the direct tax revenue lost, but the compound effect of diminished opportunity, reduced ambition and Britain's declining reputation as the natural home for global talent. This exodus isn't surprising when you consider who's making Britain's economic decisions. Of the 32 members of Labour's Cabinet, just one has ever started a business, while fewer than half have any private sector experience whatsoever. Meanwhile, the homelessness minister has resigned after claims she evicted tenants from a property she owns and then increased the rent by hundreds of pounds – behaviour she was simultaneously trying to outlaw under her own Renters' Rights Bill. Compare this to Nigel Lawson, who understood that governments don't create wealth – people do. During his six years as Chancellor, Lawson reversed Britain's spiral of industrial chaos, replacing defeatist pessimism with entrepreneurial dynamism. As we head into what will be a challenging Autumn, I grow increasingly frustrated by this Government's reluctance to pursue radical reforms. Instead, it tinkers around the edges while Rome burns. The Chancellor should be ambitious and bold. But Rachel Reeves has already admitted that further tax rises are coming, saying she won't rule them out because 'it would be irresponsible for a Chancellor to do that'. We are already reaching peak taxation – the Office for Budget Responsibility warns that the tax burden will hit a historic high of 37.7 per cent of GDP by 2027–28. Yet Labour seems oblivious to the economic reality that tax cuts, not tax rises, stimulate growth. What the figures reveal is deeply concerning. Labour raised taxes by £40 billion a year in their first Budget, having set out only £7 billion in manifesto tax plans. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research warns that Labour's economic mismanagement has created a £41.2 billion deficit. Put simply, the Chancellor cannot simultaneously meet her fiscal rules, fulfil her spending commitments, and uphold the Labour manifesto pledge to avoid taxing working people. Take our self-inflicted wound over tax-free shopping. Britain is now the only European country that doesn't offer tax-free shopping to international visitors, handing our competitors a 20 per cent price advantage. What this Government fails to understand is human behaviour. Every time the Treasury pulls another tax lever, human habits change: the brightest minds leaving for better opportunities abroad, the entrepreneurs quietly relocating their headquarters. Ministers seem transfixed by their spreadsheets and the theoretical millions they believe they can squeeze from each new policy. But spreadsheets don't capture the midnight conversations between parents wondering if they can still afford their child's school fees, or the graduates accepting job offers in Singapore rather than staying home. We should be learning from countries that understand how to attract rather than repel talent. Italy has successfully brought in 1,186 high-net-worth individuals since introducing its flat tax regime in 2017. Meanwhile, Ireland's tax receipts hit a record €108 billion in 2024. These aren't accidents – they're the result of competitive policies that understand you attract more bees with honey than vinegar. The choice facing Britain is stark: continue this war on talent and watch more of our brightest follow Fredriksen's path to places like Dubai, or embrace the policies that once made Britain a magnet for global minds and capital. That's why Kemi Badenoch's approach is the right one. She has made clear she will only announce policies that are costed, and clear, or that will save money. Her vision for a revitalised Conservative Party will take time, trust, and transparency, but what's consistent is that it's always been the Conservatives who are committed to the values of enterprise, sound money, and renewal. My work over the past 40 years across business, the arts, and education all comes from one place – because I love this country and continue to believe in public service. Born and bred in Grimsby, I could never turn my back on the communities I've grown up with. But they do deserve better. So rather than leave the country, I am committed to doubling down and trying to help tackle the challenges facing us.
