Android is currently optimised for…: Why Perplexity AI CEO Aravind Srinivas wants Google to rebuild its operating system
Perplexity AI
CEO
Aravind Srinivas
wants
Google
to rebuild its Android operating system. He noted that Android is more optimised for the tech giant's
ad-driven business model
than for enabling
AI-powered experiences
for smartphone users. Srinivas took to the social media platform X (earlier Twitter) to share his opinion that highlights a potential conflict as AI assistants become more common in smartphones. With this post, he questions whether current platforms, particularly those tied to advertising like Android, can evolve into intelligent, agentic systems that will primarily serve users. Srinivas questions whether Android's current priorities are aligned with the emerging era of
AI agents
, which are designed to interact proactively with users.
What Perplexity AI CEO Aravind Srinivas said about Android
In his X post, Srinivas wrote:
'Android needs to be rebuilt for AI. It's currently optimised for preserving Google's ad business rather than a truly agentic OS.'
With this post, he suggests that to achieve significant advancements in AI-first mobile computing, Google may need to make some fundamental changes to the operating system itself, rather than merely adding AI features as layers. This suggestion comes as Perplexity develops Comet, an AI browser that will compete with Google by offering query responses with inline citations.
This criticism comes at a time when Google is under increasing pressure on several fronts. According to a recent report by Bloomberg, Apple executives have internally discussed the possibility of acquiring Perplexity AI, with M&A chief Adrian Perica reportedly raising the idea with senior leaders, including services head Eddy Cue.
Recently, Srinivas also suggested that Google's key weakness lies in its heavy reliance on high-margin
search advertising
, which remains far more profitable than its other businesses, like YouTube, cloud services, or AI initiatives.
At the recently held Sohn Investment Conference, Srinivas explained how the Android-maker is trapped by its success. He noted,
'This is the first time in two decades that Google is extremely vulnerable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Gemini CLI debuts as Google's open-source AI coding assistant: How it works
Alphabet Inc.'s Google has unveiled a new artificial intelligence-powered coding assistant called Gemini CLI (Command Line Interface), designed to streamline the development process by allowing users to interact with their systems through natural language. The global launch signals Google's intent to close the gap with competing AI tools such as OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code. Announced on Wednesday, Gemini CLI is positioned as an open-source tool that brings the capabilities of Google's Gemini AI directly to the terminal, the text-based interface widely used by developers. It enables users to perform a variety of tasks using conversational commands, ranging from writing and debugging code to building simple websites or even generating videos. "With Gemini CLI, you can have a natural language conversation with your computer to solve problems and weave complex workflows together, to do far more than was previously possible," said Taylor Mullen, Senior Staff Software Engineer at Google, during a press briefing. One of the defining features of Gemini CLI is its open-source nature. Google said the decision reflects a broader goal of democratising access to AI tools, enabling developers to inspect, adapt, and contribute to the codebase. This move also supports transparency, allowing users to understand the mechanics of the tool and assess its security. Gemini CLI builds on Google's existing legacy of open AI development, including the TensorFlow engine and several foundational transformer models, the architecture behind leading AI systems like ChatGPT. The launch of Gemini CLI also follows Google's recent release of Gemma, its open large language models made publicly available earlier in 2024. These efforts point to a shift in strategy, with the tech giant increasingly engaging with external developers after years of keeping much of its proprietary AI under wraps. Gemini CLI users with personal Google accounts will be granted a free Gemini Code Assist licence, offering access to the Gemini 2.5 Pro model. This tier includes a generous usage limit of up to 60 requests per minute and 1,000 per day. Paid plans expand those limits to 120 requests per minute and 1,500 per day, while enterprise users can make up to 2,000 requests daily. Ryan J. Salva, Senior Director of Product at Google, emphasised the broad applicability of the new tool: 'We believe that these tools are going to dominate the way not just developers, but creators of all kinds, work over the next decade. Whether you're a student, a freelancer, or a seasoned professional, you deserve access to the same cutting-edge resources.'
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Bernie Sanders calls for 4-day work week, says AI boom means it's time to clock out early
Bernie Sanders Calls for a 4-Day Workweek Amid Rise in AI Live Events Less Work, Same Pay — A Shift in Mindset A Global Trend That's Already Working More Time to Live Your Life FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel As artificial intelligence transforms the way we work, Senator Bernie Sanders is urging companies to rethink how productivity gains should benefit workers by giving them more free time, not less pay, as per a a recent conversation at 'The Joe Rogan Experience' with podcaster Joe Rogan, Sanders argued that the time saved because of AI tools shouldn't just boost corporate profits or pile on more work, according to a TechCrunch report. Instead, it should be passed back to employees in the form of shorter work weeks, as he urged for a four-day work week , according to the pointed out that, 'Technology is gonna work to improve us, not just the people who own the technology and the CEOs of large corporations,' quoted TechCrunch in its report. He emphasised that, 'You are a worker, your productivity is increasing because we give you AI, right? Instead of throwing you out on the street, I'm gonna reduce your work week to 32 hours,' as quoted in the wrote in its report that Sanders's push for this concept "would be a relief to most people, and an abject horror to anyone who has ever been to Davos. What's the point of life if you don't take every moment you can to drive shareholder value?"ALSO READ: Google unveils Gemini CLI for developers - 5 critical features of the open-source AI agent However, for many tech companies, AI-driven productivity gains often translate into expectations for workers to handle more tasks or risk layoffs, as per the report. But Sanders envisions a different path, finishing current work faster without cutting pay, freeing up workers' time for their personal lives, like catching their kid's Little League game, as reported by also highlighted that, 'And by the way, not a radical idea,' and added that, 'There are companies around the world that are doing it with some success,' as quoted in the READ: Gas relief coming? Oil now cheaper than it was before Iran-Israel war — what it means for your wallet TechCrunch cited the example of the United Kingdom, where 61 companies (around 2,900 workers) piloted a four-day work week in the second half of 2022. It was found that out of 23 companies that shared financial data, the revenue from the beginning to the end of the trial remained almost the same, increasing by 1.4% on average, as reported by examples include Kickstarter, which has operated on a four-day work week since 2021, while even Microsoft Japan piloted a four-day work week in 2019, which led to a reported 40% increase in productivity, according to the TechCrunch said, 'Let's use technology to benefit workers,' adding, 'That means give you more time with your family, with your friends, for education, whatever the hell you wanna do,' as quoted in the TechCrunch READ: McDonald's dumps Krispy Kreme — no more Doughnuts with your fries? Fans react to abrupt breakup He's calling for a 32-hour, four-day workweek, without cutting pay, due to time saved by using AI tools, as per a TechCrunch if workers are getting more done with AI, they should be rewarded with more time for themselves, not just asked to do more.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Startup CEO says Google had everything ..., yet OpenAI beat them to the LLM Gold Rush, Elon Musk's 'one-word' reply
An online debate over AI race of Silicon Valley reignited recently. Tesla CEO Elon Musk also presented his point of view on the debate with a one-word response. Recently, a US federal judge ruled that Anthropic and AI company did not break any copyright laws while training AI model Claude using books. The judge pointed out that the use of books was a fair step and an AI model does not copy or reproduce books but it learns from them and then generate original content. Soon after the judgement, an online debate started on X (formerly known as Twitter). A startup CEO Luis Batalha has asserted that Google , despite possessing "everything" needed, was ultimately outmaneuvered by OpenAI in the burgeoning Large Language Model (LLM) "gold rush." 'Google had everything: the transformer, massive compute, access to data, even Google Books - yet OpenAI beat them to the LLM gold rush. Having the pieces isn't the same as playing the game,' wrote Batalha. Tesla CEO Elon Musk also supported the sentiment with a one-word reponse 'True'. Originally Google has been at the forefront of AI research. The company has published seminal papers and has also developed advanced models. However, with the launch of ChatGPT , OpenAI managed to capture imagination of millions and ignited the current "LLM Gold Rush," forcing other tech giants to accelerate their own public-facing generative AI initiatives. Critics suggest that Google's cautious approach, perhaps due to its established market position and the potential risks of deploying rapidly evolving AI, allowed a leaner, more focused entity like OpenAI to seize the early lead.
