Austin brothers to bike over 5,000 miles to raise funds for charity
Bobby Jenkins is the owner of ABC Home & Commercial Services, a local business that provides pest control, air conditioning repair and other services for homeowners.
The trip will be the second cross-country bike ride the business owner has embarked on with his brother Raleigh. Bobby said he's riding to raise awareness and donations for Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood (SUDC).
His grandson Moss died from SUDC in 2014, and Moss' parents established the Moss Pieratt foundation to raise awareness for SUDC. Bobby Jenkins also ran the New York City marathon in Moss' honor in 2022.
Raleigh Jenkins is riding to raise aid funding for children in Haiti, a country that has suffered widespread gang-violence and famine in recent years.
The Jenkins brothers joined KXAN Anchor Will Dupree in the studio to discuss the upcoming journey and the funds they hope to raise for two children's charities.
Read a transcription of the interview below, or watch in the video player above. Some responses have been edited for clarity.
Will DuPree: Thank you both so much for being here. We appreciate it.
Bobby Jenkins: Thank you. Appreciate the opportunity.
Dupree: Now that is a very long way, 5,500 miles, so talk to us about what inspired that.
Bobby Jenkins: Yeah, you know, for both of us and for me, it is about you mentioned my grandson, Moss. Moss passed away 11 years ago from what's called sudden unexplained death in childhood, which means we don't know why he died. It's unexplained, and this is the number four cause of death for toddlers, so it's important, but we want to find answers. And the reason we want to find answers is not just about what happened to Moss, but can we prevent it from happening to other children? And then Raleigh's riding for Mission Lazarus.
Raleigh Jenkins: Children in Haiti and their survival that they're going through right now, and the struggles they're doing.
DuPree: So this will be essentially a dual fundraiser with a very personal connection for you all.
Bobby Jenkins: Absolutely, we've done this before. It was eight years ago. We rode from Seattle to New York City. That was 3,500 miles. This is, as you said, 5,500 miles, and we're eight years older, but the cause is so important to us, and I really particularly on the funding of the research at NYU Langone. We've got to find answers. We've got to raise awareness. We've got to find answers. So we're both very passionate for both of these causes, and we really need people's help to make it a successful journey.
DuPree: Absolutely. So are you all setting a certain goal in terms of fundraising?
Bobby Jenkins: We are. We're working on the goal. Quite frankly, we'd like to be around a million dollars between the two of us. It's a big goal, but it's both big needs and the work that needs to be done. It's going to take that. And so I really think this will be our last big bike ride. I'll be almost 67 when we finish, and I don't think I'm going to want to go across the country again, but it is important, and I am passionate about it, and the need is big.
DuPree: I know people at home are going to be hearing about this and thinking, you know, what can we do to help you all? Or how can they help the certain causes you all are supporting? So fill in the blank for them. What should they do?
Bobby Jenkins: So, brothersbike.org. You can go there, and you can see my picture and Raleigh's picture, and you can donate to both or one. But that's a big part of it, and it's awareness. Having the opportunity to talk about this, awareness about what sudden unexplained death in childhood is, awareness about Mission Lazarus and the challenges in Haiti. Both of those people can learn more about it at brothersbike.org, but we'd sure appreciate their prayers, and we'd sure appreciate their support as far as the bike ride.
DuPree: Other people at home might be also wondering how you're preparing for this, because I know that's coming up in like, a month or so, right?
Raleigh Jenkins: We're almost six weeks away right now, so yeah, it's here. I will admit I had ChatGPT build my workout program. So I have a program that's a daily activity of what I'm doing, how I'm working out, and what my rides look like.
DuPree: It keeps you on that.
Raleigh Jenkins: It does. It is, it's wonderful.
Bobby Jenkins: Raleigh cheated and really got the perfect workout. I'm a little dated, and I'm trying to just go ride my bicycle more and spend some more time in the in the saddle, and getting the legs ready, and all of that. But, you know, we'll be ready for it. And part of it is, you ride into shape. We'll average about 70 to 75 miles per day, and it'll take two and a half months to get from Anchorage and we are going to finish right there at Kyle Field at Texas A&M.
DuPree: Yeah right back here close to home.
Bobby Jenkins: That's right.
DuPree: Well, Bobby and Raleigh thank you both so much for joining us and I wish you the best of luck not only in the fundraiser, but also with that ride.
Bobby Jenkins: Thank you, appreciate it.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KXAN Austin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
01-08-2025
- The Hill
Number of Texans receiving out-of-state abortions quadrupled between 2021 and 2023
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texans who sought an abortion out of state more than quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 after a state law went into effect that bans the procedure in almost all cases. Data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) shows at least 7,844 Texas residents received an abortion in a different state in 2023, up from 4,718 in 2022 and 1,712 in 2021. Still the total number of abortions for Texas residents dropped by 85 percent compared to 2021. In 2023, just 62 abortions were reported in Texas, all due to medical emergency and/or to preserve the health of the mother. In 2024, 76 abortions were performed in the state, according to the HHSC data. Texas receives reports from other states through the State and Territorial Exchange of Vital Events, a public health reporting system maintained by the National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems. Reporting abortion data to the system is voluntary, and not all states participate, according to a HHSC spokesperson. That means the total number may be higher than the 7,844 reported in 2023. In fact, the Guttmacher Institute, a non-profit that tracks access to abortion, estimates the number to be closer to 35,000. The organization estimates 14,230 Texas women traveled to New Mexico for an abortion in 2023, while 6,620 went to Kansas, 4,440 went to Colorado and 3,310 went to California. An estimated 6,300 Texas women went to other states. In 2022, almost 3,000 Texans received an abortion in Kansas, according to official data from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. That constituted a 1,178 percent increase from 2021, when just 233 abortions were performed on Texas residents. Kansas has yet to report data for 2023. HHSC does not maintain data on people who travel internationally to receive an abortion. The Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in a 6-3 decision on June 24, 2022, eliminating the nearly 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion. The ruling gave states the authority to limit or ban the procedure. A trigger law in Texas went into effect in August 2022, banning most abortions in the state. Abortion is also banned in neighboring Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, meaning Texas women who want the procedure must travel to states like Kansas, Colorado and New Mexico.
The Hill
29-07-2025
- The Hill
Ken Paxton goes after New York Clerk for refusing to enforce abortion pill judgement
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton escalated a brewing conflict between Texas and New York's abortion laws. On Monday, Paxton announced he filed legal action against New York Acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck for refusing to enforce a $100,000 penalty against Dr. Margaret Carpenter. In February, a Texas district court ruled in favor of the state of Texas over Carpenter after she failed to file a response to Paxton's complaint. However, Bruck refused to enforce the judgement against the Ulster County resident. 'In accordance with the New York State Shield Law, I have refused this filing and will refuse any similar filings that may come to our office. Since this decision is likely to result in further litigation, I must refrain from discussing specific details about the situation,' Bruck said in a prepared statement at the time. 'Dr. Carpenter is a radical abortionist who must face justice, not get legal protection from New York liberals intent on ending the lives of as many unborn children as they can,' said Attorney General Paxton in a press release. 'No matter where they reside, pro-abortion extremists who send drugs designed to kill the unborn into Texas will face the full force of our state's pro-life laws.' New York vs. Texas In 2023, New York passed a 'Shield Law' to protect their medical providers providing gender-affirming and reproductive care. 'The Shield Law broadly prohibits law enforcement and other state officials from cooperating with investigations into reproductive or gender-affirming health care ('protected health care') so long as the care was lawfully provided in New York,' the New York Attorney General's Office says. According to court filings, Carpenter is 'not a resident of the State of Texas, but is a resident of the State of New York that has done business in Texas,' and 'has not and does not maintain a regular place of business in Texas.' 'It's going to get us answers about the Shield Law and Shield Laws nationwide,' Bruck said over the phone on Monday. 'There's a lot of unknowns in this whole process right now, I'm mostly curious as to how it will all shake out.' Earlier this month, Bruck released another prepared statement after Paxton tried to enforce the judgement again. 'We have received your letter regarding the Dr. Margaret Carpenter judgment originally submitted for filing on March 17th, 2025. The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same materials does not alter the outcome,' Bruck wrote on July 14. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed. Have a good day. Excelsior.' KXAN reached out to the Texas Attorney General's office via email. New abortion proposals in special session On July 9, Texas Governor Greg Abbott added 'Protect Unborn Children' to an expansive special session call sheet, allowing new anti-abortion legislation to be taken up in the 30-day special session. As of Monday, eight anti-abortion bills had been filed in the Texas House: House Bill 37 by State Rep. Jared Patterson, R-Frisco, House Bill 65 by State Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, and House Bill 66 would allow parents of an aborted fetus to take civil action against the provider of an abortion pill. The bills are partial refilings of Senate Bill 2880 from the regular session, which failed to get out of the House State Affairs Committee after passing the Texas Senate. House Bill 58 by State Rep. Mike Schofield, R-Katy, would create a special prosecutor to enforce abortion laws — along with election and human trafficking laws. House Bill 69 by State Rep. Ellen Troxclair, R-Marble Falls, would prevent a physician from giving an abortion-inducing drug to a woman not physically present at a physician's appointment. House Bill 70 by Troxclair would prevent the transportation or the funding of transportation for minors. House Bill 95 by State Rep. Nate Schatzline, R-Fort Worth, would prevent selling abortion-inducing drugs online House Bill 163 by State Rep. Brent Money, R-Canton, would treat unborn children as full citizens for certain felony offenses. None of these bills have been referred to a committee yet.
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Yahoo
Measles Cases Could Cost the U.S. Its Elimination Status. Here's What That Means.
The U.S. has reported more measles cases in the first half of this year than in any full year since 1992, raising concerns that the country could lose its measles elimination status and undo a 25-year public health victory amid declining vaccine rates. But exactly what does that risk mean and how close is it to really happening? For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. to keep us around for the next 20 — we can't do this without you. The World Health Organization sets the criteria for elimination status, requiring a country — or defined geographical area — to go at least 12 months without continuous domestic transmission of a virus. That means any new outbreaks during that time must come from people who contracted the virus from outside, not inside, the U.S. Under that criteria, the U.S. has until January to eliminate the nation's current outbreaks, which is a year after cases started domestically in Texas, according to epidemiology experts. If it doesn't, the U.S.'s measles elimination status could be taken away. 'It could be more impactful than a lot of Americans think about since we have had measles elimination status for so long,' Brittany Kmush, associate professor and graduate director of Syracuse University's Public Health Department, told HuffPost. 'It could affect U.S. citizens' ability to travel to specific countries if they don't want the risk of measles getting introduced to their country. It could affect other people's ability to come visit the U.S. Other countries might require proof of measles vaccination before they can reenter their home country,' she said. There could also be increased quarantine and isolation requirements, with potential economic fallout, she said. On top of this, many more people could be at risk of contracting the virus, which is considered one of the most contagious in the world. If just one person has it, up to 9 out of 10 people nearby will become infected if they are not vaccinated, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It's just a matter of if and when an infectious individual enters one of those communities and kind of invites an Moss, executive director of Johns Hopkins' International Vaccine Access Center 'It's not just a cold for a lot of people. It can lead to phenomena and in rare cases encephalitis and death,' said Kmush. Children younger than 5 years of age are especially vulnerable to severe illness and health complications. Fortunately, there's still time this year to fight outbreaks. Losing the elimination status is also purposely made challenging because, unless the virus is globally eradicated ― a feat only seen with smallpox ― there's always going to be cases brought into the U.S. from outside, said William Moss, executive director of Johns Hopkins' International Vaccine Access Center, who co-leads the school's measles tracking project. 'As long as there's measles virus circulating somewhere in the world, there's always going to be these importations,' he told HuffPost.'It would be very hard to maintain measles elimination status if every time someone brought it in and there was another case, you would lose it.' Whether or not outbreaks will stop before the deadline remains uncertain, however. Measles cases in the U.S. have been dropping since their peak in March, giving hope that outbreaks may be petering out. But vaccination rates remain at their lowest in years in the U.S., reducing so-called 'herd immunity' and opening the door for new outbreaks to ignite in communities that have low vaccination rates. 'It's just a matter of if and when an infectious individual enters one of those communities and kind of invites an outbreak,' said Moss, while comparing the chances to a hot ember drifting from a wildfire. 'If it lands in a wet area, you're not going to have an outbreak if there's high vaccine coverage. But if it enters an area with really low vaccine coverage, you could have another really large outbreak,' he said. With less than six months left in the year, Moss says it's still too early to start a countdown or 'really sweat about this.' He also said that even if elimination status is lost, cases are at least unlikely to return to the levels seen in the early 1990s, since vaccine levels do remain reasonably high. Kmush, however, expressed more caution on the chances of elimination being a reality. 'I am definitely alarmed,' she said, while pointing out that the U.S. nearly lost its elimination status in 2019 when there were fewer cases than those seen this year. She credited a rise in vaccine coverage and public health advocacy toward the end of that year for sparing the U.S. from losing its status. 'We were able to get them vaccinated and do the quarantine and isolation,' she said of vulnerable communities. 'Unfortunately, measles vaccination rates are even lower now than they were in 2019 and 99% of the cases that have been reported in this outbreak are either not vaccinated or have unknown vaccination status.' She and Moss both also stressed that the U.S. getting its elimination status back after losing it is also no easy feat. A country would have to show zero continuous transmission of the virus domestically for 36 months, as well as demonstrate a good virus surveillance system, which Moss said the U.S. does have. As far as what can be done now, Kmush said more people need to get vaccinated, calling it 'the greatest tool' in decreasing cases and protecting those who are unable to get vaccinated, such as babies younger than six months of age or people who are immunocompromised. 'You can do quarantine, isolation, similar to the idea with COVID, but measles is a lot more contagious than COVID,' she said. 'And so we really need everyone who is eligible to get the vaccine.' She also stressed that federal health officials need to do more to reduce vaccine hesitancy and skepticism. 'I think certain administrators and their views on vaccines have been fueling some of this vaccine hesitancy and people's reluctance to receive a vaccine that's been proven safe and effective for decades,' she said. 'The policies and some of the vaccine hesitancy and skepticism rhetoric is definitely dangerous and going to make people who are unsure about vaccines even more unsure, when they really shouldn't be.' Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has no formal medical background and has a long record of anti-vaccine advocacy and other conspiracy theories, is among those who has offered inconsistent and tepid support for the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Earlier this year, he falsely claimed that the current vaccine administered, which was first distributed in 1968, hasn't been safely tested and that its protection is short-lived. That's despite widespread use of the vaccine being credited with achieving the nation's elimination status in 2000 and saving hundreds of lives each year. Before the measles vaccine was introduced, an estimated 48,000 people were hospitalized and 400–500 people died annually in the U.S., according to the CDC. A HHS spokesperson, when recently contacted by HuffPost about the rise in cases, said that measles infection risks remain low for the overall U.S. population, 'lower than peer developed countries including Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, and Italy.' 'CDC continues to recommend MMR vaccines as the best way to protect against measles,' the spokesperson added, while calling the decision to vaccinate 'a personal one.' 'People should consult with their healthcare provider to understand their options to get inoculated and should be informed about the potential risks and benefits associated with vaccines,' they said. Related... What To Do If There's A Measles Case In Your Area Measles Cases Surge To Highest Level Since The Disease Was Eliminated In U.S. Measles Outbreak Hits Another State Amid Measles Outbreak, Texas Looks To Make Vaccine Exemptions Even Easier
