Soft Skills: The Most Critical Skills To Teach In The Age Of AI
As AI continues to reshape the workplace, one truth is becoming increasingly clear: the most valuable skills in the future of work won't be technical—they'll be human.While AI can automate tasks, analyze data and even generate content, it can't replicate empathy, communication or the ability to read between the lines. These 'soft' skills, once considered nice-to-haves, have now become critical. However, most organizations aren't yet prepared to help their employees develop these skills. For chief human resources officers (CHROs) and benefits leaders, this presents both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge is that soft skills can be difficult to teach. The opportunity is that with the right strategy, education benefits can be a powerful lever to build a more human, and more resilient, workforce.
Why Soft Skills Matter More Than Ever
As we all know, AI is rapidly taking over routine and technical tasks. That means the human edge will increasingly come from skills like empathy and emotional intelligence, which are essential for leadership and team collaboration. According to LinkedIn's 2025 Workplace Learning Report, soft skills are among the most in-demand skills globally. Yet only 36% of organizations have robust career development programs in place to address these needs.
The Soft Skills Gap Is Real
Younger workers, especially Gen Z, are entering the workforce with strong digital instincts and a natural enthusiasm for AI tools. However, according to McKinsey, they often lack the context to know when it's wrong or how to course-correct. Meanwhile, more experienced employees may be better at spotting AI errors but less confident in adopting new tools. This creates a unique moment for HR leaders to bridge the gap by embedding soft skill development into their education strategies. Here are a few actionable steps leaders can take to help build a more human-centered workforce:
Too often, soft skills are mistakenly treated as optional or secondary. In an AI-driven workplace, they are the differentiators and thus need to be incorporated into your core learning architecture right alongside technical upskilling. For example, if you're rolling out AI training, pair it with modules on ethical decision-making, persuasive communication and cross-functional collaboration.
Soft skills aren't built in a vacuum—they're forged in real-world interactions. Create structured opportunities for employees to practice and refine these skills on the job. This could include anything from cross-functional projects and peer coaching to leadership shadowing and real-time feedback loops. Additionally, it's important to empower managers to act as learning catalysts, not just performance evaluators. When learning is truly embedded in daily workflows, it becomes part of your culture, not just a box to be checked.
Leadership, empathy and adaptability shouldn't only be reserved for the C-suite. Use your education benefits to scale soft skill development across your entire workforce from frontline teams to emerging leaders. This not only builds capability, but it also signals that your organization values growth at every level.
Measuring soft skills may be difficult, but it's not impossible. Consider tracking metrics like internal mobility, employee engagement, customer satisfaction and team performance to assess the ROI of your programs. This can be achieved through using pulse surveys and 360 feedback to capture qualitative insights. Then, share those stories internally and externally. When you can show that empathy drives retention or that communication boosts innovation, you elevate the strategic value of your HR function.
At a time when AI is redefining roles and reshaping industries, it's not just technical fluency that will set organizations apart—it's human fluency. The ability to lead with empathy, communicate with clarity and adapt with resilience will be the true competitive edge. By investing in soft skill development today, leaders aren't just preparing their people for the future, they're shaping a workforce that's agile, engaged and equipped to thrive in whatever comes next. That's not just a win for employees—it's a strategic imperative for the business.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Skift
5 hours ago
- Skift
U.S. Corporations Pause Business Travel as Economic Headwinds Trigger a Reassessment
Corporate America is no longer traveling just because it can. With tariffs and budget pressures mounting, domestic business travel is now being scrutinized trip by trip, and there's no guarantee it will come back in full. Industry insiders suggest many U.S. corporations are hitting pause on non-essential domestic business trips. In May, for the fourth consecutive month, U.S. domestic air travel has declined, even as global travel demand continues to rebound. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) attributes the dip to economic uncertainty and reduced government travel. 'There's no one-size-fits-all answer,' said Vik Krishnan, a senior partner at McKinsey who advises firms across the aviation, travel, and aerospace industries.'We're seeing a lot more scrutiny on discretionary travel. The conversation has shifted from 'how much travel' to 'why are we traveling?'' Internal Meetings Versus Sales Calls That scrutiny is being driven by more than just cost-cutting. Companies are recalibrating what kinds of trips actually are decisive, and which ones can be replaced with a Zoom call. 'Sales-related trips or supplier visits that drive top-line growth or operational efficiency are far less likely to be cut than internal meetings,' Krishnan said. 'It varies by sector, job function, and whether the trip has a direct business impact.' The big question now is whether this is a temporary dip or the start of a structural reset. Krishnan says it's too early to tell. 'Much of what we're seeing is still tied to broader economic indicators like GDP growth,' he said. 'If economic uncertainty lingers, we may see companies hold back for longer. But if conditions improve, corporate travel could bounce back quickly, especially in sectors where physical presence is still crucial.' Sectoral Differences in Travel Trends However, TravelPerk's flight booking data shows a 9% year-over-year increase in U.S. domestic travel among its customers over the past six months, especially in sectors like energy, media, and online entertainment. But other sectors are less bullish. 'We've seen a small number of companies reduce travel due to the financial climate,' said Stuart Blake, TravelPerk's VP of Revenue for North America. 'These companies are temporarily pivoting to an essential travel-only type policy, allowing them to still do necessary travel for work whilst being cautious with budget spend. Even with the challenges, they know they still need to travel for work to get their job done and are hoping that they can resume normal operations by the end of the year.' Tech firms in particular are hesitant. 'Many had embraced remote work even before the pandemic,' said McKinsey's Krishnan. 'So fewer in-person meetings haven't been as disruptive. That's made them more comfortable sticking with virtual alternatives.' Meanwhile, industries with complex global supply chains, such as manufacturing and heavy industry, have returned to travel faster. Their business models often require on-site inspections or supplier visits to keep operations running. This sets up a nuanced portrait of business travel trends, one in which some industries rebound quickly while others shift to leaner, digital-first operations. Policy, Tariffs, and Government Impact Further influencing the outlook are recent U.S. government actions. A poll by the Global Business Travel Association (GBTA) found that nearly one-third of global travel managers expect business travel to decline in 2025, citing new tariffs, cross-border frictions, and scaled-back government travel. 'Productive and essential business travel is threatened in times of economic uncertainty or in an environment of additional barriers and restrictions,' said GBTA CEO Suzanne Neufang. 'This undermines economic prosperity and damages the many sectors that rely on global business travel to survive and thrive.' However, 44% of global travel managers in the poll responded that recent U.S. government actions would not impact business travel spending and volumes. Adding to the tension is a looming travel ban reportedly under consideration by the U.S. government. The proposed expansion could target up to 36 countries, many in Africa and the Caribbean, disrupting corporate travel in key sectors like energy, tech, education, and development. A ban of that scale could impact visa access, stall ongoing projects, and prompt reciprocal restrictions, heightening volatility for multinational businesses. As Neufang put it, the long-term future of business travel depends not only on corporate belt-tightening, but on whether international mobility remains viable at all. Whether current cutbacks signal a transient dip or a structural reset remains the industry's big question. As long as economic uncertainty and policy disruption persist, corporate travel faces a new era of heightened selectivity — and volatility. Related
Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
SpaceX plans Starship program for in-orbit drug research
SpaceX is working on a program to use its mammoth Starship rocket to develop commercial products in space, potentially opening up a new business line for the world's most valuable private startup, according to people familiar with the matter. Under the plan, internally called Starfall, SpaceX's Starship rocket would bring products like pharmaceutical components to space in small, uncrewed capsules, said one of the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is confidential. Starship would then deploy the capsules, which would spend time in orbit before reentering the atmosphere, where they could be recovered back on Earth, the person added. The Starfall program would allow companies to take advantage of the unique conditions of space, specifically micro-gravity and higher levels of radiation, which can provide a new environment for manufacturing pharmaceutical drugs, semiconductors, food, and even beauty products. A representative for SpaceX, formally known as Space Exploration Technologies Corp., didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The initiative could make SpaceX, which has dramatically lowered the cost of launching to orbit, a key leader in the sector of space-based research and development for commercial goods. The SpaceX program is still in the early stages of development and the plans could change. The effort is highly reliant on the operational ability of Starship, which has been plagued by a string of explosive failures over its last several test flights. SpaceX plans to make the program operational roughly by the end of the decade, one of the people said. The company is in talks with potential customers for the service, the people said. A team to work on the initiative was created recently under the leadership of Chris Trautner, senior director of vehicle engineering for the Falcon family of rockets, one of the people said. According to an analysis conducted by the McKinsey & Co. consulting firm, certain industries could generate billions of dollars in additional revenue by expanding into space. California-based startup Varda Space Industries, which is backed by billionaire Peter Thiel, has a similar business model of processing materials in space and has so far launched three capsules on board a SpaceX rocket and subsequently recovered them. Starfall, the people said, also has defense applications, and SpaceX is working in conjunction with the military on the program, the outlines of which were reported by the Wall Street Journal in May. It wasn't immediately clear how Starfall fits into an existing SpaceX contract with the US Department of Defense to develop Starship for sending huge quantities of military cargo and humanitarian aid between points on Earth. Pashankar, Ludlow and Porter write for Bloomberg.
CNBC
6 hours ago
- CNBC
Barbara Corcoran: I sent this email to get on 'Shark Tank'—after they'd 'already chosen someone else'
Real estate mogul Barbara Corcoran, a longtime investor judge on ABC's "Shark Tank," might've missed out on the television role that changed her life — if she hadn't sent an email about it first. Seventeen years ago, Corcoran found out that the show's producer, Mark Burnett, had chosen another Shark candidate over her, she posted to LinkedIn on Friday. "They'd already chosen someone else, but I wasn't ready to give up," Corcoran wrote in her post. Instead, she sent Burnett a lengthy email listing the reasons why she deserved the seat instead. "I understand you've asked another girl to dance instead of me," the email read, according to a screenshot posted by Corcoran, now 76. "Although I appreciate being reserved as a fall-back, I'm much more accustomed to coming in first." From there, she walked Burnett through her character, work ethic and leadership style. She wrote about teachers who dismissed her because she struggled to read, battling dyslexia. She mentioned an ex-partner who swore she wouldn't be successful without him, and wrote that "everything I've done in business so far" had prepared her for this moment. Instead of declaring that Burnett should choose her over the other candidate, she suggested that he fly both of them out to Los Angeles and compare them against each other. "If you have both ladies in LA, you can mix it up a bit and see which personalities make the best combination for your show," she wrote. "I've found in building teams myself that the combination of personalities is always more important than the expertise or strengths of single individuals." She closed her email with confidence, writing that "the reputation you have in your field is equal to the reputation I have in mind, Mark. I know you're the best at what you do and I trust you'll reach the right decision. I've booked my flight for the 6th and hope to be on that plane." Sending that email ultimately got Corcoran the role, she wrote in her LinkedIn post: "Sometimes the door won't open until you knock louder." Not taking rejection personally is a skill that takes time and self-awareness. The next time you're facing a rejection, you can take a page out of Corcoran's book, further explaining your qualifications and continued interest in the role. Or you can use it as an opportunity to build your network, Jolen Anderson, chief people and community officer at BetterUp, told CNBC Make It on April 15. Say you've done a couple of interviews for a role and ultimately didn't get it. In your "thank you" email to the recruiter or hiring manager, add a sentence along the lines of, "I'm sorry that my skills didn't align with this particular role. Are there other opportunities at the company that you think might be a match for me or other people in your network you think you can introduce me to?" Anderson recommended. Worst-case scenario: They don't respond, and you continue on with your search. Meanwhile, you've shown some good sportsmanship, and you might stay top-of-mind for a hiring manager who spent days getting to know you, your background and capabilities. It's the "best thing that a candidate can do," said Anderson.
