NATO leaders set to back Trump defence spending goal at Hague summit
NATO leaders gathered in The Hague on Wednesday for a summit tailor-made for US President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance.
The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP -- a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte acknowledged that it was not easy for countries to find the money for extra defence spending but said it was vital to do so.
"There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," he told reporters on Wednesday morning.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte speaks with the media.
NATO officials are hoping the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Rutte in his home city.
Trump has threatened not to protect NATO members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were "numerous definitions" of the clause. "I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," he said.
The new target -- to be achieved over the next 10 years -- is a big increase on the current goal of 2% of GDP, although it will be measured differently. It would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in extra annual spending.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky greets by Dutch Princess Catharina-Amalia
Countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles.
All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal. Madrid says it can meet its military commitments to NATO by spending much less - a view disputed by Rutte.
But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly.
Dutch King Willem-Alexander, Queen Maxima and Princess Catharina-Amalia greet French President Emmanuel Macron.
Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on "decisive action in Iran".
"You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," Rutte told Trump.
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win."
To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge.
The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer greet by Dutch King Willem-Alexander, Queen Maxima and Princess Catharina-Amalia. Reuters
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than a seat at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet with Zelenskiy separately.
Zelensky and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying US weapons including Patriot missile defence systems and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions.
The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
U.S. to Resume Iran Nuclear Talks
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that American and Iranian officials will meet next week to discuss Tehran's nuclear ambitions, following a concerted military campaign that he claims has effectively neutralised key Iranian enrichment facilities. The announcement came at the NATO summit in The Hague. Trump defended the use of bunker-busting bombs against the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites, asserting they had been 'obliterated' and describing the bombing campaign as a decisive blow to Iran's nuclear programme. He struck a triumphant tone, crediting the strikes with hastening the end of the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, though he expressed reservations about formalising a diplomatic agreement: 'We may sign an agreement. I don't know, to me, I don't think it's that necessary,' he told reporters. ADVERTISEMENT U.S. intelligence assessments, however, diverge on the scale of success. A preliminary report from the Defence Intelligence Agency concluded the setbacks to Iran's nuclear efforts might be limited to a matter of months, not years. CIA Director John Ratcliffe affirmed that the programme had been 'severely damaged' but stopped short of declaring it destroyed. Israeli officials estimated the setbacks to be multi‑year, while the International Atomic Energy Agency emphasised uncertainties over Iran's stockpile and called for robust inspections. Diplomatic activity has meanwhile resumed. This U.S.–Iran meeting will follow six rounds of indirect talks mediated by Oman and Italy, which collapsed in mid‑June as the military confrontation intensified. Earlier this week, European envoys from the E‑3—France, Germany and the UK—engaged in direct negotiations in Geneva with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Those discussions aimed to bridge differences after stalled U.S. efforts. White House special envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated red‑line U.S. stipulations ahead of next week's meeting: Tehran must renounce nuclear weaponisation and accept restrictions on uranium enrichment. He noted the U.S. is open to crafting a comprehensive peace framework, building on what Trump described as a de‑escalation following 'a victory for everybody'. From Tehran, Iranian officials have not confirmed next week's meeting but emphasised national security. The Iranian parliament accelerated a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, pending guarantees for the safety of nuclear infrastructure targeted in the strikes. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf accused the IAEA of failing to condemn the U.S. attack. Meanwhile, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi urged renewed inspections to clarify the status of enriched uranium moved before the bombings. Regional and global actors are also weighing in. France has called for robust diplomacy to carve a sustained peace path. China has echoed the call for diplomatic restraint. Israel hailed the strikes as a critical setback to Iran's programme; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed Trump's strong posture and emphasised the need to keep pressure on Tehran. ADVERTISEMENT Analysts note the gravity of waging diplomacy in the shadow of military action. One specialist observed that while bombings may degrade enrichment infrastructure, they can complicate trust and cooperation needed for inspections and verification. Moreover, uncertainty lingers over the status of highly enriched uranium caches. Rebuilding diplomatic channels will require assurances, reciprocal transparency, and a mutual understanding of consequences. Trump has warned that if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear programme, the U.S. is prepared to act again: 'Sure,' he said when asked about further strikes. Yet the pendulum has swung toward a blend of military deterrence and diplomatic engagement. As next week's talks approach, key questions remain: who will represent each side, where the dialogue will occur, and whether the focus will be solely nuclear constraints or broader regional stability. White House administration officials have yet to disclose details, but the U.S. envoy confirmed Washington's intent is to establish a framework that could replace the 2015 agreement. Trump also signalled openness to exploring a bilateral relationship beyond nuclear confines: 'We'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran,' he said, as long as Tehran adheres to non‑weaponisation terms. As the diplomatic window opens under the spectre of military force, the world watches to see whether this fragile blend of coercion and conciliation can unfold into a sustainable agreement—one that might ensure Iran never pursues nuclear weapons and stabilises a volatile region.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Europe placates Trump with NATO pledges it can ill afford
LONDON - In their rush to retain Donald Trump's support for NATO, the alliance's European members have promised to more than double the amount of wealth they set aside for military spending. The snag is that most can ill-afford to spend 5% of output on defence - so while there will be some unpalatable sacrifices in national budgets, there will also be some creative accounting to divert existing spending to the effort. "They will not get there," Guntram Wolff, senior fellow of the Bruegel think-tank, said of the 5% goal. "If you are a highly indebted country you can't issue more debt, it means very difficult budgetary choices," he said of the hefty tax hikes or spending cuts that it would require. As a piece of political theatre, the Hague summit at least won over its intended audience: Trump himself. Amid concerns about his commitment to NATO's mutual defence clause, he said the United States stood with its European allies "all the way". While few dispute that Europe needs to do more to ensure its own security as tensions with Russia rise, the fixation on the 5% target cut short a separate debate about how it could be using its existing military budgets more efficiently, for example with national governments agreeing on joint procurement. Now it has saddled itself with pledges which - with the notable exception of Germany, whose finances are solid after years of fiscal frugality - most members will find hard to keep. To hit the 5% threshold, European Union countries, whose debt pile already tops 80% of output, would between them have to nearly triple the 325 billion euros ($377 billion) they spent on defence last year to more than 900 billion. Non-EU Britain - whose debt is 100% of output and which already pays more in debt servicing than for every spending item apart from health - would need an extra 30 billion pounds ($41 billion). "The potential losers are not just future generations saddled with huge debts, but today's societies," said Nick Witney at the European Council on Foreign Relations. "Disgruntled populations, whose sense of economic wellbeing has never recovered from the global economic crash of 2008, will likely become even easier prey for populist or nationalist politicians gathering strength across Europe." GUNS OR BUTTER? To be sure, the closer a country sits next to Russia, the less domestic angst there is about finding the extra cash - Poland, the Baltics and Finland are all cases in point. Years of rivalry with neighbouring Turkey have meanwhile attuned Greek public opinion to accept higher defence spending. But Spain's Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez - whose country is alone in not expressly signing up to the new target - voiced the concerns of others when he said the goal was "incompatible with our welfare state". Slovakia, one of the central European countries whose budgets face the greatest strains from the defence build-up, has also baulked at the target, arguing that raising living standards and cutting its borrowing were equally important. Bruegel's Wolff said it remained to be seen whether countries increase their defence quotas by shaving the odd billion here and there off other areas, or whether big-ticket areas such as pensions take a sizeable hit. "But keep it in proportion - there will still be a welfare state but perhaps less generous," he said of social protections across Europe that can account for anything up to 30% of the economy. As leaders depart the Hague summit venue, the national conversations on defence will sound strikingly different to those that were had in the run-up to the gathering. The 5% breaks down into 3.5% to be spent on "core" defence - troops and weapons - and 1.5% on defence-related measures such as adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles. The room to wedge existing spending items into the second category will likely prove generous. In France, for example, there is discussion about whether that could include the gendarmes policing country lanes, who are formally part of the defence ministry but whose existing running costs currently lie outside the defence cost tally. The long deadlines aired for hitting the target - in some cases up to a decade - are also an opportunity for those pledges to be fudged as the political spotlight shines elsewhere. "Spending goals will simply be missed," said Witney. "The transformation required will begin to take shape, but less rapidly and less coherently than if more realistic targets had been set." ($1 = 0.7344 pounds) ($1 = 0.8613 euros) (Writing by Mark John; additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Leigh Thomas in Paris; Maria Martinez in Berlin; William Schomberg in London; Eleftherios Papadimos in Athens; Anne Kauranen in Helsinki; Simon Johnson in Stockholm; Gergely Szakacs in Budapest; Jan Lopatka in Prague; Editing by Alex Richardson)
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Gold rises as weaker dollar, Trump's Powell criticism fuel uncertainty
Gold prices edged higher on Thursday, lifted by a weaker dollar and growing uncertainty after reports suggested U.S. President Donald Trump had considered replacing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell as early as September or October. The reports raised concerns over the future independence of the U.S. central bank, boosting demand for safe-haven bullion. Spot gold was up 0.2% at $3,339.20 per ounce, as of 0242 GMT. U.S. gold futures rose 0.3% to $3,353.10. The dollar fell to its lowest level since March 2022, making greenback-priced gold less expensive for overseas buyers. Powell told a U.S. Senate panel on Wednesday that while Trump's tariffs may cause a one-time price hike, the risk of persistent inflation is significant enough for the central bank to be cautious about further rate cuts. "Trump clearly wants a dovish Fed Chairman next time around, so the increased likelihood of an aggressive rate-cutting cycle is pinning down the USD," KCM Trade Chief Market Analyst Tim Waterer said. Bullion tends to do well during periods of uncertainty and in a low-interest-rate environment. On Wednesday, Trump called Powell "terrible" and said he is considering three or four candidates for the top Fed post. Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has even toyed with the idea of announcing Powell's potential successor by September or October. Markets are awaiting U.S. GDP print due later in the day, while also keeping a watch for data on Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) on Friday. "Gold is just basically treading water for the moment until we get a read on the next batch of U.S. macro data including GDP and core PCE," Waterer said. A ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday as Trump, at a NATO summit, praised the swift end to the 12-day conflict and said he would seek a commitment from Iran to end its nuclear ambitions at talks next week. Spot silver edged up 0.2% to $36.36 per ounce, platinum firmed 2.3% to $1,385.38, while palladium surged 5.5% to $1,115.58.
