
Trump's Trade War Mints An Unlikely New American Mining Billionaire
I n July, the Defense Department made an unusual move for a federal U.S. agency when it purchased $400 million of newly created shares, plus warrants to buy additional stock, in the rare earths miner MP Materials. As part of the deal, the DoD also signed a 10-year agreement to buy rare earth magnets from MP Materials to power its future instruments of warfare.
The federal government came calling because MP Materials owns the only rare earth mine in the U.S. at its Mountain Pass site in California's Mojave Desert, where it extracts, refines, and separates rare earth materials like neodymium and praseodymium. Those elements are essential ingredients in the magnets used by electric vehicles, drones, defense systems, robotics, wind turbines and other advanced technologies.
Shares in MP Materials have risen 150% since the DoD announcement, pushing James Litinsky, founder and CEO, into the three-comma-club. The 47-year-old Las Vegas resident is worth an estimated $1.2 billion, between his 8% stake in MP Materials (worth about $1 billion as of Friday's market close) and over $200 million in cash and outside investments, per Forbes' estimates.
Litinsky, who did not respond to Forbes' request for comment on his wealth, is not your typical mining magnate. He studied economics at Yale and received his J.D. and M.B.A. from Northwestern University before working at investment giant Fortress Group and then founding his own hedge fund JHL Capital in 2006. His firm acquired $20.5 million worth of distressed bonds issued by Molycorp Minerals, the previous owner of the Mountain Pass site, in 2014. Three years later, during Molycorp's bankruptcy proceedings, he turned those bonds into full ownership of the mine (which had flooded and was inactive). After getting $50 million in financing from a Chinese backer and orchestrating an 18-month cleanup effort, the newly named MP Materials began mining operations in 2018. Litinsky took the company public in 2020 through a SPAC, and its output has more than tripled since it began operations.
While Trump's tariffs and trade war wreak havoc on global supply chains and raise consumer prices in the United States, MP Materials is uniquely positioned to benefit from the chaos, especially from the escalating standoff between the U.S. and China. That's because China dominates the global rare earths trade, processing 90% of the metals and producing 95% of high-strength magnets; the U.S. imports nearly all of its 7,000 tons annually from China.
China has used U.S. reliance on its rare earth magnets as a key bargaining chip in its negotiations with Trump. Following Trump's Liberation Day tariffs announcement in April, China began requiring foreign companies to obtain export licenses for rare earth magnets, which caused a crisis for U.S. firms: exports of the magnets to the U.S. declined 59% year-over-year in April and a whopping 93% in May, the Wall Street Journal reported. For MP Materials, the chokehold spurred a surge in domestic demand. 'The sense of urgency, I've never seen anything like it,' Litinsky told Forbes in April.
Ironically, Litinksy has relied on the Chinese to get MP Materials off the ground and sustain its business prior to Trump's trade war. Shenghe Resources, a Chengdu-based rare earths giant that is partially owned by the Chinese government, helped finance JHL's 2017 bid by purchasing $50 million of future rare earth concentrate produced by MP Materials. Those funds helped pay for the mine's cleanup effort and new capital costs, in return for an 8.4% stake in the company, which Shenghe still holds. (It has no operational involvement at MP Materials and does not have a board seat). Shenghe is also its largest customer, accounting for 80% of its $204 million in revenue last year. That is changing fast: after Liberation Day and China's retaliatory tariffs, MP Materials announced it would stop shipping its products to China and focus on other buyers.
To wean off its reliance on China, MP Materials needs to continue vertically integrating. Its Mountain Pass refinery now processes around half of all ores excavated from the nearby mine, but it is still working to build out refinery capacities for the all-important neodymium-praseodymium metals that go into magnets. (The government's $400 million investment should help on that front). Further downstream, MP Materials has built a magnet manufacturing facility in Fort Worth, Texas, which is already churning out magnets and is on track to begin full commercial production later this year. And in conjunction with the DoD deal, the company announced it will build a second U.S. magnet manufacturing facility at a yet-to-be-announced location with the help of a $1 billion bank loan.
All of this costly, but even more costly for MP Materials has been the precipitous decline in rare earth prices over the past couple of years, which has hit the bottom line hard. After netting a record $290 million in 2022, MP Materials made $24 million in 2023 and lost $65 million last year. Still the company remains well positioned with $750 million of cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet, a growing roster of U.S. customers like General Motors, and now the government's backing amid the ever-escalating trade war. Even with its stock trading at an all time high of over $73 per share, seven out of 11 analysts have a Buy rating on the stock, while the other four have a Hold.
Though Litinsky has no formal training in mining or geology, he clearly knows a good investment when he sees one. He's turned a $20.5 million bet on distressed bonds into a $13 billion (market cap) company with strategic importance to his home country. 'If you can buy a world-class asset at a discount to replacement cost at the bottom of a cycle,' he told Forbes last year, 'luck finds you.'
MORE FROM FORBES Forbes The Only U.S. Rare Earth Mine May Win Big From Trump's China Tariffs By Alan Ohnsman Forbes This Contrarian Investor Saved America's Biggest Rare Earths Mine, With Some Help From The Chinese By Christopher Helman
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can Hudson Pacific Properties' (HPP) Revised Outlook Reveal Deeper Shifts in Its Core Business Strategy?
Earlier this month, Hudson Pacific Properties reported second quarter and half-year results showing declines in sales and revenue alongside increased net losses, and provided updated earnings guidance for 2025 with GAAP non-cash revenue projected between US$5.5 million and US$10.5 million. The combination of disappointing financial performance and revised outlook reflects ongoing challenges facing the company's core office and studio segments in the current market. Let's assess how the weaker quarterly results and revised guidance could affect Hudson Pacific Properties' longer-term investment narrative. These 14 companies survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. Discover why before your portfolio feels the trade war pinch. Hudson Pacific Properties Investment Narrative Recap To be a shareholder in Hudson Pacific Properties, you need to believe that its portfolio of office and studio assets can eventually overcome weak occupancy trends and sustain a turnaround, primarily through a recovery in West Coast tech and media leasing and studio show count. The latest quarterly results show further declines in revenue and deepening losses, putting near-term pressure on the company's largest catalyst: improved leasing velocity. However, the risk from elevated leverage and constrained cash flow remains front and center, as the results reflect limited margin for error in the current environment. The company's recent follow-on equity offering, raising US$599.28 million, stands out as a significant move closely tied to the need for financial flexibility highlighted in its Q2 report. While this strengthens immediate liquidity, it also points to increased dilution, which could temper any positive impact from operational improvements in the short term. But with leverage still high, investors should be monitoring how these capital moves play into... Read the full narrative on Hudson Pacific Properties (it's free!) Hudson Pacific Properties is projected to reach $910.8 million in revenue and $70.9 million in earnings by 2028. This outlook is based on an expected annual revenue growth rate of 4.7% and a $493.7 million increase in earnings from the current level of -$422.8 million. Uncover how Hudson Pacific Properties' forecasts yield a $3.24 fair value, a 20% upside to its current price. Exploring Other Perspectives Fair value estimates from the Simply Wall St Community range from US$3.24 to US$28.64, across 3 distinct perspectives. With recent losses and slower leasing activity, the risk of continued revenue shortfalls is something readers should keep on their radar as opinions differ widely on future potential. Explore 3 other fair value estimates on Hudson Pacific Properties - why the stock might be worth just $3.24! Build Your Own Hudson Pacific Properties Narrative Disagree with existing narratives? Create your own in under 3 minutes - extraordinary investment returns rarely come from following the herd. A great starting point for your Hudson Pacific Properties research is our analysis highlighting 1 key reward and 2 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision. Our free Hudson Pacific Properties research report provides a comprehensive fundamental analysis summarized in a single visual - the Snowflake - making it easy to evaluate Hudson Pacific Properties' overall financial health at a glance. Ready For A Different Approach? Don't miss your shot at the next 10-bagger. Our latest stock picks just dropped: Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. This technology could replace computers: discover 24 stocks that are working to make quantum computing a reality. Rare earth metals are the new gold rush. Find out which 27 stocks are leading the charge. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include HPP. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK job vacancies fall at a slower pace while wage growth holds steady
The decline in payroll employment in the UK eased in July, with employers cutting headcount by 8,000, compared to a month-on-month drop of 26,000 in June. July's figure marks the smallest decline in headcount since a modest rise in January, offering a glimmer of hope for the sluggish UK job market. The early estimate of payrolled employees for July 2025 decreased by 164,000 on the year, added the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Tuesday's data 'tallies with some of the business surveys which suggest hiring appetite has begun to improve after a torrid spring', said James Smith, developed market economist at ING. 'The combination of National Insurance (payroll tax) hikes and a sizeable increase in the National Living Wage in April had become a major headwind, particularly in consumer services.' The ONS also announced on Tuesday that the unemployment rate held steady in April to June at 4.7%, a four-year high. Annual wage growth excluding bonuses held steady at 5.0% in the three months to June, while this average in the private-sector eased slightly to 4.8% from 4.9%. Related Struggling to find work? UK sees more jobseekers and fewer vacancies BoE chief says collaboration is key to solving economic imbalances 'Although pay growth has slowed, it's now pretty static, and is still outstripping inflation, so there's a risk that firms will pass on heavier costs as higher prices,' said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown. She added: 'Bank of England policymakers struck a more cautious tone than expected at the last meeting when it comes to future policy, and this jobs snapshot doesn't change the overall picture too much. It's touch and go as to whether there will be a cut in November but December is looking a bit more likely.' The fresh data comes after the Bank of England cut its key interest rate last week to 4%, the lowest level since March 2023. Vacancies are below pre-Covid levels in virtually all sectors now, highlighting the weakness of the labour market, although price pressures remain a risk to the economy. The number of job vacancies fell by 44,000 to 718,000 between May and July. 'The Bank faces a fine balancing act,' said Richard Carter, head of fixed interest research at Quilter Cheviot. 'Inflation remains at 3.6%, fuelled by housing and transport costs, but signs of slack in the labour market are becoming harder to ignore. With the MPC split on the pace of easing, these latest numbers could tip the balance towards further cuts to shore up the economy." Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Warning signs in Europe's job market: Workers now brace for tariff effects
Much attention has been given to how US import tariffs might hit Europe's industries and corporate giants as the once-solid transatlantic trading relationship faces one of the biggest challenges of the modern era. One area that has been largely ignored — the fate of workers — could also suffer, as ripples in the EU's economic stability lead to a reduction in job opportunities and weakened employment stability. Here's an overview of what to expect in the months ahead. Job vacancy rate One indicator of labour market health is the rate at which vacancies appear, a sign of how stable businesses feel. When lots of jobs are up for grabs, it tends to be a sign that companies are confident and ready to hire more people. When openings start to dry up, it usually means they're getting cautious. If vacancies are rising while unemployment is low, workers have more choice and bargaining power as demand is high relative to supply. But when available job offers fall, it's often the first hint that the labour market is slowing down. Employers generally hit pause on hiring well before they start letting people go, which is why vacancy rates are such an important early clue as to what's coming. And right now, the data shows risks ahead. In first-quarter figures released by the European Commission in June, there was a slight drop in the job vacancy rate, which came in at 2.4% in the eurozone. That's down from 2.5% in the final quarter of 2024. When looking at the yearly change, the drop is more significant, as the rate for the first quarter of 2024 was 2.9%. As seen in the graph below, the COVID-19 pandemic had the most pronounced impact on job vacancies, much more than the 2008-2009 economic crisis. While the market recovered somewhat in 2021 and 2022, vacancy rates are now dropping again. Vacancy rates dropped the most in Germany, Greece, Austria and Sweden, indicating that employers are growing more reluctant, if only marginally, to hire more people. For workers, a falling vacancy rate often means fewer opportunities to change jobs, less leverage to negotiate higher pay, and a longer wait to re-enter the market if they get laid off. If the decline seen at the start of 2025 continues, workers could find themselves in a much tougher bargaining position by the end of the year. Hours worked and overtime Another important indicator is the squeeze on working hours or indicators that show employers are cutting back shifts, a step often taken before moving to layoffs or instituting a hiring freeze. Overtime hours also decrease when employers trim shifts in response to falling demand or input shortages. In the EU, in 2024, people aged 20-64 years worked 36 hours on average per week, including full- and part-time work. This number refers to the hours people worked in their main job in the reference week. Countries with the longest working week were Greece at 39.8 hours, Bulgaria at 39, Poland at 38.9 and Romania at 38.8. By contrast, when it comes to European Union countries, the Netherlands had the shortest working week at 32.1 hours, followed by Austria, Germany and Denmark (all with 33.9 hours). The number of hours worked decreased by 0.3% in both the eurozone and the European Union in the first quarter of 2025, compared with the previous quarter, according to Eurostat. Compared with the same quarter of the previous year, hours worked increased by 0.1% in the eurozone and decreased by 0.2% in the EU. Fewer hours on the job does not just mean more free time. It often means less pay and fewer benefits, especially for hourly workers. If hours continue to shrink, the impact will be felt fastest among lower- and middle-income households already squeezed by increased living costs. Even if employment levels hold steady, underemployment — when workers have a job but can't get the hours they want — can rise. In the first quarter of 2025, 10.9% of the EU's extended labour force was underutilised, amounting to around 23.6 million people. This suggests that the erosion in job quality can run deeper than headline unemployment figures might immediately show. Labour rights Europe's institutional safeguards for workers are deteriorating, which is worrying when considering the economic shocks that could potentially be caused by tariffs in the future. The Labour Rights Index for 2024 flags gaps in legislation based on its assessment of labour protections across the world. It evaluates aspects like freedom of association, employment security and family responsibilities through a 0–100 scoring system. In Europe, countries such as Norway, Sweden, Finland, France and Italy score 94, while countries such as Germany and the UK score 88.5 and 88 respectively. While many EU countries score highly on paper, the index highlights persistent legislative gaps in areas such as protection against unfair dismissal and equal treatment for non-standard workers. These gaps mean that even in stable economic periods, large groups of workers remain less shielded from sudden job loss or deteriorating conditions. Related Years at work: Which European countries have the longest average working life? UK job vacancies fall at a slower pace while wage growth holds steady Meanwhile, the ITUC Global Rights Index 2025 shows how these legal weaknesses translate into reality, and tracks violations of labour rights such as restrictions on strikes, the formation of unions, and judicial access and protections on a yearly basis. According to ITUC, Europe saw its worst-ever average score in 2025, at 2.78, compared to 2.73 in 2024 and 2.56 in 2023. "Europe continued a rapid deterioration from 1.84 in 2014 — the biggest decline seen in any region worldwide over the past 10 years," the ITUC report highlights. According to the ITUC index, "nearly three-quarters of European countries violated the right to strike and almost a third of them arrested or detained workers. More than half were denied or restricted access to justice — a sharp increase from 32% in 2024." What does this mean? The economic signals of a slowing labour market — falling vacancy rates, shrinking working hours, and rising underemployment — suggest that workers may have less power to protect themselves just as their jobs and incomes come under strain. In other words, tariffs and other trade shocks could land much harder in 2025, not simply because the economy is cooling, but because the institutional defences that once helped workers weather downturns are eroding at the same time. With early warning signs already visible, the next few quarters will reveal whether these shifts are temporary tremors or the start of a deeper downturn for Europe's workforce. If the combination of tariff pressure and eroding rights persists, the cost could be measured not only in lost jobs, but in lasting damage to workers' bargaining power for years to come. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data