logo
How Saudi Arabia is paving the way for Mideast security and stability

How Saudi Arabia is paving the way for Mideast security and stability

Arab News09-07-2025
History, driven by geographical and geopolitical realities, has repeatedly revealed a clear and fundamental pattern: Imbalances of power often lead to conflict and widespread suffering.
The Middle East, a region abundant in diversity, rich history, and untapped potential, cannot afford to fall into this trap.
Saudi Arabia and other countries, through diplomacy and initiatives, such as Vision 2030, demonstrate how rational thinking, regional cooperation, and the pursuit of peace can provide a framework for stability and security.
History offers valuable lessons on the dangers of power imbalances. For instance, the collapse of Sparta in ancient Greece serves as a stark warning. When one player becomes overwhelmingly powerful, it inevitably triggers unified resistance.
When Sparta emerged as the hegemonic power in Greece following the Peloponnesian War, many of its allies grew resentful of its heavy-handed policies and began to rebel. This growing dissatisfaction, combined with internal strife, economic stagnation, and rival coalitions, led to Sparta's downfall.
The Napoleonic Wars provide another striking example of how the hegemonic ambitions of a single power can unite others against it, leading to widespread conflict and immense costs for all involved.
Napoleon Bonaparte sought to establish French hegemony over Europe by conquering and subjugating other nations, thereby disrupting the balance of power on the European continent.
In response, a series of coalitions — comprising Britain, Prussia, Austria, Russia and others — formed to counter his ambitions. Although Napoleon's military genius allowed him to dominate much of Europe for years, his aggressive policies and disregard for diplomacy ultimately united his rivals.
This unity, however, came at a great cost: the Napoleonic Wars devastated entire regions, drained economies, and caused millions of deaths. After Napoleon's defeat, the Congress of Vienna faced the monumental task of restoring stability.
While it succeeded in establishing a new balance of power in 1815, Europe remained deeply scarred. These scars were crucial to bringing stability because there was the fear of the immense costs of war.
In other words, peace in Europe was maintained because the Europeans, especially Prussia, were determined to preserve the balance of power out of fear for their own existence.
Similarly, the Second World War provides a stark example of the dangers of upsetting regional stability. Nazi Germany, under Adolf Hitler, sought to establish hegemony over Europe, disrupting the balance of power and plunging the world into the deadliest conflict in human history.
This destabilization forced even distant powers, such as the US, to intervene, joining forces with the Soviet Union and the UK against Germany at an immense human and economic cost. The war left tens of millions dead and entire regions in ruin, proving again that the unchecked pursuit of power is disastrous for all involved.
These historical examples underscore the dangers of allowing a single player to disrupt the balance of power in a system. In the context of the Middle East, it serves as a powerful reminder that rational decision-making, collaboration, and commitment to peace are needed to avoid similar cycles of conflict and destruction.
In the Middle East, where tensions unfortunately run deep from time to time, allowing such an imbalance to arise could be catastrophic — not only for the weaker players.
If all players in the Middle East prioritize rational decision-making over short-term gains, they will see that true power lies not in hegemonic policies but in collaboration. The region holds immense potential for prosperity if its resources, human capital, and diverse cultures are harnessed and aligned under a unified vision for peace.
The end of what US President Donald Trump has labeled the '12-Day War' between Iran and Israel, which concluded 16 days ago, is possibly a flicker of hope for the beginning of a new era of peace and stability. It reminds rational actors in the region of the power of dialogue.
The Middle East can draw valuable lessons from history, particularly from Otto von Bismarck, the 19th-century statesman who unified Germany and maintained peace in Europe through pragmatic diplomacy and strategic alliances.
Similarly, Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 reflects a modern approach to fostering security and stability in the region. By prioritizing diplomacy, cooperation, economic integration and innovation over conflict, Saudi Arabia is showing how states can achieve shared prosperity.
This framework, as the only significant plan currently in place, can help all players strengthen their economic relationships. It offers a sustainable path forward, where collaboration ensures peace and progress for the entire region.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel considers full Gaza takeover as more die of hunger
Israel considers full Gaza takeover as more die of hunger

Al Arabiya

time8 minutes ago

  • Al Arabiya

Israel considers full Gaza takeover as more die of hunger

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu favors a complete military takeover of Gaza, media reported, and was to meet senior security officials on Tuesday to finalize a new strategy in the 22-month war. Mediation between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas has collapsed despite intense international pressure for a ceasefire to ease hunger and appalling conditions in the besieged Palestinian enclave. Eight more people died of starvation or malnutrition in the past 24 hours, Gaza's health ministry said, while another 79 died in the latest Israeli fire. Netanyahu was to meet Defense Minister Israel Katz and military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir to decide on a strategy to take to cabinet later this week, an Israeli official told Reuters. Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Netanyahu, would also be present. Israel's Channel 12, citing an official from Netanyahu's office, said the prime minister was leaning towards taking control of the entire territory. That would reverse a 2005 decision to pull settlers and military out of Gaza while retaining control over its borders, a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there. It was unclear, however, whether Netanyahu was foreseeing a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing Israeli hostages. The prime minister's office declined to comment on the Channel 12 report. 'It is still necessary to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel,' Netanyahu told new recruits at a military base. 'We are not giving up on any of these missions.' On Saturday, Hamas released a video of Evyatar David, one of 50 hostages still held in Gaza, appearing emaciated in what seemed to be an underground tunnel. The images shocked Israelis and sparked international condemnation. Throughout the war, there has been sustained international pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, of whom Israeli officials estimate 20 are believed to still be alive. Most hostages have been released during ceasefires following diplomatic negotiations. Israel broke the last ceasefire. Pressure tactic? A Palestinian official said the threat of a full takeover of Gaza may be a tactic to pressure Hamas into concessions, while the Palestinian foreign ministry urged foreign nations to take heed of the reports. 'The ministry urges countries and the international community to treat these leaks with utmost seriousness and to intervene urgently to prevent their implementation, whether these leaks are meant to exert pressure, test international reactions, or are genuine and serious,' it said. Israel's coalition government, the most right-wing and religiously conservative in its history, includes far-right politicians who advocate for the annexation of both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland. Nearly two years of fighting in Gaza has strained the military, which has a small standing army and has had to repeatedly mobilize reservists. It has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel fully occupying Gaza. In a sign of differences between some members of Israel's ruling coalition and the military, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on X challenged military head Zamir to state he would comply with government directives even if a decision was made to take all of Gaza. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar then said the military chief must give his professional opinion, while Defense Minister Katz weighed in to say the military would professionally implement whatever policy the government set. Hunger The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants on October 7, 2023, attacked Israel, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and capturing 251 hostages, taking them into Gaza. Israel's military response has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people – mostly civilians – according to Palestinian health authorities. Israel's campaign has forced nearly all of Gaza's over 2 million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine. Some 188 Palestinians, including 94 children, have died from hunger since the war began, according to Gaza authorities. An Israeli security official, in a briefing to reporters, acknowledged there may be hunger in some parts of Gaza but rejected reports of famine or starvation. On Tuesday, Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive. Palestinians living in the last quarter of territory where Israel has not yet taken military control – via ground incursions or orders for civilians to leave – said any new push would be catastrophic. 'If the tanks pushed through, where would we go, into the sea? This will be like a death sentence to the entire population,' said Abu Jehad, a Gaza wood merchant.

US House Speaker Johnson visits illegal Israeli settlements in West Bank
US House Speaker Johnson visits illegal Israeli settlements in West Bank

Al Arabiya

time3 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

US House Speaker Johnson visits illegal Israeli settlements in West Bank

US House Speaker Mike Johnson visited a settlement in the occupied West Bank as part of a private trip to Israel, which was organized by a pro-Israel advocacy group, Axios reported on Monday, citing two Israeli officials. 'While many Republican Congress members have visited West Bank settlements, it is highly unusual visit for a speaker of the house to do so,' the report added. Marc Zell, an American-Israeli Republican activist, said that Johnson was the highest-ranking US official on such a visit. He also reportedly quoted the House Speaker as saying, 'the territory was the rightful property of the Jewish people.' Johnson had planned to visit Israel earlier to address a session of the Israeli parliament, but postponed his plans due to the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. The US official is expected to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaaz Herzog, as well as travel to Gaza and visit US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid centers, which have come under much scrutiny since their inception. According to the Israeli officials, the Israeli embassy in Washington, the Israeli foreign ministry and the US embassy in Jerusalem were not involved in planning Johnson's trip. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war, and Palestinians want all three territories for their future state. The West Bank is home to some 3 million Palestinians live under seemingly open-ended Israeli military rule and 500,000 Jewish settlers. The international community overwhelmingly considers settlements illegal. Over the past two years of the Israel–Hamas war in Gaza, Palestinian residents in the West Bank have reported a major increase in Israeli checkpoints and delays across the territory. Israel, meanwhile, says threats from the West Bank against its citizens are on the rise. While the West Bank has largely been spared the all-out assault waged in Gaza, life has grown increasingly precarious. A ban on entering Israel for work abruptly cut off the livelihoods of tens of thousands of workers. At the start of this year, tens of thousands of West Bank residents were displaced by an Israeli crackdown on militants in Jenin in the north.

Lebanon's cabinet meets to discuss Hezbollah's arms after US pressure
Lebanon's cabinet meets to discuss Hezbollah's arms after US pressure

Arab News

time3 hours ago

  • Arab News

Lebanon's cabinet meets to discuss Hezbollah's arms after US pressure

BEIRUT: Lebanon's cabinet will meet on Tuesday to discuss Hezbollah's arsenal, after Washington ramped up pressure on ministers to publicly commit to disarming the Iran-backed group and amid fears Israel could intensify strikes if they fail to do so. The session scheduled for 3:00 p.m. (1200 GMT) at Lebanon's presidential palace is the first time that cabinet will discuss the fate of Hezbollah's weapons — unimaginable when the group was at the zenith of its power just two years ago. Pressure from the US and Hezbollah's domestic rivals for the group to relinquish its arms has spiked following last year's war with Israel, which killed Hezbollah's top leaders and thousands of fighters and destroyed much of its rocket arsenal. In June, US envoy Thomas Barrack proposed a roadmap to Lebanese officials to fully disarm Hezbollah, in exchange for Israel halting its strikes on Lebanon and withdrawing its troops from five points they still occupy in southern Lebanon. That proposal included a condition that Lebanon's government pass a cabinet decision clearly pledging to disarm Hezbollah. After Barrack made several trips to Lebanon to urge progress on the plan, Washington's patience began wearing thin, Reuters reported last week. It pressured Lebanon's ministers to swiftly make the public pledge so that talks could continue. But Lebanese officials and diplomats say such an explicit vow could spark communal tensions in Lebanon, where Hezbollah and its arsenal retain significant support among the country's Shiite Muslim community. PROPOSED WORDING On Monday evening, a group of dozens of motorcycles set out from a neighborhood in Beirut's suburbs where Hezbollah has strong support, carrying the party's flags. Hezbollah's main ally, Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, has been in talks with President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam ahead of Tuesday's session to agree on a general phrase to include in a cabinet decision to appease the US and buy Lebanon more time, two Lebanese officials said. Berri's proposed wording would commit Lebanon to forming a national defense strategy and maintaining a ceasefire with Israel, but would avoid an explicit pledge to disarm Hezbollah across Lebanon, the officials said. But other Lebanese ministers plan to propose a formulation that commits Lebanon to a deadline to disarm Hezbollah, said Kamal Shehadi, a minister affiliated with the anti-Hezbollah Lebanese Forces party. 'There's frankly no need to kick the can down the road and postpone a decision. We have to put Lebanon's interest first and take a decision today,' Shehadi told Reuters. Lebanese officials and foreign envoys say Lebanese leaders fear that a failure to issue a clear decision on Tuesday could prompt Israel to escalate its strikes, including on Beirut. A US-brokered ceasefire last November ended the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, though Israel has continued to carry out strikes on what it says are Hezbollah arms depots and fighters, mostly in southern Lebanon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store