Welfare U-turn raises questions over Labour's tax plans
But they also removed a key plank of Sir Keir Starmer's welfare reform agenda, delaying changes to Pip until after a review of the benefit not due to conclude until autumn 2026.
With no clarity on when the changes will be enacted or what they might entail, the Chancellor now faces a fiscal headache as a forecast £4.8 billion in welfare savings have been whittled away to nothing.
Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets.
IFS deputy director Helen Miller said the move had effectively halved the Chancellor's 'margin of error' against her main fiscal rule, once again raising the possibility of tax rises in the autumn.
On top of that, a stuttering economy and global instability could mean she has even less room for manoeuvre than expected.
Ms Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.'
The Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice agreed that there would be no savings in 2029/30, but suggested changes to universal credit – almost the only part of the Government's proposals still standing – could save money in the longer term.
On Wednesday morning, the Conservatives accused Labour of making billions in unfunded spending commitments, including both the U-turns on welfare and the partial reinstatement of winter fuel payments.
In a letter to Ms Reeves, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride demanded to know where the money was coming from, asking: 'Will you raise tax or increase borrowing?'
Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT.
But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30.
Meanwhile, Sir Keir himself will face a grilling from MPs on Wednesday as he attempts to repair relations with his backbenchers.
The weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions comes just a day after 49 of his own MPs voted against his welfare reforms – the biggest rebellion of his premiership so far – while several backbenchers described the Government's handling of the issue as 'chaotic' and 'a shambles'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
34 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Kier Starmer ‘doing the job for Britain' says Angela Rayner
Kier Starmer 'doing the job for Britain' says Angela Rayner The Deputy Prime Minister said "there's been a lot going on" in the 12 months since Sir Keir entered Downing Street Sir Keir Starmer (Image:) Angela Rayner has defended Sir Keir Starmer as "doing the job for Britain" as he approaches his first year in office. The Deputy Prime Minister said "there's been a lot going on" in the 12 months since Sir Keir entered Downing Street, and indicated that she is not interested in the job running the country. Speaking to ITV's Lorraine programme on Wednesday, Ms Rayner was asked whether the Prime Minister is tired, and responded: "Even before I was in politics, I said that have you ever seen a prime minister after a year or two in government? "And people always say to me, do you want to be Prime Minister? Not a chance. It'll age me by 10 years within six months." She added: "It is a very challenging job, and there's been, to be fair for Keir Starmer, there's been a lot going on. "He's been all around the world trying to repair the relationships in Europe. We've got the trade deals that the previous government wasn't able to do, tackling the things like the tariffs that the President in the US wanted to put onto the UK, which would have damaged our economy again. Article continues below "There's a lot going on, and the Prime Minister's been [...] here, there and everywhere, doing the job for Britain." Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice has referred to Sir Keir's first year in office as "the worst start for any newly elected prime minister". He told Times Radio that the Prime Minister was "never especially popular" and that "the public still don't know what he stands for." Asked if she would be interested in being prime minister at some point, Ms Rayner told the ITV programme: "No". She said that she is "passionate" about issues including workers' rights and council housing. "I'm very interested in delivering for the people of this country, because ... to be elected as an MP from my background was incredible," she said. Article continues below "Having that opportunity to serve my community that have raised me, looked after me, given me opportunities, and I don't forget that. And to be Deputy Prime Minister of this country ... it's got to count for something."
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers ‘have to work harder' to bring down small boat numbers
Ministers are going to 'have to work harder' to bring down small boat crossings, a member of Sir Keir Starmer's Cabinet has said amid record numbers in the first half of this year. Pat McFadden told LBC 'everyone in Government knows it's a big challenge', as the tally for 2025 nears 20,000, but he declined to give an assurance that the figures would be down by this time next year. The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said: 'We are going to have to work harder to bring the numbers down. 'Everyone in Government knows it's a big challenge, and as a team we are determined to meet it.' Pressed specifically on whether the numbers would be down by this time next year, Mr McFadden said: 'I'm not going to make a prediction.' Asked again for an assurance that the numbers will reduce, he added: 'I can give you an assurance that the numbers at the moment are too high. We are working together to tackle this.' Figures released on Tuesday confirmed a record number of crossings for the first half of the year. Some 19,982 migrants had arrived in the UK after making the dangerous crossing by the end of June, latest Home Office figures show. The total is 48% higher than the figure for the first six months of 2024, which was 13,489, and 75% above the equivalent figure for 2023, which was 11,433. Some 879 migrants made the journey in 13 boats on Monday, the third highest number of arrivals on a single day so far this year. Data collection on the Channel crossings began in 2018. The figures also come as the UK's borders watchdog David Bolt said in June he did not feel 'very optimistic about the ability to smash the gangs', adding that with organised crime 'the best thing you can do is deflect it to something else you're less concerned about rather than expect to eradicate it'.
Daily Mirror
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Disability benefits are our lifeline. Taking it away will end in tragedy'
Millions of people who depend on disability benefits were watching yesterday's Commons vote on welfare reform closely. Here six people talk give their verdict's on the government plans. The Government's welfare reforms eventually got over the line after a tense day in the House of Commons yesterday. But dozens of Labour MPs refused to back the bill - a sign of the deep unease within the party about how the changes will affect disabled people and concerns about a 'two tier' benefits system. Others watching the proceedings closely were those who depend on the state for support as they cope with serious illness and disabilities. While the rebellion forced PM Keir Starmer to reverse some cuts to universal credit and protect current claimants of personal independence payment (Pip) from stricter eligibility rules, many disabled people are still fearful about the future. Here six of them give their verdicts... Vie's story Confidence coach and children's book author Vie Portland, 54, from Hampshire, needs a stick to walk and suffers from multiple conditions including Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) a group of rare genetic skin conditions causing extra fragile skin that blisters and tears easily; degenerative spinal disease and ADHD. She receives PIP, which covers treatments outside the NHS, special underwear and clothes because of her fragile skin, dressings and transport. She tells The Mirror: 'News that MPs aren't voting on PIP yet could be a victory for common sense, but I worry it could also be an attempt to put making a decision off and to distract us with something else. It does feel very messy. "Everyone is so at risk from going from non-disabled to disabled, due to something like an accident or a cancer diagnosis, and I am concerned for new claimants. 'What about the young people that will now not qualify for PIP, so will not be able to afford to go to university because they won't have the PIP to cover the additional costs we, as disabled people, have to pay? 'I have been a Labour supporter all of my life, yet this current government disappoints and appalls me, so I will not be voting for them until their policies return to ones that are true Labour policies - ones that don't just support privileged people.' Dena's story Dena Britcliffe, 32, lives in Kent, with partner Max, 32, a full-time carer and their five children: Mia, 13, Teddy, 12, Harlow, 8, Franky, 5 and Hallie-Rose, 4. Dena has functional neurological disorder (FND), fibromyalgia and suspected Ehlers Danlos syndromes, causing hypermobility and dislocations. Frankie has global development delay, autism and pathological demand avoidance (PDA) and is currently unable to cope with school. Dena, who receives PIP and Universal Credit, says: 'Another u-turn makes it so much more confusing for the disabled and vulnerable. Surely they should pull the bill completely until it is a better thought out plan with real life people taken into consideration. 'PIP is my lifeline – I use the financial help to pay for aids and equipment including a wheelchair and walking frame and travel to hospital appointments in London. Life costs a lot more when you are disabled. 'The new points system worries me. Assessors are not doctors, they don't have medical training and the new points system will be harsher with even stricter targets because they want to keep the costs down. The Government has treated disabled families with contempt – they have no idea what it's like to be disabled. If I didn't have PIP I wouldn't be able to leave the house, I wouldn't able to pay for all our food. 'We need a whole Government overhaul. The Government is disregarding thousands of disabled people.' Lianne's story Lianne White, 46, from Hampshire, is blind and took four years to get PIP, finally being awarded it after a tribunal. She says: ''What just happened in Parliament makes no sense. Their own MPs are telling them to pull the bill, yet they're still voting on it with none of the promised so-called concessions were an absolute joke. 'Lots of people use PIP to buy mobility aids so that they can stay in work – stripping PIP will do the opposite to what the government wants to achieve. It's going to screw up a lot of lives. "When you are blind you rely on voice operated devices and specialist computers but these are all very expensive – even second hand they cost £2,000. I can't use buses on my own – I have to use taxis if I'm by myself and they are very expensive and PIP helps towards this cost. "It's really hard to get PIP – I applied in 2021 and was declined – I appealed and it went to tribunal. I had to wait four years! "The Government is discriminating against disabled people. They are gaslighting and just trying to appease the rebel MPs. I think people will be driven to suicide if they lose PIP.' Georgia's story Georgia Bondy, 30, from East London is secretary of the Disabled People's Organisations (DPO) Forum England. She has Multiple Sclerosis and Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is often bedbound, but was refused PIP as her assessor didn't feel her condition was severe enough. She says: 'It's already an incredibly hostile system for disabled people and the Government is proposing to make it even harsher. The narrative being pedalled out is that disabled people are asking for too much, are too greedy, don't want to work.. but it's really difficult to get PIP. When I applied for PIP I was bedbound and having to crawl to the bathroom, my joints were dislocating and I was passing out. But I was ruled not eligible. 'I have very little faith that any scheme in the future. People are saying the Government has done a u-turn but it's not a u-turn, it's just to calm the rebel MPs down so they are back on side. What the Government is proposing is to damn our children to a future where many of them will be unable to buy food or pay rent if they become disabled.' Abrigail's story University student Abigail Holly, 22, from Swansea was diagnosed with cancer in 2020 – aged 16. She says PIP has been her lifeline, explaining: 'I was in my first year of college when I was diagnosed with a tumour in my finger. I had two lots of surgery to remove the tumour and had no movement in my hands for weeks. I was out of college for months. 'My life completely stopped. PIP allowed me to keep my head above the water – without it I'd have no money to get to the hospital for appointments, to buy food. It was the only thing allowing me to continue living, it was a complete lifeline. 'It's hard to fully comment right now on what the government's doing, as they're not discussing the PIP changes as such. But it's making me wonder, why aren't they? Is it a good thing or a bad thing? It's very strange and worrying at the same time.' Jamie's story Remedial therapist Jamie McCormack, 53, from Surrey, is deaf and uses a wheelchair after being hit by a car. He receives PIP, which helps with costs like hydrotherapy, an assisted trike and pain management. He says: 'After a weekend of chaos & non concessions, I'm not surprised that Starmer was forced into an inevitable last minute climbdown. The concessions are chaotic and confusing. 'What happens if you lose PIP and you have to reapply? You shouldn't be at the mercy of a decision-making assessor. 'Why is the Government putting people through all this, rather than championing disabled lives? They could do so much better.'
