
Paul Weiss Strategy Tested as Partners Exit Post-Trump Deal
Paul Weiss leader Brad Karp spent more than a decade building his firm's deals practice to an elite level matching its litigation work. A deal he struck with President Donald Trump threatens the balance between the two.
The Wall Street firm lost a string of litigation partners following the March 20 deal with Trump to provide $40 million in free legal services. The move got Paul Weiss out from under an executive order that Karp said threatened the firm's survival.
Jeh Johnson, the prominent Democrat and former Homeland Security Secretary, last month retired from the firm where he'd spent parts of 40 years. Days later, a high-profile group of litigators, including Karen Dunn, Bill Isaacson, and Jeannie Rhee, hit the exit to launch their own firm, which numbers seven ex-Paul Weiss partners so far. Also gone: Damian Williams, the former Manhattan US Attorney who bolted from Paul Weiss after six months on the job to join Jenner & Block, a firm that successfully fought off a Trump executive order in court. All have Democratic ties.
The departures accentuate a long-term trend at Paul Weiss, with the firm shifting its focus to lucrative work for private equity giants such as Apollo Global Management, Blackstone, and Bain Capital. That's brought greater headcount, revenue, and profitability, but also challenged the firm's identity.
'Paul Weiss made a decision a while ago to invest in their corporate work, and this is just a further development in that trajectory,' said Alisa Levin, a veteran recruiter with Greene-Levin-Snyder Legal Search Group. 'Nobody has left yet from the corporate side and I doubt that anybody will.'
A Paul Weiss spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
The firm under Karp has changed its compensation model so that partners don't know what others earn, and it added a second tier of partners who don't share in the firm's profits. Some of those who departed for the new Dunn firm were in the income partner category, according to three sources familiar with the firm. The corporate practice now outnumbers the litigation group, data from Leopard Solutions show.
Karp, who has worked at Paul Weiss for more than 40 years, rose to prominence as a litigator and led the firm's courtroom practice before becoming chairman in 2008. He's become a go-to lawyer for the National Football League and built a reputation counseling major banks including Citigroup and Morgan Stanley.
'I went to Paul Weiss because of the reputation as the finest litigation, white collar defense firm in the county,' he said in a 2024 podcast interview with Quinn Emanuel leader John Quinn.
Karp, who snagged Apollo as a major client on the litigation side, identified public M&A, private equity, and restructuring as three practice groups Paul Weiss needed to develop when he took the reins.
'You wouldn't be at the top of the national or New York market if you were a very successful litigation defense boutique,' Karp said in the podcast interview. 'We just had to be broader than that, and we had to be more resilient than that.'
He scored a coup bringing onboard Scott Barshay from Cravath Swaine & Moore in 2016. Barshay, as corporate department head, holds great sway within the firm, bringing in major business and leading some of its recruitment efforts. Barshay was among a small group of partners Karp consulted on how to respond to Trump's executive order, the New York Times reported.
Tension between litigation and corporate groups is not unique to Paul Weiss.
Kirkland & Ellis, the world's largest firm by revenue, was long known as a Chicago-based litigation shop before its corporate practice shot to the top of the industry on the back of the surging private equity industry in the mid-to-late 2010s. Kirkland is among the nine firms that made deals with Trump to avoid executive orders, pledging nearly $1 billion in free legal services.
Some Kirkland alumni describe litigation as an add-on 'service' for corporate clients, a view that firm leader Jon Ballis, has pushed back against, saying that the firm's litigation group would be larger than most law firms based on its revenue and is comparatively profitable to the firm's corporate work. Kirkland's litigation group has focused its work on major matters and been more receptive to alternative fee arrangements, which can bring large profit margins.
Paul Weiss' litigators have maintained a lofty position in the industry. Top litigators include Ted Wells, former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and appellate practice leader Kannon Shanmugam.
Many of the lawyers who departed had strong ties to Democrat politics, with Dunn prepping presidential candidate Kamala Harris for her debate with Trump, and Williams serving in a role appointed by President Joe Biden.
Karp told attendees at a litigation partner lunch last week that six of the firm's 10 largest ongoing matters are litigation-related and none of those matters was generated or worked on by any of the partners who recently departed the firm, according to three people who attended the meeting.
'Paul Weiss is an institution, and the firm's litigation team will continue on as a top-caliber group despite these departures,' said Jon Truster, a partner at recruiting firm Macrae.
Dunn and Isaacson joined the firm in a high-profile move from Boies Schiller Flexner in 2020. The group was known for its relationships with Big Tech clients such as Apple Inc., Oracle Corp., Facebook Inc., Uber Technologies Corp., and Amazon.com Inc., which it continued to represent at Paul Weiss.
Dunn also pursued pro bono work with Paul Weiss-like vigor, including representing plaintiffs in a lawsuit over the Charlottsville 'Unite the Right' rally.
The firm's commitment to pro bono work dates back at least a century. Paul Weiss attorneys worked to overturn the wrongful conviction of 'the Scottsboro boys,' a group of Black teenagers in the 1930s who were falsely accused of raping a White woman in Alabama.
The firm opened an office in San Francisco—a historically difficult market to crack—shortly after the arrival of Dunn and Isaacson, signaling the hires' impact. Paul Weiss' Silicon Valley presence today numbers less than 40 lawyers, and it has only made one internal partner promotion there since the office opened.
Dunn appears set to continue her work with major clients. She's notified courts in cases representing Google and Qualcomm of her change to a new firm, staying on the cases alongside other Paul Weiss lawyers.
She did withdraw from one case this week. She is no longer working alongside Paul Weiss lawyers representing the city of Springfield, Ohio in a pro bono case against the Blood Tribe, a group labeled as neo-Nazis by the Anti-Defamation League that rallied in the city in 2024 amid a campaign of conspiracy theories directed against its Haitian community.
To contact the reporters on this story: Roy Strom in Chicago at rstrom@bloombergindustry.com; Justin Henry in Washington DC at jhenry@bloombergindustry.com
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Chris Opfer at copfer@bloombergindustry.com; John Hughes at jhughes@bloombergindustry.com; Alessandra Rafferty at arafferty@bloombergindustry.com
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'
WASHINGTON, - Three prominent Democratic U.S. governors face a grilling on Thursday from a Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives panel over immigration policy, as President Donald Trump steps up a crackdown on people living in the country illegally. The governors of New York, Illinois and Minnesota are due to testify to the House Oversight Committee following days of protests in downtown Los Angeles over the Trump administration's aggressive ramping up of arrests of migrants. Tensions escalated as Trump ordered the National Guard and Marines into California to provide additional security. Trump's immigration crackdown has become a major political flashpoint between the White House and national Democrats. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, seen as a contender for the party's presidential nomination in 2028, in a Tuesday night video speech accused Trump of choosing "theatrics over public safety." Minnesota's Tim Walz, who ran unsuccessfully for vice president last year; Illinois' JB Pritzker, also seen a 2028 hopeful, and New York's Kathy Hochul, walked a careful line in their prepared testimony for Thursday's hearing, voicing support for immigration enforcement, if not Trump's tactics. "If they are undocumented, we want them out of Illinois and out of our country," Pritzker said. At the same time, Pritzker lashed out against "any violations of the law or abuses of power" and said, "Law-abiding, hardworking, tax-paying people who have been in this country for years should have a path to citizenship." Reuters/Ipsos polls show Trump getting more support for his handling of immigration than any other policy area. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz proclaimed, adding that state officials cooperate with federal immigration authorities, while noting that it offers "respect" to cities and counties that choose to give no more than the legal minimum support to the Department of Homeland Security.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Impeachment Calls Amid Immigration Protests: Can Trump Be Removed As President?
Last Updated: Calls to remove President Trump are growing, but with complex procedures and political roadblocks in place, can these efforts really succeed? Close to 400 individuals have been apprehended amid immigration raid protests in Los Angeles over the past week, particularly following President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops and Marines throughout the city. Trump has mobilised over 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to suppress the protests concerning immigration enforcement. Amid the unrest, a growing chorus—from Democratic lawmakers, activists, and community groups—is calling for President Trump's removal from office. But while removal is legally possible, it faces formidable hurdles. Texas Democratic Congressman Al Green has called for Trump's impeachment, stating that Trump is 'unfit" to hold office given his 34 felony convictions and history of being impeached twice before. Green told reporters that he is in the process of drafting articles of impeachment. Several other Democratic lawmakers, especially from strongly anti-Trump constituencies, have also voiced sharp criticism of Trump's policies and leadership. However, the likelihood of impeachment remains low due to the Republican majority in both the House and the Senate. Several posts on X claim that large-scale protests are erupting in Democrat-led states like New York and California over President Trump's policies on immigration, tariffs and restrictions on foreign students. Some users have even described the situation as 'civil war-like." In California, Trump's immigration measures have sparked widespread anger among immigrant communities and academic institutions, triggering legal action. So far, more than 100 lawsuits and around 50 temporary restraining orders have reportedly been filed challenging various policies introduced by the Trump administration. Although these legal challenges have slowed the implementation of Trump's policies, they are not directly connected to efforts to remove him from office. Impeachment would require significant support in Congress, which is currently lacking. The demand to remove Trump is mostly confined to Democratic strongholds and activist circles. Efforts by lawmakers like Al Green are largely symbolic, with little chance of success given the Republican majority in Congress. While there is significant anger among immigrants, students, and liberal groups, the unrest is not yet widespread enough to pose an immediate threat to Trump's presidency. Can Trump Be Removed From The Post Of President? Yes, Donald Trump can be removed from the post of US President, but this is a complex and extraordinary process that can only happen through the provisions laid down in the US Constitution. This includes impeachment, the 25th Amendment, or pressure from a massive civil movement. In the US, impeachment can be brought against the President through a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives, but this seems unlikely due to the Republican majority. When And How Can The US President Be Removed And Can It Apply To Trump? Under Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution, the President can be removed by impeachment for 'treason, bribery, or other serious crimes and misdemeanours." In the first phase, the impeachment motion must pass by a simple majority in the House of Representatives. In the second phase, a trial is held in the Senate, where a two-thirds majority (67 senators) is required for conviction. The Chief Justice presides over the trial. Trump was impeached twice (in 2019 and 2021), but the Senate did not convict him. At present, impeachment seems unlikely due to the Republican majority in the House, making it difficult to get the two-thirds support required. However, public pressure or new evidence could change the situation. What Is The 25th Amendment By Which The President Can Be Removed? The 25th Amendment of the Constitution allows the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to declare that the President is unable to perform his duties. After this, the Vice President becomes the acting President. This is unlikely because Vice President JD Vance and most of the Cabinet members are loyal to Trump. A serious reason, such as mental or physical incapacity, is required for this, and there are no clear signs. The 25th Amendment has been used twice in America, but only to temporarily replace the President under Section 3. In 1985, when President Reagan was ill, and later in 2002 and 2007, when President George W. Bush briefly transferred power to the Vice President during medical treatment. In each case, the President resumed his duties afterward. Can The American President Resign Due To Civil Movement Or Pressure? Massive public outrage or political pressure could force Trump to resign, as Richard Nixon did in 1974. top videos View all However, Trump's history shows that he does not easily bow to pressure. His recent controversial decisions, such as the travel ban and the ban on foreign students, have triggered anger among the public and the opposition, but resignation remains unlikely due to his strong support base, especially among Republicans. Cases are ongoing against Trump's decisions. If a major legal violation is proven, impeachment or other actions may begin. Massive protests or electoral pressure (2026 midterm elections) could weaken Trump's position, but they would not directly lead to removal. First Published:
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Trump says 'helped Los Angeles survive' as unrest continues: Top updates
The anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles, which began after the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raided several businesses on June 6, have now entered their sixth day as the enforcement officers fail to quell the unrest. The protests, which were peaceful at first and began in downtown Los Angeles, soon turned violent as protesters resorted to vandalism. The protest spread to Paramount on June 7, and by June 11, t he anti-immigration protests spread to several cities, including Chicago, Austin, and Seattle, with many more protests lined up for the weekend when US President Donald Trump celebrates his 79th birthday along with the grand military parade, celebrating the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Politics over the Los Angeles protest has intensified as California Governor Gavin Newsom blamed Trump for deploying nearly 5,000 National Guard and members of the US Marines to quell the protest, accusing him of 'misusing his powers'. Newsom, a Democrat, said he believed the deployment of troops was not necessary. However, Trump called these protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy'. With California filing a lawsuit against Trump's use of National Guard troops and the enforcement officers detaining as many as 400 people since June 7, here is a look at the recent developments in the Los Angeles protests: 1. President Trump on Wednesday (local time), while attending the 'Les Misérables' Opening Night at Kennedy Center with First Lady Melania Trump, said that he was proud of the work done in Los Angeles in curbing the riots. He said, 'I am very proud to have helped Los Angeles survive... If we didn't bring the National Guard and the Marines, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground, and that's not over yet... These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They are tough, smart. They are probably paid many of them.' 2. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass took to X to announce the extension of the curfew in the downtown area till Thursday morning. A curfew was imposed from 8 pm Tuesday to 6 am Wednesday. She wrote, 'Curfew remains in effect tonight 8 pm - 6 am for downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation.' Bass also said, 'Los Angeles will not allow fear to be used as a weapon against Angelenos who make our city strong. My administration is working with community organisations, legal advocates, and local leaders to ensure that every resident knows their rights and has the support they need. This city stands united.' A few simple truths: –Looting an Adidas store isn't justice. –Burning cities isn't speech. – @GavinNewsom isn't a good governor. And what's happening in Los Angeles aren't 'peaceful rallies' — they're third-world insurrection riots on American soil. — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 11, 2025 3. As demonstrations against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown spread to other states, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told CNN that Trump's order to federalise the National Guard in California to respond to the protests could extend to other states. 4. Associated Press reported that the US troops have now started detaining immigrants accused of trespassing on a recently designated national defence zone. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, the troops are prohibited from conducting civilian law enforcement on US soil. However, an exception known as the military purpose doctrine allows it in some instances. 5. Dozens of mayors across the Los Angeles area joined hands to demand that the Trump administration stops the raids which have been stepped up since the first protests at downtown Los Angeles began.