Cut red tape hindering marine restoration to boost coastal towns
The Conservative Environment Network (CEN) warned of the impact on towns of declining tourism and flooding, storms and coastal erosion, in a report outlining measures to help them.
The group, which includes dozens of Tory MPs, called for regulation to be streamlined for projects such as the Solent Seascape Project, an initiative to restore saltmarsh, seagrass, oyster reefs, and seabird nesting sites between the Isle of Wight and mainland England.
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins backed the report, calling it a 'valuable conservative contribution for consideration in our ongoing policy renewal programme'.
'Britain's once-buzzing seaside towns are facing growing economic and environmental pressures. The Conservatives are determined to set out a plan to protect our coastal communities and preserve them for future generations,' she said.
She added: 'Needless red tape continues to hamstring investment into marine restoration projects that could bring coastal communities jobs, nature-abundant habitats, and protection against the growing threats of climate change.'
The network is also calling on Labour to use the flood defences budget to fund more nature-based solutions and to designate more highly protected marine areas in English waters to protect against practices like bottom trawling, in which fishing gear is dragged across the seabed destroying habitats and scooping up a wide array of species.
They also want the Government to publish blue carbon codes – frameworks that define how carbon stored in marine habitats like seagrass and saltmarsh can be measured, verified and sold as credits – to unlock more funding for coastal resilience.
They say these moves will boost nature recovery as well as local economies through nature tourism and job creation as more projects could get off the ground.
Some 67% of English coastal towns are in the Office for National Statistics higher deprivation category and 3,500 properties are in areas at risk from coastal erosion.
Kitty Thompson, head of campaigns at CEN, said offering solutions for coastal communities could also help the Conservatives challenge Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
'The teal tide is not inevitable. Reform offers an easy outlet of anger for many coastal towns who have watched their neighbourhoods fade.
'But they won't give these communities the solutions they deserve. If the Conservatives offer a pragmatic, credible alternative that can deliver for coastal communities, then they can challenge Reform in coastal target seats, stopping them in their tracks,' she said.
Jacques Villemot, marine rewilding lead for Rewilding Britain, said the current marine licensing framework is outdated and called for the application process for projects to be streamlined.
'This framework urgently needs to be updated to support marine rewilding projects. Though necessary, in its current format marine licensing acts as a blocker, a laborious and costly process which was designed for approving developments like huge oil rigs and large wind farms,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Working from home is already happening. So why are people in Victoria so mad?
It is suddenly very important to certain Victorians that their laptops have playdates. Every day, the laptops will travel to a communal location, where they will do parallel play for eight hours before returning home again. This is crucial to the survival of traditional values as we know them. The Victorian Labor party has pushed back on this essential social ceremony. At the party's state conference last weekend, Jacinta Allan announced a plan to protect Victorians' right to flexible work, 'if reasonable'. Essentially, that means people who use computers instead of hammers and Bunsen burners. Allan isn't suggesting we all hang out in our PJs every day (sadly). If enacted, the proposal would give Victorians the right to spend three days in the office and two days at home (or somewhere else, as long as they have a Teams background that looks like a home). Sign up: AU Breaking News email This has upset certain people. After all, a lot can happen in two days. Chicken can go bad. A parcel can be delivered. Workers can defy their employment contracts and watch several seasons of Grey's Anatomy. Pushback has been quick and fierce. Most of the criticism reasonably centres on Allan's ability to implement it: various lawyers are quoted as saying it's unenforceable. The AFR has said it's a 'plan built on hypocrisy', while Sky News' commentator called it a 'stunt'. Most are – rightly – calling it an obvious election ploy (it would only be implemented in 2026, if Labor is re-elected). Less boringly, The Age referred to 'the cynical artistry of legislating to protect something not at risk'. The suggestion is that Allan is campaigning to protect Victorians' right to keep doing what they're already doing. Which is wrong, but not in the obvious way. In 2019, before working from home was invented, as many as 30% of Australians worked from home. Almost a third of us understood the specific joy of rolling out of bed and down the hallway instead of spending 65 minutes going somewhere else. It wasn't perfect. The Office People found it deeply suspicious: surely grown adults couldn't be trusted to do any work unless a manager could see them. What if they went shopping? Played with their dog? Or simply napped all day? Despite a total lack of evidence, certain people pushed a narrative that autonomous working was a scam invented by Peter Alexander. The pandemic amplified both the technology and the distrust. Our primary function became video calling. We learnt to dress for work from the waist up. Time trackers went mainstream – and so did mouse jigglers. We invited ourselves to fake meetings so no one would see our Teams 'away' status and think we'd skived off to a pub lunch instead of emailing. For the existing 30%, a lot of this was welcome progress. It was no longer weird to see someone's pet/child/sentient trash pile in the background. The washing finally got done. Children saw their parents before bedtime. And way, way, way less time was wasted on commutes. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion But as the acute Covid threat eased, the Office People got nervous. What if no one ever came back to the office? What if they liked this new life? What if – lord mayor protect us – they never again had to choose between catching the train and not smelling like a toilet? For these and other – secret – reasons, they began to insist people return to the office full-time. Whatever their reasoning, they are – as ever – fighting an imaginary enemy. Remote working increased during peak Covid but it's still pretty darn close to the 2019 numbers: 36% of Australians usually worked from home in 2024 (compared with 40% in 2021). Almost everyone still leaves their house to teach, build, cook, save lives, drive buses, grow food, sell mobile phone plans and, yes, type. A plan – however cynical – to protect flexible working doesn't enshrine what Covid produced. We can never go back to what we were already doing (being the weird guys who knew how to use the company VPN) and the thing I want to keep doing is quietly typing without being surveilled. This week's criticism has merely revealed that classic conservative trope: it was already happening. You just didn't care until you felt personally attacked.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Plan to reintroduce banned pesticide in France overruled by constitutional council
France's top constitutional authority has ruled against the reintroduction of a pesticide that is harmful to ecosystems, saying it is unconstitutional. The decision on Thursday night deals a blow to the government. It comes after weeks of opposition from the left, environmentalists and doctors, and a record-breaking 2m signatures on a petition against a bill that would have allowed a pesticide banned in France in 2020 to come back into use. The 'Duplomb law' – named after the conservative lawmaker Laurent Duplomb who proposed it – had been presented in parliament as a bid to free up French farmers, who have repeatedly expressed frustration over bureaucratic constraints on the agricultural sector, unfair foreign competition, and what they called stringent regulations, including on pesticides. But in a rebuke of the government on Thursday night, the constitutional council found that the law's provision to reintroduce acetamiprid – a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees – did not abide by France's environmental charter, which guarantees the 'right to live in a balanced and healthy environment'. The constitutional authority also raised questions over provisions for water reservoirs in the bill. The president, Emmanuel Macron, had 'taken good note of the decision', his office said on Thursday night, and was expected to swiftly validate the bill without these contested sections. The Green leader, Marine Tondelier, said she was 'very relieved' by the verdict. The Socialist party said the verdict was a rebuke to the 'irresponsibility of the prime minister, François Bayrou, and his government'. The insecticide in question was particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who said they had no alternative against pests and faced unfair competition. Some growers also argued that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, was vital to fight virus yellows, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output. The petition on the website of France's lower-house National Assembly called the measure a 'frontal attack on public health'. Beekeepers have described the chemical as 'a bee killer', and its effects on humans are also a source of concern, though its risk remains unclear in the absence of large-scale studies. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion The student-led petition against the bill garnered more than 2m signatures after lawmakers adopted its reintroduction on 8 July, when it was rushed through a deeply divided lower house of parliament without a proper debate. Agence France-Presse contributed to this report
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
'Restriction zones' to be introduced for domestic abusers
The government is seeking to introduce "restriction zones" to limit where convicted domestic abusers can go. Exclusion zones currently exist to stop perpetrators from going within a certain distance of where their victims live. The new plans would place greater limits where abusers can go, with the aim of allowing survivors to go about their daily lives without fear of seeing their former abuser. Sexual and violent offenders could be restricted to certain locations and tracked with technology under the new proposals. They would then face jail time for breaching the conditions. Probation officers will carry out detailed risk assessments and work with survivors to decide on banned locations for perpetrators. 4:58 Survivor Leanne said from her experience, she would have asked for restriction zones at the school where she took her two children, her local supermarket or near her family's homes. "These are places where I was confronted, even when he had restraining orders," the 54-year-old said. While Leanne said she is "loving what I'm hearing" about the government's approach, she added: "Would I put a lot of faith in it? Probably not, because I don't like being let down, and I've been let down by previous governments. "So we can only have hope." Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones will announce the new measure at charity Advance in London on Friday. The victims minister will say abusers will be GPS monitored to provide real-time data about where they are going, and subject to "virtual boundaries". The government is overhauling the prison system to curb overcrowding, which could see violent and sexual offenders released from jail earlier, and for more criminals to serve sentences in the community. Tens of thousands of offenders would be tagged, prompting concerns from the victims' commissioner for England and Wales over the Probation Service's ability to cope with rising numbers. The government has announced £700m of funding until 2028/29 for the Probation Service to back up its reforms. It will also recruit 1,300 new probation officers by March 2026.
