Ukraine appoints Yulia Svyrydenko as new prime minister
The 39-year-old economist was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's only nominee for the role.
A photograph of the parliament's electronic voting screen, posted on Telegram by member of parliament Yaroslav Zheleznyak, showed that 262 deputies voted in favour of Ms Svyrydenko's nomination, with 22 votes against and 26 abstentions.
Ms Svyrydenko has served as the country's first deputy prime minister and minister of economy since 2021 and oversaw the terms of a crucial minerals deal with the United States in May.
That agreement, which established a joint fund between Kyiv and Washington to extract key Ukrainian minerals, went a long way to securing continued US support for Ukraine.
Only two months previously, US-Ukraine relations had soured after a disastrous Oval Office meeting between Mr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump.
The minerals deal signed by Ms Svyrydenko was widely viewed as being more favourable to Ukraine than the original format proposed by the Trump administration, with Ukraine maintaining ownership over its natural resources and infrastructure.
"War leaves no room for delay. We must act swiftly and decisively," Ms Svyrydenko posted this morning on X after the vote.
"Our priorities for the first six months are clear: reliable supply for the army, expansion of domestic weapons production, and boosting the technological strength of our defense forces".
Outgoing prime minister Denys Shmyhal ended his five-year tenure yesterday when parliament voted to accept his resignation, part of Mr Zelensky's largest cabinet reshuffle of the war.
Mr Zelensky has proposed Mr Shmyhal for the role of defence minister, while serving defence minister Rustem Umerov has been tipped to become Ukraine's new ambassador to the US.
Ukraine's parliament is expected to vote on new ministerial appointments later today.
This week's cabinet reshuffle has been viewed by many political analysts in Ukraine as an attempt by Mr Zelensky to give the government fresh momentum three and a half years into Russia's full-scale invasion.
Ms Svyrydenko becomes Ukraine's second female prime minister after Yulia Tymoshenko, who led two Ukrainian governments in the 2000s.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Tariffs aren't good news but it could have been much worse
While the crucial US EU trade deal announced this weekend does bring certainty for businesses, there are significant drawbacks. Fundamentally, tariffs are negative for trade. The US is a significant export market for Ireland, and many sectors now face duties of 15% which did not exist last year. The biggest issue is pharmaceuticals, which are the largest Irish export to the US, valued at €44bn in 2024. In recent months US President Donald Trump had threatened enormous duties on drugs imported by America. He had ordered a national security investigation of the pharmaceutical sector. Last night, Tánaiste Simon Harris said his understanding was that after the investigation concludes the maximum tariff which could be imposed would be 15%. So, while the threat of more damaging duties is averted, pharmaceuticals made in Ireland may well face 15% tariffs in future, up from zero at present. Another key sector for Ireland is the manufacture of computer chips. Like pharmaceuticals it has been subject to a separate investigation by the Trump administration and faced the possibility of punitive tariffs, but it too could face a 15% tariff after the investigation ends. Last night, European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen said there was no decision yet regarding spirits exported to the US. This is critically important to Ireland's whiskey industry which has already seen several recent closures. There had been speculation that sector could have been part of a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement, but that is not yet agreed. Another important area for Ireland is aircraft leasing. Ms Von Der Leyen said last night that aviation would be part of a tariff-free arrangement. For other EU countries the massive duty of 27.5% which was imposed on European cars now falls to 15%. Some existing tariffs will be folded into that baseline 15%, meaning it would be an all-in tariff. For example, it is expected to include the existing "most favoured nation" duties of 4.8% which exist currently under World Trade Organization rules. The fact there is a deal at all avoids the threat of a prolonged tit-for-tat trade war. It means businesses can plan, investments can be made, and job-creating projects can proceed. But exporters are already seeking Government support as they navigate the new reality of the Trump administration's tariffs. The EU-US agreement is not a trade deal in the usual sense. Normally these pacts are negotiated over years and culminate in a document running to hundreds of pages. What was announced yesterday was the framework of a deal with much detail yet to be finalised. Yesterday wasn't the end of the negotiations, but it was a milestone.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Call for Government to urgently support Irish businesses most at risk from US tariffs
Social Democrats finance spokesman Cian O'Callaghan says the Government must publish an updated summer economic statement to account for the EU 's tariff agreement with the US . In a statement on Sunday evening, Mr O'Callaghan welcomed a deal that 'avoids a catastrophic trade war', but said it is 'beyond doubt . . . that a 15 per cent tariff rate will be very damaging for many Irish businesses'. 'It is less than a week since the Government published its summer economic statement, using an assumption of no tariffs,' he added. 'This was despite the dogs on the street being aware that a 10 per cent tariff rate was the best possible outcome.' Mr O'Callaghan was one of a number of figures in Irish politics to publish statements regarding the trade deal on Sunday evening. Labour leader Ivana Bacik called on the Government to engage with Irish businesses, warning that continued uncertainty around pharmaceutical exports is evidence of 'just how difficult it is to engage constructively with the Trump administration'. READ MORE 'We in Labour are calling on the Government to fast-track the development of a new, modernised short-time work scheme to ensure that skilled jobs are not lost in sectors under pressure,' Ms Bacik said. 'Other EU countries have long-standing schemes that help employers retain staff during economic shocks. We need a system in place in Ireland that can respond to future volatility or sectoral downturns quickly and effectively.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the agreement, saying it 'will help to protect many jobs in Ireland'. He added that it 'brings clarity and predictability to the trading relationship between the EU and the US – the biggest in the world". Mr Martin acknowledged that higher tariffs will make trade 'more expensive and more challenging' but said that the agreement 'creates a new era of stability that can hopefully contribute to a growing and deepening relationship between the EU and the US'. [ EU-US deal good for Ireland as it averts trade war but vital details remain unclear Opens in new window ] The Taoiseach pledged to study the details of the agreement, including its implications for Irish businesses exporting to the US and for other sectors operating here. 'Given the very real risk that existed for escalation and for the imposition of punitively high tariffs, this news will be welcomed by many,' his statement concluded. There were further calls to support Irish businesses from Sinn Féin spokesperson on foreign affairs and trade, Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire. 'Ultimately, while a deal is preferable to tit-for-tat tariffs, the reality is, tariffs of this kind are bad for businesses, consumers and workers,' he said. 'We need to take the necessary steps to support our indigenous businesses, to increase exports to new markets, to grow talent across the island and to trade across the island and internationally." Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris echoed the Taoiseach in welcoming the transatlantic trade agreement, noting that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described the 15 per cent tariff rate as 'all-inclusive'. 'While Ireland regrets that the baseline tariff of 15 per cent is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations of the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment,' Mr Harris said. Finally, Danny McCoy, CEO of business lobby Ibec, said the trade agreement represents a 'substantial burden for many industries', particularly those relying heavily on the US market to operate. 'Our message to the Government, as it was with the 10 per cent tariff, is that the most exposed sectors will require support similar to the interventions provided as a response to Brexit,' Mr McCoy said.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the EU/US trade deal: a step towards economic stability
The agreement of an outline trade deal between the EU and the US is positive, to the extent that it avoids the risk of a full-scale tariffs war between the two sides. For Ireland, the EU state most exposed to US trade and investment, this could have been particularly damaging. What the EU has been dealing with here is damage limitation. Average tariffs of 15 per cent on EU imports into the US - a central part of the deal - are roughly three times the rate that applied when Donald Trump came to office. This will cause economic damage on both sides of the Atlantic. Whatever Trump's objections are to the way the EU treats US imports, dealing with them this way ensures US consumers will pay more for their goods, as well as damaging Europe. Trump is claiming the deal, which also includes promises of EU purchases of US energy and military equipment, as a triumph. And he did get a lot of what he wanted. Perhaps driven in large part by the desire to see continued US support for Nato and Ukraine, the EU has been on the back foot. It has been faced by a US president pursuing a relentless tariff agenda, partly driven by economic nationalism and partly by the need to raise cash for the US exchequer. The main gain for the EU – and for Ireland - of the outline deal is that it avoids the risk of a trade war, which would have had unpredictable and dangerous consequences. Trump had threatened a general tariff level of 30 per cent to apply from next week on EU imports and, had there not been a deal, the EU had a list of US goods ready on which it planned to impose tariffs. This could have escalated quickly, potentially drawing in US digital tech companies, many with international bases in Ireland. READ MORE Details have still to be spelled out on how the 15 per cent tariffs will be applied and these will be important. The impact will vary across different sectors of exporters from Ireland to the US and will be difficult in some areas. It may be some weeks before this is clear. Importantly for Ireland, Trump has said a separate process examining what should happen to the pharma sector will continue and he again underlined that he wanted key drugs and ingredients made in the US. While there was some uncertainty on this in the immediate wake of the deal, the risk of higher tariffs in this area, or other action to try to get pharma companies to relocate production to the US, appears to remain. And while European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said that in general the deal would bring 'stability', the final details have still to be agreed and published. With Trump in office, uncertainty will remain. However, it is still better to have a basic deal which, provided it holds, will now start to restore some level of certainty to trade between the US and EU.
