
Is your anxiety monster ruining your life? The 4 steps to beat it – and when you need professional help
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
FEEL like you're fighting a losing battle against anxious thoughts?
Here's how to stop worrying and start living.
1
The anxiety hacks to stop worry in its tracks
Credit: Vector Illustration
Do you often find yourself tangled in a spiral of negative thoughts?
Maybe you worry that you'll mess up a meeting at work that will ruin everything, or you overthink that joke you told at the pub into the early hours of the morning.
Anxious thoughts are something we all experience – 37% of women report having high anxiety levels* – but if it affects daily life, it's a problem.
The sliding scale of symptoms can range from racing thoughts to a pounding heart – or a full-blown panic attack.
READ MORE ON ANXIETY
REAL DEAL MAFS star back at her day job but co-works have left her 'riddled by anxiety'
And yet, chances are, you've told yourself to 'stop being silly' when you've felt anxious – or maybe someone else has.
'Many patients come to me bewildered by their anxiety and feeling quite foolish about it, which disempowers them and leaves them feeling defeated and stuck,'
NHS GP Dr Martin Brunet tells Fabulous.
He is the author of Your Worry Makes Sense, which explores why anxiety is logical and how you can manage it.
He adds: 'If you can understand anxiety, then you can be empowered, and if you're empowered, you can take small steps and get to a point where you're in control of your anxiety, rather than it being in control of you.'
You should see your GP if you are concerned about the impact it is having on your life and if it is there most of the time.
The Surprising Benefits of Swearing for Mental Health
But there are some things you can do to help yourself, as Dr Brunet explains. . .
What Is Anxiety?
Anxiety is a normal bodily response that, from an evolutionary perspective, protects you from threat.
It is part of the broader 'fight, flight or freeze' response that kicks in when you sense danger.
The point at which it becomes excessive and persistent, rather than temporary, may be considered generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), which affects one in 25 people in the UK.**
Dr Brunet likens anxiety to 'a faulty smoke alarm that goes off every time you use the toaster.'
He explains: 'What we perceive as a threat can be impacted by conditioning, maybe from a past experience or how we've been brought up.'
Other forms of anxiety disorder include social anxiety, agoraphobia and OCD.
'The false alarm in OCD might be a fear of contamination that can only be calmed by excessive cleaning,' he says.
But the symptoms can prevent you from living a full life.
'I want to help people understand it makes perfect sense if you avoid the supermarket because you have panic attacks when you get there,' says Dr Brunet.
'What you need to know next is: 'What do I do now? How do I regain control and manage anxiety in my day-to-day life?' '
Stop thoughts spiralling
The first step is understanding and acknowledging what is happening when you begin to feel anxious – your body is going into protective mode.
The second step is to focus on the facts, rather than letting your imagination run wild.
'So, when you start panicking, instead of thinking: 'My body is falling apart and something terrible is going on,' think: 'My heart is racing and that is my healthy heart responding to adrenalin, because I'm anxious about such and such',' says Dr Brunet.
'It is about taking a step back, allowing the adrenalin in your body to drop a little bit and your breath to slow down, so you are not spiralling.'
Rethink Your Language
Your language reflects your mindset, and therefore, adapting it can prove empowering.
Someone stuck in 'obey mode' to their anxiety often tells themselves 'I can't' or 'I have to' statements.
Dr Brunet explains: 'It restricts their life, leaving them powerless.'
Reframing your anxiety as a doubting disorder, for example, can be useful.
'Anxiety is best thought of as a problem with uncertainty or doubt,' says Dr Brunet.
You might remind yourself: 'I find it difficult to deal with uncertainty and doubt.'
He adds: 'You're acknowledging it's not what you want, and it's a challenge for you, but notably, you can work with that and move forwards.'
Expand Your Comfort Zone
Anxiety can be all-consuming, so Dr Brunet suggests approaching recovery like rehabilitation of a physical injury – slowly and kindly.
He recommends drawing three large circles, one inside the other. The inner circle is the Comfort Zone.
He says: 'Write down activities where anxiety might not be absent, but you do them freely because you enjoy them.'
The outer circle is the No-Go Zone: 'Write down activities or situations anxiety currently stops you from doing, but you would be happy to never do. It reminds us that anxiety is normal.'
This could include getting public transport, for example.
The middle circle is the Expansion Zone: 'Write down activities or situations you can't do because of your anxiety, but would like to do.'
For example, you would like to go to your friend's party, despite knowing few people.
Work on expanding your Comfort Zone.
'Pick something you think you can realistically achieve and plan how you might start doing that thing in little steps,' says Dr Brunet.
'It might be going that bit further or doing something a bit longer each time, and then practise getting used to each step, tolerating and accepting the feeling of anxiety that you get when you do it.'
Imagine Your Anxiety Monster
It might sound absurd to put yourself in situations where you have to endure anxiety.
So, imagine your anxiety as a goofy monster or an excitable puppy, and give it a name you find funny – in his book, Dr Brunet calls it Wilbur.
'You can't expect Wilbur to stay at home, so you acknowledge he will be with you as you go about your day,' he says.
'You're not going to fight him; you're not going to let him be the boss. You might even thank him for trying to keep you safe, but reassure him everything is OK. That way, he quietens down.'
If this feels daft, it should do!
'Anxiety takes itself very seriously and there is power in the silliness,' says Dr Brunet.
'So, if thinking of your anxiety monster makes you smile, you are building new associations in the brain and changing your relationship with anxiety.'
When Do I Need Professional Help?
'If it is something that's been going on for some time, or if you're finding it very difficult, then why try to manage on your own?' asks Dr Brunet.
Visit your GP, who may prescribe medication or refer you for talking therapy if self-help hasn't worked.
This is usually cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), either alone with a therapist or in a group.
The goal of CBT is to change unhelpful thought patterns or behaviours. You can self-refer for talking therapies on the NHS website.
'People often think anxiety has got to be really bad before you have therapy, or they don't think they need therapy yet,' he says.
'But it is not a question of whether you need it, it is a question of whether it would be helpful. Even a 15-minute chat with your GP can make a difference.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
9 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Alzheimer's blood test ‘can accurately pick up early symptoms'
Experts from the Mayo Clinic in the US have provided further evidence that blood tests can work to accurately diagnose dementia, by examining two proteins in blood plasma. These proteins – amyloid beta 42/40 and p-tau217 – are associated with amyloid plaque build-up, which is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Researchers found the blood test was highly accurate, with 95% sensitivity, which means it was 95% accurate in picking up people with memory problems, with very few cases missed. It was also 82% for specificity, which means it was also highly accurate in ruling out people without dementia. The study was carried out on more than 500 people in an outpatient memory clinic, meaning it is real-world data. The blood test has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration regulator in the US. Dr Gregg Day, who led the study in the Alzheimer's and Dementia journal, said the test was as good as more invasive tests currently in use. 'Our study found that blood testing affirmed the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity,' he said. 'When performed in the outpatient clinical setting, this is similar to the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of the disease and is much more convenient and cost-effective.' Overall, researchers found that p-tau217 levels were higher in patients with Alzheimer's disease versus those without the disease. Dr Day said the next steps in the research were to evaluate blood-based testing in more diverse patient populations and people with early Alzheimer's who show no cognitive symptoms. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director for research and innovation at the Alzheimer's Society in the UK, said the results 'suggest this test is very accurate' and could be used alongside other tests and observations from a trained health professional. He added: 'This study shows how blood tests are making diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease quicker, easier and more accessible than ever before in a real-world setting. 'While focused on Alzheimer's disease, the test was evaluated in people with other types of dementias too, showing that it may help with differentiate causes of cognitive decline – though more research in diverse groups of individuals and in community-based setting is still needed. 'Currently diagnosis options in the UK are often slow, expensive and can be invasive, meaning thousands miss out on the benefits one can bring. 'It's great to see blood tests like this approved for clinical use in the US – we hope to see the same in the NHS, which is why we're part of the Blood Biomarker Challenge.' The Blood Biomarker Challenge is a multi-million-pound research programme supported by the Alzheimer's Society, Alzheimer's Research UK and the National Institute for Health and Care Research. Its goal is to bring blood tests for dementia diagnosis to the NHS by 2029. Dr Oakley said: 'Blood tests will be critical to accelerate diagnosis and give more people access to the care, support and treatments they desperately need faster than ever before. 'We must see long-term investment in the tools and workforce needed to ensure everyone living with dementia can get an early an accurate diagnosis, which is even more important with disease-modifying treatments on the horizon.' Dr Julia Dudley, head of research at Alzheimer's Research UK, said: 'We urgently need to improve how we diagnose dementia and it's great to see international research working towards this goal. 'Blood tests in this study look at p-tau217 and amyloid beta 42/40, and showed the tests offered high accuracy in confirming Alzheimer's disease. 'This study adds to the growing evidence that blood tests can detect the diseases that cause dementia in people with early memory and thinking problems. 'An important point to consider is that people taking part in research don't always reflect the full diversity of those affected by dementia, who might have additional conditions or other characteristics. 'That is why work is needed to understand whether these blood tests work in a real-world setting. 'In the UK, studies like the Blood Biomarker Challenge are helping to build this evidence. 'The study is testing blood tests, including p-tau217, in thousands of people from sites across the UK. 'This work will be a crucial part of making diagnosis easier and faster, which will bring us closer to a cure.'

Rhyl Journal
11 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Alzheimer's blood test ‘can accurately pick up early symptoms'
Experts from the Mayo Clinic in the US have provided further evidence that blood tests can work to accurately diagnose dementia, by examining two proteins in blood plasma. These proteins – amyloid beta 42/40 and p-tau217 – are associated with amyloid plaque build-up, which is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Researchers found the blood test was highly accurate, with 95% sensitivity, which means it was 95% accurate in picking up people with memory problems, with very few cases missed. It was also 82% for specificity, which means it was also highly accurate in ruling out people without dementia. The study was carried out on more than 500 people in an outpatient memory clinic, meaning it is real-world data. The blood test has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration regulator in the US. Dr Gregg Day, who led the study in the Alzheimer's and Dementia journal, said the test was as good as more invasive tests currently in use. 'Our study found that blood testing affirmed the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity,' he said. 'When performed in the outpatient clinical setting, this is similar to the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of the disease and is much more convenient and cost-effective.' Overall, researchers found that p-tau217 levels were higher in patients with Alzheimer's disease versus those without the disease. Dr Day said the next steps in the research were to evaluate blood-based testing in more diverse patient populations and people with early Alzheimer's who show no cognitive symptoms. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director for research and innovation at the Alzheimer's Society in the UK, said the results 'suggest this test is very accurate' and could be used alongside other tests and observations from a trained health professional. He added: 'This study shows how blood tests are making diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease quicker, easier and more accessible than ever before in a real-world setting. 'While focused on Alzheimer's disease, the test was evaluated in people with other types of dementias too, showing that it may help with differentiate causes of cognitive decline – though more research in diverse groups of individuals and in community-based setting is still needed. 'Currently diagnosis options in the UK are often slow, expensive and can be invasive, meaning thousands miss out on the benefits one can bring. 'It's great to see blood tests like this approved for clinical use in the US – we hope to see the same in the NHS, which is why we're part of the Blood Biomarker Challenge.' The Blood Biomarker Challenge is a multi-million-pound research programme supported by the Alzheimer's Society, Alzheimer's Research UK and the National Institute for Health and Care Research. Its goal is to bring blood tests for dementia diagnosis to the NHS by 2029. Dr Oakley said: 'Blood tests will be critical to accelerate diagnosis and give more people access to the care, support and treatments they desperately need faster than ever before. 'We must see long-term investment in the tools and workforce needed to ensure everyone living with dementia can get an early an accurate diagnosis, which is even more important with disease-modifying treatments on the horizon.' Dr Julia Dudley, head of research at Alzheimer's Research UK, said: 'We urgently need to improve how we diagnose dementia and it's great to see international research working towards this goal. 'Blood tests in this study look at p-tau217 and amyloid beta 42/40, and showed the tests offered high accuracy in confirming Alzheimer's disease. 'This study adds to the growing evidence that blood tests can detect the diseases that cause dementia in people with early memory and thinking problems. 'An important point to consider is that people taking part in research don't always reflect the full diversity of those affected by dementia, who might have additional conditions or other characteristics. 'That is why work is needed to understand whether these blood tests work in a real-world setting. 'In the UK, studies like the Blood Biomarker Challenge are helping to build this evidence. 'The study is testing blood tests, including p-tau217, in thousands of people from sites across the UK. 'This work will be a crucial part of making diagnosis easier and faster, which will bring us closer to a cure.'


Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear
Until very recently, Health Secretary Wes Streeting tried to market himself as a radical health reformer, who is not afraid to poke sacred cows. While his reform-minded rhetoric always remained at a highly-abstract and general level, Streeting deserved some credit for it, because he did not have to do this. He had the courage to say things which he knew would rub some people up the wrong way, not least the Corbynite wing of his own party. Sadly, that brief period of NHS candour is now officially over. Streeting, the self-styled reformer, is no more. He and his colleagues have fully retreated into their comfort zone. During the recent local election campaign, Labour distributed a leaflet that showed a mock medical bill, and a doctor holding up a credit card reader. The message was clear: vote for us, because this is what the other lot want to do to you. On Twitter/X, Labour are now frequently posting dire warnings about the alleged evils of insurance-based healthcare systems. This is exactly that old-school NHS cultism which Streeting used to disavow until five minutes ago. It may work for him. The NHS may be falling apart, but the cult around is still going strong. In the eyes of its keenest defenders, the NHS can do no wrong. They have quietly dropped the old cliché about the NHS being 'the envy of the word', and replaced it with a slightly more subtle version, which goes something like this: Once upon a time, the NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world. But then, from 2010 on, it was systematically defunded. It was deliberately run into the ground, so that it can be privatised more easily. A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor. None of these claims are true. Let's have a look at each of them in turn. 'The NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world' The NHS was never the best healthcare system in the world. The idea that it ever was can be traced back to a ranking compiled by the Commonwealth Fund, an American healthcare think tank, which relies on a very unusual methodology, in which medical outcomes only account for a fifth of the total score. This matters, because on medical outcomes, the NHS has always been one of the worst-performing healthcare systems in the developed world – as even the Commonwealth Fund study shows. There is no turning point after which the NHS's performance suddenly deteriorated. It was just never good in the first place. '…it was systematically defunded' At the end of the 2010s, age-adjusted real NHS spending per capita was only marginally higher than it had been in the beginning of the decade. Put differently, the NHS budget only just about kept pace with population growth, population ageing, and inflation. This clearly constituted a slowdown in spending increases compared to the previous decade. But it does not constitute a 'defunding'. In any case: that period of relative spending restraint is already over again. The NHS budget was given a massive boost during the pandemic, which has only been partially reversed. Public healthcare spending in the UK stands at just under 9% of GDP: one of the highest levels in the world. '…so that it can be privatised…' Conspiracy theories about secret plans to privatise the NHS have been around for decades. I wrote a report on this three years ago, for which I went through the news archives, and I found warnings about the NHS's imminent demise from every year since 1980. But somehow, it never happens. The NHS remains an unusually state-centred system. Most healthcare systems, including tax-funded ones, use a mix of public, private for-profit and private non-profit providers. 'A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor' There are no plans – secret or otherwise – to privatise the NHS. More's the pity. Because there is nothing wrong with private healthcare systems. There are good examples of private, insurance-based healthcare systems, most notably in the Netherlands and Switzerland, which are nothing like the dreaded system of the US. These systems cover everybody: poor people are exempt from health insurance premiums and co-payments. Under these systems, rich and poor alike get faster access to medical treatment, and better medical outcomes, than they would on the NHS. The only thing these people don't get is a naff feel-good mythology around their health systems.