These Presidents' Day Stanley deals are bigger than the cups themselves — from $15
Best Presidents' Day Stanley deals
Stanley All Day Slim Bottle for $21 (was $30): All-time low
Stanley x Calia 30-Ounce Quencher FlowState Tumbler for $26 (was $40): 35% off (rare sale)
Stanley 20-Ounce AeroLight Transit Bottle for $27 (was $35): Over 20% off
If you've been waiting to get your hands on a Stanley tumbler, the brand's collaboration with Calia is on sale at Dick's Sporting Goods for as low as $26, a healthy discount from its original $40 price tag. And if a traditional insulated bottle is more your speed, the All Day Slim Bottle is even more affordable right now at Amazon — just $21. Check out the best Stanley deals to shop right now, all listed below.
Related: Stanley's iconic tumbler now has a built-in, leakproof straw — get it in 5 sizes
The reviews quoted above reflect the most recent versions at the time of publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fort Collins voters to decide on extending Natural Areas sales tax that would never expire
A sales tax renewal to fund Fort Collins Natural Areas is officially headed to the ballot. This quarter-cent tax — 25 cents on a $100 purchase — was first approved in 1992. It was last renewed in 2002. Without renewal, the tax will expire at the end of 2030. But this November's citizen-referred question asks voters to extend the tax into perpetuity so nobody ever again has to ask voters to renew it. The proposal also would adjust how the money will be allocated: Starting in 2061, 70% of the money would be used on land conservation activities specifically, and 30% would be used for operations and maintenance. Currently, the split is 80%/20%, respectively, and the ballot issue proposes it remain that way until 2061. The initiative would update the definition of "land conservation activities" to include restoring, enhancing and maintaining native plant and animal communities. It also would change some language to eliminate confusion and more accurately reflect the policies and practices of the city's Natural Areas program, according to the ballot language. Petition coordinator Linda Stanley, speaking at the Aug. 19 City Council meeting, said the campaign submitted more than 9,300 signatures. City Clerk Delynn Coldiron said the city verified signatures until reaching the 6,205 mark, with about 1,800 left to verify. That's because the effort already had more than 1,000 verified signatures over the 5,070 required. Why is this being voted on now when the tax doesn't expire until 2030? An expiring tax makes planning for the future difficult, Stanley told the Coloradoan for an earlier story. She said most city programs don't have expiration dates. "Some of the acquisitions have taken years to come to fruition, and you don't start relationships with land donors if you're not sure what the future will hold," Stanley said, noting some donors may be willing to sell or put a conservation easement on their land but might not be ready to take that step for a few more years. Taking the issue to the voters in 2025 instead of 2027 or 2028 will simply create certainty sooner, Stanley said, when asked why the effort is beginning five years ahead of the expiration. On Tuesday, council member Kelly Ohlson recused himself from council's vote referring it to the ballot — a formality because Colorado voters must approve all taxes — because he was one of the petition representatives and Stanley, his spouse, is leading the campaign. Ohlson led the effort to get the 1992 ballot issue passed and has said he wanted to see it renewed before retiring from council, which he plans to do at the end of his term, which is in January. What else is on the ballot? This Natural Areas tax question is one of two tax renewals voters will consider this November. Also up for renewal is a quarter-cent capital construction sales tax that funds specified capital projects in the city. There are also four Fort Collins City Council seats up for a vote — mayor, District 1, District 3 and District 5 — and some proposed City Charter updates. Finally, there's another citizen initiative on the ballot, and it asks voters to require the city to make the former Hughes Stadium site it purchased in 2023 a city natural area in its entirety. It's possible council will refer a competing Hughes proposal to the ballot on Sept. 2. That one would ask voters to OK a multiuse plan for the site — a bike park, a natural area, open spaces, trails and conservation/education features — that would be planned in consultation with the Indigenous community. In addition to these, Larimer County is asking voters to consider a new quarter-cent sales tax to boost early childhood education affordability and availability. The Coloradoan will provide full coverage of each race and issue leading up to the mailing of ballots and the Nov. 4 election. This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: In 2025, Fort Collins election, a Natural Areas sales tax is on ballot Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) Increases Despite Market Slip: Here's What You Need to Know
Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) closed the most recent trading day at $227.57, moving +1.87% from the previous trading session. This change outpaced the S&P 500's 0.59% loss on the day. Meanwhile, the Dow gained 0.02%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, lost 1.46%. Coming into today, shares of the sporting goods retailer had gained 3.69% in the past month. In that same time, the Retail-Wholesale sector gained 3.3%, while the S&P 500 gained 2.49%. The investment community will be closely monitoring the performance of Dick's Sporting Goods in its forthcoming earnings report. The company is scheduled to release its earnings on August 28, 2025. On that day, Dick's Sporting Goods is projected to report earnings of $4.29 per share, which would represent a year-over-year decline of 1.83%. Meanwhile, the latest consensus estimate predicts the revenue to be $3.6 billion, indicating a 3.57% increase compared to the same quarter of the previous year. For the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates project earnings of $14.38 per share and a revenue of $13.9 billion, demonstrating changes of +2.35% and +3.37%, respectively, from the preceding year. Any recent changes to analyst estimates for Dick's Sporting Goods should also be noted by investors. These revisions typically reflect the latest short-term business trends, which can change frequently. Consequently, upward revisions in estimates express analysts' positivity towards the business operations and its ability to generate profits. Research indicates that these estimate revisions are directly correlated with near-term share price momentum. To exploit this, we've formed the Zacks Rank, a quantitative model that includes these estimate changes and presents a viable rating system. Ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), the Zacks Rank system has a proven, outside-audited track record of outperformance, with #1 stocks returning an average of +25% annually since 1988. Within the past 30 days, our consensus EPS projection has moved 0.05% higher. Dick's Sporting Goods is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold). Digging into valuation, Dick's Sporting Goods currently has a Forward P/E ratio of 15.53. This valuation marks no noticeable deviation compared to its industry average Forward P/E of 15.53. We can additionally observe that DKS currently boasts a PEG ratio of 3.19. This metric is used similarly to the famous P/E ratio, but the PEG ratio also takes into account the stock's expected earnings growth rate. The Retail - Miscellaneous was holding an average PEG ratio of 3.11 at yesterday's closing price. The Retail - Miscellaneous industry is part of the Retail-Wholesale sector. This industry, currently bearing a Zacks Industry Rank of 157, finds itself in the bottom 37% echelons of all 250+ industries. The Zacks Industry Rank gauges the strength of our industry groups by measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Be sure to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and many more, on Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Equitable Holdings price target lowered to $67 from $68 at Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley lowered the firm's price target on Equitable Holdings (EQH) to $67 from $68 and keeps an Overweight rating on the shares. Following Q2 results, the firm is updating its price targets for stocks in the Life Insurance segment under its coverage, the analyst tells investors. Nearly half of the life insurers under its coverage beat expectations on a reported basis and most exceeded expectations on a core basis, the firm adds. Morgan Stanley notes the earnings beats were largely driven by selective favorable underwriting, better than expected performance of macro-sensitive segments, or both. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See today's best-performing stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on EQH: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Equitable Holdings price target lowered to $63 from $66 at Wells Fargo Equitable Holdings Reports Q2 2025 Financial Results Equitable Holdings' Earnings Call Highlights Growth Amid Challenges Equitable Holdings reports Q2 EPS ex-items $1.41 consensus $1.30 Equitable Holdings Completes Major Reinsurance Transaction Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
