Vance Keeps Aggressive Summer Fund-Raising Schedule for G.O.P.
Mr. Vance, in an unorthodox arrangement, is serving in the Republican National Committee's senior-most fund-raising role. And he has quickened his pace of finance engagements in recent weeks, including a previously unreported round table to be held in San Diego on Monday, according to two people with knowledge of the event.
That round table will occur on the same trip as a dinner in San Diego at which Mr. Vance is to receive an award from the conservative Claremont Institute. The right-wing activist Charlie Kirk will serve as the emcee for that event, where tickets are going for a minimum of $2,500-a-seat.
Mr. Vance is also set to headline a fund-raising reception in the summer hot spots of Nantucket, Mass., on July 22, and Jackson Hole, Wyo., on July 29, according to copies of the invitations. And he is expected to headline several other fund-raising events in July and August.
The Wyoming event will be at least the seventh finance event that Mr. Vance has attended since mid-June. Others have included appearances in Silicon Valley at the home of the investor Chamath Palihapitiya, along with Sergey Brin, the co-founder of Google, Alexandr Wang, the co-founder of Scale AI, and Palmer Luckey, the co-founder of the autonomous defense systems company Anduril, according to a person briefed on the event. Mr. Vance also appeared in Atlanta, in Nashville and at the Republican National Committee's summer retreat in Los Angeles, according to copies of the invitations.
Several of these dinners have advertised ticket prices of $100,000 per couple to attend or $250,000 per couple to join the host committee.
Mr. Vance is doing all of this as he remains a likely 2028 presidential candidate. His finance role allows him to mingle with prospective donors under the auspices of the Republican National Committee.
The committee is not wanting for cash. As of May 31, it held a commanding $60 million advantage in cash on hand over the Democratic National Committee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
24 minutes ago
- Business Insider
AAPL Earnings: Apple's Financial Results Beat on Top and Bottom Lines
Consumer electronics giant Apple (AAPL) has reported financial results for this year's second quarter that beat Wall Street forecasts across the board. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Apple announced earnings per share (EPS) of $1.57, which topped consensus expectations of $1.43. Revenue in the April through June quarter came in at $94.04 billion, beating Wall Street forecasts of $89.53 billion. The Silicon Valley-based company also reported that its iPhone sales grew 13% year-over-year during the quarter and its overall revenue grew 10%, the largest quarterly revenue growth since December 2021. Apple's income statement. Source: Main Street Data Unit Performance Among Apple's various business units, iPhone revenue came in at $44.58 billion versus $40.22 billion expected. iPad revenue totaled $6.58 billion, which was below the $7.24 billion anticipated among analysts. And Services revenue, which includes the company's streaming platform and payments app, was $27.42 billion, ahead of a consensus outlook of $26.80 billion. Apple said its gross margin for the quarter was 46.5%, which surpassed forecasts of 45.9%. The technology giant's management team usually provides informal guidance about the current quarter on its earnings call. The company stopped providing formal guidance during the Covid-19 pandemic. AAPL stock was up 2% in after hours trading on news of its latest print. Is AAPL Stock a Buy? The stock of Apple has a consensus Moderate Buy rating among 26 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 13 Buy, 12 Hold, and one Sell recommendations assigned in the last three months. The average AAPL price target of $228.11 implies 8.96% upside from current levels. These analyst estimates are likely to change after the company's financial results.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Only a Monopoly Can Pull That Off': Billionaire Grant Cardone Calls Apple's 30% App Store Fee 'Insane'
Grant Cardone, a prominent real estate investor, entrepreneur, and business educator, has publicly questioned the legitimacy of Apple's (AAPL) long-standing 30% commission on in-app purchases, describing it as 'insane' and suggesting it is only possible for companies with monopolistic power. 'The fact Apple charges developers 30% on in-app purchases is insane. No company should be able to make 30% of gross fees charged,' Cardone wrote on X in July. He continued, 'There's no justification for it & it cost the end user. Only a monopoly can pull that off.' More News from Barchart Morgan Stanley Says Nvidia Has 'Exceptional' Strength. Should You Buy NVDA Stock Here? Dear MicroStrategy Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 31 2 Growth Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Soar 74% to 159% Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Cardone's perspective is based on his extensive experience as both an entrepreneur and outspoken advocate for small businesses. Having built a multi-billion-dollar real estate portfolio and a portfolio of media and education businesses, Cardone frequently touts competitive openness and strategies to empower individuals and organizations in markets often dominated by major players. His business philosophy revolves around challenging industry norms and questioning practices that disadvantage smaller participants, as reflected in his criticism of Apple's fee structure. For more than a decade, Apple enforced a 30% commission on all revenue generated through in-app purchases on its App Store, a model that became a significant source of revenue for the company and an industry benchmark. Apple defended the fee as necessary to support platform maintenance, security, and distribution, yet many developers and business leaders argued it stifled competition, limited consumer choice, and cut deeply into the already narrow margins of app makers. Notably, Cardone's assertion that 'only a monopoly can pull that off' resonates with findings from recent regulatory battles. Criticism of Apple's approach has not only come from business figures like Cardone, but also from regulators in the United States and Europe. These authorities have found Apple's rules in violation of antitrust standards and, in some regions, forced the company to reduce its fee or permit alternative payment methods. A recent landmark federal court decision concluded that Apple must allow app developers to direct users to alternative payment systems outside of Apple's commission structure. The court criticized Apple's persistent efforts to shield its revenue even after initial legal interventions, highlighting how integral the fee had become to Apple's business model and how resistant the company was to outside scrutiny. The wide-reaching implications of these decisions support Cardone's view that such a sizable fee is unsustainable in a truly competitive environment. From a market dynamics perspective, Cardone's comments tie into ongoing concerns about digital platforms' gatekeeping power, and the negative impacts on both developers and consumers. As the global app economy evolves and as regulators increase pressure, Apple's decades-old commission policy is being dismantled. The shift is likely to encourage more competition, lower costs for developers, and potentially better pricing or innovation for end users — all outcomes Cardone has championed throughout his business career. In essence, Cardone's critique speaks to larger questions of what constitutes fair play in modern digital marketplaces and who ultimately bears the cost of entrenched market power. In that regard, his voice underscores a movement pushing for greater accountability and opportunity across the technology sector. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Enterprises prefer Anthropic's AI models over anyone else's, including OpenAI's
AI research lab Anthropic's AI models are now the top choice for enterprises, surpassing OpenAI. Anthropic now holds 32% of the enterprise large language model market share by usage, according to a report from Menlo Ventures released on Thursday. OpenAI holds the second-largest market share by usage among enterprises, with 25%. The figure marks a strong reversal from even just a couple of years ago. Since 2023, OpenAI has seen its market share among enterprises decline sharply, according to the report, as Anthropic's has steadily risen over the same timeframe. OpenAI held 50% of the enterprise market share by usage just two years ago while Anthropic had 12%. Google has seen enterprise usage for its models increase over the last few years as well. Anthropic has an even larger market share when it comes to coding, with 42% of the enterprise market share, the largest market share by a wide margin. Enterprise usage of Anthropic's AI models are more than double OpenAI's, when it comes to coding, which garnered 21% of overall market share. Anthropic's release of its Claude 3.5 Sonnet model in June 2024 is what laid the foundation for the company's surge in usage, according to the report. The release of Claude 3.7 Sonnet in February 2025 only accelerated that momentum. The findings from Menlo Ventures align with anecdotal chatter in the industry, which suggested that enterprise and startup developers preferred Claude over OpenAI's ChatGPT. Meanwhile, OpenAI has a strong foothold on the consumer side of the house. The company reported last week that its users send more than 2.5 billion prompts to ChatGPT a day. The Menlo Ventures report found enterprises prefer closed models, which Anthropic and OpenAI use. More than half of enterprises replied that they don't use open source models at all. Only 13% of enterprise daily workloads use open source models as of mid-year 2025, down from 19% at the beginning of the year. Meta still maintains dominance in the open source market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
