Is the NHS gearing up for a new winter of discontent?
It obviously comes during the five-day resident doctors' strike, and there are also signs of unrest developing elsewhere in the NHS. Some difficult times lie ahead...
When are the nurses going on strike?
Not soon. The present RCN vote is 'consultative' or 'indicative', and is aimed at strengthening their bargaining hand – there's no commitment to withdraw labour.
Union sources suggest there will be an overwhelming rejection of the offer, which is already barely sufficient to keep up with inflation – but this may, to some extent, be a bargaining ploy as they enter into negotiations. Even so, the chances are they'd go on strike again after a 'real' strike ballot, as they did so often in 2022 and 2023. It might happen towards the end of the year.
Is it too soon to use the phrase 'winter of discontent'?
Sort of. Nonetheless, it is perfectly possible to conceive of the nurses and doctors being on strike simultaneously towards the end of the year. The GMB union is making similar noises about industrial action. They represent many domestic and auxiliary staff, plus ambulance crews (a service still in some crisis). It might well feel a lot like when Rishi Sunak was running the country – 'chaos and confusion'.
What could stop the strikes?
More money, but that feels unlikely given the state of the public finances, and just how many people work in the NHS – the pay bill was around £82bn in 2023-24 for England and Wales, about a half of the NHS budget. So a 1 per cent uplift is the best part of £1bn.
A more important factor, though its impact is less direct, is public opinion. Support for strike action is certainly subsiding in the case of the doctors. Maybe Wes Streeting, faced with by far the greatest challenge of his political career, will somehow persuade them to help him reform and save the NHS – which would, after all, be in their own long-term interests.
What would be the effect on the NHS?
Severe – though eventually, when the strikes are settled, as they'll have to be one day, the backlogs will eventually return to normal. The much more insidious damage will be to public confidence in the NHS as an institution.
If neither the Conservatives nor Labour can fix the NHS, the question may be asked, who can? For some it might feel as though more radical changes are needed, and that the NHS should be effectively privatised. Such changes would not necessarily be in the best interests of the BMA, RCN, or Unison members. The nurses should thus worry about destroying the thing they profess to love most – the health service itself.
What does the opposition say?
Nigel Farage wants a 'French-style' insurance system – but that means hefty premiums for some, and presents a problem for those people who cannot afford them.
Questions would remain about how to fund the kinds of long-term treatment that the private sector refuses to cover – for dementia, cancer, degenerative diseases. Under such a regime, some doctors and nurses in some disciplines might prosper, but others would be worse off. It would be driven more by market forces.
The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, wants to ban strikes by doctors: 'Doctors hold lives in their hands. No one should lose critical healthcare because of strikes, but that's what's happening now. That's why a Conservative government led by me would ban doctors' strikes, just like we do [in respect of] the army and police.'
However, working to rule, and overtime bans, would not be outlawed, which could render the 'ban' ineffective given how much the NHS depends on people working beyond their contracted hours. The Conservatives might also reinstate 'minimum service' in hospitals and healthcare, now being abolished by Labour via the Employment Rights Bill. In short, some form of industrial action would remain an option.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lidl recalls chicken product due to concerns of unlabelled allergens
Lidl has urgently recalled a popular chicken product due to concerns they contain an unlabelled allergen. The product, Red Hen 4 Tempura Chicken Steaks, was pulled from shelves because it may contain milk which is not correctly named on the ingredients label. If you have bought the product, and have an allergy or intolerance to milk, do not eat it and return it to the nearest Lidl store where a full refund will be given. The products affected are the pack size 380g with the best before dates 11/12/2026, 16/12/2026, 22/12/2026, 30/12/2026 and 16/01/2027. In a written statement, allergy charity anaphylaxis UK said they have been informed by the supermarket of the urgent recall . 'We have been alerted by Lidl that it is recalling its Red Hen 4 Tempura Chicken Steaks from sale because they contain milk which is not correctly declared on the ingredient label,' it read. So, they went on to explain: 'The product is therefore unsuitable for and should be avoided by anyone with an allergy or intolerance to milk.' When a supermarket is urgently recalling a product that contains an ingredient not named on a label, they often contact allergy charities. These charities can help inform the people with the relevant allergies of the product that may put them in danger. The item affected was the Waitrose and Partners Egg and Spinach Protein Pot, which comes in a 90g plastic tub and is sold in stores nationwide. Two batches were involved in the alert—those with use-by dates of July 31 and August 1, 2025. The supermarket has pulled the product from shelves and urged customers who have already bought it to not eat it. Instead, they should return it to a store for a full refund, with no receipt necessary. Point-of-sale notices have been displayed in affected stores warning shoppers of the risk. These explain the reason for the recall and what steps customers should take if they have purchased the item. A spokesperson for the Food Standards Agency (FSA), which issued the alert, said: 'The presence of salmonella in this product poses a risk to human health... and can be particularly dangerous for the elderly, young children, and those with weakened immune systems.' Salmonella infection—known as salmonellosis—typically develops within six to 72 hours of consuming contaminated food.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Has Labour made any progress at all on irregular migration?
T he number of people crossing the English Channel to claim asylum in small boats has reached a record high. More than ever – some 25,000 – have made the journey since the beginning of the year, and, if this continues, we will see the highest annual total since records began in 2018. A year ago, Labour pledged to 'smash the gangs' and to 'turn the page and restore order to the asylum system so that it operates swiftly, firmly, and fairly'. There has been some progress, but it's fair to say that many feel impatient. Is it really that many? Yes and no. The 25,000 or so who've arrived on the south coast so far this year mean that the number is up by 51 per cent on this point in 2024 (16,842) and 73 per cent higher than at the same point in 2023 (14,732). So the country is well on course to exceed the figure of 37,000 who arrived by these irregular means last year, and the 46,000 in 2021, the prior record. On the other hand, it is far lower than the number of migrants arriving on a visa, entirely lawfully – some 431,000 net (938,000 gross, both figures including students) – and has to be set in the context of the UK's total population of 69 million. The number of irregular migrants last year was equal to the population of Guildford. On balance, it is still the case that migration of all kinds into the UK has been running at historically high levels for some years. Why so high? In terms of the big picture, on total migration, it is simply that the UK suffers from chronic labour and skills shortages – there aren't sufficient young people to replace retirees, so that means there are not enough workers. In addition, there are not enough with the right skills and in locations where demand is high, while those who do have the skills required are not always willing to do the jobs that are available at current wage rates. In the case of asylum seekers, the recent run of calm weather has certainly pushed the flows higher, and there is no shortage of civil wars and collapsing societies that are pushing them towards the UK. The stories about the Afghan refugees that made headlines in July are an extreme example of a wider phenomenon. There are lots of perfectly genuine refugees, in other words, as well as those who just want a better life. Has the government smashed the gangs? Evidently not, and certainly not to the extent required to stop the boats, but the authorities have been given the 'counterterrorism-style powers' and resources that Keir Starmer promised them. At best, it will take time. What about the returns policy? The one-in, one-out deal with France would reduce irregular migration, but it would have no net impact on the overall numbers. It's also relatively small – initially 50 a week, as opposed to the 898 who arrived last Wednesday alone. What happened to 'safe and secure routes'? This idea was quietly dropped by Labour in the months before the election because it wouldn't actually get the numbers down, which is what it's all supposed to be about. Clearing the backlog? Again, it will take time. There were a large number of unprocessed asylum seekers who were due to be deported to Rwanda and were being kept in limbo in hotels, and the number still arriving is such that it's like trying to empty a bath while the taps are running. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, says she has taken on more people to process claims, and some have been returned, either by force (8,590 in the year to March) or voluntarily (26,388 in the same period). International obligations and domestic law, as well as humanitarian considerations, require that all claims be assessed, and again, it will necessarily take time if so many have been left unchecked for so long. Even summary deportation is problematic, and this can also take time if the country of origin refuses entry and there are no third countries available to accept someone. Why don't we use the Royal Navy to tow them back to France? It's not what the navy is for, but also the risk to life is great, and the number of small boats would make the task impossible. British warships or Border Force vessels cannot enter French sovereign waters without permission, and the French government would retaliate. The Royal Australian Navy did take migrants into international waters, but this isn't applicable in the narrow English Channel, so that's not practical either. Why use hotels? Simply because there's nowhere else to put them, and accommodating them in tents in fields, as suggested by the Reform mayor of Lincolnshire, Andrea Jenkyns, would cause even more problems. Hotels are unpopular for understandable reasons, but so is paying to rent private houses, especially as homes of multiple occupation, or using much-needed social housing. Cooper has also promised to end the use of hotels, with the one in Epping that's been the subject of protests now an 'urgent priority'. What do the public think? Concern about immigration of all kinds has been growing, and when the small-boat figures go up, or when there are high-profile incidents involving migrant hotels, as now, the salience of the issue trends to increase in the opinion polls. The most obvious sign of dissatisfaction is the rise in support for Reform UK, even though its solutions – leaving the European Convention on Human Rights, 'sending them back to France', 'turning them back' or sending them to some unnamed third country – haven't necessarily been fully thought through. Indeed, they could make matters worse by encouraging the small boats to make undetected landings rather than surrendering to Border Force and making a claim. This increases the likelihood that these refugees would then end up in the hands of gang masters in the illegal economy, and living in slums, adding to crime. And if the boats were ever stopped, there are other routes, such as overstaying a visa. After all, the small boats only became the preferred method after the Channel authorities made the ports and lorries secure, and then the pandemic – plus Brexit – also made smuggling in vehicles, previously a popular tactic, almost impossible. What no party fully admits is that irregular migration is such an intractable problem that if it were as easy to solve it as is so often claimed, it would by now be a thing of the past. The solution would probably involve using every possible policy lever tried so far, and also introducing identity cards to prevent illegal working – a far bigger 'pull factor' than the welfare system. Another idea would be to allow the immigrants to relieve Britain's labour shortage, which includes unskilled work, thus boosting economic growth and tax revenues. Why not?
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Report has major concerns over Jersey States finances
A committee has raised "major concerns" about States finances, including an overspend of £30.7m by the health department in Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has released its report on the States Annual Reports and Accounts 2024 (ARA), outlining concerns over transparency in public spending, fiscal sustainability and departmental overspending in chair, Deputy Inna Gardiner, said the the total external borrowings for the States Group at 31 December 2024 was £1.14b, compared to 2013 when it owed added: "It is crucial that robust financial controls are put in place to ensure spending across government, but particularly in health, is controlled." In its latest report, PAC looked at how ministers were using taxpayers money, with Gardiner stating there was "rising expenditure, falling reserves, and weakening financial discipline".She said public spending exceeded public income, with the difference being covered through in-year budget transfers, use of reserves, and delayed report found the States of Jersey group held no external borrowings in 2013, but the levels of external borrowings had since risen."The total external borrowings for the States Group at 31 December 2024 was £1.14b, representing a material long-term liability that places added pressure on future public finances," the report said."Our findings raise serious concerns regarding whether the government can maintain our current spending, taxation, and borrowing habits and policies over the long term without incurring unsustainable debt or/and reducing essential services."The need for strategic planning and fiscal discipline has never been greater." The committee made 20 recommendations including the development of a more accessible and interactive version of accounts to aid public said the government should publish, in time for the debate of the 2026 budget, a 10 year revenue and expenditure outlook focusing on potential changes to the island's demographics, as well as flagging forecast overspends to the assembly when they are above 2%.
