Lidl recalls chicken product due to concerns of unlabelled allergens
The products affected are the pack size 380g with the best before dates 11/12/2026, 16/12/2026, 22/12/2026, 30/12/2026 and 16/01/2027. In a written statement, allergy charity anaphylaxis UK said they have been informed by the supermarket of the urgent recall . 'We have been alerted by Lidl that it is recalling its Red Hen 4 Tempura Chicken Steaks from sale because they contain milk which is not correctly declared on the ingredient label,' it read.
So, they went on to explain: 'The product is therefore unsuitable for and should be avoided by anyone with an allergy or intolerance to milk.' When a supermarket is urgently recalling a product that contains an ingredient not named on a label, they often contact allergy charities. These charities can help inform the people with the relevant allergies of the product that may put them in danger.
The item affected was the Waitrose and Partners Egg and Spinach Protein Pot, which comes in a 90g plastic tub and is sold in stores nationwide. Two batches were involved in the alert—those with use-by dates of July 31 and August 1, 2025. The supermarket has pulled the product from shelves and urged customers who have already bought it to not eat it.
Instead, they should return it to a store for a full refund, with no receipt necessary. Point-of-sale notices have been displayed in affected stores warning shoppers of the risk. These explain the reason for the recall and what steps customers should take if they have purchased the item.
A spokesperson for the Food Standards Agency (FSA), which issued the alert, said: 'The presence of salmonella in this product poses a risk to human health... and can be particularly dangerous for the elderly, young children, and those with weakened immune systems.' Salmonella infection—known as salmonellosis—typically develops within six to 72 hours of consuming contaminated food.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
7 minutes ago
- Sky News
90% of young carers could be under the radar - and missing out on vital support
Hundreds of thousands of young carers could be missing out on vital support because they are not registered with their local authority, according to new data seen by Sky News. A Freedom of Information request, carried out by the charity Action for Children and shared with Sky News, has found that 84,256 young carers are known to local authorities in England and Wales. The number is a fraction of the potential 800,000 young carers thought to be helping a loved one in England alone, according to a University of Nottingham study. It means that around 90% of young carers could be missing out on statutory help. "They don't get the time out from being a young carer, they don't get somebody to listen to - and almost, they just get forgotten," says Vicki Phillips from Action for Children. The stark findings come amid concern about extra support for young carers during the summer holidays. The FoI request - which had a response rate of 81.5% - also found that more than a fifth of councils either had no additional provision for young carers during the school break, or that the only extra provision was via services available to other children. Vicki said many young carers, aged under 18, are looking after siblings, parents, grandparents and other relatives while juggling their own lives. "When you think of that young carer is also in school 30 hours a week - is trying to do exams for example - is trying to have a social life and have friends and fit in and just do what everybody else is doing," she adds. "They really can't do that if they have 50/60 hours of caring responsibilities at home as well." Local authorities have a legal duty to assess the impact of caring on a young person, including the impact on education. But many children aren't aware that the help they give to a family member is a formal caring role. Meghan, 16, from Pembrokeshire, has looked after her 12-year-old sister Mia for years. She says: "Over time, as I got older and she got older, I started to notice more about her and how she was different from my friend's siblings and that I was looking after her more than being her sister. "I'm there as a support for her - emotional support - I think I understand her very well and I'm able to communicate with her on a different level." But it was only recently that she was identified as a young carer. "I was recognised as being a young carer for my role by one of the support workers - even before I realised I was doing anything. It was a bit shocking and a bit confusing," she adds. Being assessed and registered as a young carer unlocks a range of statutory and additional support. But that extra help is patchy across the country, with councils often reliant on grants or the charity sector to provide them. In Haverfordwest, Meghan and a dozen other young carers are meeting up at the start of the holidays for a BBQ and chat. It may only be a three-hour break, but it is a chance to get away from their responsibilities for a while. "Being able to come down here and do things like this kind of gives us that chance of a childhood that we may not have at home," said Elle, aged 15. She's here with her 13-year-old brother Charles. "I would say I feel refreshed because it gives me like a sort of restart to doing all the things I have to do at my house." In response to our story, the UK Department for Education said it urges "young carers or their families to contact their local authority for help and support". It added that the government has expanded data collection to better track how young carers are supported. It said it encourages the use of the Young Carer ID card scheme, which helps young carers to be identified, particularly within education.
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Unhealthy diets fueling public health crisis in the North, research suggests
Unhealthy diets are to blame for a public health crisis in the North, research has suggested. People living in the North are more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes, develop cardiovascular disease and be obese because of poor eating habits. They consume less calcium, fibre and fruit than the average across the country, research by the Northern Health Science Alliance's Nutrition North network found. There are also 26 per cent more fast food outlets in the North than the UK average, with one for every 1,000 people, the study showed. Experts linked their findings on diet to the stark health challenges in the region. The three areas analysed – the North East, the North West and Yorkshire – have the highest mortality rates in the country for preventable cancer, liver disease and cardiovascular disease. High blood pressure rates are more than 50 per cent higher than the London average. Researchers say taking action will impact the whole country as the NHS is estimated to spend more than £11.4 billion a year treating and managing obesity alone, with the wider social costs estimated at £74.3 billion annually. Hannah Davies, chief executive of Northern Health Science Alliance and executive director of Health Equity North, said: 'In the North, communities face a huge variety of challenges when it comes to putting healthy food on the table. 'Northern regions experience higher levels of deprivation so it comes as no great surprise they also have some of the highest rates of food insecurity in the country, and some of the lowest weekly spends on food. 'It is therefore no surprise that we have the highest rates of preventable diseases, and of conditions such as childhood and adult obesity.' Si King, Hairy Biker and television presenter, said: 'Food should nourish us, bring us together, and help us thrive, but too many in the North are missing out on the basics: fibre, calcium, fresh veg and healthy fats. These aren't luxuries, they're essentials. 'We need action now... so that every family in the North has the chance to eat well and live well.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Why thousands of people are missing out on NHS jabs for agonising shingles virus
Widespread confusion over who is eligible for the NHS shingles jab means thousands are going unprotected against the agonising infection, a survey has revealed. The poll found one in five over-65s either did not know what shingles was or were unaware the NHS offered a vaccine to prevent it. Fewer than half said they had been vaccinated, while nearly seven in ten admitted they did not understand who was eligible. More than 50,000 elderly Britons develop shingles every year, and nearly one in four of any age will have it at some point in their lives. The condition is linked to chickenpox – a highly contagious childhood illness that causes itchy, spotty rashes. While chickenpox is usually mild, the virus that causes it – varicella-zoster – lies dormant in the body and can reactivate later in life, especially as the immune system weakens with age. This can cause shingles – a painful, blistering rash that typically appears on one side of the chest or abdomen, but can strike anywhere on the body. Currently, anyone turning 65 is offered a shingles vaccine, and remain eligible until they are 80. But those who turned 65 before September 1, 2023, must wait until they are 70. 'I am not surprised by these findings at all,' said Professor Paul Hunter, an infectious disease expert at the University of East Anglia. 'A combination of confusing eligibility criteria – which even confused me, to be honest – and a lack of promotion of the vaccine campaign means that many people are going unprotected from what can be an extraordinarily painful and debilitating virus.' The jab is available privately at high street pharmacies such as Boots and Superdrug – but the two required doses cost £460 in total. 'I'm part of that group who has to wait until they turn 70 for the vaccine, and I did consider going private because of how painful shingles can be,' Professor Hunter added. 'It is a very effective and safe vaccine, and people should make sure they get it as soon as they're eligible on the NHS.' The study of more than 2,000 over-65s by GSK – the British pharmaceutical firm behind the jab – also found that most respondents wrongly believed they were still eligible for the NHS shingles vaccine after turning 80, when that is the cut-off age. A third of respondents also said they did not trust the Government for information on vaccines. Shingles is often accompanied by headaches, nausea and weeks of severe pain – and in some cases it can prove fatal. Around 50 Britons over 70 die from shingles each year. The vaccine reduces the risk of infection by 90 per cent, yet uptake has historically been low – less than half of all 71-year-olds are vaccinated. The latest figures show fewer than one in five of those who turned 65 this year have received the jab. The current two-dose vaccine, Shingrix, replaced a less effective version in September 2023. But due to high global demand, the Government opted to phase in eligibility. As reported by The Mail on Sunday, campaigners have urged ministers to end what they call 'discrimination' against the three million people aged 66 to 69 who are currently ineligible. Senior citizens group Silver Voices has called on the NHS to scrap the age restriction, warning it puts millions at unnecessary risk. One man who regrets missing out on the jab is 72-year-old Daniel Hill. While on holiday in Majorca he noticed a strange rash of blisters, about four inches wide, on his back. Concerned, but not alarmed, he visited a local clinic, where a doctor diagnosed shingles and prescribed antiviral medication. He was offered painkillers, but he declined them. But he said that moments after leaving, the pain struck 'like someone had taken an axe to my back'. The pensioner spent the rest of the trip in agony, confined to bed. 'You really don't want to get shingles,' he said. 'I wish I'd known the vaccine was available on the NHS – I was eligible but had no idea. 'It's so important to check if you qualify and, if you do, get vaccinated to avoid the terrible impact it can have.'
