Social Security is a promise made. Here's a simple plan to save it
The Social Security trust funds face growing challenges, and too many solutions offered today either threaten benefits or ask too much from working families. We don't need cuts or gimmicks. We need a balanced plan that keeps the promise without breaking the backs of everyday Americans.
Here's a straightforward approach to securing Social Security for today's retirees and generations to come:
Reallocate defense spending: Redirect $74 billion over three years from nonessential defense expenses. The United States can maintain its security without sacrificing economic stability.Modernize payroll taxes: Keep the current cap on taxable income but reapply Social Security taxes on yearly earnings over $250,000. This 'doughnut hole' approach asks the wealthy to pay their fair share without burdening middle-class families.Scale benefits for the wealthy: Gradually reduce benefits for retirees earning more than $250,000 annually, phasing out entirely at $2 million. We should even offer a voluntary 'Patriot Opt-Out' for ultrawealthy individuals who choose to forgo benefits.Adjust the retirement age sensibly: Raise the full retirement age by two months each year for those who are younger than 40 today, eventually reaching age 68 or 69 over time — with exemptions for workers with physically demanding jobs.Gradually increase payroll taxes: A modest increase from 6.2% to 6.5% over 10 years would ensure steady funding without shocking workers.
This plan would extend Social Security's solvency well beyond 2090, protect benefits for working- and middle-class Americans, and restore fairness by asking the wealthy to contribute more. It's realistic, compassionate and fiscally responsible.
Social Security is a sacred promise. It's time to keep that promise — not just for today's older adults, but for all Americans. Because fairness matters. Because dignity matters.
This plan would make a promise made a promise kept.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Summer break is costing parents more than just time—here's how debt is becoming the new normal for child care
With five kids, paying for summer camp is one of the biggest items in our annual budget. I'm constantly shifting schedules, looking for more affordable ways to cover my kids' time out of school. And beyond the logistics of getting our family to multiple locations each day, the strain of paying for camp has been equally real over the years. In a world not built for modern parenthood (seriously—why do we still accept a 9-month school year designed for an agrarian society?), summer can feel like the peak of institutional abandonment. Between bosses who pretend the season doesn't exist and a government that acts like every parent has backup child care on call, it's hard not to ask: Why does no one seem to care that summer is such a massive source of strain for families? Turns out, the numbers back up the burnout. Families are spending big and still falling short A new LendingTree survey of more than 600 parents found that 62% of those who used summer child care or camps have gone into debt to cover the cost. On average, they're spending nearly $900 per child. Two-thirds of parents—66%—said paying for summer care is a financial struggle. Nearly half cut back on nonessentials, while 19% reported reducing spending on basic needs like food and utilities. And that pain sticks around: A quarter of parents took up to a year to pay off the debt, while some are still carrying last summer's balance even as the next one rolls in. 'Many parents don't have any other option but to pay for child care,' said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree. 'As much as they'd love to take a bunch of time off during the summer to spend with their kids, that just isn't a realistic thing for most Americans, so they're forced to shell out for child care. That extra cost often requires sacrifice.' Related: Child care costs over 50% of income in some states—and moms are done staying quiet Parents know the value but can't afford more Even amid the financial stress, most parents still believe summer care is important. A full 91% of parents surveyed said summer programs are worth the investment for their children's development and well-being. Still, 86% wish they could afford to enroll their kids in more camps or activities, and 36% say affordable options simply don't exist where they live. While nearly half of respondents receive some form of tuition assistance, the patchwork system doesn't meet the scale of the need—especially when families are already stretched thin the rest of the year. The emotional load is constant The money is one thing. The planning, coordination, and constant hustle? That's another beast entirely. Each summer brings a logistical obstacle course of drop-offs, pickups, sibling schedules, and desperate group chats about carpooling. For many moms, that mental labor is relentless. And it doesn't pause when the budget is tight or your inbox is overflowing. Support systems that could ease the burden—affordable child care, flexible work schedules, equitable co-parenting—are still the exception, not the rule. Which means summer ends up landing hardest on the very people already maxed out. The reality for single parents is even more pressing The math becomes even more unforgiving in single-parent households. According to WalletHub, single parents in New York are spending up to 45% of their median income on childcare. In New Mexico, it's as high as 36%, compounded by some of the lowest household incomes in the country. And that's just for care during the academic year—summer often adds extra weeks of uncovered time and an additional layer of debt. It's time to rethink the system We are long overdue for a national reckoning on what child care actually is: not a private family issue, but a public infrastructure need. Without summer care, many parents—especially mothers—can't work. Yet every year, we treat the cost and logistics of camp like an individual puzzle that families should just 'figure out.' Parents need a system that fully supports child care as a core part of family life—especially in the summer months. That includes public investment in summer programming, employer flexibility, and school calendars and community options designed for the actual lives we live—not the ones we were expected to live in 1955. Because surviving every summer shouldn't be a parenting badge of honor. It should be a policy failure we're finally ready to fix. Related: A push to pay parents to stay home is gaining traction—but moms say what they really need is child care they can afford Sources: 62% of parents using summer child care go into debt. June 2024. LendingTree. 62% of parents using summer child care go into debt. Best and worst states for working moms. May 2024. WalletHub. Best and worst states for working moms. Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
7 minutes ago
- Axios
Social Security recipients set to face an $18,000 benefit cut in just seven years
Retirees are facing the prospect of substantial Social Security cuts in just seven years, sooner than projected, due to the "big, beautiful bill," per an analysis out Thursday from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Why it matters: If policymakers don't stop this from happening, it would at least double the poverty rate of America's seniors, per several estimates. By the numbers: The new analysis projects a 24% cut to benefits by late 2032. That's equal to an $18,000 annual benefit cut for a dual-earning couple who both retire in 2033. They also might experience reduced healthcare access, per the analysis, due to an 11% cut in Medicare hospital payments. The percentages would grow over time, as the population ages and fewer young Americans are paying into the system. How it works: The trust fund is effectively the money the federal government takes in from Social Security taxes. For decades, the system took in more in taxes than it paid out, the Treasury department then invested the surplus. In 2021, it started tapping reserves to keep paying benefits. Once the reserves are depleted, benefits would be "pay-as-you-go," paying out money as taxes come in. That the trust fund would be depleted in the 2030s has long been known. Zoom in: The tax cuts in the big bill and the increase in the deduction for seniors, specifically, would reduce Social Security's incoming tax revenue — and speed up depletion by about a year, per the CRFB. The big picture: Social Security is arguably the most popular government benefit — most Americans either receive benefits or know someone who does — the vast majority of Americans believe in its importance, according to recent polling. The bottom line: Most policy wonks and Social Security advocates believe that it's highly unlikely that Congress would sit back and watch benefits get cut like this.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Top Biden aide Ron Klain answers questions in GOP mental acuity probe
Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain answered questions in an interview with the House Oversight and Accountability Committee in its investigation into former President Biden's mental acuity and use of an autopen. His approach contrasts with some other former Biden aides who refused to answer questions, invoking their Fifth Amendment rights. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said that Klain was 'fairly responsive' to the panel's questions as the interview broke for a lunch break, expecting to continue questioning into late afternoon. 'I found Mr. Klain to be very credible. He answered every single question. He was fully cooperative,' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a member of the committee, said of Klain's interview. Khanna added that Klain was 'forthcoming' about private conversations he had with Biden and did not avoid questions. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), another member of the committee, said that Klain was 'not trying to avoid answering the questions,' and was 'answering the questions carefully.' 'I think he is telling what he knows accurately,' Biggs said. 'He's trying to be accurate.' Several other former aides from the Biden administration invoked their Fifth Amendment rights and refused to answer the committee's questions in recent depositions: Anthony Bernal, former Chief of Staff to First Lady Jill Biden; Deputy Director of Oval Office Operations Annie Tomasini; and Biden's former White House doctor Kevin O'Connor. Others, though, have answered questions in depositions with the committee: Former Biden aides Ashley Williams and Neera Tanden. 'Americans what to know, was Joe Biden in fact aware of what the auto pen was being used to sign his name on, or was in fact some family members or high-level officials in the Biden administration just acting unilaterally as president of the United States and using the autopen,' Comer said ahead of Klain's interview. One Biden ally told The Hill that former aides to the president will take different approaches to the investigation that they see as an exercise in political retribution. 'People are going to take different approaches. Some might speak to committee, while others may invoke their fifth amendment rights. But none of it changes the fact that this investigation isn't about oversight—it's about political retribution,' the Biden ally said.
