MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 09 Jun 2025
Author: Timothy Goh
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has clarified that digital token service providers offering services solely to customers outside Singapore – whether involving digital payment tokens or capital market products – will need to be licensed from June 30.
The central bank added in its clarification on June 6 that it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence.
'The money laundering risks are higher in such business models and if their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it said.
Without a licence, existing digital token service providers serving only overseas customers will be required to cease these activities when the regime comes into effect on June 30, said MAS.
In its response on May 30 to feedback on a consultation paper regarding its proposed regulatory framework for digital token service providers, MAS noted that such providers may be more vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing risks due to the internet-based and cross-border nature of their services.
This increases the likelihood that they could be misused for illicit purposes, to the detriment of Singapore's reputation.
The proposed regulatory framework will come under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022.
MAS also clarified that service providers for digital payment tokens or tokens of capital market products that serve customers in Singapore are already regulated, and there will be no change to what these licensed providers can do.
Providers serving customers in Singapore may also offer services to overseas clients, while those dealing with other types of tokens – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to licensing or regulation under the new regime and are therefore unaffected.
MAS said that it has reached out to persons who, based on information available to them, may be affected by the new regime to clarify its policy position and to discuss their plans for an 'orderly wind-down' of the activity.
It added that 'based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers'.
Parties who may be affected by the digital token service regime may contact MAS at [email protected].
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
SG60: The development of Singapore's corporate and securities law over the last 6 decades
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox It has evolved from a colonial-era system into a globally respected, business-friendly and sophisticated legal regime The Monetary Authority of Singapore Act was passed in 1970, leading to the birth of the eponymous financial services regulator in 1971. SINGAPORE'S corporate law framework has undergone remarkable transformation over the past 60 years, evolving from a colonial-era system into a globally respected, business-friendly and sophisticated legal regime. This evolution directly mirrors Singapore's journey from a developing nation to a premier global financial hub. Here is a breakdown of the key developments. Foundational period (1960s–1980s): Establishing sovereignty and basic frameworks Prior to 1967, the Companies Ordinance 1940, which was modelled after the English Companies Act 1929, was the only corporate Act in force. Thereafter, the Companies Act 1967, Singapore's first major independent corporate statute, was enacted in 1967. While it was largely based on the Malaysian Companies Act (1965 edition), this began the process of localisation. The Companies Act 1967 was focused on basic incorporation, administration and creditor protection. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Act was passed in 1970, leading to the birth of the eponymous financial services regulator in 1971. In 1973, the Securities Industry Act 1973 was established. This set the framework for regulating securities markets in Singapore. The same year, the Stock Exchange of Singapore was formed. The key focus during this period was building foundational legal structures for a nascent economy, ensuring basic corporate governance and market regulation. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation Singapore MyRepublic customers air concerns over broadband speed after sale to StarHub Singapore Power switchboard failure led to disruption in NEL, Sengkang-Punggol LRT services: SBS Transit Singapore NEL and Sengkang-Punggol LRT resume service after hours-long power fault Business Ninja Van cuts 12% of Singapore workforce after 2 rounds of layoffs in 2024 Singapore Hyflux investigator 'took advantage' of Olivia Lum's inability to recall events: Davinder Singh Singapore Man who stabbed son-in-law to death in Boon Tat Street in 2017 dies of heart attack, says daughter Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court Modernisation and liberalisation (1980s–late 1990s): Embracing market economics and global standards Against the backdrop of an economic recession in 1985, the enactment of the Companies (Amendment) Act 1987 facilitated tighter regulatory standards. The Securities Industry Act 1973 was replaced by the Securities Industry Act 1986 and, later, the Securities and Futures Act 2001. This created a more comprehensive and modern capital markets regulatory framework, aligning more closely with international standards such as those of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. The Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers, first introduced in 1974, was refined in 1979 and again in 1985. Rudimentary corporate governance guidelines began to take shape. In 1977, MAS played a predominant role in regulating the securities and futures industries, such as the insurance industry, alongside banking. Towards the late 1990s, Singapore's approach shifted to a disclosure-based regime, granting public companies greater liberty to tap the stock market. The focus was on making Singapore attractive to foreign investment and multinational corporations, fostering a dynamic capital market, and improving regulatory robustness. Strategic review and enhancement (late 1990s–2010): Post-Asian financial crisis and competitiveness drive December 1999 marked the appointment of the Company Legislation and Regulatory Framework Committee (CLRFC), which was pivotal to conducting a coherent and comprehensive review of Singapore's corporate law and framework. The recommendations of the CLRFC were implemented across major amendments of the Companies Act from 1999 to 2005. In 1999, the Companies Act criminalised any person who acted as a director or manager of a company while being an undischarged bankrupt. Major amendments were made to the Companies Act in 2002, with key recommendations being the introduction of the limited partnership and limited liability partnership business structures, the simplification of incorporation and maintenance procedures for private companies, and the threshold for compulsory share acquisition. More significant changes were made with the Companies (Amendment) Act 2004, and subsequently the Companies (Amendment) Act 2005. Singapore's corporate governance was further enhanced with the enactment of the statutory derivative action in 1993, which was a significant milestone for the protection of minority shareholders. Singapore progressed from a merit-based regime for public companies to a disclosure-based model in 1997. The Companies Act began codifying the general management powers of directors, duties of disclosure of conflicts of interest, and duties not to misappropriate company assets and breach of directors' fiduciary duties. Following the Companies (Amendment) Act 2005, the Companies Act 2006 strengthened creditors' protection by imposing restrictions on a company's provision of financial assistance for the acquisition of its own shares. It also empowered creditors to declare that a person engaged in fraudulent trading was personally liable for the debt of the company. In 2004, the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Acra) was formed by merging the Registry of Companies and Businesses and the Public Accountants Board, creating a one-stop regulator for company registration and accounting standards. Greater administrative efficiency came with Acra's launch of the BizFile+ portal, which streamlined filing requirements and processes for businesses. Acra was formed in 2004 through the merger of the Registry of Companies and Businesses and the Public Accountants Board, creating a one-stop regulator for company registration and accounting standards. PHOTO: ACRA The first Code of Corporate Governance that was formalised in 2001 and made applicable to all listed companies came into effect in 2003. The code was significantly revised in 2005 to strengthen the disclosure framework for directors. The statutory and regulatory focus was in response to the Asian financial crisis. The development of Singapore's corporate laws and regulations during this period emphasised enhancing transparency, accountability, and investors' protection to boost international confidence and Singapore's attractiveness as a financial and business hub. Comprehensive reform and global leadership (2010–present): Agility, innovation and sustainability After extensive review and public consultation, the Companies Act 1967 was repealed and replaced with the landmark Companies Act (Chapter 50) 2006, which came into full effect with the Companies (Amendment) Act 2014 and Companies (Amendment) Regulations 2016. The key changes included simpler criteria to be registered as a 'small company' exempt from audit requirements and mandatory annual general meetings. New solvency tests were introduced for capital reductions and financial assistance to apply uniformly to all transactions, allowing more flexible options for mergers and amalgamations. Corporate governance was strengthened through more stringent disclosure requirements for nominee directors, refined director duties and shareholder remedies. In 2020, the Variable Capital Companies Act 2018 took effect, creating a novel, flexible corporate structure specifically designed for investment funds. This boosted Singapore's status as an asset management hub. Sweeping revisions were made to the Corporate Governance Code in 2012 and 2018, emphasising board independence, diversity (including gender diversity), business sustainability, internal risk governance and remuneration-linked risk management, as well as stakeholder engagement beyond pure shareholder primacy. The Covid-19 years also saw the modernisation of company communications through the embrace of virtual meeting technologies. Singapore also made significant progress in environmental, social and governance areas. In 2021, Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo) mandated sustainability reporting for listed companies in line with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. This enhanced the transparency of climate-related disclosures by listed companies in Singapore. In 2022, MAS and SGX jointly launched ESGenome, a disclosure portal for listed companies to voluntarily make climate-related financial disclosures. In 2024, MAS' investigative and enforcement powers against corporate miscreants were expanded. Acra's scope of such powers were also widened with the Corporate Service Providers Act 2024 and its regulations. Greater enforcement powers accorded to SGX RegCo were introduced from August 2021, including its ability to issue public reprimand and compel listed companies to comply with its directives. The BizFile+ portal was further revamped in 2024 to ensure seamless online corporate filings and transactions, streamlining digitalisation. The Corporate Restructuring and Insolvency Regime implemented pre-packaged schemes of arrangements and adopted the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law's Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Regulatory reforms were implemented to maintain Singapore's competitiveness, foster innovation (particularly in areas such as fintech and asset management), promote sustainable and responsible business practices, enhance ease of conducting businesses – especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – and strengthen Singapore's reputation as a trusted international dispute resolution centre. The key drivers of these developments span various factors. The laws governing Singapore's corporate regulatory regime were shaped to support the national economic goals of attracting foreign direct investment, developing financial services, and facilitating the growth of SMEs. Global best practices have also served as a reference point for Singapore when international regulatory standards are adopted. The regulatory authorities have demonstrated continual stakeholder engagement by seeking extensive public and industry consultations prior to introducing and formalising reforms to the corporate regulatory regime in Singapore. Through the various reforms, Singapore has also shown its willingness to adapt to various crises such as the Asian financial crisis by forming review committees such as the CLRFC. The developments in Singapore's corporate law landscape have been complemented by a robust dispute resolution system, offering multiple forms of internationally recognised dispute resolution processes. Over the last six decades, Singapore's corporate law has shifted from a basic compliance framework to a dynamic, sophisticated, and principles-based system. It successfully balances competing priorities: robust investor protection and corporate governance with business-friendly efficiency and flexibility; adherence to global standards with responsiveness to local needs (especially SMEs); and traditional commercial law with emerging demands such as sustainability and digital innovation. The continuous, strategic evolution of Singapore's corporate law has been a cornerstone of the Republic's economic success, as well as its reputation as a premier global business and financial centre. The focus now extends beyond pure efficiency and growth to encompass long-term sustainability and responsible stewardship. In 2024, the government formed a review committee headed by a Cabinet minister to boost Singapore's attractiveness as a venue for initial public offerings and secondary listings. The various proposals that have been announced by the review committee led to a perceptible increase of new listings from both foreign and local companies on the Singapore bourse in 2025.
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
As global financial markets rewire, Singapore investors look to home
[SINGAPORE] Events this year make it clear that we are living in an unpredictable and complex world. For years, investors have operated under the assumption that the US would lead growth in developed markets, that policy changes were incremental, and economic disruptions were cyclical. However, a global transformation is underway and investors are considering the implications of various outcomes for the broader macro environment – including trade tariffs and the potential end of US exceptionalism, and how these factors will impact their investments. For investors in Singapore looking to rebalance their portfolios, the local market looks to be a safe haven. This is according to Fidelity International's Asia Pacific Investor Study 2025, which aims to provide a pulse check of investor behaviour in the region. The survey revealed that among Singapore investors holding US equities, 23 per cent have decreased their allocation since the start of the year and 46 per cent have held it at the same level. What is perhaps more interesting is that among those who have reduced their US equity exposure, 46 per cent have re-allocated assets back to the Singapore market. This was followed by the China (20 per cent) and global (10 per cent) markets. This is perhaps unsurprising given the efforts from the Monetary Authority of Singapore to boost the local market, including S$5 billion set aside under the Equity Market Development Programme. Equally intriguing was the fact that investors here maintained a risk-on sentiment. Almost half of equity investors indicated they would increase their allocation in the next 12 months, and just 13 per cent planned to decrease it. The many uncertainties in the world can present opportunities if investors know where to look. In these volatile times, the case for diversifying portfolios is more compelling than ever. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Identifying opportunities Investors should not overlook developments in the macro environment as they are crucial in evaluating opportunities across various sectors, companies and regions. While there is no crystal ball to offer a definitive answer, it is important to consider key factors such as GDP growth expectations, the trajectory of inflation, and the potential outcomes of different scenarios. In times of market uncertainty, such as we are experiencing today, it is important to continuously recalibrate for various potential scenarios. This involves having a clear grasp of the current key drivers and how they differ from a year ago, alongside delineating what a bull market case would entail compared to a bear market case. By attempting to identify options that are resilient across different scenarios – be it new tariffs, fluctuations in oil prices, or changes in macroeconomics and interest rates – you are ultimately seeking the most favourable risk opportunities. End of US exceptionalism Many investors are evaluating whether the era of US exceptionalism is drawing to a close and considering the implications for current and future investment strategies. Over the past 15 years, the US has emerged as an economic and financial leader. This trend has been driven in part by the rise of hyperscale companies which are now dominant constituents of the S&P 500 index. The robust earnings growth delivered by such companies has contributed significantly to market performance overall. However, a key consideration is whether these mega-cap companies can maintain their momentum and continue to generate sustainable growth. On a multi-year outlook, the companies are well protected from a moat perspective, and they have solid market share. However, investors should also consider whether they will continue to have an edge in innovation and the capital to re-invest down the track. The assumption that their historical returns and growth would continue to outstrip the rest of the world is starting to become a little bit more tenuous. Expectations for US GDP growth are being downgraded, while treasury markets are jittery as high fiscal deficits look likely to continue. Investors should reflect on developments in the rest of the world and assess whether the expectations for other markets are improving or declining. Europe looks promising, buoyed by fiscal and monetary policy stimulus across numerous European nations. Valuations are reasonable, and companies are demonstrating strong cash flows – all of which signal a positive investment environment. Similarly, in emerging markets, there is a notable combination of attractive valuations and, in some cases, advantages arising from a weaker US dollar. Additionally, certain markets, such as China, are demonstrating promising innovation cycles. The broad revitalisation observed in 2025 – exemplified by upstarts such as DeepSeek, which rolled out potentially market-leading products – highlights significant opportunities for investors. These developments warrant increased optimism and consideration for investment. Risk and diversification Uncertainty can be daunting, but it also presents opportunities for investment and global diversification. Maintaining an exposure to the US remains important due to the strength and reputation of its companies. However, ongoing questions regarding the US economy and the sustainability of mega-cap leadership suggest that investors should also consider diversifying into other regions worldwide. It is positive that many investors here already plan to do so. As we navigate ongoing market volatility, investors should seize the opportunity to identify and invest in companies with resilient cash flows, robust balance sheets and potential for re-investment. The writer is head of South-east Asia and country head of Singapore, Fidelity International
CNA
5 days ago
- CNA
Trade wins and holiday woes: Mixed emotions amid the Singdollar's climb against China's yuan
SINGAPORE: Like many cost-conscious Chinese nationals abroad, Kevin Wang, a 23-year-old masters student from Qingdao studying in Singapore, has been fervently monitoring foreign currency rates. Two particularly important currencies have been the Chinese yuan and the Singapore dollar (SGD), Wang said, because being on exchange in a country as expensive as Singapore can be costly. 'It influences my spending choices while I'm here,' Wang said, adding that food, transport and accommodation in Singapore were 'very expensive' compared to lower prices back in China. Spending has become tougher for Wang in recent months, as the SGD climbed against the yuan and hit a 28-year high on Jul 2 at 1:5.631 - according to statistics by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). In early May and in early July, the SGD traded at around 5.63 against the yuan, marking a 22 per cent increase from around 4.61 in February 2022. According to Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) data, the SGD:RMB rate was 1:5.631 on Jul 2, which appears to be a 28-year high. The last time it was higher was on Aug 1, 1997, at 5.643. 'When I first arrived, things were already expensive,' said Wang, who arrived in 2024. He is now more cautious about spending. "If it's a non-essential item, I won't buy it unless I truly want it," he said. The Singapore dollar, often ranked as one of Asia's best-performing currencies, has continued to grow in strength over the past year, analysts said, trading at record highs against global counterparts like the Japanese yen and US dollar. 'The Singapore dollar has held firm and maintained its strength against other currencies in the region, also gaining on the weakening US dollar,' said Jeff Ng, director and Head of Asia Macro Strategy at Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation. In contrast, the Chinese yuan 'saw more stability' despite appreciating in value against the US dollar, Ng said. 'What we have noticed is the Singdollar strengthening against a weakening US dollar, with the yuan remaining stable,' Ng said. 'In a way, this reflects that the Singdollar has (continued to) strengthen over the past three months while the yuan has underperformed.' Strong fundamentals, like Singapore's safe haven appeal, robust economic growth and easing of monetary policies, have aided the Singdollar's stability and growth, he added. Its rise against the yuan began in early April, said Sim Moh Siong, commodities strategist from the Bank of Singapore, adding that it also reflects the weakening of the US dollar due to its trade tariff escalations. 'This weakness has led to the current highs (we are seeing) between the Singapore dollar and Chinese yuan, with the Singdollar appreciating more than the yuan against the greenback,' he told CNA. BOON OR BANE FOR TOURISTS? One group set to benefit from a stronger Singdollar: outbound Singaporeans travelling to China, experts said. A stronger Singdollar would translate into more spending yuan - allowing them to stretch their travel budgets and spend more on accommodation, dining and entertainment options in China. Chrislyn Ng, a 22-year-old NTU student on a month-long summer exchange programme at Fudan University in Shanghai, has been enjoying the perks of a stronger Singdollar. Things have always been cheaper in China, Ng said, but the new currency highs have made dining out and visiting popular attractions even more affordable. 'It makes me more willing to spend,' she added. To commemorate her trip, she spent 380 yuan (S$68) on a portrait photoshoot in Shanghai, which included full costume changes, makeup services as well as post-production editing. The experience was 'definitely value for money', Ng said. 'If I did a similar shoot in Singapore, I would have paid more, and services might have been more rushed.' Also benefitting from a strong Singdollar against a weaker yuan are Chinese nationals working in Singapore sending their hard earned money home. Jiang, a 42-year-old labourer, recently remitted 29,000 yuan to family members back in China. This month, they would be receiving slightly more yuan, Jiang said. 'I remit money on a routine basis, every two to three months or so. It goes without saying that if I'm sending money back home, the higher the rate, the better,' Jiang said. On the flip side, experts say a weaker yuan 'creates more caution' among budget-conscious Chinese tourists and travellers, who already feel that Singapore is too expensive. 'This will likely dampen discretionary spending on luxury shopping, F&B establishments and wellness experiences,' said Subramania Bhatt, founder and CEO of China Trading Desk, a Chinese-focused travel consultancy. Chinese tourists who spoke to CNA recounted paying higher prices for food, hotel stays and transport fees because of a stronger Singdollar. Visiting Singapore had been a very expensive holiday for Liao Chao, a Chinese tourist who had travelled from the southern Guangdong province with his wife and children. The family of six, who have also holidayed in Hong Kong, forked out close to S$3,580 for a 5 night stay at a luxury downtown hotel. Transport also did not come cheap - they spent an average of at least S$200 a day on 'bigger and more premium rideshare options' to get around. 'Because of how expensive things are in Singapore to begin with, the higher exchange rates have made us try to avoid spending money on non-essentials," Liao said. 'So after our time here, I can definitely say that Singapore is more expensive than Hong Kong,' he added. Ella Zhang, 31, and Nancy Chen, 29, who had travelled to Singapore from the city of Hangzhou to visit friends and sightsee, were careful about their travel expenses and spending. 'We didn't buy much,' Zhang told CNA, estimating that she spent around S$50 on cosmetics and perfume. They also relied on cheaper off-peak rideshare services to get around. 'It's definitely way more expensive than what we would pay for similar services back home,' Zhang said. Spending hard-earned yuan in Singapore was not ideal, Chen said. 'It's too expensive to get by in Singapore. I don't think we would come back (unless) we visit friends or for work.' IMPACT ON BUSINESSES The yuan's weakening against the Singapore dollar would most likely be a bane for Chinese businesses that import high-value products manufactured and distributed from Singapore, experts said, adding that prices were also likely to increase. But at the same time, the Singdollar's rise would allow Singaporean companies to invest in China at lower costs and rates. Soo Wei Chieh, executive director of the Singapore Business Federation's (SBF) international business division, said that a stronger Singdollar would enable Singapore companies to expand or deepen their market presence in China. There has also been a growing interest in Singapore-based companies and consultancies looking to partner with Chinese counterparts, Soo added. 'With setup costs and investment outlays in China now offering more value, there has been a noticeable uptick in business interest and activity,' he said. Local entrepreneur Marcus Sia is the founder of Applied Total Control Treatment (ATC), a leading precision engineering company headquartered in Singapore, which also runs manufacturing facilities and operations in Malaysia. A stronger Singapore dollar means that Sia's clients in China would have to pay more, potentially resulting in more competition from rival Chinese manufacturers. But Sia isn't worried. 'Our competitors are not able to produce products of similar high quality that are required in high-stakes industries like aerospace and semiconductor applications,' Sia said. 'Our Chinese clients would not consider ordering from (them) because of concerns over stringent quality requirements,' he said, adding that he was confident demand would remain stable. PREDICTIONS AHEAD Analysts are confident that current exchange highs between the Singapore dollar and the yuan will remain the same for much of 2025. As of Aug 7, the Singdollar eased gradually to around 5.593 against the yuan, according to MAS figures. Ng predicts that it will continue to 'hover between 5.5 and 5.6' without any major changes. 'It's more likely both currencies will remain at similar levels and hover around 5.6 for the time being,' Ng said. The Singapore dollar may also likely make some gains against currencies around the region, while losing to others, Ng said. 'It may not be able to maintain the same level of outperformance and may weaken against currencies like the South Korean won or the Malaysian ringgit, which are projected to appreciate more against the US dollar.' But at the end of the day, the performance of these currencies against the Singapore dollar is ultimately dependent on how all of them fare against the US dollar. Sim expects the yuan to continue its upward trend of gradual strengthening. However, this would mean that there would most likely be no aggressive moves to tighten the yuan to increase its value. He agrees that exchange rates are 'set to hover around 5.6'. Economic uncertainty is also expected in the second half of the year and things could worsen depending on tariff outcomes. If tariffs are imposed on US trading partners worldwide, observers say businesses might be more apprehensive to invest or have as many dealings, for fear of potential losses, or being unable to maintain their bottom lines. China's heavily export-dependent economy would then have to bear the brunt under increasing tariffs and potential trade war pressures as a result. And if demand for Chinese exports does fall, so will demand for the yuan, causing it to further devalue against the greenback, and ultimately the Singapore dollar. 'We would have to wait and see how the tariffs are really implemented, who they will apply to and when, and what exemptions could be potentially included in policies,' Ng said, adding that it would also depend heavily on US President Donald Trump.
