
How a first-time playwright created a giant hit
Yet this coveted prize has not gone to some precocious scribe: Rosenblatt is 47 and has spent his entire career as a director, mostly freelancing at venues including Shakespeare's Globe and the National. But that is not to take away from his success: Giant – in which Roald Dahl wrestles with the potentially career-threatening fallout of his very public anti-Semitism – has been a huge success. The towering American actor John Lithgow (who plays Dahl) and Elliot Levey (who plays his publisher, Tom Maschler) also won Oliviers and, after a sold-out run at a resurgent Royal Court last autumn, Giant is now opening in the West End.
Giant is set at Gipsy House, Dahl's Great Missenden home, in the summer of 1983 – which was, as Rosenblatt writes in his note on the play text, 'a particularly challenging season to be (or be near) Roald Dahl'. He was recently divorced from Patricia Neal, the Hollywood actress, enduring a disruptive renovation of his home and physically creaking but near the peak of his powers as a children's writer: The BFG had been published the previous year to great acclaim.
All of this is overshadowed by Dahl's review of a book, chronicling the siege of Beirut in the 1982 Israel-Lebanon war, in which he wrote of Jews that 'never before in the history of man has a race of people switched rapidly from being much pitied victims to barbarous murderers'. He railed against the apparent global dominance of 'Jewish financial institutions' and 'American Jewish bankers', while also asking if Jews around the world 'have the guts' to criticise Israeli actions.
Rosenblatt's path to Gipsy House was prompted by a similarly cantankerous old man with forthright views: Jeremy Corbyn. When Labour was rocked by frequent accusations of anti-Semitism under its former leader, Rosenblatt sought a way to explore how criticism of Israel often blurs into prejudice against Jewish people. 'As a British Jew, I found hearing those things very shocking,' he says. 'As a director, I thought it would be interesting to see if there was a way of dramatising it,' he tells me.
He remembered reading about Dahl's anti-Semitism and thought that could be a way in, but had no intention of writing the play himself: 'plays felt like another person's gift'.
Rosenblatt's gift, since he graduated with an Oxford English degree, has been directing. He won an award for young directors in 1999 with his adaptation of The Dybbuk by the Russian S An-sky, then set up Dumfounded Theatre to revive forgotten classics, such as CP Taylor's Bread and Butter. From 2013-16 worked full-time as associate director at Leeds Playhouse.
Rosenblatt, who has flecks of grey creeping into his black beard and a habit of gesticulating a lot when he talks, tells me that he only decided to write Giant after a meeting with Nicholas Hytner. He had worked for Hytner during his tenure as artistic director of the National Theatre and asked for advice about who might be suitable to write the play about Dahl he had in his head. Hytner suggested he do it himself.
Then came the pandemic, which gave Rosenblatt the chance to write at his kitchen table. He says that he spent a couple of years working intensively on his own and, from the end of 2022, Hytner was 'very, very involved, as directors are, in noting it and giving me suggestions and feedback and redrafts'.
The Royal Court may have seemed an unlikely theatre for the play's premiere run given its own much-publicised accusations of anti-Semitism: ranging from Ken Loach's Perdition in 1987 to Rare Earth Mettle in 2021, which included a megalomaniacal billionaire named Hershel Fink that critics said put forward anti-Semitic tropes, and for which the Court publicly apologised.Rosenblatt says that he 'never really discussed the past' with the Court's new director, David Byrne, and was thrilled to have his play put on at a 'powerhouse of new writing'.
Rosenblatt got word that Giant was going to be programmed at the Royal Court on October 5, 2023 – just two days before Hamas terrorists launched their attack on Israel that left almost 1,200 dead and around 250 more taken hostage. Then came the war in Gaza. During previews, Israel bombarded Lebanon in an attempt to oust Hezbollah. All of a sudden, there was added relevance to the play.
There was no question in Rosenblatt's mind about not going ahead with the production; 'My only thought was, would the Royal Court – like any theatre – wobble in any way about the decision, given what was happening in the world, the sensitivity of it? And they were unerring.'
In polarising times, Giant is unusual for its nuanced portrayal of a character like the unapologetically anti-Semitic Dahl. 'Roald Dahl is, for everything that is difficult about the things that he said and did in that time, also a very charismatic, funny, quite mesmerising character,' says Rosenblatt. 'Even the outrageous stuff is, at times, kind of funny and holds people in the story.'
The playwright was determined to channel Dahl's duality, rather than merely excoriate him. 'He's got a gleeful fun, he's very charming. He uses his charm to disguise his cruelty. He uses his cruelty to cover his vulnerability too,' says Rosenblatt. 'I knew that if it was just a hatchet job on a famous writer, it would be very singular and boring after 10 minutes.'
Dahl is an emotive character for many: 'part of the cultural wallpaper of our lives', as Rosenblatt describes it. 'He has informed so many childhoods. Then what do you do? You don't want to share that with your children? I read his books to my kids, knowing who he was,' he says.
'I wouldn't read his books to my kids if they actually directly contained anti-Semitism, and I don't think they do.'
Though he has no wish to cancel Dahl, Rosenblatt says he does tweak some of his stories – 'I sometimes edit on the fly' – when he reads to his five-year-old son, because he feels uncomfortable with some of his characterisations. 'I will soften some of the adjectives when I'm reading it, but that's what I do in order to still have the opportunity to read these amazing stories to him.'
Are there any examples that spring to mind? 'I think there's some misogyny in [the depiction of] Mrs Twit and the way that she evolves as a person in the story. There's some quite binary thinking about people's looks and people's actions and their behaviour,' he says. 'Someone who isn't conventionally beautiful, that doesn't mean that in some way they think bad thoughts… I don't want my son, particularly, to go out into the world and think that someone who looks a certain way is, therefore, in some way a bad person.'
There is a neat circularity to Rosenblatt achieving such stellar success with a play about Dahl: his first memory of the theatre is going to a production of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Though he does not remember where or when this was, he vividly recalls the actor playing Willy Wonka telling Augustus Gloop on stage to 'turn your mic down' because it was malfunctioning.
'I must remember it because there's something about the illusion shattering in theatre that interests me,' Rosenblatt says. 'It's this very complex thing that can go wrong.' Thankfully, for Rosenblatt, nothing's gone wrong yet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Reporter
18 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Fringe 2025 – Joe Bor: Leave Them Wanting Bor ⭐⭐⭐
The filmmaker, cartoonist, and comedian Joe Bor made a return to the Edinburgh Fringe with Leave Them Wanting Bor. This was Bor's first appearance here since 2019. His 2019 show, The Story of Walter and Herbert, was a gentle, humorous meditation on friendship, family and the Jewish experience in the 20th century. That show had a very clear narrative and focus, skilfully interweaving sound recordings, video and extracts from his grandfather's unpublished memoirs. This year Bor has brought a new show, Leave Them Wanting Bor to Edinburgh. Willy the warm up In contrast, this show lacked the same level bit of coherence, though Bor was again an engaging presence on stage. He began under the guise of 'Willy the warm-up' an Australian alter ego in a Pat Sharp style wig, who tried to raise the atmosphere in the room. This was perhaps an admission that the room lacked a bit of character, especially mid-afternoon – the 'strip club' vibes not ideal. In the evening, Fingers Piano Bar can have a fantastic atmosphere, but at 2pm it wasn't ideal for a comedy based act; it was a little flat with fewer than a dozen in the room. The 'Willy the warm-up' character actually had perhaps more potential; I felt that Bor switched too abruptly to his normal persona. Breaking down barriers Bor gave us tales from his travels and his life experiences. These were told in an engaging way, with some nice moments of interaction with the audience which helped create a nice collective feel to the show. That's very much consistent with the Free Fringe philosophy of breaking down barriers. Bor clearly enjoyed picking up bits of wisdom from some of the members of the audience, keen to find out what the secret of the long lasting relationship was. Some of the best material was actually found in his very entertaining text exchanges with his 'no filter' Mum. Perhaps this aspect could have been made a larger feature of the show. A sense of acclaim Ultimately the theme was of Bor's sense of not quite living up to some of his relatives of past generations , especially his great aunt, the chemist and X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin, whose work was central to the understanding of the molecular structures of DNA. This sense of trying to live up to a certain standard of achievement, the search for a 'sense of acclaim', was the thread running through the show, rather than the slightly laboured material on science. Bor shared a number of Einstein quotes about science, which were interesting in themselves, but I'm not sure they really cohered with the show more generally; at least in its present form. Stupid joke – but I like it The show how a little bit of a scattergun feel, with Bor sometimes shooting off into tangents, and slightly losing his thread. The tangents were often very entertaining, but the show perhaps needs some tightening up. His clear enjoyment of 'stupid jokes' (aka Dad jokes), was endearing, but perhaps overdone ('stupid joke – but I like it'). More broadly, the whole show was tinged with a large element of self-deprecation 'I think that's the best joke – it never gets a big laugh though'. In general, the show had many good elements (if you pardon the science pun), but, in its current state, lacks the satisfying cohesiveness of The Story of Walter and Herbert. I imagine that as Bor's run here at the Fringe continues, the show will develop and get closer to its potential. Like this: Like Related


Daily Mail
19 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Now Hamlet issues trigger warning that Shakespeare classic contains 'coercive' behaviour
Theatregoers have been issued a trigger warning over William Shakespeare's classic tragedy Hamlet containing 'coercive behaviour'. Those visiting London 's National Theatre later this year to watch director Robert Hastie's adaptation of the iconic play have also been told to prepare themselves for themes such as suicide as well as depictions of madness and violence. The epic play, which is a cornerstone of English literature, centres around Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and his mad descent after his father is murdered by his uncle Claudius, who usurps the throne and marries Hamlet's mother. It ends with a fatal duel that sees most of the principal characters - including the Prince himself - dead by the final curtain, prompting the theatre to issue a series of warnings. Under the play's 'suitablity' a note reads: 'This production contains themes of grief and death, including suicide and the loss of a parent, depictions of madness, violence, and coercive behaviour.' The show is set to begin with previews beginning on Monday, September 25 until Friday, September 30 - with tickets currently fetching anywhere between £20 and £64 for those dates. It will then run until November 22 out of the South Bank theatre in the English capital and stars Laurence Olivier Award-winning actor, Hiran Abeysekara, as the Danish prince. However, the trigger warnings attached to the show have sparked debate over whether they are necessary for a 400-year-old Shakespearian tragedy which is widely taught in schools. Previously speaking to the Daily Mail about the warnings, historian and author Roy Schwartz said it creates an unsustainable precedent. He said: 'A trigger warning is meant to alert that something contains potentially distressing material. It's gratuitous to include it in something that's well-known to have mature subject matter, and it's frankly ridiculous to include it in a classic like Hamlet. 'For that matter, why not have a trigger warning in every history book? Every Bible and Sunday sermon? Coddling audiences against reality only serves to infantilise culture. 'A trigger warning is fair when the audience might not expect something 'triggering,' not in the most famous play in history.' Agreeing with Mr Schwartz, writer Simon Evans added that trigger warnings are 'tiresome, infantilising and ultimately counterproductive' - a belief he said is supported by research and 'common sense'. Mr Evans continued: 'To attach one to one of the supreme works of art in the western canon, a play that contains the single most quoted lines in the language, let alone on the subject of 'self-slaughter', is risible in the extreme. 'Let all theatres bookshops and cinemas carry a single "trigger warning" henceforth. "Take Heed! - all human life is here. Proceed at your own peril".'


Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
More woke madness as theatre-goers warned to expect ‘coercive' behaviour in Hamlet
Bosses at the National Theatre in London deemed it necessary to warn fans in case anyone paying up to £89 for tickets are triggered TOO PC OR NOT TO PC? TOO PC OR NOT TO PC? More woke madness as theatre-goers warned to expect 'coercive' behaviour in Hamlet Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THEATRE-goers have been warned to expect 'coercive' behaviour in Hamlet — a play more than 400 years old. Producers have also flagged up grief, suicide, mental illness and parental loss in Shakespeare's to-be-or-not-to-be epic. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Theatre-goers have been warned to expect coercive behaviour in a Shakespeare play over 400 years old Credit: Getty 2 Woke theatre bosses warned the audience: 'This production contains themes of grief and death, including suicide and the loss of a parent' Credit: Alamy The tale of the Prince of Denmark's madness after his father's murder is a bloodfest, with six characters croaking in the final scene alone. Bosses at the National Theatre in London deemed it necessary to warn fans in case anyone paying up to £89 for tickets is triggered. They said of Shakespeare's longest play: 'This production contains themes of grief and death, including suicide and the loss of a parent, depictions of madness, violence, and coercive behaviour.' Online resource says of the body count: 'It is a well-known fact that Shakespeare's tragedies normally conclude in death, and Hamlet, written in 1600 to 1601, is no exception. "The last scene alone reveals the death of six different characters, and that is after the death of Hamlet's father, Polonius, and Ophelia in earlier scenes.' In June, London's Globe Theatre warned of guns and suicide in a Wild West version of Romeo and Juliet. The Royal Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon also issued a warning about Macbeth in 2023. It included 'scenes of war, violence, and death including execution, suicide, violence against children, murder and domestic, emotional and physical abuse'. There were also 'special effects including flashing lights, strobe lights, loud noises, haze, fire effects, smoking and gunshots'.