logo
People are only just realising what's inside a Jammie Dodger biscuit

People are only just realising what's inside a Jammie Dodger biscuit

Daily Mail​2 days ago

Jammie Dodgers have been a tea time favourite since 1960 but people are only just learning what makes its delicious filling.
The popular British biscuit is made of two round shortbreads sandwiched together by a rich jammy red filling and famously stamped with a small red heart.
Jammie Dodgers - which often retail for as little as £1 or less at supermarkets like Asda and Tesco - come in a variety of flavours including raspberry and strawberry.
But fans have been left shocked to discover that the beloved sweet snacks contain neither fruit, but rather a totally different one altogether.
According to a Facebook post, the popular jammy dodgers achieve their wondrous filling using apple jam. The biscuits also feature a raspberry filling, which gives it the famous taste fans have come to love.
Meanwhile the strawberry variation - which comes in a pink packet - also uses apple jam in its ingredients - and likewise contains strawberry flavouring.
The specific ingredients of a standard 140g pack of Jammie Dodgers are listed as including 'flour', 'raspberry flavour apple jam', 'apples', 'flavourings' and 'sugar' amongst other things.
Responding to the post, one person said the revelations made them 'question' everything they knew.
'Something like this makes one question everything they know and makes their world crash around them' they wrote.
'Actually, a bit like when I painstakingly reassembled my iMac earlier today, and then later found a T10 screw on the kitchen floor. I might treat myself to some Jammie Dodgers later'.
It also appears the post left one person emotional, as they wrote: 'This is a HORRIBLE HORRIBLE thread.'
'Well I am flabbergasted. I always thought it was strawberry jam... good Lord' wrote another.
Meanwhile, one woman explained: 'This is definitely nothing new. Many a pot of "jam" of the cheaper varieties used to be made in the same way, apple pulp because it is cheap and easy to gel, and some "flavouring" added.
'I don't know what they are like now because I make my own jam these days (and grow or forage my own fruit for them) and have done for some 30 years'.
Jammie Dodgers is a popular British biscuit typically enjoyed by being dipped in tea, or as a standalone snack.
After briefly adding dairy to their recipe, Jammie Dodgers reverted back to a vegan-friendly recipe in 2020, sparking joy among plant-based diet followers across the globe.
Fans have been left shocked to discover that the renown sweet snacks contain neither fruit, but rather a totally different one altogether
Meanwhile over the years, the biscuit has seen a variety of limited edition flavours, including toffee, lemon, and even berry blast.
In 2009, they were even reportedly sent to the International Space Station as part of a care package for British astronaut Tim Peake.
However despite being one of the only British biscuit to make it to space, the debate is still strong on what is the correct way to devour the delicious snack.
Taking to Instagram threads Danny, from Leeds, asked his followers the pressing question.
He wrote: 'How do you eat your Jammie Dodgers? I think I eat mine the weirdest way. Eat the top edge, eat the bottom edge and then boom centre goes in one.'
Many rushed to the comments with their own way to eat the biscuit.
One person wrote: 'Nibble all the outside and the biscuit leaving the jam then eat that…yes I'm weird.' Another said: 'I'm the same. Save the best till last.' While someone else agreed adding: 'Leaving the jam bit until last.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen
Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen

'Allow me to reintroduce myself!' yelled the squat, muscular, tattooed, silver haired 51-year-old, standing on a runway in the centre of the vast Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland, a tiny, isolated figure in the midst of a 70,000 strong crowd. 'My name is ROBBIE! F______! WILLIAMS!' And the crowd roared back with a gusty, noisy delight to match the star's own. He's back, folks. To be fair, I am not sure how far he ever really went away, but Britain's self-proclaimed 'King of Entertainment' is on the march, determined to reclaim his crown. Oasis mania is about to be unleashed once more in the UK, as the biggest band in Britpop returns to the stage next month. Cheekily stealing their thunder, they are being preceded around Britain's stadiums by the biggest British hitmaker of the 1990s and 2000s in a show mischievously entitled Britpop, filled with buzzing guitars and mighty singalongs. Mind you, that's where any resemblance to the fiercely dour and belligerently stationary Oasis ends. Because Williams throws everything he's got at his audience – special effects, jokes, choreography, stunts and, mainly, himself – in a relentless, almost desperate desire to please. His spectacular show opened with a gasp-inducing high dive from a giant winged platform suspended above the stage and ended two hours later with fans singing the choruses of Williams's beloved ballad Angels louder than the giant PA, whilst the star of the occasion looked on beaming with emotional delight. I am not sure who was more moved by Williams's relentless antics – the woman named Debbie from Dundee openly weeping as Williams clambered into the crowd to serenade her with a version of She's The One, or Williams himself as he basked in the glow of love and acceptance. A neurotic neediness is at the heart of Williams's appeal but is crucially wrapped up in songs with meaningful lyrics, flowing melodies, snappy hooks and huge choruses that the audience seem even more eager to sing than the performer. Indeed, it is not really a criticism, but Williams talks as much as he sings, frequently interrupting his own emotional performances with silly jokes and overexcited chatter. 'I'm s_______ hits all over the place!' he shouts in the middle of an otherwise gorgeous A Love Supreme and makes a lewd penis joke during his most vulnerable anthem Come Undone. A Robbie Williams show is a lot to take in. It's an end of the pier cabaret routine staged with the firepower of a Hollywood blockbuster; a cheesy pop extravaganza infused with darkly witty postmodern irony; an exposed bundle of raw human neuroses transposed into monster pop anthems interlaced with old fashioned showbiz comedy patter and interrupted by scatological stream of consciousness babble. He makes unscripted comments about age ('I'm 51,' he repeatedly shouted in self-amazement), anxiety ('I've been s_______ myself for weeks, old feelings from Take That, PTSD'), his family ('my mum has dementia, and my dad has Parkinson's, I feel like I'm in sniper's alley'), and sings the showbiz standard My Way in a pink suit and boa with all the feeling of a man who can't quite believe he's made it this far. He's 51, you know. There is a theme to proceedings, roughly hovering around the question of 'what is entertainment?'. Williams offers himself as the answer to his own question, to which the crowd offer noisy validation. From the riotous bombast of Let Me Entertain You to the vulnerability of anthemic ballad Feel, Williams arrived fully armed with the singalong hits that his massive audience have already taken to heart. In his natural element on stage, he put them across with a combination of ridiculous humour, raw humanity and powerful musicality that proved irresistible. We let him entertain us. I suspect from his gurning delight that the experience was mutual.

Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'
Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'

Prince Harry asked Princess Diana's brother about changing his family name to Spencer, according to reports. During a rare visit to Britain, Prince Harry is said to have sought advice from his uncle Earl Spencer, about whether to assume his mother's surname. It would have meant dropping his current family name, Mountbatten-Windsor, which is used by his children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three. The Duke, 40, was advised against the move by the Earl, 61, because of the legal hurdles, according to the Mail on Sunday. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step', a friend of the Duke told the newspaper. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. It combines the British Royal family's House name of Windsor and Prince Philip's adopted surname of Mountbatten. The Duke's apparent desire to abandon the name speaks to the growing rift with his family. An interview with the BBC last month, in which he made a series of comments about the Royal family, is understood to have deepened the divide between Buckingham Palace and the Duke and his wife, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex. On their birth certificates, the couple's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. However, it was revealed last year, they had started using 'Sussex' as the official surname for their children. The Royal family name of Windsor was confirmed by Queen Elizabeth II following her accession to the throne in 1952. But in 1960, the late Queen and then Duke of Edinburgh elected for their direct descendants to carry the name Mountbatten-Windsor. This meant that when the Queen's children needed to declare a surname, it would be Mountbatten-Windsor. Mountbatten-Windsor first appeared on an official document on Nov 14 1973 upon the marriage of the Princess Royal and Captain Mark Phillips.

Man charged after three police officers assaulted in Crawley
Man charged after three police officers assaulted in Crawley

BBC News

time30 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Man charged after three police officers assaulted in Crawley

A man has been charged with multiple offences after three police officers were assaulted in Police said officers attended a property in Gossops Drive, Gossops Green, at about 14:30 BST on Saturday to arrest a suspect in an ongoing suspect resisted arrest and attacked three officers, causing "significant injuries", before fleeing to a nearby property, the force Rasool, 43, of Gossops Drive in Crawley, has been charged with grievous bodily harm with intent, two counts of actual bodily harm and two counts of non-fatal strangulation. He has been remanded in custody and will appear before Crawley Magistrates' Court on three officers required hospital treatment for their injuries, said Steve Biglands said: "My colleagues put their own safety at risk to protect the people of Sussex and they will continue to receive the full support of Sussex Police."I would like to commend them for their bravery and acknowledge the swift actions of their colleagues who responded to the incident."Police officers are human beings, and being assaulted while they carry out their duties should never be seen as 'part of the job'. "It is unacceptable and will not be tolerated."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store