Bruno Fernandes turns down lucrative Al Hilal offer to stay at Man United
MUNICH — Manchester United captain Bruno Fernandes has turned down a proposed move to Saudi club Al Hilal because he wants 'to play at the highest possible level.'
Fernandes confirmed Tuesday that he had received an 'exciting offer' from the Riyadh-based club to switch after what was a disappointing season for United.
'They waited for me to think about my future, because I said only if Manchester thought it was the time to move on, that I'd be willing to do so,' Fernandes said through an interpreter. 'I talked to the gaffer, Ruben Amorim, and at the time he asked me not to go. I then talked to Man United. They said they didn't want to sell me. If I wanted to go, I could, but they didn't need the money, they didn't need to sell me.'
Media reports suggested Al Hilal was prepared to pay 100 million pounds to take the 30-year-old Fernandes from United while offering him a wage of 700,000 pounds per week to play for the Saudi Pro League team.
'It was a very exciting offer,' Fernandes said. 'The president of Al Hilal, he was very nice to me. He talked to my manager but then I talked to my wife and as a family we wanted to see what I wanted to do. She asked me, what do you want to do with your future?'
Fernandes last year signed a contract extension to stay at Old Trafford until June 2027.
This season did not go as planned as the Red Devils failed to qualify for the Champions League after finishing 15th in the Premier League, while it also endured the heartbreak of losing the Europa League final to Tottenham.
'We had goals and we didn't meet them,' said Fernandes, a key figure for United since his arrival in January 2020.
He said it would have been easy for the family to make the move to Riyadh, and for him to adjust to the team with Portugal teammates Rúben Neves and João Cancelo already playing for Al Hilal.
'I'm used to them, but I want to play at the highest possible level," he said. "I want play for major competitions. I know I still can, and I want to be happy doing the thing I love the most. And for better or worse, I'm still very passionate about football. This is how I see football. This is how I see my life and my future, and I'm happy about the decision I made.'
Fernandes was speaking as a Portugal player before the team's Nations League semifinal against Germany on Wednesday in Munich. The winner of that game will face either France or Spain in Sunday's final.
soccer: /hub/soccer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
HighlightsGoogle is facing an $800 million lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California, from Android smartphone users who claim the company misappropriates their cellphone data, affecting an estimated 14 million Californians. The plaintiffs allege that Google secretly transmits data over cellular networks even when devices are turned off, which they argue improperly consumes purchased data from mobile carriers without user consent. Despite Google's history of settling class actions, the company is opting for a trial, disputing the plaintiffs' claims that they have a property interest in cellular data allowances and arguing that no actual losses were incurred. Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks "for Google's own purposes," including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said the claims "mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable," he told me. "We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation - a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called "passive" data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered "property" under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the "rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim - not wrongful conversion," defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. "The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year," plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest - 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions - more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it "must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel."
Business Standard
44 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Redefining Student Living: How Vita Student Is Transforming Cost, Community, and Comfort
BusinessWire India New Delhi [India], June 5: Vita Student, a leading UK-based student accommodation provider, offers its residents high-end and functional living environments. Vita Student's vision is to develop an integrated student lifestyle centred around community, wellness, and career development. It offers a variety of amenities, ranging from co-study suites to gyms and private dining rooms, as well as resident-led services and activities. In today's era, students expect more from their living spaces, and Vita rises to meet these expectations. Vita Student transforms the university living and learning experience through its all-encompassing approach. This approach focuses on clear pricing, cosy spaces, a sense of belonging, and a keen awareness of changing student habits and the lifestyle of those studying abroad. Vita Student delivers this in purpose-built accommodation in cities with popular universities, such as Manchester, Edinburgh, London, Birmingham, Belfast, Bristol, Cardiff, Coventry, Exeter, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, Newcastle, Nottingham, Sheffield, Southampton, York, and Barcelona. With All-inclusive rooms, Vita offers high-speed premium internet, fully equipped gyms, private study areas, curated social events, and 24/7 security. Vita Student provides a hassle-free, high-quality living experience to support every aspect of student life. Moreover, it introduces students to an international community, providing access to additional workshops, networking opportunities, and career guidance. Vita Student champions a culture of diversity and inclusivity by actively celebrating cultural events, offering inclusive facilities, and fostering a strong sense of community. Through these strategies, Vita creates a welcoming environment where students from diverse cultural backgrounds feel respected and supported. With a strong focus on quality education and career development, Vita Student ensures students are not only helped in their studies but also set up for success in their future careers. "Students now seek value beyond cost--they want quality, ease, connection, and support for their long-term ambitions," says Shayon Dasverma, the marketing head for India, SEA, and MENA at Vita Student. He further adds, "Vita Student removes the stress and empowers students to focus on what truly matters--their goals, well-being, quality education, and future careers--by providing exceptional living spaces, dedicated support teams, curated events, and access to personal development opportunities. We recognise that university life is not just about academics but about preparing for a successful future. That's why we create spaces that foster learning and career development, offering access to industry professionals, workshops, and personalised career counselling. Our holistic approach ensures that students thrive academically and professionally. And there's a lot more that we do. From social events and cultural celebrations to group workout sessions and cooking classes, we put together people for lasting friendships and building a strong community."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Want to work abroad? Forget US or UK, Reddit says these countries are easiest for Indians to find jobs
In today's competitive job market, many Indian professionals—both in IT and non-IT sectors—are actively exploring opportunities abroad. While some aim for higher salaries or better work-life balance, others seek global exposure and long-term immigration prospects. A recent Reddit thread, Indian Workplaces, shed light on which countries are relatively easier to migrate to for work and strategies used by those who have successfully secured international roles. The original poster (OP), who works remotely in digital marketing, sought insights from others, asking which countries seemed less difficult to break into, what roles and sectors worked, and which hiring methods were effective, such as direct applications, internal transfers, or referrals. They also asked for helpful tools, sites, and resources others might recommend. This discussion quickly drew in responses from users with diverse backgrounds and personal experiences, offering a raw and realistic picture of what it currently takes to find a job abroad. Internal Transfers: An Effective Route, But Not for Everyone One Reddit user, an analyst at a global bank, highlighted that internal transfers remain one of the most effective ways to move abroad. He explained that working directly with international teams and proving value can lead those teams to request the transfer themselves. However, while effective, another Redditor pointed out that this path is highly dependent on company policy. In their 13 years of experience—first in a US-based bank and now in a content marketing firm—they found that many mid-sized or non-MNC firms don't offer such mobility options. So, while internal transfers may be among the easiest paths, they are far from the most common. Outsourcing Firms: A Declining Gateway Before 2015, Indian outsourcing firms provided a relatively smooth path to international jobs. However, one user noted that this has changed significantly. Due to rising opposition in host countries, these companies are increasingly hiring locals instead of facilitating international relocations. This shift has made it harder for Indian professionals to rely solely on these firms for overseas movement. Gulf and Southeast Asia: Easier Entry Points Several users agreed that Gulf countries, particularly the UAE, and Southeast Asian markets like Malaysia, are more accessible for Indians. One user shared that Malaysia had the simplest visa processing experience, while the US was the most complex due to legal and procedural hurdles. Another added that despite the Gulf region's accessibility, factors like company size and sector still play a role in the ease of migration. Canada: A Promising Yet Competitive Landscape Canada also came up as a popular destination, though it was noted that immigration policies have become stricter in recent times. Still, pursuing higher education in Canada and choosing the right fields of study can significantly improve one's chances. A Reddit user emphasized the benefits that come with Canadian Permanent Residency, such as free healthcare and higher wages. They also pointed out that opportunities extend beyond IT—long-haul trucking, for example, can pay over Rs 70 lakh annually. One user advised not to obsess over the country itself, but rather to focus on aligning one's skills with market demand. They suggested looking at your company's overseas hiring patterns, especially for client-facing roles, and identifying if your profile matches the requirements. Understanding the 'hot' skills in your target geography can be a more fruitful strategy than randomly applying to jobs abroad .
