Google faces heat
While this is not the first time since Google faced disputes over its geographical name changes, experts say this opens a Pandora's box of questions about how major tech companies help shape global narratives.
'Google, along with the other major platforms, wield enormous influence in how people perceive geography, history and political realities,' said Tobias Feakin, Australia's former inaugural ambassador for cyber affairs and critical technology.
'What appears on a map isn't just data, it shapes global narratives. When Google changes a name, it effectively validates a political stance, even if unintentionally,' he continued.
Shortly after Trump's executive order to rename the body of water, the U.S. Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) made the change official, prompting Google Maps to follow suit for U.S. users.
Apple Maps and Bing Maps also updated their systems to align with the change.
Google maintains it has a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they are updated in official government sources, as the GNIS did. In a case where official names vary between nations, users will see their official local names, according to Google's policy.
Quickly resisting the change, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has threatened to file suit against Google, arguing Trump's executive order renaming the Gulf applied only to the area of the continental shelf under U.S. control.
The backlash against Google comes as technology companies continue to become more influential in broader society. With this growing power comes a larger role in geopolitics, or the ways geography impacts politics and foreign relations.
'Tech companies are no longer just participants in geopolitics, they are shaping it,' said Feakin, whose research examines geopolitics and its intersection with advanced and emerging technologies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
4 reasons why the Trump tariffs haven't caused U.S. inflation to soar
Despite a barrage of new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration this year on dozens of U.S. trade partners, the prices of goods and services across the U.S. have defied many economists' expectations and remained relatively stable. Economists caution that just because tariffs have yet to trigger a renewed bout of inflation, there is no guarantee that prices won't surge later this year. They note that recent data shows a modest rise in the cost of items including clothing, home furnishings and appliances. Tariffs — meaning the rate importers must pay at the border for imported goods — also take a long time to seep into the economy. That's because companies often trying to hold off on passing along higher costs to customers to avoid losing market share to rivals. Yet experts acknowledge that tariffs have yet to unleash the kind severe inflationary pressures that could cause prices to spike. For their part, White House officials have consistently maintained that foreign exporters — not American consumers — will bear the brunt of added tariff costs. "Despite the doom-and-gloom predictions of inflation and recession, it's been months since Liberation Day, and inflation is trending towards an annualized rate not seen since President Trump's first term, while a recent [Council of Economic Advisers] analysis found that prices of imported goods are actually declining," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, alluding to the baseline and other tariffs President Trump originally announced on April 2. Here are four reasons economists say explain why inflation isn't jumping despite the highest U.S. tariffs in decades. Despite President Trump's many threats to jack up levies on imports, the actual average tariff rate being charged on U.S. imports is not as high as what has been announced, data shows. The average tariff rate on U.S. imports in June was 9% — well below the 15% that many economists were forecasting earlier this year following Mr. Trump's slew of tariff announcements, according to investment advisory firm Capital Economics. "It's not so much that the reaction to tariffs has been low, it's that the effective tariff rate increase has been relatively limited up until June," Mark Cus, an economist at Barclays, told CBS MoneyWatch. Actual U.S. tariffs remain lower than earlier estimates in part because countries facing steeper levies are sending fewer goods to the U.S., according to Barclays and Capital Economics. By contrast, countries with below average tariff rates are shipping more goods to the U.S. The upshot: Average tariff rates on imports are lower than many economists were projecting earlier this year. Additionally, many goods imported into the U.S. have been exempted from steeper tariffs. Of the roughly $258 billion worth of imports that hit the U.S. retail market in June, only 48% were subject to tariffs, Barclays data shows. For example, pharmaceuticals, some electronics, and many imports from Canada and Mexico are exempt from any new tariffs. "While dutiable goods face elevated tariff rates, a substantial portion of U.S. imports remains duty-free," Barclays analysts said in a recent report. "This is a major contributor to the low effective tariff rate." U.S. retailers built up their inventories earlier this year in expectation that the Trump administration would hike tariffs on imported products and parts. Many retailers are still selling those non-tariffed products, allowing them to delay price hikes, experts said. For example, "There was a big jump in imports of goods from Canada that would later be tariffed before the tariffs kicked in, and perhaps imports of those goods in May and June were relatively low, and that shows up as a smaller amount of dutiable goods," Barclays' Cus told CBS MoneyWatch. Eventually, experts warn, retailers will exhaust those lower-cost goods imported earlier in the year, which could lead to higher prices down the road. For now, many retailers are eating the additional tariff costs. Businesses "have been willing to absorb the initial hit via lower margins, although we suspect that was mostly a temporary development as those firms waited for more clarity on where tariff rates would settle," analysts with investment adviser Capital Economics said in a recent report. "We doubt that is a sustainable outcome over the longer term, however. As the uncertainty over tariff levels eases over the next couple of weeks, giving retailers more clarity on rates over the next year or two, we would expect more firms to raise prices," they said. Tariffs typically take many months to seep into company supply chains and and show up in the prices consumers pay at the store. The full impact of tariffs plays out not immediately but over an extended period of time, peaking roughly a year after they take effect, a June Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas report noted. That means any U.S. tariffs imposed this year could would be unlikely to have much of an impact on inflation until later this year and into 2026. "Up to now there has been only limited passthrough from tariffs into final consumer prices, but we still expect the impact to gradually mount in the second half of this year," Capital Economics analysts said in a report. A final possibility is that the fears that the Trump administration's turn toward protectionist trade policies would trigger another severe bout of inflation are overblown. The White House has maintained that such a shift will protect jobs, and make the U.S. more competitive globally. "The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be paid by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's best and biggest consumer market," the White House's Desai said in a statement.
Washington Post
a few seconds ago
- Washington Post
Marisa Bellack, Lynh Bui and Alexis Sobel Fitts appointed to leadership positions in the Futures Department
We're pleased to announce a series of leadership appointments in Futures. Marisa Bellack becomes a senior assignment editor overseeing Climate & Science coverage; Lynh Bui becomes a senior assignment editor overseeing Health coverage; and Alexis Sobel Fitts becomes a senior assignment editor overseeing our Technology and Media coverage. Alexis Sobel Fitts A champion of revelatory reporting who has guided some of our biggest scoops and most ambitious enterprise, Alexis will oversee the tech team from the corporate campuses of Silicon Valley to the halls of power in Washington. Since joining The Post in 2021, Alexis has edited probing stories that illuminate the political and cultural impact of the industry, its key figures and the rise of artificial intelligence. Her team dug into Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service as well as Musk's transformation from environmental champion to anti-climate change enforcer. Her team broke news on Donald Trump's designs on TikTok amid a broader rethinking of his relationship with Silicon Valley. And she has produced deep stories about key figures helping to propel the nation's shift to the right, including the pro-Trump wellness guru who ran for vice president and the investor who emerged as an unlikely leader in the movement to end DEI. Alexis has produced revelatory stories about AI's impact in the real world alongside pieces that investigate its inner workings. Late last year, she edited a ground-breaking report on the use of AI by the Israeli military in the war on Gaza. And she has spearheaded some of our most impactful projects on social media, including our coverage of the Facebook Papers in 2021 and our exclusive 2022 report on 'Mudge,' the Twitter whistleblower. Before coming to The Post, Alexis was deputy editor of Jezebel and a senior editor at Wired. She has covered tech since 2013 when, as a senior writer at the Columbia Journalism Review, she developed a beat examining how technology giants were influencing media and the spread of information. Raised in Philadelphia, Alexis holds a master's degree from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and a bachelor's degree in English literature from Yale University. Lynh Bui As acting health and science editor for the past six months, Lynh has overseen some of the scoopiest reporting in Washington as the health team generated revelation after revelation about Donald Trump and Robert F Kennedy Jr.'s remaking of the federal health establishment, with major implications for everyday Americans. She joined the desk last year as deputy health and science editor, where she collaborated with our gifted science writers to capture the awe and wonder of exploration and experimentation. She helmed stories that looked deeply at Lucy, the celebrity of the fossil world; offered readers an interactive tour of the Andromeda galaxy; and provided a compelling behind-the-scenes look at surgeons' first attempt to remove a spinal tumor through a patient's eye. Lynh joined health and science from the Metro staff, where she served as an editor since 2020 managing coverage of the federal courthouse in D.C. and the D.C. Circuit appellate court as well as Maryland's police departments and courts. Lynh helped direct coverage of some of the most urgent topics in the region including the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and the more than 1,000 prosecutions that followed. Lynh helped run coverage of Trump's prosecution in D.C. and was part of the team leading The Post's coverage of the Key Bridge collapse in Baltimore last year. Lynh arrived at The Post in 2012 as one of the first American University fellows on Metro, while simultaneously earning her master's degree in journalism. She joined the staff and ultimately covered police and courts on Metro for six years. During that time, she was part of the team that examined how 8-year-old Relisha Rudd disappeared from a D.C. homeless shelter in 2014, reported extensively on the death of Freddie Gray in police custody in Baltimore and anchored The Post's foray into augmented reality while covering the officers' trials. An Arizona native, Lynh previously worked at the Arizona Republic and earned her bachelor's degree in journalism and mass communications from the Walter Cronkite School at Arizona State University. Marisa Bellack Marisa has spent 18 years at The Post helping to shape beautiful and thought-provoking stories, running complex coverage of big news events and launching creative new initiatives. She has guided an extensive body of work on extreme weather, environmental challenges and discoveries related to the natural world, both in her most recent position of Climate Solutions editor and before that as Europe editor, overseeing bureaus in London, Berlin, Brussels, Paris and Rome. She helped lead coverage of the coronavirus pandemic, anticipating that what was happening in Italy would soon hit the United States, tracking how the virus spread and transformed societies, and explaining how new vaccine technology, then untested in the real world, might be key to resuming normal life. She ran a team of a dozen Post staffers at the COP26 summit in Glasgow. She was also part of the team that won the 2022 Polk Award for Technology Reporting, for an investigation that revealed how spyware intended to help governments track terrorists and criminals was used to hack the phones of journalists, human rights activists and others. Marisa started at The Post in 2007 as digital opinion editor. She inaugurated real-time commentary on PostPartisan and hired Ann Telnaes to experiment with animated cartoons. She pulled back the veil on the editorial board by inviting readers to debate previously unnamed writers. She also debuted the America's Next Great Pundit competition and orchestrated a crowdsourced Washington spy serial with columnist and author David Ignatius. As deputy editor of The Post's Sunday Outlook section, Marisa commissioned and shepherded ideas essays – many of them future-oriented. Among those were a cover story anticipating how solar geoengineering could lead to geopolitical conflicts; an essay on why sociable robots can't be good friends to kids; a piece investigating the claims of a 'brain strengthening' company; and a piece on how invoking historical comparisons can make it harder to see the future. Marisa went to college at the University of Pennsylvania and earned master's degrees at the London School of Economics and Harvard's Kennedy School.
Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
'South Park' targets federal takeover of Washington, DC, police in latest episode
NEW YORK (AP) — 'South Park' is continuing its cartoon assault on the Trump administration, with an episode on Wednesday that addresses the federal takeover of Washington, D.C.'s police department. A 20-second promo of this week's episode released by Comedy Central depicts the show's recurring character 'Towelie' — an anthropomorphic towel — riding in a bus past the U.S. Supreme Court building and White House, where armed troops are patrolling. A tank rolls by in front of the White House. 'This seems like a perfect place for a towel,' the character says upon disembarking the bus. 'South Park' creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone recently signed a reported $1.5 billion, five-year deal with Paramount for new episodes and streaming rights to their series, which began its 27th season this summer. Their second episode of the season depicted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem shooting puppies, a reference to a story from the former South Dakota governor's biography where she said she killed the family dog because of its behavioral issues. Noem is also depicted being trailed by a team of beauticians having to reattach her face. 'It's so easy to make fun of women for how they look,' Noem told Glenn Beck in response to the episode. The season premiere mocked President Donald Trump's body in a raunchy manner and depicted him sharing a bed with Satan. The White House has dismissed 'South Park' as a fourth-rate, no-longer-relevant show. But it has been attracting attention; Comedy Central said the Noem episode had the highest audience share in the show's history, a reference to the percentage of people with televisions on watching the cartoon. ___
