logo
4 reasons why the Trump tariffs haven't caused U.S. inflation to soar

4 reasons why the Trump tariffs haven't caused U.S. inflation to soar

CBS Newsa day ago
Despite a barrage of new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration this year on dozens of U.S. trade partners, the prices of goods and services across the U.S. have defied many economists' expectations and remained relatively stable.
Economists caution that just because tariffs have yet to trigger a renewed bout of inflation, there is no guarantee that prices won't surge later this year. They note that recent data shows a modest rise in the cost of items including clothing, home furnishings and appliances.
Tariffs — meaning the rate importers must pay at the border for imported goods — also take a long time to seep into the economy. That's because companies often trying to hold off on passing along higher costs to customers to avoid losing market share to rivals.
Yet experts acknowledge that tariffs have yet to unleash the kind severe inflationary pressures that could cause prices to spike. For their part, White House officials have consistently maintained that foreign exporters — not American consumers — will bear the brunt of added tariff costs.
"Despite the doom-and-gloom predictions of inflation and recession, it's been months since Liberation Day, and inflation is trending towards an annualized rate not seen since President Trump's first term, while a recent [Council of Economic Advisers] analysis found that prices of imported goods are actually declining," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, alluding to the baseline and other tariffs President Trump originally announced on April 2.
Here are four reasons economists say explain why inflation isn't jumping despite the highest U.S. tariffs in decades.
Despite President Trump's many threats to jack up levies on imports, the actual average tariff rate being charged on U.S. imports is not as high as what has been announced, data shows.
The average tariff rate on U.S. imports in June was 9% — well below the 15% that many economists were forecasting earlier this year following Mr. Trump's slew of tariff announcements, according to investment advisory firm Capital Economics.
"It's not so much that the reaction to tariffs has been low, it's that the effective tariff rate increase has been relatively limited up until June," Mark Cus, an economist at Barclays, told CBS MoneyWatch.
Actual U.S. tariffs remain lower than earlier estimates in part because countries facing steeper levies are sending fewer goods to the U.S., according to Barclays and Capital Economics. By contrast, countries with below average tariff rates are shipping more goods to the U.S.
The upshot: Average tariff rates on imports are lower than many economists were projecting earlier this year.
Additionally, many goods imported into the U.S. have been exempted from steeper tariffs. Of the roughly $258 billion worth of imports that hit the U.S. retail market in June, only 48% were subject to tariffs, Barclays data shows. For example, pharmaceuticals, some electronics, and many imports from Canada and Mexico are exempt from any new tariffs.
"While dutiable goods face elevated tariff rates, a substantial portion of U.S. imports remains duty-free," Barclays analysts said in a recent report. "This is a major contributor to the low effective tariff rate."
U.S. retailers built up their inventories earlier this year in expectation that the Trump administration would hike tariffs on imported products and parts. Many retailers are still selling those non-tariffed products, allowing them to delay price hikes, experts said.
For example, "There was a big jump in imports of goods from Canada that would later be tariffed before the tariffs kicked in, and perhaps imports of those goods in May and June were relatively low, and that shows up as a smaller amount of dutiable goods," Barclays' Cus told CBS MoneyWatch.
Eventually, experts warn, retailers will exhaust those lower-cost goods imported earlier in the year, which could lead to higher prices down the road.
For now, many retailers are eating the additional tariff costs.
Businesses "have been willing to absorb the initial hit via lower margins, although we suspect that was mostly a temporary development as those firms waited for more clarity on where tariff rates would settle," analysts with investment adviser Capital Economics said in a recent report.
"We doubt that is a sustainable outcome over the longer term, however. As the uncertainty over tariff levels eases over the next couple of weeks, giving retailers more clarity on rates over the next year or two, we would expect more firms to raise prices," they said.
Tariffs typically take many months to seep into company supply chains and and show up in the prices consumers pay at the store.
The full impact of tariffs plays out not immediately but over an extended period of time, peaking roughly a year after they take effect, a June Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas report noted. That means any U.S. tariffs imposed this year could would be unlikely to have much of an impact on inflation until later this year and into 2026.
"Up to now there has been only limited passthrough from tariffs into final consumer prices, but we still expect the impact to gradually mount in the second half of this year," Capital Economics analysts said in a report.
A final possibility is that the fears that the Trump administration's turn toward protectionist trade policies would trigger another severe bout of inflation are overblown. The White House has maintained that such a shift will protect jobs, and make the U.S. more competitive globally.
"The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be paid by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's best and biggest consumer market," the White House's Desai said in a statement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Silvaco Announces CEO Transition
Silvaco Announces CEO Transition

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Silvaco Announces CEO Transition

Walden C. Rhines, Ph.D. appointed as new CEO following departure of Dr. Babak Taheri SANTA CLARA, Calif., Aug. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Silvaco Group, Inc. ('Silvaco') (NASDAQ: SVCO), a provider of TCAD, EDA software, and SIP solutions that enable semiconductor design and digital twin modeling through AI software and innovation, today announced that Dr. Babak Taheri has left the company, effective August 19, 2025, following nearly seven years as Chief Executive Officer, during which he led the company through its initial public offering. The Board has appointed Walden 'Wally' C. Rhines, Ph.D., as the company's new Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately. 'It has been a great honor to work with the team and the board at Silvaco. I am very proud of our successful IPO and the sustained double-digit growth over several years. The 'One Silvaco' team has achieved many accomplishments,' said Dr. Babak Taheri. 'The dedicated team at Silvaco is well-positioned to continue executing its strategic vision and creating shareholder value.' 'Silvaco is at an exciting point in its market opportunity. We sit at the forefront of semiconductor design automation with a unique set of technology offerings and a strong pipeline of business opportunities,' said Rhines. 'On behalf of the Company and the Board, I would like to thank Babak for his leadership for nearly seven years and wish him the very best. I'm honored to step into this role and am committed to maximizing long-term value for our shareholders.' Rhines has served as a member of Silvaco's board of directors and as a member of the audit committee since September 2022. Since March 2020, he has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cornami, Inc., and is Chairman of the board of directors of Qorvo, Inc. (Nasdaq: QRVO). Rhines previously served CEO of Mentor Graphics Corporation from 1993 until its acquisition by Siemens in March 2017. Following the acquisition, Rhines served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Siemens EDA (formerly Mentor Graphics). Rhines holds a B.S.E. in engineering from the University of Michigan, an M.S. and Ph.D. in materials science and engineering from Stanford University, and a M.B.A. from the Southern Methodist University Cox School of Business. 'We are at an exciting point in Silvaco's trajectory, and I have the utmost confidence in Wally leading Silvaco through this next chapter. I also want to thank Babak who has been an incredible asset to the company and has played an instrumental role in all of our recent milestones, including our public listing and acquisitions," said Kathy Pesic, Co-Founder and Chair of the Board. About Silvaco Group, is a provider of TCAD, EDA software, and SIP solutions that enable semiconductor design and digital twin modeling through AI software and innovation. Silvaco's solutions are used for semiconductor and photonics processes, devices, and systems development across display, power devices, automotive, memory, high performance compute, foundries, photonics, internet of things, and 5G/6G mobile markets for complex SoC design. Silvaco is headquartered in Santa Clara, California, and has a global presence with offices located in North America, Europe, Egypt, Brazil, China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam. Learn more at ContactsMedia Relations:Tiffany Behany, press@ Investor Relations:Greg McNiff, investors@ Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.

Australia's Zip soars on strong earnings, outlook, US listing plan
Australia's Zip soars on strong earnings, outlook, US listing plan

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Australia's Zip soars on strong earnings, outlook, US listing plan

(Reuters) -Shares of Australia's Zip surged over 25% on Friday to hit their highest level in more than three years after the buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) company reported higher annual earnings and announced plans for a secondary U.S. listing. The company's cash earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBTDA) more than doubled to A$170.3 million ($109.38 million) in the year ended June 30, higher than a Visible Alpha consensus estimate of A$160 million. The earnings growth came on the back of strong performance of its U.S. business, which delivered a 41.6% growth in total transaction volume (TTV), driven mainly by spend on non-discretionary items. The company's net bad debts were 1.5% of TTV, down from 1.7% last year. Zip said it expects more than 35% growth in its U.S. TTV in fiscal year 2026. According to Citi analysts, that, along with an assumption of 6% revenue growth in Australia, implies cash EBTDA of A$230 million this fiscal, ahead of consensus estimate of A$215.8 million. The company also said it was considering a listing on Nasdaq, while maintaining its primary listing in Australia. "It is expected that a dual listing will support Zip's significant growth opportunity in the U.S. (which now represents over 80% of divisional cash earnings)," Zip said in a statement, adding that it had seen an increase in interest from U.S. investors. Zip shares jumped as much as 25.6% to A$3.920 by 0102 GMT, reaching their highest point since early January 2022. The stock was also the best performer on the ASX 200 benchmark index, which was down 0.3%. Zip shares have gained more than six-fold in value since the end of 2023, when reduced consumer spending, rising interest rates, and heightened regulatory scrutiny sapped confidence in BNPL stocks. ($1 = 1.5569 Australian dollars) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

Chicago Tribune

time12 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

NEW YORK — A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out President Donald Trump's massive financial penalty while narrowly upholding a judge's finding that he engaged in fraud by exaggerating his wealth for decades. The ruling spares Trump from a potential half-billion-dollar fine but bans him and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Trump claimed 'TOTAL VICTORY' in the case, which stemmed from a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. 'They stole $550 million from me with a fake case and it was overturned,' Trump said, echoing his earlier social media post as he addressed police in Washington, D.C. 'They said this was a fake case. It was a terrible thing.' James, a Democrat, focused on the parts of the decision that went her way, saying in a statement that it 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' The ruling came seven months after Trump returned to the White House, his political fortunes unimpeded by the civil fraud judgment, a criminal conviction and other legal blows. A sharply divided panel of five judges in the state's mid-level Appellate Division couldn't agree on many issues raised in Trump's appeal, but a majority said the monetary penalty was 'excessive.' A lower-court judge, Arthur Engoron, had ordered Trump last year to pay $355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organization, including sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., have brought the total to $527 million with interest. 'While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award' to the state, Judges Dianne Renwick and Peter Moulton wrote in one of three opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. They called the penalty 'an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Both were appointed by Democratic governors. Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and the president was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. Donald Trump Jr. celebrated the decision by mocking James, who had periodically posted a running tally of the fraud penalty, with interest. Over a post from James in February 2024, when the tally was nearly $465 million, Trump Jr. wrote: 'I believe you mean $0.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' The five-judge panel, which split on the merits of the lawsuit and Engoron's fraud finding, dismissed the monetary penalty in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for an appeal to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. In the meantime, Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause to prevent any punishments from taking effect. While the Appellate Division dispatches most appeals in a few pages in a matter of weeks, the judges weighing Trump's case took nearly 11 months to rule after oral arguments last fall and issued 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Two judges wrote that they felt James' lawsuit was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any lenders felt cheated, they could have sued Trump themselves, and none did. Another wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial that James had proven Trump engaged in fraud. In his portion of the ruling, Judge David Friedman, appointed by a Republican governor, was scathing in his criticism of James for bringing the lawsuit. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' … but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business,' Friedman wrote. 'The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. At the conclusion of the civil trial in January 2024, Trump said he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' The Republican has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D. Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old and that James had misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump over private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said that while Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, his exaggerations led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store