Chevron Overcomes ExxonMobil to Acquire Hess. Which High-Yield Energy Stock Is the Better Buy Now?
It's been nearly two years since Chevron announced it would acquire Hess.
Guyana is rich with geographically advantaged reserves.
ExxonMobil and Chevron are supporting their high dividend yields with cash flow.
10 stocks we like better than Chevron ›
October 2023 was a big month for oil and gas shake-ups. ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) announced an all-stock merger with exploration and production (E&P) company Pioneer Natural Resources. Chevron (NYSE: CVX) followed suit with a similar-size deal to buy E&P Hess.
ExxonMobil completed its acquisition in May 2024, but it wasn't until July 18, 2025, that Chevron finally announced it had acquired Hess.
Here's why Chevron's deal was delayed, what it means for the investment thesis, and which dividend-paying energy stock is the better buy now.
From adversaries to partners
The most valuable aspect of Hess' business is its 30% stake in the Stabroek Block in offshore Guyana. The other holders are ExxonMobil, with a 45% interest, and Chinese state-owned CNOOC with a 25% stake.
ExxonMobil has been exploring reserves in offshore Guyana since 2008. In 2015, it achieved its first exploration well. Since then, it and the rest of the consortium have ramped up their production -- reaching 500 million barrels of total oil produced from the Stabroek Block in November 2024. The consortium plans to grow production to 1.3 million barrels per day by the end of 2027.
For context, ExxonMobil produced 4.55 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in the first quarter of 2025. Needless to say, Guyana has become one of the company's top producing regions. In fact, it identified Guyana as one of its "advantaged assets," which are high-margin investment opportunities.
Other advantaged assets include the company's onshore exposure in the Permian Basin in Texas and its liquefied natural gas (LNG) portfolio. ExxonMobil plans to have 60% of its production come from the Permian, Guyana, and LNG by 2030.
Given that it had the largest stake in the Stabroek Block, it was in ExxonMobil's best interest to prevent arguably its largest competitor from joining the consortium. It engaged in a lengthy dispute with Chevron, contending that the deal triggered a change-of-control clause. The ruling went in favor of Chevron, and the deal moved forward.
Although ExxonMobil would probably have preferred to partner with a pure-play E&P like Hess rather than a global integrated major like Chevron, the change of ownership won't directly harm ExxonMobil. And Chevron's backing could help the consortium develop the block even faster. As for Chevron, the company gains access to one of the most valuable offshore plays in the world -- rich in reserves with decades of development potential at a low cost of production.
The cash cow playbook
The oil and gas industry experienced a significant downturn in 2014 and 2015. It took years to recover, and then the industry entered yet another downturn in 2020 due to the pandemic. Investors were not happy, and ExxonMobil's and Chevron's stock prices hit multiyear lows, and the companies reported billions in losses that year.
To regain investor confidence, ExxonMobil and Chevron have focused on improving the quality of their production assets. A combination of technological advancements, efficiency improvements, and doubling down on regions with geographic advantages has enabled both companies to reduce their break-even levels, allowing them to generate positive free cash flow even at relatively low oil and gas prices. This advantage aids in forecasting multiyear capital allocation strategies -- including operating expenses, capital expenditures, buybacks, and dividends -- as well as expanding low-carbon investments.
ExxonMobil and Chevron have become much stronger and balanced companies over the years. The former's corporate plan through 2030 forecasts a break-even Brent crude price per barrel of just $30 by 2030 and $165 billion in cumulative surplus operating cash flow even if Brent prices average just $65 per barrel.
Chevron has an even lower breakeven than ExxonMobil, estimated in the low $30 Brent range by consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. The integration of Hess and development of reserves in offshore Guyana should help Chevron grow its production while maintaining a low cost of production.
Two quality dividend stocks at attractive valuations
Having a low cost of production allows ExxonMobil to support its growing dividends at lower oil and gas prices, generating substantial excess cash flow even at mid-cycle prices to repurchase stock and invest in new projects.
ExxonMobil has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years and yields 3.6%, while Chevron has a 38-year streak and yields 4.5%. With both companies expecting steady long-term earnings growth, ExxonMobil's 14.6 price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) and Chevron's 17.4 P/E seem like bargains.
Add it all up, and ExxonMobil and Chevron are both great buys now for value investors looking to boost their passive income.
Do the experts think Chevron is a buy right now?
The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Chevron make the list?
When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,041% vs. just 183% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 858.71%!*
Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!*
The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Daniel Foelber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Chevron Overcomes ExxonMobil to Acquire Hess. Which High-Yield Energy Stock Is the Better Buy Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
OPEC Plus Will Increase Oil Output
Eight countries that belong to the oil cartel known as OPEC Plus said Sunday that they would boost oil production by 547,000 barrels a day beginning in September, the latest in a series of monthly increases that began in April. The move, in effect, reverses a program of 2.2 million barrels a day in output cuts that was put in place in 2023 to tighten supply and prop up the markets. The announcement from OPEC Plus was expected and so may have little impact on prices. 'We expect a limited negative market reaction,' analysts at the investment bank Jefferies said in a note to clients after the announcement. After years of pursuing production restraints, the group, led by Saudi Arabia, is taking advantage of what analysts view as a relatively short-term window in the oil market to boost output. The United Arab Emirates and other countries have chafed at restraints on production that have opened the way for the United States and other producers outside OPEC Plus to pump more oil. In addition, Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing countries appear to have an interest in pleasing President Trump, who wants lower gasoline prices for American drivers. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chevron's Q2 Free Cash Flow Rises - CVX Stock Looks Cheap
Chevron Corp (CVX) reported a 15% increase in free cash flow (FCF) quarter-over-quarter (Q/Q), and following the closing of the Hess acquisition, its FCF outlook is now stronger. Assuming Chevron ups its dividend by 4%, CVX could be at least 10% undervalued. CVX closed at $151.40 on Friday, Aug. 1, after releasing its Q2 results in the morning. This is well off its high of $168.51 on April 1. More News from Barchart The Saturday Spread: How to Use Descriptive Math to Play the Hand, Not the Dealer Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Moreover, as I discussed in a July 6 Barchart article, shorting out-of-the-money (OTM) put options is a great income play here. More on this below. First, let's look at Chevron's results and an updated price target. Strong FCF Results Chevron reported that its adjusted free cash flow (FCF) was $4.9 billion in Q2, up over +16% over last quarter's $4.2 billion adj. FCF, despite a 10% decline in crude oil prices, according to the company. The FCF adjustment adds back to FCF the net changes in working capital and certain acquisition costs, as seen in the table below from pages 2 and 10 of its earnings release: The fundamental point is that Chevron is squeezing out higher amounts of cash from its operations. Now that the Hess acquisition closed on July 18 (i.e., in Q3), management says its FCF outlook has been extended. The net effect is that Chevron is finally covering its huge dividend and share buyback costs. This can be seen in the company's deck presentation table (page 9): It shows that in Q2 adj. FCF of $4.9 billion was $0.6 lower than the $5.5 billion cost of shareholder payments (i.e., $2.9 billion in dividends plus $2.6 billion in share buybacks). Moreover, this could be covered if revenue and FCF margins play out as expected. For example, the Q2 adj. FCF was 10.3% of its $47.6 billion in quarterly revenue. If this improves by 12% to 11.65%, it could cover annual shareholder returns. Here is why. Let's use analysts' $194.5 billion (according to Seeking Alpha's revenue estimates for 2026): 11.65% x $194.5 billion = $22.65 billion adj. FCF $5.5b div and buybacks x 4 = $22 billion shareholder payments Even if it stays flat at 10.3% adj. FCF margins, the figure would be $20 billion, or less than 10% below shareholder payments. Dividend Yield Target Price The bottom line is that investors can expect CVC stock's high dividend yield of 4.52% (i.e., $6.84 dividend per share / $151.40) could fall, pushing CVC stock higher. For example, Chevron has already announced or paid out 3 of 4 quarterly payments at a $1.71 dividend per share (DPS) rate. Since it has consistently raised its dividend over the last 37 years, let's assume the quarterly DPS rises by 4.1% to $1.78 (i.e., $7.11 annual run rate): $1.71 + ($1.78 x 3) = $7.05 next 12 months (NTM) DPS Morningstar reports that the average yield over the last 5 years has been 4.16% and Yahoo! Finance says it's been 4.33%. Therefore, using an average yield of 4.25%, here is a price target: $7.05 / 0.0425 = $165.88 target price = +9.6% upside That is almost 10% higher than Friday's close of $151.40. Moreover, using an expected $7.11 DPS next year, the price target is 10.5% higher: $7.11/0.0425 = $167.29, and $167.29 / $151.40 = 1.105 = +10.5% upside So, on average, we can reasonably expect at least a 10% higher target price or $166.54. Analysts tend to agree. Analysts Agree CVX is Undervalued Yahoo! Finance's survey of 24 analysts has an average of $165.64, and Barchart's survey is $164.35. However, other surveys show higher prices. For example, Stock Analysis says the average of 14 analysts is $168.14, and which tracks recent analyst recommendations, says that 19 analysts have an average of $184.25 per share. The average of these surveys is $170.60. That is an upside of +12.7%, slightly higher than the +10% upside using historical yield metrics. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee this will happen over the next 12 months. For one, the market needs to see if Chevron's free cash flow improves. As a result, one way to play this is to set a lower buy-in price and get paid. This also allows existing investors to make extra income. Shorting OTM Puts In my Barchart article 3 weeks ago, I suggested selling short (i.e., entering a trade to 'Sell to Open' a put contract at any strike price), the $144.00 strike price expiring Aug. 8. This strike price was just less than 3% below the trading price (i.e., out-of-the-money). How did that perform? At the time, the premium received was $2.41 per put contract shorted, which was a 1.67% yield (i.e., $2.41/$144.00 = 0.0167). As of Friday, that premium had decayed to 21 cents in the midpoint. In other words, the investor has made 91% of that 1.67% yield, and the short-play has been successful. It makes sense to roll this over to a new period. For example, look at the Sept. 5 expiry period. It shows that the $167.00 put option, 2.91% out-of-the-money (OTM), has a $2.65 midpoint premium. That gives a short-seller of the $167.00 put strike an immediate yield of 1.80% (i.e., $2.65/$147.00 = 0.0180) over the next month. This gives the short-seller a lower potential buy-in breakeven of $144.35, or 4.6% below Friday's close. For existing investors, this provides additional income. For example, even after rolling the prior trade over to this new expiry period, the net yield is $2.44 (i.e., $2.65-$0.21), or 1.66% (i.e., $2.44/$147.00). So, over the two periods of 7 weeks, the total income earned would be $485 for an average investment of $14,550. That works out to a 3.33% yield for 7 weeks, or an annualized expected return (ER) of over 23.3% (assuming the same yields can be made 7 times a year). The bottom line here is that this is an additional way to play CVX stock for both existing and new investors. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Leave the oil in the ground': Same debates, different country
Guyana, a country of roughly one million people perched on the northeastern corner of South America, is one of the world's fastest growing economies thanks to a super-charged nation-building project: the accelerated development of gigantic offshore oil fields. In just six years, one of the continent's poorest nations has emerged as the world's newest petrostate. The discovery, though, has enraged Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro and revived his government's claims to Guyanese territory in a century-old boundary dispute. These issues of nation-building and sovereignty are familiar to Canadians, so I wanted to talk with a wise Guyanese colleague about their moment, as we contemplate ours. Selwin Asafa George, a 52-year-old entrepreneur, is remarkably thoughtful about what it's going to take for Guyana to embrace this movement towards prosperity, without losing its soul in the process. While the catalyst for accelerating nation-building in our respective countries differs, there is something for Canadians in Guyana's journey. 'This is our moment in the sun,' Selwin readily acknowledges when we virtually connect. Guyanese by birth, Selwin worked as an investment banker in New York City, studied at New York University and then Harvard's Kennedy School of Public Policy, before returning to Guyana in 2005 to take care of the family business. A mid-size enterprise employing over 150 locals, W&T George and Company holds several franchises in the food services and hospitality sector, and owns a portfolio of commercial real estate in Guyana's capital, Georgetown, as well as prime land outside the capital. 'There have been locals suggesting we leave the oil in the ground,' Selwin shares, with a smirk. 'And there have been very influential locals who have at least said to slow the rate at which we are extracting the oil, to give use a better chance, a better deal, to give us time.' Familiar sentiments to an Albertan like me. In Canada, I explain, First Nations remain divided on the merits of some of the nation-building projects pitched by provincial premiers, including, for example, the mining of critical minerals in northern Ontario's Ring of Fire. And despite the obvious need to become less reliant on a single market for Canada's oil — America — the green lobby is unrelenting in its push against the construction of export pipelines to tidewater. In the last decade, I tell Selwin, advocacy campaigns have sucked the energy out of many projects. It's different in Guyana, Selwin reports: 'Where you have strong economic interests, that will prevail.' Between Exxon and Chevron, American companies 'now control the majority of Guyana's oil output … so it's heavily in the interest of the U.S. to protect their economic interests.' (Exxon, operator and owner of 45 per cent of Guyana's Stabroek block, forecasts its output there to nearly double to 1.3 million bpd by the end of 2027. And Chevron now owns 30 per cent of the block.) There's no denying Canada is economically tied to America's hip, yet this conversation with Selwin is a reminder of the choices Canada retains. Foreign companies do invest in Canada's extractive sectors, but domestic ownership remains strong and influential. And while Canadians are struggling to define First Nations treaty rights within Confederation, we don't have another nation actually challenging our sovereignty. Venezuela is actively disputing Guyana's control over the Essequibo region, territory that makes up two-thirds of Guyana's landmass and includes oil and other resources. Selwin has thought deeply about the issues that bubble in nation-building endeavours and he's savvy enough to know what's negotiable. Right now, he's especially focused on one question: Who benefits from Guyana's resource windfall? After the first significant oil discovery in offshore Guyana was made by ExxonMobil, Selwin argued his country should adopt something similar to the Alaska sovereign wealth fund model. 'I believe it is critical that the public remains vigilant,' Selwin wrote then in a Guyanese newspaper, 'and so I urge that we go the path of Alaska by adopting a model of dividends for all. The introduction of the Alaska model of paying dividends to every Alaskan from their oil and gas resources would work wonders to strengthen the good governance model and ensure an engaged populace.' Who benefits? It's a critical question that can stimulate public awareness and buy-in — and one Canadians could spend more time talking about. How many Canadians know oilsands projects contribute roughly 3 per cent of our country's total GDP? How many Canadians understand the mechanics of equalization payments, how wealth is transferred from have to have-not provinces to ensure non-renewable resource bounty is shared? Ultimately, a sovereign wealth fund was created in Guyana but, Selwin reports, the funds have largely been squandered. He did the math at the end of 2024, to see what the outcome could have been if the government of Guyana had heeded his advice. (He's a former investment banker, so his calculations are credible.) The fund would likely have grown to roughly $1.5 billion, he estimates, the equivalent of US$50,000 to $60,000 for every Guyanese citizen, and would continue to grow quickly, he adds. Selwin is encouraging leaders in Guyana to focus not just on the building of physical infrastructure, but on the building of a culture of productivity in the country as well. What's that, I ask. 'That's culture where it's not just about the pay,' he says, it's culture that 'respects the dignity of being productive.' Mayor battling Ottawa over 'really left' housing mandate The Doug Ford Doctrine: 'We really have to flex our muscles' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here.
