logo
Most women in England and Wales report abusive behaviour to them or others, poll finds

Most women in England and Wales report abusive behaviour to them or others, poll finds

The Guardian30-06-2025
A majority of women have direct experience of violence or harassment, or know someone who has suffered it in the last year, a poll has found.
The poll finds little faith in police or government to stem the tide of male violence, and most believe the problem has got worse.
The survey was presented to a private meeting attended by police chiefs and police and crime commissioners just under three weeks ago.
It was conducted by Zencity and based on almost 1,800 female respondents aged over 16 across England and Wales.
The large scale and high frequency of violence against and harassment of women is something law enforcement and the government are trying to get a grip on.
Women were asked: 'In the last 12 months, have any of the following behaviours happened to a woman/girl that you personally know … or have you heard or seen them happening to any woman/girl … (in your daily life) … domestic abuse, sexual harassment, sexual violence, stalking, taking/sharing intimate images without consent.'
Of women surveyed, 69% said they have first or secondhand experience of women being ill treated within the last 12 months.
That includes a majority, 55%, of women aged 55 and over. For women aged 16-34 the figure was 74%, and similar for those aged 35 to 54.
Three out of four women surveyed said violence and harassment was a serious problem, and asked whether it had got worse in the last five years, 42% agreed, 28% disagreed and 30% thought it was the same.
Those who argue the system is failing have battled for years to have the issue taken seriously. A watershed occurred after a Metropolitan police officer kidnapped and murdered Sarah Everard in March 2021 and then Met officer David Carrick was unveiled as a serial sexual offender after the force missed repeated chances to identify him as a threat to women.
The poll found that four out of 10 women do not believe police treat violence and harassment of women seriously, and 16% disagree.
Asked about confidence in key institutions to keep them safe, that is police, the Crown Prosecution Service, the courts and local councils, confidence in police was 34%, and lower for courts and prosecutors at three out of 10, and lower still for councils.
The new police national lead on violence against woman and girls (VAWG), Helen Millichap, said: 'We need to keep these issues at the top of the agenda, and the societal outrage we see in response to these crimes needs to remain. We need to challenge misogynistic views that only serve to drive these crimes.
'Policing has a role to play, and we are up for the challenge, but we are only one part of a wider system that must play their part.
'What I want, is to show the public that progress is happening and for them to be confident that it is happening everywhere.'
Four out of 10 told the survey they would report online harassment, almost the same number said they would not, and more than one in 10 said they would not report a rape or assault by a partner.
Police believe the extent of violence against women is under-reported and the survey said: 'The most common reasons for hesitation [in reporting] are the belief that the police wouldn't act (31%) or wouldn't believe them (25%). These concerns outweigh more practical barriers such as the process being too hard or slow (18%). This indicates that hesitation is driven more by distrust in the outcome than by the mechanics of reporting … Restoring trust that reports will be taken seriously and lead to action is essential to encouraging more women to come forward.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'

Driver pleads GUILTY to killing woman, 22, in 140mph horror crash on Christmas Day as he fled police in his Mercedes
Driver pleads GUILTY to killing woman, 22, in 140mph horror crash on Christmas Day as he fled police in his Mercedes

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Driver pleads GUILTY to killing woman, 22, in 140mph horror crash on Christmas Day as he fled police in his Mercedes

A DRIVER has pleaded guilty to the killing of a 22-year-old woman on Christmas Day in a 140mph horror crash. Evan Forde, 32, was driving his Mercedes in Brent Cross, north London, when he crashed into another vehicle at high speed. 2 He then proceeded to flee from the police on foot in the early hours of the morning on December 25, 2022. Brazilian Maria Carolina Do Nascimento was a passenger in the BMW that Forde crashed into. The young woman tragically passed away at the scene. The accident occurred on a 40mph stretch of road in Hendon Way at around 3.45am. Despite the speed limit, Forde had been driving at speeds of more than 140mph. This resulted in Nascimento's tragic death, despite the London Ambulance Service rushing to the scene and desperately trying to save the girl. Shortly before the fatal crash, police officers on patrol in a marked vehicle had indicated for his car to stop. However, the vehicle drove off from police and there was no pursuit, according to Scotland Yard. Moments later, cops were informed that the same car had been involved in a collision. The occupants of the Mercedes did not stop for the police as they proceeded to flee the scene on foot. Moment unsuspecting painter is sent flying through air in terrifying crash after car comes out of nowhere On Tuesday, Forde appeared at the Old Bailey where he pleaded guilty to causing Ms Nascimento's death by dangerous driving. Members of the victim's family wept in court after he admitted the offence. Defence barrister Tasmin Malcolm said Forde had "always accepted" he was driving the Mercedes. She said: 'Undoubtedly the speed Mr Forde was driving will be an aggravating feature to the court. 'It is important we are satisfied of the accuracy of the material relied on by the Crown.' Prosecutor Frederick Hookway observed that small variations of the speeds involved in the case were unlikely to have an impact given the defendant had reached 'top speeds of over 140mph'. Judge Anthony Leonard KC adjourned sentencing until October 22 and granted Forde continued conditional bail. He told him: "You have pleaded guilty to a very serious charge. "There was perhaps no option other than to do so given the state of the evidence. "However, the fact you pleaded at this stage will be taken into account at sentencing. Previously the Metropolitan Police said it had made a referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct as is routine in such circumstances.

Lenny Scott: Friend of alleged prison officer killer 'felt used'
Lenny Scott: Friend of alleged prison officer killer 'felt used'

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Lenny Scott: Friend of alleged prison officer killer 'felt used'

A man accused of helping to murder a former prison officer wiped away tears in court as he claimed his friend of 15 years "confessed" to the shooting in a phone Scott, 33, was shot six times outside a gym in Skelmersdale, Lancashire, at 19:35 GMT on 8 February 2024. Anthony Cleary, 29, admits dropping off a van containing an electric bike near the scene, but denied knowing his friend, 35-year-old Elias Morgan, would use them as "attack and getaway" vehicles in the shooting - which Mr Morgan denies any involvement in. Mr Cleary told Preston Crown Court the first he knew of the shooting was when Mr Morgan told him "I've done someone". HGV driver Mr Cleary, who denies murder and an alternative count of manslaughter, told the jury he had known Mr Morgan since he was around 13 years old. He said Mr Morgan called him on the afternoon of 7 February 2024 and offered him £150 to move a van to an address in Skelmersdale, a short distance from the gym on Peel Road, using a low-loader truck. He claimed he did not ask Mr Morgan why he needed the van moving and had no idea it was related to any criminal plan - despite accepting he knew Mr Morgan "did not have a nine-to-five" job and that he was a criminal capable of Cleary said the following night, at 23:05 GMT, he got a call from Mr Morgan on WhatsApp. Under questioning from his barrister, Tim Forte KC, Mr Cleary said: "He [Morgan] rang me to say he had done someone in Skem and I needed to get rid of me phone."He said he asked Mr Morgan whether it had anything to do with the van he left there the previous evening, and was told it Forte asked if he believed Mr Morgan at the time, and Mr Cleary said: "He's a bit of a joker, he's always messing around. "But he didn't sound like he was messing around."He said his fears were confirmed when he searched online and found news reports about a shooting in Skelmersdale. Asked how he felt towards his then close friend, Mr Cleary said: "I was fuming. "I don't know the word, like used."He accepted that he had remained in regular contact with Mr Morgan, telling the jury: "If I changed how I acted towards him, he would have changed how he acted towards me."It could have turned into some sort of violence."He told the jury the situation made him feel "trapped". In cross-examination Mr Morgan's barrister, Caroline Goodwin KC, suggested Mr Cleary was "simply gutless" and was attempting to "get yourself out of trouble" by blaming her client. She pointed out that minutes after a supposedly life-changing phone call which implicated him in a murder, Mr Cleary was exchanging Facebook messages with a woman about the purchase of a car. Mr Cleary said he "was not thinking straight" at the time and had simply been dealing with "another problem that I had". Ms Goodwin also highlighted that despite Mr Cleary allegedly being told to "get rid of his phone", he not only carried on using it but that Mr Morgan continued to contact him on that number. She said: "I'm going to suggest if there was a confession and you put two and two together and he said ditch your phone, you would have done. "But you didn't, did you?"Mr Cleary replied: "No."He was also cross-examined by Alex Leach KC, prosecuting, who questioned him about a screengrab of a Google map image he sent to Mr Morgan on the evening of 7 February. He said the map showed the gym on Peel Road, and not the estate where he had left the van. Mr Leach said: "It showed the location where just over 24 hours later, Mr Scott was shot."Mr Cleary said he could not recall why the map was sent. Mr Leach suggested one explanation was it was "just bad luck" that he sent a map of the murder scene to Mr Morgan, who would be accused of the shooting, having driven a van used by the gunman to the murder scene. Mr Cleary denied the alternative, which Mr Leach suggested was that he "knew exactly" what Mr Morgan was planning. The prosecution has alleged Mr Scott's murder was an "act of retaliation" four years after he seized a phone from the prison cell of Mr Morgan at HMP Altcourse in Liverpool. The jury heard data on the phone revealed Mr Morgan was in a sexual relationship with a female prison officer at Altcourse called Sarah Williams, who was later jailed. At the time Mr Scott reported to police and to prison authorities that he had been threatened by Mr Morgan, who the jury heard told the prison officer "I will get you" while making a gun sign. The trial continues. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store