logo
Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY)

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY)

Business Wirea day ago

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP ('Scott+Scott'), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC ('Reckitt' or the 'Company') (OTC: RBGLY), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, 'Defendants'). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Reckitt American Depositary Shares ('ADSs') between January 13, 2021, and July 28, 2024, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), and were damaged thereby (the 'Class'). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: Elevator Constructors Union Local No. 1 Annuity & 401(K) Fund v. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-4708.
Reckitt is a United Kingdom-based, global consumer goods company. To date, over 500 state and federal products liability lawsuits have been filed against Reckitt and its competitor, Abbott Laboratories ('Abbott'), claiming that they failed to adequately warn that premature infants consuming cow milk-based formulas, such as Reckitt's Enfamil and Abbott's Similac, have an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis ('NEC'), a life-threatening intestinal disease that affects premature or low birth weight infants.
The Class Action alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants made misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company's business, financial condition, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to warn investors and consumers: (1) that preterm infants were at an increased risk of developing NEC by consuming Reckitt's cow's milk-based formula, Enfamil; (2) of the attendant impact on Reckitt's sales of Enfamil and Reckitt's exposure to legal claims; and (3) as a result of the above, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
The market began to learn the truth on March 15, 2024, when, in the case captioned Watson vs. Mead Johnson Co., Case No. 21-L-1032 (Ill. Cir. Ct. Oct. 28, 2021), a jury in St. Clair County, Illinois, returned a $60 million verdict in the first NEC lawsuit to be tried to a verdict. The jury found that Mead Johnson was negligent and failed to warn the decedent's mother of the increased risk her preterm infant could develop NEC by consuming cow's milk-based formula. On this news, the price of the Company's ADSs fell $1.87, or nearly 14%, from a closing price of $13.31 per share on March 14, 2024, to a closing price of $11.44 per share on March 15, 2024.
Then, on July 29, 2024, the market continued to learn the truth when, in the case captioned Gill v. Abbot Laboratories, Inc., Case No. 2322-CC1251 (Mo. Circ. Ct. Jun. 23, 2023), a jury in St. Louis, Missouri, concluded that Abbott's specialized formula for premature babies led to a baby developing NEC and awarded the plaintiff $495 million. On this news, the price of the Company's ADSs fell $1.02, or nearly 9%, from a closing price of $11.66 per share on July 28, 2024, to a closing price of $10.64 per share on July 29, 2024.
LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE ON AUGUST 4, 2025
If you purchased Reckitt ADSs during the Class Period and were damaged thereby, you are a member of the 'Class' and may be able to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to apply to be lead plaintiff, a motion on your behalf must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than August 4, 2025. The lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent class members of the Class. You do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in the Class Action. If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member.
If you wish to apply to be lead plaintiff, please contact attorney Nicholas Bruno at (888) 398-9312 or at nbruno@scott-scott.com.
What Can You Do?
You may contact an attorney to discuss your rights regarding the appointment of lead plaintiff or your interest in the Class Action. You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in the Class Action.
About Scott+Scott
Scott+Scott is an international law firm known for its expertise in representing corporate clients, institutional investors, businesses, and individuals harmed by anticompetitive conduct or other forms of wrongdoing, including securities law and shareholder violations. With more than 100 attorneys in eight offices in the United States, as well as three offices in Europe, our advocacy has resulted in significant monetary settlements on behalf of our clients, along with other forms of relief. Our highly experienced attorneys have been recognized for being among the top financial lawyers in 2024 by Lawdragon, WWL: Commercial Litigation 2024, and Legal 500 in Antitrust Civil Litigation, and have received top Chambers 2024 rankings. In addition, we have been repeatedly recognized by the American Antitrust Institute for the successful litigation of high-stakes anticompetitive claims in the United States.
To learn more about Scott+Scott, our attorneys, or complex case resolution, please visit www.scott-scott.com.
This may be considered Attorney Advertising.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cycurion announces continued listing and trading of common stock on Nasdaq
Cycurion announces continued listing and trading of common stock on Nasdaq

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Cycurion announces continued listing and trading of common stock on Nasdaq

Cycurion (CYCU) announces continued listing and trading of its shares of common stock and warrants on Nasdaq. On June 5, the SEC filed a Form 25 notification of removal from listing and/or registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding the Units previously listed and registered by Western Acquisition Ventures Corp, the predecessor company prior to the business combination with Cycurion. Cycurion's shares of common stock and warrants continue to be listed and traded on The Nasdaq Global Market and The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols 'CYCU' and 'CYCUW', respectively. Confident Investing Starts Here:

Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns
Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns

-- CoreWeave Inc (NASDAQ:CRWV) reported a strong debut earnings release as a public company, delivering better-than-expected revenue and robust guidance. Yet, shares fell by 5.4% in Thursday's trading, with investors focusing on the company's aggressive capital expenditure plans. Despite near-term pressure, analysts overwhelmingly reiterated bullish ratings and have significantly raised price targets. They cited rapid AI infrastructure demand and substantial new customer wins as the driving forces behind CoreWeave's long-term positioning. The AI-oriented cloud infrastructure firm delivered first-quarter revenue of $981.6 million, surpassing estimates by over $100 million and growing 420% year-over-year. CoreWeave expects Q2 revenue of $1.06 billion to $1.1 billion and full-year revenue between $4.9 billion and $5.1 billion, well ahead of consensus estimates. However, CapEx guidance of $3 to $3.5 billion for the second quarter, roughly three times expected revenue, led to concerns around free cash flow and dilution risk. Investors reacted negatively to the elevated spending levels despite the otherwise strong results. BofA analyst Brad Sills raised his price target to $76 from $42 while maintaining a Buy rating, calling CoreWeave's Q1 performance validation of its 'best-of-breed' position in the AI infrastructure market. Sills flagged better-than-expected return on net assets and strong contract signings, including a $12 billion OpenAI deal and $4 billion expansion with another large enterprise. While acknowledging CapEx came in above forecasts, he highlighted margin stability when adjusting for IPO-related costs. Mizuho's Gregg Moskowitz lifted his price target to $70 from $46 and reiterated an Outperform rating. He noted that the company's top-line guidance is 'materially' ahead of already strong Street expectations. 'CRWV is positioned to capture meaningful share of an AI cloud provider market growing at a server-melting pace,' Moskowitz wrote. He acknowledged near-term pressure on margins due to accelerated investment but said valuation remains reasonable. Jefferies analyst Brent Thill raised his price target to $80 from $51. He called CoreWeave a 'multi-year winner' based on customer growth and its ability to align CapEx with signed contractual deals. Thill cited new enterprise traction and the deal with OpenAI as evidence of momentum. He said the stock's premium to peers is justified by its unmatched growth profile in a rapidly scaling market. Not all analysts were bullish. Citi reiterated a Neutral rating and $43 target, pointing to mixed profitability and declining RPO. DA Davidson downgraded the stock to Underperform with a $36 target. The firm warned that investors 'may not want to scale this business,' drawing comparisons to the pitfalls of scaling WeWork (OTC:WEWKQ). Still, most analysts see CoreWeave as poised to capitalize on accelerating AI infrastructure demand. As Morgan Stanley's Keith Weiss wrote, 'Accruing large contracts from the most demanding GenAI users provides strong validation of CoreWeave's positioning.' Related articles Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns Constellation Brands jumps as Berkshire raises stake CrowdStrike CEO Kurtz said 'not riding off into sunset', remains large shareholder Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille

Some Zeeland neighbors want to block Mead Johnson expansion
Some Zeeland neighbors want to block Mead Johnson expansion

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Some Zeeland neighbors want to block Mead Johnson expansion

ZEELAND, Mich. (WOOD) — While some property owners have gotten more than $1 million from Mead Johnson for land that the company needs to expand on East Main Street, Margie and Earl Klein aren't selling. Some neighbors say they hope the holdouts will help block the expansion, which they fear will destroy their neighborhood. The Kleins have lived since 1973 in their home about 150 yards west of the baby formula plant — at the heart of the company's controversial expansion plans. They raised two kids there. Her parents lived there in the 1920s. 'We still walk on the hardwood floors that my parents did,' Margie Klein said on Friday. In January, she answered a knock on her door. It was a stranger from Mead Johnson. 'He sat down on our couch and said, 'We want your property.' 'Really?' 'And all of this on both sides of you, and we want everything on Washington Avenue, also,'' she recalled. Mead Johnson, now owned by a United Kingdom-based company, says it needs to modernize. Its $836 million plan calls for an expansion that would mean leveling several homes on the north side of East Main Street, including the Kleins'. The company, which makes Enfamil, released renderings at a meeting this week. The plan requires the city to rezone some of the land from residential to industrial. A hearing is scheduled before the city's Planning Commission Thursday. The company is the third-biggest taxpayer in Zeeland and employs 500 people. 'Mead Johnson Nutrition takes pride in our deep roots in the Zeeland community where we have been producing some of the nation's most trusted baby formula products for more than 100 years,' the company said in a statement released on Friday. 'This investment in modernizing our operations in Zeeland reflects our commitment to sustained job creation and economic growth here in our local community, while also ensuring we maintain industry-leading quality standards and remain a trusted partner in pediatric nutrition.' 'Mead Johnson is important to the community, we want to keep them here,' City Manager Timothy Klunder said. 'We certainly don't want to see a desire where they would have to leave, but we also want then to do it in the right way.' Neighbors have planted signs and launched a website in opposition. Already, the company has bought out most of the Kleins' closest neighbors: One said he sold his home for $600,000 and must be out by July 31. Property records show the company paid $1.5 million for a house and barn a few doors away with an assessed value of less than $300,000. Two properties around the corner went for a combined $3.7 million — about 10 times their assessed value. The Kleins won't say exactly how much Mead Johnson has offered. It's somewhere between $500,000 and $1 million. 'We love our place, but we don't want to sell to Mead Johnson because they are pushy and demanding,' Klein said. Asked if she was holding out for more money, she responded: 'Oh heavens, no.' 'This has nothing to do with the money,' she continued. 'It's the whole principle of the thing. We have lived here for decades. We are so involved in the city of Zeeland, chamber of commerce back in the day. We love this town.' Jonathan Funckes lives on the south side of East Main Street. His home would face the expanded factory. 'I'll be looking at Industrial 2 (zoning),' he said. 'When we bought this, this was all residential.' When Funckes moved in 16 years ago, he said, the neighborhood was mostly rentals, some marred by graffiti. 'We've all in the last dozen years really improved it and brought the neighborhood up and are doing things to improve and make it look better, only to have the city just destroy our property values,' he said. Some neighbors said they fear city leaders have already decided. 'Why would you purchase these (properties) way above tax-assessed values if you didn't have some sort of promise?' Sue VandenBeldt, who lives a few doors away. 'My concern is that the city has sold our neighborhood out. I think my big concern is that we've lost trust in our officials we elected.' As for Jonathan Funckes, 'We're going to be fighting it, but at this point I'm preparing to sell, because I've had enough.' Perhaps, he said, the best hope is the Kleins not selling. 'That's the only saving grace at this point,' he said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store