Iran moves to punish ‘spying' as it proclaims victory over Israel, US
Gilan, Iran – Iranian authorities are moving to allow for tougher punishment of cooperation with foreign governments after a 12-day war with Israel and the United States ended with a ceasefire on Monday.
In a late Tuesday written message addressed to the Iranian nation, President Masoud Pezeshkian claimed a 'historic victory' and said plans to sow 'discord and division' among Iranians would fail.
At the same time, the country's parliament and judiciary are advancing efforts to enforce more serious punishment against any action viewed as damaging to national security.
The Iranian parliament on Monday approved a plan to 'intensify punishment for espionage and collaborators with the Zionist regime [Israel] and hostile countries against national security and interests'.
Alireza Salimi, a member of the presiding board of the parliament, said 'any intelligence or espionage activity or practical action' that would favour Israel, the US and others could, as part of the proposal, be considered an example of 'corruption on Earth' – a crime that carries the death penalty.
The legislation also targets people linked to weapons 'that can kill or create chaos and terror', as well as those who receive money, property or cryptocurrencies in exchange for services to hostile states.
The bill is expected to 'give the security forces a freer hand', according to the lawmaker.
Asghar Jahangir, the Iranian judiciary spokesperson, told state television on Tuesday that the country's current law on espionage is too general, and might not cover the types of espionage Iran currently faces.
He said the current law would cause 'restrictions and limitations' for authorities who wish to punish people arrested during the war with Israel.In Urmia in northwest Iran's West Azerbaijan province, near the borders with Iraq and Turkiye, authorities on Wednesday morning executed three Iranians for collaborating with Israel.
They were convicted of moharebeh or 'waging war against God' and corruption on Earth, after being accused of bringing equipment used to assassinate Iranian officials over the border. The judiciary did not name the assassinated figures, but the executions are believed to be linked to the killing of nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh in November 2020 by Israel.
Iran has executed three other men, in three separate cases linked to spying for Israel, since the start of the war on June 13. More than 600 people were killed by Israeli attacks in Iran during the conflict, with many attacks – particularly those on the first night of bombing, when several Iranian military commanders were killed – linked to Israeli intelligence-gathering operations.
At least 700 arrests were made across the country in the 12 days of the war, according to local media, and authorities are announcing more arrests each day.
Amir Kholfian, the prosecutor general of Khuzestan province, in southwestern Iran bordering Iraq, said on Wednesday that indictments were issued against 23 people for 'sabotage acts' that included 'propaganda against the holy establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran'.
Similar arrests or cases have been announced in many provinces, with some of the latest including 115 arrests in Kermanshah to the west, 53 in Fars to the south, and 36 in Gilan to the north of Iran.
Amnesty International said last week that expedited trials and executions of those arrested for alleged collaboration with Israel 'show how the Iranian authorities weaponise the death penalty to assert control and instill fear among the people of Iran'.
The anti-execution global rights monitor said there is a heightened risk of execution for those already on death row, adding such suspects often undergo 'grossly unfair trials'.Iranian authorities are also trying to crack down on any online activity that can be construed as favouring Israel and the US, including any support for their military strikes on Iran.
Some Iranians online have reported that they received an identical text message from the crime prevention department of the judiciary, telling them that membership in or following any online accounts affiliated with Israel is a crime punishable by law.
'Considering that your number has a record linked with the pages of the Zionist regime, you are warned to remove your supportive comments and likes and immediately leave those pages' or face punishment, the message reads.
And after Israel extensively used explosive quadcopters and other small drones to hit Iranian targets from inside the country, rules governing those aircraft are expected to be toughened as well.
The state-linked Fars news agency reported on Wednesday that the parliament approved the outlines of a plan to set punishments for people who own unlicensed drones.
Lawmakers also emphatically approved a plan to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which Iranian authorities claim acted in a way that paved the way for the US and Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities to take place.
The parliament members again shouted 'death to America' and 'death to Israel' after they voted, and parliament speaker and former military commander Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf vowed that the country will advance its nuclear programme stronger and faster than before.
Members of parliament have also expressed their support if Iran's Supreme National Security Council chooses to leave the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
US media outlets including CNN reported that US military strikes on Sunday failed to destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities buried deep in the mountains, which angered US President Donald Trump, who insisted that the sites were taken out.
The IAEA has said it is unaware of the location of Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, including more than 408kg (900 pounds) of high-enriched 60 percent uranium.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
22 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
An Israeli strike kills 18 Palestinians in central Gaza as turmoil mounts over food distribution
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — An Israeli strike hit a street in central Gaza on Thursday where witnesses said a crowd of people was getting bags of flour from a Palestinian police unit that had confiscated the goods from gangs looting aid convoys. Hospital officials said 18 people were killed. The strike was the latest violence surrounding the distribution of food to Gaza's population, which has been thrown into turmoil over the past month. After blocking all food for 2 1/2 months, Israel has allowed only a trickle of supplies into the territory since mid-May. Efforts by the United Nations to distribute the food have been plagued by armed gangs looting trucks and by crowds of desperate people offloading supplies from convoys. The strike in the central town of Deir al-Balah on Thursday appeared to target members of Sahm, a security unit tasked with stopping looters and cracking down on merchants who sell stolen aid at high prices. The unit is part of Gaza's Hamas-led Interior Ministry, but includes members of other factions. A horrific scene Witnesses said the Sahm unit was distributing bags of flour and other goods confiscated from looters and corrupt merchants, drawing a crowd when the strike hit. Video of the aftermath showed bodies, several torn, of multiple young men in the street with blood splattering on the pavement and walls of buildings. The dead included a child and at least seven Sahmt members, according to the nearby Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital where casualties were taken. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. Israel has accused the militant Hamas group of stealing aid and using it to prop up its rule in the enclave. Israeli forces have repeatedly struck Gaza's police, considering them a branch of Hamas. An association of Gaza's influential clans and tribes said Wednesday they have started an independent effort to guard aid convoys to prevent looting. The National Gathering of Palestinian Clans and Tribes said it helped escort a rare shipment of flour that entered northern Gaza that evening. It was unclear, however, if the association had coordinated with the U.N. or Israeli authorities. The World Food Program did not immediately respond to requests for comment by The Associated Press. 'We will no longer allow thieves to steal from the convoys for the merchants and force us to buy them for high prices,' Abu Ahmad al-Gharbawi, a figure involved in the tribal effort, told the AP. Accusations from Israel Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz in a joint statement Wednesday accused Hamas of stealing aid that is entering northern Gaza, and called on the Israeli military to plan to prevent it. The National Gathering slammed the statement, saying the accusation of theft was aimed at justifying the Israeli military's 'aggressive practices.' It said aid was 'fully secured' by the tribes, which it said were committed to delivering the supplies to the population. The move by tribes to protect aid convoys brings yet another player in an aid situation that has become fragmented, confused and violent, even as Gaza's more than 2 million Palestinians struggle to feed their families. Throughout the more than 20-month-old war, the U.N. led the massive aid operation by humanitarian groups providing food, shelter, medicine and other goods to Palestinians even amid the fighting. U.N. and other aid groups say that when significant amounts of supplies are allowed into Gaza, looting and theft dwindles. Israel, however, seeks to replace the U.N.-led system, saying Hamas has been siphoning off large amounts of supplies from it, a claim the U.N. and other aid groups deny. Israel has backed an American private contractor, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has started distributing food boxes at four locations, mainly in the far south of Gaza for the past month. Thousands of Palestinians walk for hours to reach the hubs, moving through Israeli military zones where witnesses say Israeli troops regularly open fire with heavy barrages to control the crowds. Health officials say hundreds of people have been killed and wounded. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots. A trickle of aid Israel has continued to allow a smaller number of aid trucks into Gaza for U.N. distribution. The World Health Organization said on Thursday it had been able to deliver its first medical shipment into Gaza since March 2, with nine trucks bringing blood, plasma and other supplies to Nasser Hospital, the biggest hospital still functioning in southern Gaza. In Gaza City, large crowds gathered Thursday at an aid distribution point to receive bags of flour from the convoy that arrived the previous evening, according to photos taken by a cameraman collaborating with the AP. Hiba Khalil, a mother of seven, said she can't afford looted aid that is sold in markets for astronomical prices and was relieved to get flour for the first time in months. 'We've waited for months without having flour or eating much and our children would always cry,' she said. Another woman, Umm Alaa Mekdad, said she hoped more convoys would make it through after struggling to deal with looters. 'The gangs used to take our shares and the shares of our children who slept hungry and thirsty," she said. Separately, Israeli strikes overnight and early Thursday killed at least 28 people across the Gaza Strip, according to the territory's Health Ministry. More than 20 dead arrived at Gaza City's Shifa Hospital, while the bodies of eight others were taken to Nasser Hospital in the south.


Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from Critics
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox & Friends Weekend co-host, publicly criticized his former colleague Jennifer Griffin, calling her "about the worst" during a Thursday morning press briefing, taking issue with her reporting and line of questioning on the administration's recent strikes against Iran. His remarks, which also lambasted the media and numerous outlets, have sparked backlash from critics and journalists. Why It Matters The exchange comes days after the U.S. struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Isfahan, Fordow and Natanz. The Trump administration has lauded the military mission, in which B-2 stealth bombers used bunker bombs on Fordow, which is deep underground inside a mountain. Trump has said that the strikes resulted in "total obliteration" of the facility, although the Defense Intelligence Agency's (DIA) preliminary report suggests damage and not complete destruction. The DIA is part of the Pentagon, which Hegseth oversees. Hegseth's rebuke of Griffin comes as members of the Trump administration increasingly use personal attacks in response to dissenting views or media coverage. During the briefing, Hegseth criticized the press for its reporting on the leaked initial damage assessment that cast doubt on the totality of the strikes, echoing sentiments expressed by the president on his social media platform. (L): Jennifer Griffin attends AI Honors hosted by the Washington AI Network at Waldorf Astoria on June 03, 2025 in Washington, DC. (R): Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon,... (L): Jennifer Griffin attends AI Honors hosted by the Washington AI Network at Waldorf Astoria on June 03, 2025 in Washington, DC. (R): Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Thursday, June 26, 2025, in Washington. Morefor Haddad Media/ AP Photo/Kevin Wolf What To Know On Thursday, during the question and answer portion of the briefing, Griffin, Fox News' chief national security correspondent, asked Hegseth, "Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow mountain, or some of it, because there were satellite photos that showed more than a dozen trucks there two days in advance—are you certain that none of the highly enriched uranium was moved?" Uranium enrichment increases the concentration of uranium-235, the isotope necessary to sustain a nuclear chain reaction used in both power generation and nuclear weapons. The process is central to weapons development, which the U.S. and Israel accuse Iran of pursuing, though Tehran insists its nuclear program is solely for energy purposes. The comment comes after the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said, "We do not have information on the whereabouts of this material" in reference to 900 pounds of potentially enriched uranium that Iranian officials said had been removed ahead of the strikes. Grossi said the comments on Fox News The Story with Martha MacCallum on Tuesday. Hegseth responded to Griffin first stating, "of course we are watching ever single aspect," and then took a jab at the veteran journalist, saying, "Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally." Griffin, who appeared shocked, responded by pointing out her reporting on the B-2s and the mission as a whole, adding, "So, I take issue with that." Many have called out Hegseth's response to Griffin and noted her storied journalist background, with another former Fox colleague Brit Hume saying it was an undeserved "attack." Newsweek reached out to Fox New's press team for comment via email on Thursday, and they directed Newsweek to Hume's comments on the matter. During the press briefing, he accused the media of twisting "half-truths" due to what he described as a deep-seated desire to "cheer against Trump so hard," telling the press room it's "in your DNA" to root against the president. Trump applauded the press conference, writing on Truth Social, "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen. The Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!" What People Are Saying Brit Hume, Fox News Channel's chief political analyst, said on Thursday: "I'd like to say a word if I may, Dana, about Jennifer Griffin, who was attacked by the Defense Secretary today. An attack she certainly in my view did not deserve. Her professionalism, her knowledge, her experience at the Pentagon is unmatched. I have had and still have the greatest regard for her. The attack on her was unfair." Ron Filipkowski, the editor-in-chief of the left leaning and Trump-critical MeidasTouch, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Hegseth even attacks the Fox correspondent. This whole thing is just attacking the media." Daniel Koh, former deputy assistant to the president and deputy director of the White House office of intergovernmental affairs, wrote in an X post on Thursday: "What an embarrassment for our country. @JenGriffinFNC— well-respected across the aisle — asked a fair question re: actions in Iran. She handled @PeteHegseth's absurd response with far more professionalism than he showed her. If a question shakes him, he can't handle the job." Brian Krassenstein, who has over 900,000 followers on X, wrote: "Fox News Reporter Jennifer Griffin just asked an incredibly important question and Hegseth completely loses it, going off on is better than this!" Republicans Against Trump wrote on X: "What a jerk." What Happens Next More detailed intelligence on the impact of the strikes is expected to be released in the coming days, as officials assess the extent of the damage.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pete Hegseth's news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answering
Pete Hegseth's angry news conference, where the US defence secretary roundly abused those media outlets and individuals who didn't agree with him, certainly told us one thing. That when reliable information eventually emerges from the battle damage assessment of the US attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant, it won't be accepted by everyone. The whole issue has suddenly become politically toxic in Washington and will doubtless be fed into the spin dryer of vitriolic commentary and assertion that has been the most stand-out feature of this second Trump administration. But what we did find out from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Dan Caine, was that the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs had been designed in some secrecy with exactly this sort of target in mind. Trump-Iran live: We also learned they all worked as per the test simulations, and that 12 were fired at six separate targets at Fordow and another two at a single target at the Natanz nuclear facility. But over how to characterise the damage done in these attacks is really just a semantic spat. The two key questions are rather different. Firstly, will the Iranians decide to give up their quest for a nuclear weapon as a result of this attack, as the Syrians did in 2007 when the Israelis destroyed their Al Kibar nuclear reactor? Or else will they go hell for leather for a nuclear weapon, as Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did after the Israelis destroyed his nuclear reactor in 1981? Read more: And secondly, if the Iranians decide to go again for a nuclear weapon, how long will it be before they are back at the nuclear threshold, where they were less than a month ago? Will it be within a year? Or five years? Or longer? When we have an answer to those two questions, then we can put some real perspective on whether the US bombing has really been a success.