Florida Senate targets 'high stakes' testing
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - The Florida Senate on Thursday passed a wide-ranging education bill that includes eliminating a requirement that high-school students pass algebra and language-arts tests to earn standard diplomas.
Senators unanimously approved the measure (SB 166), which would represent a major change after years of Republican leaders saying test requirements are an important part of evaluating student performance and holding schools accountable. Some senators, however, said Thursday it was time to move away from "high stakes" testing.
"If all they (students) learn how to do is take a test, then I think we have failed in our education system," Senate Education Pre-K-12 Chairman Corey Simon, a Tallahassee Republican who is sponsoring the bill, said.
Halfway through this year's legislative session, it remains unclear whether the House will take up the proposal.
Under current law, students must pass Algebra 1 and English-language arts standardized tests to earn standard diplomas. The bill would require that a student's performance on the English-language arts assessment make up 30 percent of the student's course grade — similar to an already-existing requirement for Algebra 1.
Among other things, the bill would make a change in requirements for third-grade students to be promoted to fourth grade. It would expand what are known as "good cause exemptions" for students who do not meet a test requirement.
Many Republican leaders, dating back to when Jeb Bush was elected governor in 1998, have said testing is a critical part of measuring student and school performance.
But Simon pointed to changes that have occurred in recent years, including a decision in 2022 by lawmakers and Gov. Ron DeSantis to use what is known as a "progress monitoring" system that tests students three times a year to measure how they are advancing. That decision eliminated the Florida Standards Assessments standardized tests.
Simon said the progress-monitoring system gives educators years to evaluate students, as opposed to relying on individual tests to determine whether they should get diplomas. He said progress monitoring provides accountability.
Senators pointed to easing what Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, D-Orlando, described as "so much stress and anxiety around these standardized tests." Simon said the bill would bring balance.
"Its focus is the total child, not just the child who's going to be able to take a test," Simon said.
But as the bill moved through Senate committees, the Foundation for Florida's Future, an influential education group that Bush founded, opposed the measure.
"Public school deregulation remains a worthy goal, but reducing high school graduation requirements and weakening the state's fourth grade promotion policy isn't the way to get there," Patricia Levesque, executive director of the foundation, said in a February statement. "These proposals will make it harder for parents and teachers to know if kids are reading at grade level or if they're ready to take the next step after high school."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' Michael R. Blood, The Associated Press Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio


Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's World Is 'Fracturing,' Former Giuliani Associate Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lev Parnas, a former associate of Rudy Giuliani, is warning that President Donald Trump's world is "fracturing" amid Elon Musk's rebuke of his sweeping spending bill and other recent policy moves. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment on Wednesday. Why It Matters The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a key avenue for Republicans to advance the White House's agenda following the widespread GOP victories in the November election. Key Republican holdouts in the House and Senate have voiced opposition to the bill, citing concerns that it would increase the national debt, among other worries. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday, former Department of Government Efficiency chief Musk bashed the piece of legislation, saying, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk doubled down in another X post on Wednesday: "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS." What To Know In a Substack article published on Wednesday, Parnas mentioned Musk's recent shift against the president's beloved legislation. "I've been warning you for months now — there are real cracks forming inside Trump's world. And not just little disagreements behind the scenes," Parnas wrote. "The latest — and loudest — break came from Elon Musk." Parnas said that Musk was "paraded around the White House" in the first few months of Trump's second term, but the Tesla billionaire is no longer "playing" along. The former Giuliani associate is a Ukrainian American businessman who was convicted in 2021 of fraud and campaign finance crimes. He was then sentenced to 20 months in prison. "I've seen how this works from the inside," Parnas wrote. "When loyalty turns to silence, and silence turns to defiance — it's over. The myth of Trump's control starts to collapse." "But Elon is just the loudest crack. The truth is, Trump's empire is fracturing on every front," he added. Parnas went on to note that policy decisions, such as tariffs, praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the acceptance of a Qatari airliner, are also causing cracks in Trump's world. "And I'm telling you now: the very foundation of Trump's power — fear and obedience — is crumbling," Parnas wrote. "Elon might be the first to break publicly, but he won't be the last. There are lawmakers. There are donors. There are insiders. I promise you, they are rattled. And some of them are looking for a way out." Lev Parnas testifies during a House Oversight and Accountability Committee hearing on March 20, 2024, in Washington, D.C. Lev Parnas testifies during a House Oversight and Accountability Committee hearing on March 20, 2024, in Washington, People Are Saying President Donald Trump, Monday on Truth Social: "So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,' but what nobody understands is that it's the single biggest Spending Cut in History, by far! But there will be NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid." Trump continued: "In fact, they will be saved from the incompetence of the Democrats. The Democrats, who have totally lost their confidence and their way, are saying whatever comes to mind — Anything to win! They suffered the Greatest Humiliation in the History of Politics, and they're desperate to get back on their game, but they won't be able to do that because their Policies are so bad, in fact, they would lead to the Destruction of our Country, and almost did." The president concluded, "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday: "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion." What Happens Next Trump has set a deadline for Senate Republicans to pass the bill and have it on his desk before July 4. It is unclear whether Republican senators will garner enough votes to get it done.


CBS News
20 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump administration moves to pull California high-speed rail funding after DOT review
The Trump administration is once again seeking to end federal funding for California's high-speed rail project, following a lengthy review of the state's progress that found "no viable path" to completion. In a 315-page compliance review released Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Railroad Administration detailed the cost overruns and missed deadlines that have plagued the state's plans to build a high-speed rail link from the San Francisco Bay Area to Los Angeles, which was approved by voters in 2008. FRA Acting Administrator Drew Feeley said in a letter to California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri that the authority was in default of its agreement with the federal government to obtain $4 billion in funding for projects that could deliver passenger rail by 2033. Feeley said the FRA would not continue to commit taxpayer dollars to a "Sisyphean endeavor" that currently is a fraction of what was promised in 2008. Rendering of a California high-speed rail train California High-Speed Rail Authority The initial proposal was for the project to be completed by 2020 for $33 billion. However, costs for just the first segment of the project - a 171-mile section from Merced to Bakersfield in the Central Valley - have ballooned to $35 billion, with a goal to begin service by the end of 2030, according to the CHSRA. "What started as a proposed 800-mile system was first reduced to 500 miles, then became a 171-mile segment, and is now very likely ended as a 119-mile track to nowhere," said Feeley. "In essence, CHSRA has conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time." It has been estimated that another $100 billion will be needed to complete the route from Los Angeles to San Francisco. In February, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy ordered the review of the project, long targeted by Republican lawmakers and President Donald Trump, to determine whether to commit $4 billion promised by the Biden administration. Mr. Trump also targeted the project in his first term, halting about $1 billion in federal funding that was later restored and increased by the Biden administration. Duffy called the project a "boondoggle" in a statement Wednesday, saying the administration would pull the $4 billion it authorized for the project unless the CHSRA can prove within 37 days that the project is still viable. "CHSRA is on notice — If they can't deliver on their end of the deal, it could soon be time for these funds to flow to other projects that can achieve President Trump's vision of building great, big, beautiful things again," said Duffy. In a statement on Wednesday, a CHSRA spokesperson said it strongly disagreed with the FRA's conclusions, calling them misguided and not reflective of the project's progress. The statement said the agency would correct the record in a formal response to the FRA's notice. "While continued federal partnership is important to the project, the majority of our funding has been provided by the state," said the spokesperson. "To that end, the Governor's budget proposal, which is currently before the Legislature, extends at least $1 billion per year in funding for the next 20 years, providing the necessary resources to complete the project's initial operating segment." In January, the CHSRA released an economic impact report saying the $13 billion spent so far on the high-speed rail project created nearly 15,000 jobs, $8.3 billion in labor income, and $21.8 billion in total economic output. Overall, the entire build-out of the project would create 1,034,000 job-years of employment and total economic activity of $221.8 billion, the CHSRA said. In a statement Wednesday, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) called Duffy's remarks about the high-speed rail project "a rejection of the future." "It is unfortunate that the Secretary has misrepresented the facts and lacks understanding of how California High-Speed Rail promotes commerce, improves quality of life for Californians and creates good-paying jobs - while also lowering the cost of housing by shortening the distance to commute from home to work," said Pelosi. "With his statement, it is clear the Secretary is either trying to mislead or has been misled on this issue." Rep. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose) called the Trump administration's move to cut CHSRA funding "partisan theatrics" that seek to derail clean transportation. "It's shameful that some lawmakers would support taking critical infrastructure dollars away from their own communities. California already sends $81 billion more to Washington than it gets back. Now, they want to give away another $4 billion," Cortese said in a statement. This is a project that will unlock major employment access across the Tri-Valley and beyond. The Central Valley is the top agricultural producer in the country - it deserves 21st-century infrastructure, and should not be neglected. But state Sen. Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield) commended Duffy for issuing the notice to end CHSRA's federal funding. "For years, I've called for ending California's high-speed rail to nowhere, and the DOT's 310-page report delivered by Secretary Duffy slams its delays, mismanagement, and billions in wasted federal funds," said Grove in a prepared statement. "Let's redirect these taxpayer funds to real infrastructure, not this disaster that won't be completed before our grandkids retire." An Emerson poll published in February showed 54% of Californians still support high-speed rail, despite the cost overruns. California's Senate Transportation Committee has said federal funding is only a small fraction of the project's budget.