Peers who ‘make great sacrifices' hike their own overnight allowance by a fifth
Members of the unelected chamber, who Parliament heard 'make great sacrifices', waved through the allowance increase of more than a fifth without a vote.
Changes made to the remittance system last year enabled peers living outside the capital and attending the House of Lords to claim £100 towards the cost of 'hotels, clubs or similar accommodation' on production of receipts.
This was on top of the daily attendance payment that can be claimed of up to £361 and travel expenses.
The overnight allowance was automatically uprated in line with inflation to £103 a night and after approval by peers will now swell to £125 – a 21% rise.
In a further change to the system, a payment will also be made available to contribute towards other London accommodation costs that may be incurred to attend sittings at Westminster, such as for those who rent or own a property that is not their main address.
This has been set at £63 or half the overnight allowance after rounding up.
Outlining the proposals in Parliament, Lords leader Baroness Smith of Basildon said the existing overnight rate of £103 'is not a realistic reflection of the cost of hotels across the capital'.
As such the House of Lords Commission, on which she sits, recommended this was increased to £125-a-night.
Lady Smith added: 'As previously, claims are linked to attending the House on a sitting day, and receipts must be provided.'
On the proposed flat-rate allowance for alternative accommodation in London, the Cabinet minister said: 'This will again be tied to attendance in the House, with a robust system of verification.
'For members whose main address is outside London, they would be able to claim £63-per-night to spend at a designated property in Greater London where they stay and are responsible for the costs.
'To claim, peers must have stayed in the property the day before or the day after attending the House, and the finance team will require documentation to support the claim.'
Her Conservative counterpart Lord True, who when in Government introduced the overnight allowance last year, said: 'It is always difficult to strike a balance, and I think that the commission… has struck a reasonable balance which will support people who come to this House from all over the country, who wish to work hard on behalf of the House and on behalf of the country.'
He added: 'There is a lot of loose talk outside this House about people in this House being lazy and lining their pockets.
'You do not become rich by becoming a member of the House of Lords. Many people here make great sacrifices.
'We should not claim that we are poor or that we are underprivileged, but it is right that the House makes provision to enable those of us who come here to do a hard day's work to enable us to do so in the most reasonable fashion.
'Obviously, there is a duty on us to behave with honesty and clarity, as we all do and will all do, I have no doubt, under these new proposals. I support them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
UK government must provide certainty to Troubles victims, Sinn Fein says
John Finucane was commenting after he and party vice president Michelle O'Neill met Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn in Belfast to discuss legacy issues. Since taking office last year, the Labour government has pledged to repeal and replace some of the provisions of the contentious Legacy Act that was introduced by the last Conservative government, and bring forward a revised framework for dealing with cases linked to the Troubles. The Irish government has been involved in the process, and political leaders in Dublin have said intensive engagement is ongoing to see if a 'landing zone' can be arrived at in the coming weeks. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 halted scores of civil cases and inquests into Troubles deaths and also offered conditional immunity to perpetrators of conflict-related crimes in exchange for their co-operation with a new investigatory and truth recovery body. The Act was opposed by all the main political parties in Northern Ireland, the Irish government and many victims' representative groups. In 2023, the Irish government initiated an interstate legal case against the UK in the European Court of Human Rights, claiming the Legacy Act breached the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The case remains active, with ministers in Dublin wanting to see how Labour resolves its concerns over the legislation before any decision is taken to withdraw the action. Mr Benn's engagement with Sinn Fein on Wednesday was part of a round of discussions with the main Stormont parties. Alliance leader Naomi Long and deputy leader Eoin Tennyson also had a meeting at the NIO offices in Belfast city centre on Wednesday. The UUP held an online meeting with Mr Benn while the SDLP's discussions took place on Tuesday. The DUP will hold a meeting with the Northern Ireland Secretary at a later date. After the Sinn Fein meeting, Mr Finucane said there was a need for families to have a route to seek truth and justice. 'Today was an opportunity for us to reiterate and speak on behalf of those families that have been treated disgracefully by the Legacy Act and that have been left in limbo really since Labour came into government last July,' he told reporters. 'Those families who have had their inquests halted, those families who have uncertainty and who, after many years, still find themselves in a position where they don't know if they will receive truth and justice.' Mr Finucane said he and Ms O'Neill also raised the case of murdered GAA official Sean Brown. Mr Benn has applied for a Supreme Court appeal on judicial rulings in Belfast that compel him to establish a public inquiry into the 1997 murder by loyalist paramilitaries. Mr Brown, 61, the then-chairman of Wolfe Tones GAA Club in the Co Londonderry town of Bellaghy, was ambushed, kidnapped and murdered as he locked the gates of the club in May 1997. No-one has ever been convicted of his killing. Mr Finucane said: 'We made it very clear in the meeting that on behalf of Sean Brown's family that there needs to be a full public inquiry established and announced without any further delay. 'We talked about the fact that five High Court judges here have endorsed consistently the family's position and we criticised without any equivocation his (Mr Benn's) decision to take this family, to take Bridie Brown (Mr Brown's 87-year-old widow) and her family to London for an appeal.' Alliance leader Ms Long described her meeting with Mr Benn as 'constructive'. 'We're very conscious of the impact that the legacy process and lack of a formal and comprehensive legacy process has had on victims, and our priority in all of this is to ensure that victims' families' rights and needs are properly respected in that process,' she said. 'We're on record as having said that we don't believe that the Legacy Act as passed by the last government is fit for purpose, and the courts agreed with us in that regard. 'I would have preferred if that Legacy Act had been repealed and replaced (in full) and we have said that. However, that's not the space we're in, and so what we are doing now is trying to ensure that whatever the Secretary of State brings forward is a clean and fresh start in terms of how we deal with legacy and one that puts the victims at the heart of all that we do.' Ms Long, who is Stormont's Justice minister, said achieving 'consensus' on a new framework was key. 'We're not in that space yet, but I remain hopeful that there is a possibility we could be in that space, and I think that that would be the best outcome for everyone,' she said. 'This being a contested space where nothing progresses, where nothing moves forward, is not good for families. It's not fair on them that they are constantly at the whim of political change. What we need now is substantive progress.' Ahead of Wednesday's meetings, Mr Benn said the Government was committed to finding a system 'capable of delivering for all families who are seeking answers around the loss of their loved ones'. 'I am continuing to work with all of the Northern Ireland parties over what should be included in that legislation,' he said. 'It is important that new legacy arrangements are capable of commanding the confidence of families and of all communities.'
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
GOP bill for Trump's agenda would add $2.4 trillion to the debt, budget office says
WASHINGTON — The sweeping Republican bill for President Donald Trump's domestic agenda is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt, according to a new estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. It is slightly higher than an earlier version of the bill, which the CBO projected to add $2.3 trillion in new debt. The long-awaited new score factors in a series of last-minute revisions GOP leaders made to placate holdouts before the House passed the legislation last month. The changes include a higher state and local tax (SALT) deduction and a provision that triggers the Medicaid work requirements sooner than the original legislation did. Overall, CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation found that over a 10-year period, the legislation would decrease revenues by $3.7 trillion, while cutting net spending by $1.3 trillion — for a total of $2.4 trillion in new red ink. The legislation is now in the hands of the Senate, where top Republicans want to pass a revised version by July 4. It is unclear what changes they will make or how those revisions would impact the deficit. The score contradicts claims by the White House and GOP leaders that the bill won't worsen the national debt. They have highlighted the spending while downplaying the tax cuts and extensions that affect the long-term budget outlook. And it emboldens new criticism by Trump's former billionaire adviser Elon Musk, who excoriated the bill Tuesday as a "disgusting abomination," citing the increase in the debt.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Concerns raised over Presiding Officer meeting with Chinese official
Alison Johnstone is set to meet with the Chinese official today (Wednesday), with Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie writing a letter urging her to speak up. The party, who Johnstone was an MSP for after the 2021 Holyrood election before standing down to become Presiding Officer, also highlighted the date the meeting is taking place. This is because the meeting is taking place on the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. READ MORE: Labour MPs visit Israel on lobbying trip in middle of Gaza genocide On June 4 1989, hundreds of protesters were murdered, and thousands injured or arrested by the Chinese military. In the letter, Harvie said holding these sorts of meeting is 'consistent' with Johnstone's role. But he added: 'Where such meetings are required, I would trust that the human rights issues are always addressed directly in discussions. "This is not only important in relation to inter-governmental meetings; as a democratic body it is important that the Parliament itself speaks up for democratic values, especially when meeting with regimes which suppress pro-democracy movements.' Harvie went on: 'Additionally, in this particular instance I am sure you will also be aware that today is the anniversary of the anti-democratic violence generally known as the Tiananmen Square massacre. "I was extremely surprised that this particular meeting should have been timed to coincide with the anniversary of such a violent assault against pro-democracy campaigners. 'I am asking for your assurance that you have made clear, or that you will make clear, to the Consul General the Scottish Parliament's commitment to human rights and democracy, and the international community's longstanding call for a re-evaluation of the Chinese Government's position on the use of excessive and lethal force against legitimate protest on June 4th 1989, including justice for the perpetrators and reparations for the victims.'
