Property investors: It's not time to break up yet
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
Calls for New Zealanders to break up with property investment and focus instead on investing in more productive assets such as growth companies are missing the point, says an economist at one property investment firm.
Jeremy Williamson, head of private wealth and markets at Craigs Investment Partners, said there was momentum building for a
move away
from the country's "love affair with property and property investing".
"New Zealand is always going to have an affinity with property investment but there are so many benefits for us as a country if we can turn the dial away from it, into more productive parts of the economy."
He pointed to the returns that were possible from investing in the sharemarket.
"If you put $100 into a New Zealand house 30 years ago it would be worth nearly $600. If you put it in New Zealand shares, it would be $1100."
But Ed McKnight, property economist at Opes Partners, said that was ignoring the power of leverage.
Because people only put a deposit in to the purchase of a property, and borrow the rest, it can mean bigger returns.
"If you compare a standard property index or prices to shares, shares increase in value faster than houses. But houses can help you grow your wealth faster than shares… it comes down to the debt, the mortgage.
"It's a double-edged sword. Whenever you use a mortgage to invest, whether in a house or business it makes your returns larger, which can either be good if the value increases, or it can be bad if the value decreases.
"That's the reason why, if you put a 20 percent deposit into a house and your house value goes down by 20 percent you've lost your entire deposit at least on paper until the asset recovers in price.
"But if you put 20 percent into a house and the value goes up 20 percent, you've doubled your money. I call it the mortgage magnifier effect. The bigger the mortgage you use, the larger your return compared to the market return.
"So property doesn't go up in value as fast but it can be a better wealth builder because you can borrow against it."
He said it was also not accurate to say that property was not a productive investment.
While it would not grow the economy if an investor bought a house and sat on it, he said, people who were buying new were encouraging economic activity.
"The builder or developer is taking an older house and building a new one, it drives the economy forward. You have people building houses and nice, new, warm dry homes for tenants.
"Even if you are buying old properties, many investors do them up. That's economic activity, taking something that might be a bit run down and you're improving the quality of the New Zealand housing stock, you're spending money at Bunnings or Mitre 10, it means plumbers and electricians get jobs. It's not true to say property investors don't add anything to the economy."
He said simply buying and selling existing shares did not add to the economy, either.
"Because buying a share in a company doesn't mean that the money goes to the company for investment. If you buy a share in NZME, the money goes to the person I bought the share off, not the company itself.
"Even in IPOs the money sometimes goes to the founders. Only a small fraction of My Food Bag's IPO was earmarked for investment. A large part went to paying out the founders. So share investments aren't always as 'productive' as the average reader might think.
"Though if more people invest in shares, then there is more money available when companies do raise money for further investment. Similarly, property is more productive than non-property people give it credit for. Many investors don't just buy and sell houses. They build new ones, or do them up. This improves the housing stock in New Zealand and does contribute to higher GDP and a higher standard of living."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Department of Conservation to hike fees to visit sub-Antarctic islands
Wandering Albatross chicks on nests on Antipodes Island in the New Zealand sub-Antarctic Islands. Photo: Andris Apse The cost of visiting the sub-Antarctic islands will significantly increase, as the Department of Conservation proposes hiking its fees for the first time in a decade. About 1500 tourists visit the islands each year - most of them sailing with one of the six cruise operators who hold permits. Documents released under the Official Information Act revealed the Visitor Impact Management fee could more than double from $405 (excluding GST) per tourist to just over $1000 by the 2027/28 season. An independent review of the sub-Antarctic entry permit and concession fees recommended significantly increasing them to recover costs associated with tourism and to reflect market value. The concession activity fee would also jump from $30 per person to $171 - a more than five-fold increase. A long-time tourism operator said the increase and timeframe came as a shock. RNZ has approached DOC for comment. The documents showed the review into two of the five fees paid by concessionaires - expedition operators - was commissioned at the end of last year, with the final report delivered in June. "The review found the concession activity fee, last reviewed in 2015, was not at market value and that the entry permit VIM fee, last reviewed in 2014, was not appropriately recovering DOC costs for managing cruise ships visiting the islands," DOC said. "The review recommended DOC markedly increase both fees and DOC approved the recommended increases to fees on 30 June 2025." DOC said the concession fee contributed to general track and hut maintenance, and pest control, while the VIM went directly into costs related to managing the sub-Antarctic islands. The report said the average annual cost of managing the islands was about $6.4 million, of which $1.5 million could be recovered by the VIM. A DOC memo said the updated fees were a "significant increase for tourist operators, so it will be crucial to discuss the new fees further with them". "Concessionaires have already priced and are advertising trips through to the 2026/27 season." While operators had been advised of the review in September 2024 - and therefore could have made provisions - it said they may be surprised as "they can't reasonably have predicted the extent of change". Commercial director of long-time operator Heritage Expeditions Aaron Russ said he was concerned about the short-time frame and hoped to have a discussion with DOC before the fees kicked in. He said the sharpness of the increase was unexpected and he was disappointed that there hadn't been more consultation beforehand. "It was probably shock in the first instance, the degree of the increases as significant as the immediate nature of the increases. We organise and schedule our voyages 2-3 years in advance. "DOC's well aware of that scheduling timeframe, so the increases that have come about for the upcoming season are exceptionally short notice." Russ said the company was upfront with customers about the fees and collected them on DOC's behalf. He said he wanted to have a meeting with DOC to discuss the changes and better understand where the money was going, before informing clients. Russ said visitor levies should contribute to New Zealand's conservation, but were only one part of the picture. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Alcohol sale hours need to be reduced after reform u-turn
Proposed changes would have reduced off-licence sale hours from 16 hours to 12 a day. Photo: ABC News / Mitchell Woolnough The Salvation Army says it sees the harm caused by alcohol every day, and wants the government to revisit plans to tighten the hours bottle stores and supermarkets can sell alcohol. A leaked cabinet paper showed the government scrapped plans to reduce the hours alcohol could be sold to focus instead on making business easier for the alcohol industry. Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee planned to reduce off-licence sale hours - which are now 7am-11pm - to only 12 hours, from 9am, in reforms to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. She said that could have prevented 2400 violent crimes a year, but later versions of the paper showed the reform would now focus on reducing the regulatory burden. Salvation Army social policy and parliamentary unit director Dr Bonnie Robinson said that came as a surprise. "We don't know why we've ended up with a draft cabinet paper, which looks quite different to what we were expecting," she said. "Certainly, the alcohol industry lobbies the government and the alcohol industry does have a lot of resources behind it." Robinson said the u-turn was concerning, given alcohol-related harm currently costs the country $9.1 billion a year. "We're really concerned, if we're not going to take this opportunity to reduce harm from alcohol," she said. "We see the harm from alcohol every single day at our services. "We know that we need to do more to reduce the harm from alcohol, so it will be disappointing, if we miss this opportunity to really take some steps that can do that." The organisation planned to urge government to reconsider. "We'll certainly be writing to the minister and urging her to make the reforms focused on alcohol harm reduction, in particular, if we can get back to that reduction of sales hours," Robinson said. "We'll be talking to other ministers, because this is a public health issue. It's also a crime and family violence issue, it goes across a lot of issues that government is concerned about." More than 20 councils across the country were working on their own local alcohol policies and, so far, three had come into force in Auckland, Christchurch and Hastings, where 9pm closing applied to off-licence sales. Other councils had abandoned plans to embark on their own local alcohol policies, including Grey District, which cited the cost involved and threat of industry challenge. Hamilton City Council ditched plans to change the hours alcohol could be sold, after receiving three appeals, including from Progressive Enterprises. At the time, council said negotiations failed to resolve the issues and it abandoned its policy, after spending more than $200,000 on staff and legal time. In 2022, Hamilton councillors unanimously voted in support of a private members bill, which aimed to put more controls around the sale of liquor. Robinson said a law change reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act to tighten alcohol sales would take the burden off councils. "It strengthens the arm of councils, when they also want to make adjustments in their communities," she said. "Without that, each council does have to do that policy themselves. "It's very inefficient in terms of lawmaking and, for smaller councils particularly, it can be very expensive for them to do it." She said Rotorua was one example of a city affected by alcohol-related harm, because 60 percent of bottle shops were in the highest deprivation suburbs. Those suburbs represented 11 percent of Rotorua's population, but accounted for one-third of hospital admissions attributable to alcohol. "Behind those stats are real people, who are suffering, because they are being harmed by alcohol and addiction to alcohol," Robinson said. "We do have the opportunity to reduce that harm. It's not going to eliminate it, but we can at least make some dents in that harm, if we do some really good reform, especially around trading hours." She said evidence internationally showed reducing trading hours helped reduce harm, by reducing the availability of alcohol, particularly in vulnerable communities. "The less alcohol is available, the less harmful drinking we have and the less harm from alcohol we have - the research is very clear on this. "That's why we do need to protect these vulnerable communities. We need to make sure there isn't a proliferation of off-licences in them and we need to reduce the hours that the existing off-licences can operate, and that will reduce harm." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Anthony Albanese, Christopher Luxon wrap up bilateral leaders' meeting in Queenstown
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the Arrowtown War Memorial Park. Photo: RNZ / Katie Todd Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has laid out his vision for "frictionless" business and travel between Australia and New Zealand, as he wraps the annual bilateral leaders' meeting in Queenstown. Luxon and Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese paid tribute to Anzac soldiers in Arrowtown and took a scenic helicopter flight, before Albanese departed on Sunday afternoon. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese laying a wreath at the Arrowtown War Memorial Park. Photo: RNZ / Katie Todd The previous evening, the leaders met with the heads of major Australasian businesses, including Qantas, ASB Bank and Genesis Energy, after a one-on-one discussion at tech entrepreneur Rod Drury's new private retreat. In a media debrief at Queenstown Airport on Sunday afternoon, Luxon described how the countries could do more to remove the "barnacles from the boat" for businesses straddling the Tasman. "There's a lot that we could actually do to simplify some of the standards across both markets," he said. "There are a challenge within the domestic Australia, between the states, where there's often different regulatory requirements within the states and the point is we want it to be as frictionless as possible." Luxon pointed to recent progress, including harmonising building-product standards and trialling visa-free entry for Chinese nationals arriving from Australia. He said there were further opportunities to explore - like synchronising both countries' approaches to AI and environmental issues, and advancing work on digital IDs and drivers licences , which would be recognised on both sides of the Tasman. Luxon said it was all about getting rid of small "irritants" for travellers, such as Australians having to use their passports for ID at New Zealand bars. "It's those things... that make it frictioned in terms of trying to move between countries," he said. Luxon said previous efforts to achieve entirely seamless cross-border movement - such as trials of passport-less travel - had faltered, due to what he called genuine "nationhood" considerations, but that did not preclude other measures to streamline trans-Tasman travel. Defence was also high on the agenda during his meetings with Albanese, with both countries committed to intensifying defence co-operation and moving towards an increasingly integrated ANZAC force. Asked if New Zealand could join Australia's deal with Japan to build buy 11 Navy frigates, Luxon said "harmonisation in procurement" could benefit both countries. "We want to make sure that we have optionality to join the procurement process. For example, we're in the market for new helicopters - we want to make sure that they're as interoperable as possible with the Australians. "When we go to market, we want to present joint procurement bids for those things that we can tack on the New Zealand requirement and, as a result, lower the cost for each of those individual items for each country," he said. When it came to economic challenges, Luxon said Australia and New Zealand were both trying to improve their productivity. "We both have huge desires to improve economic productivity in our respective countries. It's been a problem for 30 years and both countries actually, under successive governments. "Everyone's working hard, but we haven't able to lift everyone's collective living standards sufficiently." As he bid goodbye to his "good mate" Albanese, Luxon hailed the leaders' meeting as a very successful trip altogether. "We're good friends and that helps a lot, when you have good chemistry with the leader," he said. "It's actually quite nice having a peer support group at times with fellow leaders you can actually talk to." The relationship was in "good heart", he said, although he conceded Albanese's decision to wear a Wallabies scarf on the final stretch of the trip may have been a bit of "trolling." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
